2. Article 21 of the Constitution of India incorporates the right to "Doctor's assistance". In which of the following cases was this decided?
(a)Charles Sobhraj v. Superintendent Central Jail
(b)Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
(d)Parmanand Katara v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 includes the right to emergency medical aid and that doctors, whether in private or government hospitals, are obligated to provide immediate assistance to preserve life.
June 2009
3. In which of the following cases was the doctrine of "prospective overruling" applied?
(a)Shankari Prasad v. Union of India
(b)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
(c)I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab✓
(d)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The doctrine of prospective overruling was first introduced in Indian constitutional law in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court held that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights, and this ruling would apply only prospectively, not retrospectively.
June 2009
5. Part IV-A was added to the Constitution of India by the:
(a)Twenty-Fifth Amendment Act
(b)Forty-Second Amendment Act✓
(c)Forty-Fourth Amendment Act
(d)Fifty-Second Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Part IV-A, which contains Article 51A enumerating the Fundamental Duties of citizens, was inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, during the Emergency period.
June 2009
6. Advertisement is a "Commercial Speech" was laid down in:
(a)Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India✓
(b)Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
(c)Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India
(d)Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1960), the Supreme Court observed that advertisements which have an element of commercial interest do not fall under the ambit of freedom of speech and expression. However, this case laid the groundwork for the concept of commercial speech, although it restricted it. The later decision in Tata Press Ltd. v. MTNL expanded the scope and affirmed that commercial speech is protected, but the initial legal view was introduced in Hamdard Dawakhana.
June 2009Assertion–Reason
8. Assertion (A): Article 21 expressly incorporates the concept of due process of law.
Reason (R): Due process of law is an attribute of liberty.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 21 does not expressly mention "due process of law"; it uses the phrase "procedure established by law". However, the Maneka Gandhi case expanded its scope to include elements of due process. So while Article 21 does uphold liberty through fair procedure, it does not explicitly incorporate the term "due process".
December 2009
3. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that allowing medical examination of a woman to prove her virginity amounts to violation of her right to privacy, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution?
(a)Surjeet Singh Thind v. Kanwaljit Kaur✓
(b)Phillipa Anne v. State of Tamil Nadu
(c)Hameeda Sarfaraj v. M.S. Kashekar
(d)Kavita v. State of Maharashtra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Surjeet Singh Thind v. Kanwaljit Kaur
Explanation:
The court held that compelling a woman to undergo a virginity test violates her right to privacy, which is protected under Article 21.
December 2009
4. By which Constitutional Amendment was Article 21A (Right to Education) inserted in the Constitution of India?
(a)Eighty-Third Amendment Act
(b)Eighty-Sixth Amendment Act✓
(c)Ninetieth Amendment Act
(d)Ninety-Second Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Eighty-Sixth Amendment Act
Explanation:
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 inserted Article 21A, which provides for the Right to Education for children aged 6 to 14 years.
December 2009
6. Justice Verma Committee Report relates to:
(a)Effectuation of Fundamental Duties✓
(b)Duty to vote in Election
(c)Freedom of Religion
(d)National Judicial Commission
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Effectuation of Fundamental Duties
Explanation:
The Justice J.S. Verma Committee was set up in 1998 to recommend how Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A) could be made effective.
The committee emphasized:
Civic education
National integration
Incorporating duties into school curricula
It was not concerned with elections, religion, or judicial reforms.
December 2009
7. Article 51A(k) (Eleventh Fundamental Duty) was added by:
(a)Ninety-Third Amendment
(b)Ninety-First Amendment
(c)Eighty-Sixth Amendment✓
(d)Eighty-Fourth Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Eighty-Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
The Eighty-Sixth Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002:
Inserted Article 21A (Right to Education),
Amended Article 45 (Early childhood care),
Added Article 51A(k): Duty of parents/guardians to ensure education of children aged 6–14 years.
December 2009
8. Who submitted the report of the “National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution”?
(a)Justice B.P. Jeevan Reddy
(b)Justice A.S. Anand
(c)Justice R.S. Sarkaria
(d)Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah
Explanation:
The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) was established in 2000. It was chaired by Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India.
The commission submitted its report in 2002, suggesting several constitutional and governance reforms.
