Unit III · Topic 7Settlement of international disputes – Previous Year Questions

47 previous year questions on Settlement of international disputes from UGC NET Law papers (2009–2026), including 3 assertion–reason, 15 match-the-list, 4 statement-based questions. The correct option is marked in green.

Questions

47 questions

December 2009

2. Principal modes of peaceful settlement of disputes are:

  1. (a)5
  2. (b)6
  3. (c)4
  4. (d)None✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation: The principal modes listed under Article 33 of the UN Charter are seven: Negotiation, Enquiry, Mediation, Conciliation, Arbitration, Judicial Settlement, and resort to Regional Agencies.

June 2010

4. Which of the following can request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion?

  1. (a)State
  2. (b)General Assembly✓
  3. (c)International Law Commission
  4. (d)Individual
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: As per Article 96 of the UN Charter, the General Assembly (and Security Council) can request advisory opinions from the ICJ.

December 2010Assertion–Reason

2. Assertion (A): The jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice is based on the consent of the parties to the dispute.

Reason (R): The principle of reciprocity underlies the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.

Codes:

  1. (a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
  2. (b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
  3. (c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
  4. (d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: ICJ’s jurisdiction depends on state consent, often based on reciprocity — one state consents if another does likewise.

December 2010Match the lists

4. Match the case decided by the International Court of Justice with the year of decision:

Codes:

  1. (a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4✓
  2. (b)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
  3. (c)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
  4. (d)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: Matches established ICJ case rulings to their respective years.

June 2012 Paper 2

7. In a case concerning the legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, the International Court of Justice gave an advisory opinion at the request of:

Options: (a) U.N. Security Council

  1. (b)U.N. General Assembly✓
  2. (c)World Health Organization
  3. (d)UNESCO
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: (b)

Explanation: The ICJ rendered its advisory opinion on nuclear weapons in 1996 following a request from the UN General Assembly on the legality of their use.

December 2012 Paper 3

6. Which of the following has the power to give effect to the judgment of the International Court of Justice if a party to the case fails to perform the obligations incumbent upon it under a judgement?

Options:

  1. (a)General Assembly
  2. (b)Security Council✓
  3. (c)Highest National Court in the connected State
  4. (d)International Court of Justice
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: (b)

Explanation: Under Article 94 of the UN Charter, if a party fails to perform a judgment, the other may bring the matter to the Security Council for enforcement.

December 2012 Paper 3

7. In which of the following cases, International Court of Justice refused to give advisory opinion at the request of World Health Organization?

Options:

  1. (a)Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons✓
  2. (b)Nicaragua v. USA
  3. (c)Competence of Assembly regarding admission to United Nations
  4. (d)North Sea Continental Shelf cases
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: (a)

Explanation: The ICJ initially refused to issue an advisory opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons use requested by WHO, considering it outside the organization's mandate.

June 2013 Paper 3Match the lists

3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

Options:

  1. (a)1 2 3 4✓
  2. (b)4 3 2 1
  3. (c)3 4 1 2
  4. (d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: (a)

Explanation: These are the well-established legal principles associated with each respective case.

September 2013 Paper 2Match the lists

3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

Options:

  1. (a)2 3 1 4✓
  2. (b)3 2 1 4
  3. (c)3 2 4 1
  4. (d)1 2 4 3
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: (a)

Explanation: This pairing matches classic international law scholars and their notable works correctly.

September 2013 Paper 3

4. In which case was the following principle laid down: "The absence of one party's consent to jurisdiction when proceedings were instituted was cured by subsequent consent to jurisdiction given outside, and without specific reference to the proceedings before the court."

Options:

  1. (a)Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case✓
  2. (b)Corfu Channel case
  3. (c)Electricity Co. of Sofia case
  4. (d)Right of Passage over Indian Territory case
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions case addressed the effect of subsequent consent to jurisdiction.

June 2014 Paper 2

6. The Doctrine of Forum Prorogatum means:

Options: (a) Jurisdiction cannot be conferred upon an existing tribunal not otherwise competent by the litigants during proceedings

  1. (b)Jurisdiction can be conferred upon an existing tribunal not otherwise competent by the litigants during proceedings✓
  2. (c)Jurisdiction can be conferred upon an existing tribunal not otherwise competent by the litigants after the proceedings
  3. (d)None of the above
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: Under this doctrine, consent of parties during a case can confer jurisdiction on a tribunal previously lacking it.