June 2010
1. Requirement of ‘reasonableness’ runs like a golden thread through the entire fabric of fundamental rights is held in:
(a)Keshavananda Bharthi v. State of Kerala
(b)Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
(c)Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Explanation:
In the Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Supreme Court held that 'reasonableness' is an essential element of any law that seeks to restrict fundamental rights, particularly under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The Court emphasized that no procedure can be considered lawful if it is arbitrary or unjust.
June 2010
2. 'Right to life' does not include 'right to die'. It has been held in the case of:
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
(c)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(d)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
Explanation:
In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 does not include the right to die. This reversed the earlier position in P. Rathinam, which had interpreted the right to life as including the right to die.
June 2010
3. Fundamental Rights are:
(a)Unrestricted Rights
(b)Absolute Rights
(c)Restricted Rights✓
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Restricted Rights
Explanation:
Fundamental Rights under Part III of the Constitution are not absolute. They are subject to reasonable restrictions under various clauses. For example, Article 19 outlines specific freedoms and then provides grounds for imposing restrictions under Article 19(2) to 19(6).
June 2010
4. Right against 'Double Jeopardy' is guaranteed under:
(a)Article 21
(b)Article 20(1)
(c)Article 20(2)✓
(d)Article 22(1)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 20(2)
Explanation:
Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution provides protection against double jeopardy, meaning a person cannot be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This is a crucial safeguard for individuals in criminal proceedings.
June 2010Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): An accused person cannot be compelled to give his thumb impression, except for comparison.
Reason (R): It amounts to self-incrimination.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) (A) is false, but (R) is true
Explanation:
Article 20(3) protects an accused from self-incrimination, but compelling thumb impressions or handwriting samples is not considered testimonial compulsion, and thus does not amount to self-incrimination. Hence, (R) is true, but (A) is incorrect.
December 2010
1. The term 'secularism' implies that:
(a)Parliament should support religion
(b)State and religion are inseparable
(c)State does not recognise any religion as a State religion✓
(d)People are free to worship State recognised religion
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The term secularism was added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 1976. It implies that the State has no official religion and treats all religions equally. The government shall not discriminate, patronize, or prefer any religion.
December 2010
2. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that, “if a body is an agency or instrumentality of the government, it may be an authority under Article 12”?
(a)Ujjambai v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(b)Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India✓
(c)Electricity Board Rajasthan v. Mohanlal
(d)P.O. Shamdasani v. Central Bank of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979), the Supreme Court held that any body which is an agency or instrumentality of the government falls within the definition of “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution.
December 2010
3. The Supreme Court of India struck down the 'Carry Forward Rule' as unconstitutional in which case?
(a)Balaji v. State of Mysore
(b)Rangachari v. General Manager, Southern Railway
(c)Ashok Kumar Thakur v. State of Bihar
(d)Devadasan v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Devadasan v. Union of India (1964), the Supreme Court struck down the carry forward rule for reservations in government services as violative of Article 16(1) — right to equal opportunity in public employment.
December 2010
5. Which of the following cases is popularly known as the 'Fundamental Rights' case?
(a)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
(b)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(c)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(d)Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights form part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be abrogated even by constitutional amendments.
December 2010Match the lists
6. Match the following (List I with List II):
Correct Code:
(a)4 2 1 3
(b)2 3 4 1
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)2 1 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
A. Right to go abroad → Maneka Gandhi case (1978) – expanded Article 21
B. Right to livelihood → Olga Tellis case – linked with right to life
C. Right against sexual harassment → Vishaka case – laid guidelines to protect women at workplace
D. Right to education → Mohini Jain case – education interpreted as part of right to life
June 2011
1. The Supreme Court of India has adopted a new approach for interpreting the concept of 'Equality' in which of the following cases?
(a)State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
(b)E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu✓
(c)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(d)State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974), the Supreme Court gave a dynamic interpretation to Article 14 (Right to Equality), shifting from a traditional classification test to a broader concept of arbitrariness being opposed to equality. It marked a progressive departure from earlier formalistic interpretations.
June 2011
2. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the 'Right to Life' does not include the 'Right to Die'?
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
(c)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
(d)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that Right to Life under Article 21 does not include the Right to Die, overruling the earlier decision in P. Rathinam.
December 2011
1. The words 'Socialist' and 'Secular' were inserted in the Preamble by:
(a)1st Amendment✓
(b)24th Amendment
(c)44th Amendment
(d)42nd Amendment
Explanation: The words "Socialist" and "Secular" were added to the Preamble of the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 during the Emergency period.
2. The expression 'minority' in Article 30 means any community which is:
(a)Less than 50% of the population of a particular state as a whole✓
(b)Less than 40% of the population of a particular state
(c)Determined on basis of the population of the country
(d)Determined on basis of the Census
Explanation: Article 30 provides rights to religious and linguistic minorities. The Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation (2002) held that minority status is determined state-wise, and if the population of a group is less than 50% in that state, it qualifies as a minority.
3. A writ of certiorari can be issued against:
(a)Parliament✓
(b)State Legislature
(c)Lower Courts to remit all documents to the writ court for verification
(d)Executive for duty performance
Explanation: Certiorari is issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal to quash an order passed without jurisdiction or in violation of principles of natural justice. It is not applicable to legislatures.
4. Who is competent to seek the advisory opinion of the Supreme Court?
(a)Parliament✓
(b)Governor
(c)Council of Ministers
(d)President of India
Explanation: As per Article 143, the President can refer matters of public importance or legal questions to the Supreme Court for its advisory opinion.
5. The Supreme Court observed that Parliamentary privileges are not subject to Fundamental Rights in:
(a)Ganapati Reddy v. Nafisul Hasan✓
(b)M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha
(c)Keshav Singh v. Speaker, U.P.
(d)S.P. Mittal v. Union of India
Explanation: In M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha (1959), the Supreme Court held that Parliamentary privileges are not subject to fundamental rights, particularly Article 19.
6. Article 360 of the Constitution relates to:
(a)Ordinance making power✓
(b)Amendment
(c)Election Commission
(d)Financial Emergency
Explanation: Article 360 empowers the President to declare a Financial Emergency if the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is threatened.
1. The Supreme Court held in which case that the Preamble is not part of the Constitution?
(a)Berubari case✓
(b)A.K. Gopalan case
(c)Balaji case
(d)Minerva Mills case
Explanation: In the Berubari case (1960), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. This view was later overruled in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), which held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and reflects its basic structure.
2. Article 16(4A), which empowers states to make reservation in promotion for SC/STs, was added by:
(a)75th Amendment✓
(b)76th Amendment
(c)77th Amendment
(d)78th Amendment
Explanation: Article 16(4A) was inserted by the 77th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1995, allowing the State to provide for reservation in promotion to SCs and STs in government services.
3. Environmental protection, including forests and wildlife, is:
(a)Directive Principle of State Policy✓
(b)Fundamental National Policy
(c)Fundamental Duty of a Citizen
(d)Both (a) and (c)
Explanation:
Article 48A: Directive Principle about protecting the environment
Article 51A(g): Fundamental Duty of citizens to protect the environment, forests, and wildlife
4. Originally, the Supreme Court consisted of a Chief Justice and:
(a)Seven other judges✓
(b)Twelve other judges
(c)Thirteen other judges
(d)Fifteen other judges
Explanation: When the Supreme Court was established in 1950, it had one Chief Justice and seven other judges. This strength has been increased over the years.
5. A resolution passed under Article 249(1) remains in force for a maximum of:
(a)Three months✓
(b)Six months
(c)Nine months
(d)Twelve months
Explanation: A resolution under Article 249(1) passed by the Rajya Sabha remains valid for one year (12 months) and can be extended by similar resolutions.
6. The President's Rule under Article 356 remains valid in a State for a maximum of:
(a)One month✓
(b)Three months
(c)Six months
(d)One year
Explanation: Initially imposed for 6 months. Can be extended up to 3 years with parliamentary approval every 6 months and fulfillment of certain conditions.
7. The power of Parliament to amend the Constitution is given in Article 368 by:
(a)Twenty-fourth Amendment Act✓
(b)Twenty-sixth Amendment Act
(c)Forty-second Amendment Act
(d)Forty-fourth Amendment Act
Explanation: The 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971, made it clear that Parliament has the power to amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, and that the President must give assent.
1. "The new Constitution establishes, indeed a system of Government which is at the most quasi-federal... rather than the federal state with unitary features" — said by:
(a)Dr. K.C. Wheare✓
(b)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(c)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(d)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Dr. K.C. Wheare described the Indian Constitution as quasi-federal, meaning it has a unitary bias with some federal features. This highlights the dominance of the Centre over the States, unlike typical federal structures.
June 2012 · Paper 3
2. In which of the following cases was it held that 'Right to life' does not include 'Right to Die'?
(a)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
(b)Chenna Jagdeshwar v. State of A.P.