June 2014 Paper 3Match the lists

5. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:

Codes:

  1. (a)3 4 1 2
  2. (b)4 3 1 2✓
  3. (c)4 3 2 1
  4. (d)1 2 4 3
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: The doctrine and cases are accurately matched as per landmark ICJ decisions.

December 2014 Paper 2Sequence / order

5. Arrange the following ICJ judgments in chronological sequence:

Right of Passage over Indian Territory case

South-West Africa case

Frontier Dispute

Temple of Preah Vihear

Code: (a) 1, 2, 3, 4

  1. (b)2, 4, 1, 3
  2. (c)1, 4, 2, 3✓
  3. (d)3, 2, 4, 1
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: (1) Right of Passage case — 1957

(2) Temple of Preah Vihear — 1962

(3) South-West Africa case — 1966

(4) Frontier Dispute — 1983

December 2014 Paper 2Match the lists

6. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the codes given below:

Code: (a) 3 4 1 2

  1. (b)2 3 4 1
  2. (c)4 2 3 1
  3. (d)1 2 3 4
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: Article 59 pertains to the binding force of decisions, Article 36 to jurisdiction, Article 65 to advisory jurisdiction, and Article 62 to intervention rights.

December 2014 Paper 3Match the lists

2. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the codes given below:

Code:

  1. (a)1 2 3 4
  2. (b)4 3 2 1✓
  3. (c)2 4 1 3
  4. (d)3 1 4 2
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: The cases are famous in international legal history for establishing principles on state passage, border disputes, fisheries jurisdiction, and asylum — correctly paired in option (b).

June 2015 Paper 3

4. Which of the following cases is not a case decided by the Permanent Court of International Justice?

  1. (a)Movrommatis Palestine Concessions Case
  2. (b)S.S. Wimbledon Case
  3. (c)Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case✓
  4. (d)Chorzow Factory (Indemnity) Case
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: The Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case was decided by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 1951, not its predecessor, the Permanent Court of International Justice.

December 2015 Paper 2Match the lists

5. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer:

Code:

  1. (a)1 2 3 4
  2. (b)4 3 2 1
  3. (c)3 4 1 2✓
  4. (d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Article 38 outlines the applicable law; Article 36(5) deals with transferred jurisdiction; Article 62 allows intervention by non-party states; Article 59 establishes binding force for parties.

December 2015 Paper 3

5. Which institution is not authorized to request an Advisory Opinion from the ICJ?

  1. (a)Economic and Social Council
  2. (b)The Trusteeship Council
  3. (c)International Atomic Energy Agency✓
  4. (d)Secretariat
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Only UN organs and specialized agencies listed by the General Assembly may request ICJ advisory opinions. IAEA isn’t listed.

July 2016 Paper 3

7. Under which Article of the United Nations Charter is the Security Council empowered to implement the judgments of the World Court in case one of the parties fails to implement it and the other party brings the matter to the Security Council?

  1. (a)Article 94✓
  2. (b)Article 96
  3. (c)Article 62
  4. (d)Article 36 (5)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: Article 94(2) of the UN Charter empowers the Security Council to enforce ICJ decisions if a party fails to comply.

September 2016 Paper 3

8. Which one of the following cases has not been decided by the International Court of Justice under its contentious jurisdiction?

  1. (a)Nuclear Tests Case (22 June, 1973)
  2. (b)Corfu Channel Case
  3. (c)Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala) Case
  4. (d)Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation: The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons was decided by the ICJ under its advisory jurisdiction, not contentious jurisdiction.

January 2017 Paper 2Statements

5. Which of the following statements is/are correct?

"Mediation" is not a pacific means of settlement of international disputes.

"Pious Fund Case" is an important decision given by the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

"Retorsion" is a coercive means of settlement of international disputes.

A leading case on "Reprisal" is the "Naulilaa incident".

Codes:

  1. (a)Only 2 is correct
  2. (b)1, 2, and 3 are correct
  3. (c)2, 3, and 4 are correct✓
  4. (d)1, 2, 3, and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct. Mediation is indeed a pacific means, hence statement 1 is incorrect.

January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists

6. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct code:

Codes:

  1. (a)4 1 2 3✓
  2. (b)1 2 3 4
  3. (c)2 3 4 1
  4. (d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: Correct pairings as per ICJ case law precedents.