(c)State of U.P. v. Sanjay Kumar Bhatia
(d)Deena v. Union Bank of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 (Right to Life) does not include the Right to Die. The court overturned earlier precedents that had indicated otherwise.
June 2012 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Assertion (A): An accused person cannot be compelled to give his signature or thumb impression.
Reason (R): An accused person cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself.
Code:
(a)A is true but R is false
(b)A is false but R is true
(c)Both A and R are true✓
(d)Both A and R are false
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution protects an accused from self-incrimination. However, the protection does not extend to giving thumb impressions or signatures, which are considered physical evidence, not testimony.
So technically, R is correct, but A is not fully correct, though courts have accepted both as true in some contexts. Hence, option (c) is most cited in standard MCQs.
June 2012 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): Directive Principles are not enforceable by any Court.
Reason (R): Directive Principles are more or less fundamental in the governance of the country.
Code:
(a)A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) are non-justiciable, meaning they are not enforceable by courts (Article 37). However, they are fundamental to governance, guiding the State in lawmaking and policy. Hence, R correctly explains A.
June 2012 · Paper 3
9. Writ of Mandamus cannot be issued where a fundamental right is infringed by:
(a)A Statute
(b)A Statutory Order
(c)An Executive Order
(d)Private body✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Mandamus is issued to a public authority to perform a legal duty. It is not maintainable against a private body, unless that body is performing a public duty. Therefore, if the infringer is purely private and not discharging a public function, Mandamus cannot be invoked.
December 2012 – Paper 2
1. Clause (4) of Article 15 has been added to the Constitution by:
(a)The Constitution First Amendment Act✓
(b)The Constitution Second Amendment Act
(c)The Constitution Fourth Amendment Act
(d)The Constitution Sixth Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Clause (4) of Article 15 was inserted by the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951 to allow the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes or SCs and STs. It was a response to judicial decisions that had restricted such provisions.
December 2012 – Paper 2
2. The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India as per:
(a)Article 40
(b)Article 43
(c)Article 44✓
(d)Article 48
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 44 of the Indian Constitution directs the State to endeavor to secure a Uniform Civil Code for all citizens throughout the territory of India. It is a Directive Principle of State Policy (Part IV).
December 2012 – Paper 2
3. In India, sovereignty lies with:
(a)The Constitution
(b)The Supreme Court
(c)The Parliament
(d)The People✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
In India, sovereignty lies with the people, as declared in the Preamble of the Constitution: “We, the People of India…”. All authority — legislative, executive, and judicial — ultimately flows from the people.
December 2012 – Paper 2
4. The Supreme Court of India formulated the doctrine of eclipse in:
(a)Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of M.P.✓
(b)Bashesharnath v. Income Tax Commissioner
(c)State of W.B. v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Eclipse was laid down in Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of M.P. (AIR 1955), which states that any law inconsistent with fundamental rights is not void but becomes dormant (eclipsed) and can become active again if the inconsistency is removed.
December 2012 – Paper 3
11. Democracy and Federalism are essential features of our Constitution and form part of its basic structure. This observation was made in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India by which judge?
(a)Justice P.B. Sawant✓
(b)Justice S.R. Pandyan
(c)Justice J.S. Verma
(d)Justice A.M. Ahmadi
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the S.R. Bommai v. Union of India case, Justice P.B. Sawant emphasized that Democracy and Federalism are basic features of the Constitution, forming part of its unamendable structure.
December 2012 – Paper 3
12. According to A.V. Dicey, the 'Rule of Law' is embodied in which Article of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 12
(b)Article 13
(c)Article 14✓
(d)Article 21
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 14 ensures equality before law and equal protection of laws, which reflects A.V. Dicey's concept of the Rule of Law—a foundational principle of constitutional governance.
December 2012 – Paper 3
13. When the court declares certain provisions of an Act invalid, but it does not affect the rest of the Act, the principle is called:
(a)Doctrine of Prospective Overruling
(b)Doctrine of Severability✓
(c)Doctrine of Pleasure
(d)Doctrine of Eclipse
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Severability means if a part of a law is unconstitutional, it can be severed without affecting the validity of the rest of the law.
December 2012 – Paper 3Assertion–Reason
**14. Assertion (A): A bill which contains a taxation clause along with other matters may also be a Money Bill.
Reason (R): All bills dealing with taxes are Money Bills.**
(a)A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation✓
(b)A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
According to Article 110, a Money Bill may contain provisions on taxation and other matters mentioned therein. Hence, both statements are true, and R explains A.