November 2017 Paper 2Match the lists

4. Match the items of List-I with the items of List-II and choose the correct answer:

Code:

  1. (a)2 1 4 3✓
  2. (b)1 2 3 4
  3. (c)3 4 1 2
  4. (d)4 3 2 1
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation: Correctly matched as per case law.

November 2017 Paper 3

8. Advisory opinions can be given by the International Court of Justice on legal questions:

  1. (a)On the request of the Security Council only
  2. (b)On the request of the General Assembly only
  3. (c)On the request of the General Assembly or the Security Council both✓
  4. (d)On the request of the Economic and Social Council if authorized by the Security Council
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Under Article 65 of the ICJ Statute, advisory opinions can be given on legal questions at the request of the General Assembly or the Security Council.

July 2018Match the lists

5. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the code given below:

List-I (Provisions)

A. Law applied by the International Court of Justice

B. Binding force of the decision of International Court of Justice

C. Interim Measures or Relief

D. International Court's power to allow a state to intervene, in a case to which it is not a party

List-II (Articles)

Article 41

Article 62

Article 38

Article 59

Code:

  1. (a)3 4 1 2✓
  2. (b)1 2 3 4
  3. (c)2 3 4 1
  4. (d)4 1 2 3
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

A → Article 38: Sources of law applied by the ICJ

B → Article 59: Binding force of ICJ decisions is only between parties to the case

C → Article 41: Provisional/interim measures

D → Article 62: Power to permit intervention by a state with legal interest in the case outcome

July 2018Match the lists

6. Match List-I with List-II and give the correct answer by using the code given below:

List-I (Modes)

A. Cession

B. Reprisal

C. Good offices

D. Substitution

List-II (Provisions)

Acquisition of Nationality

Loss of Nationality

Pacific means of settlement of International Disputes

Coercive means of settlement of International Disputes

Code:

  1. (a)1 4 3 2✓
  2. (b)2 3 4 1
  3. (c)3 2 1 4
  4. (d)4 1 2 3
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

A → 1: Cession is a mode of acquiring nationality

B → 4: Reprisal involves coercive means in international disputes

C → 3: Good offices are pacific means of settlement

D → 2: Substitution relates to the loss of nationality in some legal systems

July 2018Assertion–Reason

9. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the code given below:

Assertion (A): When a state behaves discourteously with another state, international law confers the right upon the affected state to resort to 'retorsion', which means retaliation.

Reason (R): If international disputes are not resolved by peaceful means, coercive measures may be used.

Code:

  1. (a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
  2. (b)Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
  3. (c)(A) is correct but (R) is wrong
  4. (d)(A) is wrong but (R) is correct
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

December 2018

7. Under Article 36(2) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, a State party may confer compulsory jurisdiction on the Court in respect of which of the following matters?

Interpretation of a Treaty

Any question of national law

The existence of any fact which, if established, would constitute a breach of international obligations

The nature and extent of reparation for the breach of a domestic obligation

Options:

  1. (a)Only 1
  2. (b)1 and 3✓
  3. (c)1, 2 and 4
  4. (d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

Article 36(2) of the ICJ Statute allows States to accept compulsory jurisdiction of the Court in matters concerning the interpretation of a treaty and the existence of any fact constituting a breach of international obligations. Questions of national law and reparations for domestic obligations fall outside its scope.

December 2018Assertion–Reason

8. Assertion (A): The 'Doctrine of Forum Prorogatum' states the court will have jurisdiction in a matter where it otherwise has none, if the respondent consents to jurisdiction after proceedings have commenced.

Reason (R): The operation of the 'Doctrine of Forum Prorogatum' has been envisaged under the UN Charter and also the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

Options:

  1. (a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
  2. (b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
  3. (c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
  4. (d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

The Doctrine of Forum Prorogatum allows the International Court of Justice to assume jurisdiction if a respondent consents after a case is filed. This is permitted under Article 36 of the ICJ Statute and recognized as a procedural mechanism in international adjudication.

June 2019Statements

7. Which of the following statements is/are correct?

The operation of the doctrine of Forum Prorogatum has not been envisaged under the UN Charter or the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

The doctrine of Forum Prorogatum may not operate where the court already has jurisdiction ratione personae.

The doctrine of Forum Prorogatum affords an informal way for a state to express consent to the jurisdiction of the court.

The principle underlying the doctrine of Forum Prorogatum was enunciated by the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Island of Palmas case (1928).