December 2012 – Paper 3
16. Articles 20 and 21 were excluded from the scope of Article 359 by which Constitutional Amendment?
(a)42nd Amendment
(b)43rd Amendment
(c)44th Amendment✓
(d)59th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The 44th Amendment Act (1978) excluded Articles 20 and 21 from suspension during an emergency under Article 359, thereby safeguarding life and personal liberty.
June 2013 · Paper 2
2. “The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief” is found:
(a)In the Preamble
(b)As a Fundamental Right under Article 21
(c)As a Directive Principle of State Policy✓
(d)As a Fundamental Duty of the State
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
This provision is found under Directive Principles of State Policy in Article 42 of Part IV of the Constitution, directing the State to ensure humane work conditions and maternity relief.
June 2013 · Paper 2
3. Fundamental Duties under Part IVA were added by which Amendment?
(a)17th Amendment
(b)25th Amendment
(c)42nd Amendment✓
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Part IVA and Article 51A, enumerating Fundamental Duties, were added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.
June 2013 · Paper 2
4. The powers of the President of India are:
(a)Supra-Constitutional
(b)Beyond the Constitution
(c)In accordance with the Parliament of India
(d)In accordance with the Constitution of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
The President exercises powers as per the Constitution (Articles 52 to 78), including ordinance-making (Art. 123), emergency powers (Art. 352–360), and pardon powers (Art. 72).
June 2013 · Paper 2
6. In which case was it held that under Article 226, courts are flooded with PILs and frivolous petitions must be filtered and dismissed with costs?
(a)Deepak Sharma v. Vineeta Sharma
(b)Dharampal v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(c)Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. v. Premchandra Mishra✓
(d)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
In Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. v. Premchandra Mishra (2007), the Supreme Court observed that courts must filter frivolous PILs to preserve judicial resources.
December 2013 · Paper 2
2. Article 15(1) prohibits discrimination against any citizen on the grounds of:
(a)Religion, race and caste only
(b)Religion, caste and sex only
(c)Religion, caste, sex and place of birth only
(d)Religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 15(1) of the Constitution of India prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
December 2013 · Paper 2Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:
Code: A–2, B–1, C–3, D–4
Answer & explanation
Correct Option: (a)
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A → 44th Amendment (Right to property removed as FR)
B → 42nd Amendment (Added “Integrity” in Preamble)
C → 86th Amendment (Right to education made FR under 21A)
D → 93rd Amendment (Inserted Clause (5) in Art. 15)
December 2013 · Paper 2
4. Which provision imposes a duty on the Union to ensure that State Governments function according to the Constitution?
(a)Article 352
(b)Article 355✓
(c)Article 356
(d)Article 360
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 355 imposes a duty on the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance, and to ensure that governance in every state is in accordance with the Constitution.
December 2013 · Paper 2
6. A Judge of the Supreme Court can be removed on the grounds of:
(a)Proved misbehaviour or incapacity✓
(b)Violation of the Constitution
(c)Both (A) and (B)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
According to Article 124(4), a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed only by the President on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, after an impeachment resolution is passed by both Houses of Parliament.
December 2013 · Paper 3Match the lists
5. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:
A. Parliament can legislate on State subjects in national interest → Article 249
B. Parliament can legislate on State subjects during emergency → Article 250
C. Parliament can legislate for treaties and international agreements → Article 253
D. Parliament can legislate on State subjects with consent of States → Article 252
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 1 2 4 3
Explanation: These articles allow Parliament to override State List limitations under specific conditions, maintaining constitutional flexibility.
December 2013 · Paper 2
1. Social, economic and political justice is —
(a)an idea enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution of India✓
(b)guaranteed by Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of India
(c)a Directive Principle of State Policy taken into consideration while making enactments
(d)guaranteed to the people by the writs issued by the High Courts and Supreme Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Justice—social, economic, and political—is one of the guiding principles mentioned in the Preamble of the Constitution. It reflects the ideals the Constitution aims to secure for all citizens and serves as a source of constitutional interpretation.
December 2013 · Paper 2
2. Without paying proper remuneration, labour taken from prisoners is 'forced labour' and a violation of —
(a)Article 20 of the Constitution of India
(b)Article 21 of the Constitution of India
(c)Article 22 of the Constitution of India
(d)Article 23 of the Constitution of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 23 prohibits trafficking, begar (bonded labour), and all forms of forced labour. Taking work from prisoners without fair payment, if not part of a lawful sentence, qualifies as forced labour and violates this fundamental right.
December 2013 · Paper 2
3. Article 51A of the Constitution of India provides for the Fundamental Duties of —
(a)Citizens of India✓
(b)Public Servants
(c)All those who run public and private sectors
(d)Prime Minister and his Council of Ministers
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A, added by the 42nd Amendment in 1976, outlines the Fundamental Duties of Indian citizens. These duties are moral obligations to help promote patriotism and maintain national integrity.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
2. In which of the following amendments were the words "Nothing in Article 13 shall apply to any amendment made under Article 368" inserted?
(a)22nd Amendment
(b)24th Amendment✓
(c)42nd Amendment
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The 24th Amendment Act of 1971 inserted Clause (4) to Article 13, clarifying that constitutional amendments under Article 368 are not subject to judicial review under Article 13. This was done to remove ambiguity following court decisions challenging Parliament’s amending power.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
4. In which one of the following cases has the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (93rd Amendment) introducing Article 15(5)?
(a)T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
(b)Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
(c)M. Nagaraj v. Union of India
(d)Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008), the Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 93rd Amendment which introduced Article 15(5), enabling the State to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes in educational institutions, including private ones.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawAssertion–Reason
11. Assertion (A): Equality is antithetic to arbitrariness.
Reason (R): Article 14 of the Indian Constitution prevents arbitrary discretion being vested in the executive.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation: Article 14 guarantees equality before law and forbids arbitrary state action. Arbitrary actions violate equality. Hence, equality and arbitrariness are fundamentally opposed. The reason rightly explains the assertion.
June 2014 · Paper 2
1. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?
Options:
(a)Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves
(b)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(d)None of these
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In the landmark 1973 case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is indeed a part of the Constitution. This overruled the earlier view expressed in the Berubari Union case (1960), where it was held otherwise. The Court affirmed that the Preamble reflects the basic structure and guiding philosophy of the Constitution.
June 2014 · Paper 2
2. Clause (5) of Article 15 was added to the Constitution by which amendment?
Explanation: Article 15(5) was inserted by the 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2005. This clause empowers the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, including their admission to educational institutions, even in private institutions, except minority institutions.
June 2014 · Paper 2Match the lists
3. Match the following directives with the correct articles:
A. Equal justice and free legal aid
B. Uniform civil code for citizens
C. Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife
D. Promotion of international peace and security
Options (Codes):
(a)3, 2, 4, 1
(b)3, 1, 2, 4✓
(c)1, 2, 3, 4
(d)4, 1, 2, 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 3, 1, 2, 4
Explanation:
Equal justice and free legal aid: Article 39A
Uniform civil code for citizens: Article 44
Protection of environment and wildlife: Article 48A
Promotion of international peace and security: Article 51
These are Directive Principles of State Policy aimed at guiding the state in governance.
June 2014 · Paper 2
5. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the word "law" in Article 21 does not mean just any enacted piece of legislation, but must be just, fair, and reasonable?
Options:
(a)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(b)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
(c)Both (a) and (b)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Explanation: In the 1978 case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court significantly widened the scope of Article 21. It held that “law” must be just, fair, and reasonable, not arbitrary or oppressive. This interpretation overruled the earlier narrow view in A.K. Gopalan, where mere existence of law was considered sufficient.
June 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
Q4. Match the following doctrines with relevant cases:
A. Doctrine of Eclipse
B. Doctrine of Severability
C. Doctrine of Waiver
D. Doctrine of Pith and Substance
RMDC v. Union of India
State of Bombay v. A.N. Balsara
Bhikaji v. State of M.P.
Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner
(a)3 2 4 1
(b)2 3 1 4
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)4 2 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Doctrine of Eclipse – Bhikaji v. State of M.P.
Doctrine of Severability – RMDC v. Union of India
Doctrine of Waiver – Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner
Doctrine of Pith and Substance – State of Bombay v. A.N. Balsara.
June 2014 · Paper 3Statements
Q6. Which of the following statements is true regarding self-incriminatory statements?
(c)Self-incriminatory statements made under compulsion violate Article 20(3)✓
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 20(3) of the Constitution protects an individual from being compelled to be a witness against themselves. However, only those statements made under compulsion violate this provision.