Select the correct answer using the code below:

  1. (a)Only 1
  2. (b)1 and 3✓
  3. (c)2, 3 and 4
  4. (d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

Statement 1 is correct — the doctrine of Forum Prorogatum is not explicitly mentioned in the UN Charter or ICJ Statute.

Statement 3 is also correct — this doctrine allows a state to informally give consent to the jurisdiction of the court.

Statements 2 and 4 are incorrect —

• Statement 2 is wrong because Forum Prorogatum is precisely for cases where jurisdiction is otherwise absent, not already existing.

• Statement 4 is factually inaccurate; the Island of Palmas case (1928) dealt with territorial sovereignty, not the doctrine of Forum Prorogatum.

December 2019Statements

4. Which of the following statements are correct?

Chapter VI of the UN Charter deals with the pacific settlement of disputes.

The purpose of the United Nations is world peace.

The Security Council comprises of 14 members.

The non-permanent members are elected by the General Assembly for a period of three years.

Choose the correct option:

  1. (a)1 and 2✓
  2. (b)1 and 3
  3. (c)2 and 3
  4. (d)2 and 4
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

Chapter VI of the UN Charter covers pacific settlement of disputes and the primary purpose of the UN is maintaining world peace. The Security Council has 15 members (not 14), and non-permanent members are elected for two years.

December 2019Match the lists

7. Match List I with List II

Choose the correct option:

  1. (a)2, 3, 4, 1✓
  2. (b)3, 1, 4, 2
  3. (c)2, 4, 1, 3
  4. (d)4, 3, 2, 1
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

Correct matching based on case subjects and ICJ judgments.

December 2019

8. “The International Court of Justice is indeed a sine qua non for the establishment of Rule of Law in interstate relations” is said by:

  1. (a)Judge Shigeru Oda
  2. (b)Judge Nagendra Singh✓
  3. (c)Justice Dalveer Bhandari
  4. (d)Justice R.S. Pathak
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

Judge Nagendra Singh made this observation about the importance of the ICJ for maintaining legal order among states.

June 2020

4. Which Chapter of the UN Charter deals with pacific settlement of disputes?

  1. (a)Chapter VI✓
  2. (b)Chapter VII
  3. (c)Chapter III
  4. (d)Chapter II
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : Chapter VI titled ‘Pacific Settlement of Disputes’ provides for methods like negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and adjudication.

June 2020Match the lists

5. Match List I with List II:

Choose:

  1. (a)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
  2. (b)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)✓
  3. (c)(A)-(II), (B)-(III), (C)-(I), (D)-(IV)
  4. (d)(A)-(IV), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(I)
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : Correct match — A-38, B-62, C-36, D-41.

June 2020Sequence / order

3. Indicate the correct chronological order in which the following cases were decided:

Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear

Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v. Mali)

The Caroline Case

R v. Keyn

Chorzow Factory (Indemnity) Case

Choose the correct answer:

  1. (a)1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  2. (b)5, 4, 3, 2, 1
  3. (c)3, 4, 5, 1, 2✓
  4. (d)2, 3, 4, 5, 1
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

The Caroline Case — 1842

R v. Keyn — 1876

Chorzow Factory — 1927

Temple of Preah Vihear — 1962

Frontier Dispute — 1986

June 2020

11. The World Court refused to give its advisory opinion in which of the following cases?

  1. (a)The Genocide Convention case
  2. (b)The Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict✓
  3. (c)Interpretation of Peace Treaties case
  4. (d)Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons case
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

The ICJ declined to deliver an advisory opinion on the legality of the use of nuclear weapons in armed conflict upon a WHO request.

June 2023Sequence / order

19 Indicate the chronological order in which the following cases were decided:

A. Fisheries Jurisdiction (Merits) Case

B. Island of Palmas Arbitration

C. Nuremberg Judgement

D. Right of Passage over Indian Territory Case

E. SS Lotus Case

Options:

  1. (a)B, E, C, D, A
  2. (b)B, C, D, E, A
  3. (c)E, B, C, D, A✓
  4. (d)E, C, D, B, A
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Chronological order:

E (1927), B (1928), C (1946), D (1954), A (1972)

June 2023Sequence / order

20 Indicate the chronological order in which the following cases were decided:

A. Elcamann’s Case

B. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case

C. Anglo-Iranian Oil Company Case

D. Chorzow Factory Case

E. Western Sahara Case

Options:

  1. (a)D, C, A, B, E
  2. (b)D, B, C, A, E✓
  3. (c)D, A, C, B, E
  4. (d)D, A, B, C, E
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: Chronological order:

D (1928), B (1951), C (1952), A (1960), E (1975)

1. There is no distinction between de facto and de jure recognition for the purpose of giving effect to the internal acts of the recognised authority. This was held so in the case of:

(a) Mighell v. Sultan of Johore

(b) Luther v. Sagor

(c) Vavasseur v. Krupp

(d) Schooner Exchange v. Mc Faddon

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

In Luther v. Sagor (1921), the British court held that both de facto and de jure recognition entitle a government to have its internal acts recognised, establishing no practical distinction between them for legal effect.

June 2023Sequence / order

3. Arrange the following cases decided by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in their chronological order:

(A) Muscat Dhows case

(B) North Atlantic Fisheries case

(C) Savarkar's case

(D) Russian Indemnity case

(E) The Island of Palmas case

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E)✓
  2. (b)(C), (D), (B), (A), (E)
  3. (c)(B), (C), (D), (A), (E)
  4. (d)(C), (E), (D), (B), (A)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

June 2024Statements

6. Which of the following statements are correct as per the International Court of Justice (ICJ)?

A. The judgment is final and without appeal

B. No application for revision may be made at all

C. The Court shall deliver its advisory opinion in open court

D. The members of ICJ are elected for 10 years

Choose the correct answer:

  1. (a)C and D only
  2. (b)B and D only
  3. (c)A and B only
  4. (d)A and C only✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation:

Statements A and C are correct. ICJ judgments are final with no appeal, and advisory opinions are delivered in open court. Judges are elected for 9 years, not 10.

Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.(9 to 11) From the second half of the nineteenth century to the present, the Geneva Convention 1864, (revised in 1906, 1929, and 1949) and Hague Convention 1899 (revised in 1907) comprised one of the most extensive bodies of positive international law outlining constraints on state behavior. The Geneva and Hague Conventions are noteworthy not only for their content, but also for their widespread ratification. Accepting the Conventions was a prestigious symbol of membership in the exclusive "international society of civilized states," and most states ratified them sooner or later. The Conventions gave combatant victims of war-wounded soldiers and POWs-international rights to medical care and humane conditions of incarceration. The Hague Convention was built on a fundamental distinction between combatants and noncombatants, designed to ensure that noncombatants did not become victims of war. Noncombatants were not considered legitimate military targets, and military occupation authorities were prohibited from exploiting civilian populations under their control.

December 2024

6. The jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice is based upon which principle?

  1. (a)The principle of deferential treatment
  2. (b)The principle of functionalism
  3. (c)The principle of compulsory participation
  4. (d)The principle of consensual basis✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation:

ICJ’s jurisdiction is fundamentally based on consent of the parties (Article 36 of ICJ Statute). States must agree to submit to its jurisdiction.

December 2024Sequence / order

16. Arrange the following cases in their chronological order.

(A) Legal consequences of the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia (South-West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution (Advisory Opinion)

(B) Texaco Overseas Petroleum Co. v. Govt. of the Libyan Arab Republic

(C) Fisheries Jurisdiction (United Kingdom v. Iceland)

(D) Western Sahara Case (Advisory Opinion)

(E) Voting Procedure on Questions Relating to Reports and Petitions Concerning the Territory of South-West Africa (Advisory Opinion)

Options:

  1. (a)(A), (C), (D), (B), (E)
  2. (b)(E), (A), (C), (D), (B)✓
  3. (c)(D), (B), (C), (A), (E)
  4. (d)(B), (E), (A), (D), (C)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation:

Chronological order:

E (1955) → A (1971) → C (1974) → D (1975) → B (1977)

December 2025Sequence / order

1. Arrange the following in the order of their appearance in the relevant Article under the Charter of the United Nations. The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall first of all, seek a solution by:

A. Negotiation

B. Enquiry

C. Mediation

D. Conciliation

E. Arbitration

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. 1.A, C, D, E, B
  2. 2.E, C, D, A, B
  3. 3.A, B, C, D, E✓
  4. 4.B, D, C, A, E
Answer & explanation

Correct Answer: A, B, C, D, E

June 2026 · Q68Match the lists

Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II

A. Principle of Reciprocity I. Article 36(1) of ICJ

B. Voluntary Jurisdiction II. Article 36(2) of ICJ

C. Transferred Jurisdiction III. Article 65 of ICJ

D. Advisory Jurisdiction IV. Article 36(5) of ICJ

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III✓
  2. (b)A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III
  3. (c)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
  4. (d)A-II, B-III, C-IV, D-I
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III

Explanation: Matching each jurisdictional concept of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) with its governing statutory provision:

• A. Principle of Reciprocity \longrightarrow II. Article 36(2) of ICJ Statute:

Article 36(2) provides that States may declare acceptance of compulsory jurisdiction "in relation to any other state accepting the same obligation" (and Article 36(3) explicitly notes declarations may be made "on condition of reciprocity").

B. Voluntary Jurisdiction \longrightarrow I. Article 36(1) of ICJ Statute:

Article 36(1) provides that the jurisdiction of the Court comprises all cases which the parties refer to it by mutual consent (voluntary/conventional jurisdiction), as well as matters provided for in the UN Charter or treaties in force.

• C. Transferred Jurisdiction \longrightarrow IV. Article 36(5) of ICJ Statute:

Article 36(5) deals with transferred jurisdiction, stipulating that declarations made under the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) that remain in force are deemed acceptances of the compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ.

• D. Advisory Jurisdiction \longrightarrow III. Article 65 of ICJ Statute:

Article 65 explicitly governs the Court’s advisory jurisdiction, empowering the ICJ to give advisory opinions on legal questions at the request of authorized UN organs or specialized agencies.

•

June 2026 · Q98Sequence / order

Arrange the following decision of ICJ under contentious jurisdiction in their ascending order

A. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case

B. The Carfu Channel Case

C. The Asylum (Colombia v. Peru) Case

D. Minquiers and Ecrehos (France v. UK) Case

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)B, C, A, D✓
  2. (b)C, B, A, D
  3. (c)B, A, C, D
  4. (d)D, B, C, A
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) B, C, A, D

Explanation: Arranging the given landmark decisions of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) under its contentious jurisdiction in ascending chronological order of their final judgment dates:

• B. The Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania): Decided on April 9, 1949. It was the very first contentious case decided by the ICJ after its establishment, laying down key principles regarding state responsibility, innocent passage, and maritime safety.

• C. The Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru): Decided on November 20, 1950. Addressed regional international customary law, state sovereignty, and diplomatic asylum.

• A. Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (United Kingdom v. Norway): Decided on December 18, 1951. A foundational case on customary international law regarding straight baselines and territorial sea delimitation.

• D. Minquiers and Ecrehos Case (France v. United Kingdom): Decided on November 17, 1953. Dealt with territorial sovereignty over two small island groups based on historical title and exercise of effective possession.

June 2026 · Q118Match the lists

Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II

A. Temple of Preah Vihear I. Justice, Equality and Conscience

B. Mavrommati’s Palestine Concession Case II. Principle of Estoppel

C. R. v. Keyn III. Res Judicata

D. Diversion of Water from Muese IV. Principle of Subrogation

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)A-II, B-IV, C-I, D-III
  2. (b)A-III, B-II, C-IV, D-I
  3. (c)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III✓
  4. (d)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III

Explanation: Matching each landmark judicial decision in International Law from List I with the fundamental General Principle of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations (Article 38(1)(c) of the ICJ Statute) established or applied in List II:

• A. Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand, 1962) II. Principle of Estoppel:

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) applied the doctrine of estoppel, holding that since Thailand had accepted and relied upon Annex I maps drawn up by French authorities for decades without protest, it was precluded from denying the validity of the boundary established by those maps.

• B. Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions Case (PCIJ, 1924) IV. Principle of Subrogation:

The Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) recognized and applied the legal concept of subrogation, holding that Great Britain, as the Mandatory power over Palestine, succeeded to the concessions and obligations granted by the predecessor sovereign power (the Ottoman Empire).

• C. R. v. Keyn (1876 / The Franconia Case) I. Justice, Equality and Conscience:

In this landmark English court decision, it was observed that international law is rooted in the principles of justice, equality, and conscience as accepted by the long-continued practice of civilized nations.

• D. Diversion of Water from Meuse Case (PCIJ, 1937) II. Res Judicata:

The PCIJ recognized general principles of procedural and substantive law, notably applying the rule of Res Judicata along with principles of equity (such as the clean hands doctrine) in international dispute resolution.

← Back to all units All topics of Unit III