June 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
Q7. Assertion (A): Under Article 368, Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution.
Reason (R): Parliament is the supreme legislative body elected by the people.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: While Parliament is indeed the supreme legislative body, it cannot amend the basic structure of the Constitution even under Article 368, as held in the Kesavananda Bharati case.
June 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
Q8. Match the following Directive Principles with their respective Articles:
A. Separation of Judiciary from Executive
B. Promotion of International Peace
C. Organisation of Village Panchayats
D. Protection of Forests and Wildlife
Article 40
Article 48A
Article 50
Article 51
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)3 1 4 2✓
(c)3 2 4 1
(d)2 1 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Separation of Judiciary – Article 50
International Peace – Article 51
Village Panchayats – Article 40
Forests and Wildlife – Article 48A.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q9. Which of the following is not correct about the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
(a)It is a part of the Constitution
(b)It can be amended under Article 368
(c)It confers power to the legislature✓
(d)It declares the objectives of the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Preamble does not confer any powers to the legislature. It is a statement of ideals and objectives guiding the Constitution. It was held to be part of the Constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati case and can be amended, as in the 42nd Amendment.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q11. Which Article provides for the right to constitutional remedies?
(a)Article 19
(b)Article 21
(c)Article 32✓
(d)Article 226
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 32 guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of fundamental rights. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called it the "heart and soul" of the Constitution.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q13. What does the doctrine of severability mean in constitutional law?
(a)If one part of a statute is unconstitutional, the entire law is void
(b)Only that part which is unconstitutional will be struck down✓
(c)The unconstitutional law will be modified by courts
(d)Law remains valid unless Parliament repeals it
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: According to the doctrine of severability, if any part of a statute is found unconstitutional, only that part is invalidated while the rest of the statute remains operative, provided it is separable.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q14. Who among the following was not a member of the Constituent Assembly of India?
(a)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(b)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(c)Mahatma Gandhi✓
(d)Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Mahatma Gandhi was not a member of the Constituent Assembly. However, he greatly influenced the vision and values that shaped the Constitution through his philosophy and leadership.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q15. The 44th Amendment to the Constitution of India removed which of the following rights from the list of fundamental rights?
(a)Right to property✓
(b)Right to education
(c)Right to life
(d)Right to religious freedom
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 44th Amendment Act, 1978, removed the right to property from the list of fundamental rights. It is now a constitutional right under Article 300A.
December 2014 · Paper 2
1. It was remarked in Golaknath v. State of Punjab that the Preamble to the Constitution contains in a nutshell its ideals and aspirations. Who made this observation?
(a)Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer
(b)Justice K. Subba Rao✓
(c)Justice A.N. Ray
(d)Justice H.R. Khanna
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In the Golaknath v. State of Punjab case (1967), Justice K. Subba Rao observed that the Preamble encapsulates the ideals and aspirations of the Indian Constitution. This interpretation was important in expanding the constitutional vision and laying the groundwork for the later doctrine of the basic structure.
December 2014 · Paper 2
2. The right of eligible employees to be considered for promotion is virtually a part of Fundamental Rights. This was decided by the Supreme Court in which case?
(a)Union of India v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan✓
(b)Supreme Court Employees Association v. Union of India
(c)John Vallamattam v. Union of India
(d)St. Stephens College v. University of Delhi
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Union of India v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan (2010), the Supreme Court held that consideration for promotion is part of service jurisprudence and can have implications under Article 14 (equality before law). Ignoring eligible candidates without due process may violate their fundamental rights.
December 2014 · Paper 2
4. In which of the following cases have Fundamental Duties been judicially invoked?
Prem Prakash v. Punjab University
Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala
Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Shri Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal
(a)1 and 2
(b)2 and 3
(c)3 and 4✓
(d)1, 2, 3, and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In Rural Litigation and Sachidanand Pandey cases, the Supreme Court invoked Fundamental Duties while interpreting environmental laws. These cases expanded the role of Part IVA of the Constitution in guiding the interpretation of statutes and governance principles.
December 2014 · Paper 3
3. Article 51A of the Constitution of India is confined to:
(a)All citizens of India✓
(b)All persons of India
(c)All Non-Residents of India
(d)All students of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A, inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976, outlines the Fundamental Duties. These duties apply only to citizens of India, not to all persons.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): The power under Article 368 of the Constitution is a constituent power subject to the constitutional scheme as to distribution of legislative power according to entries in the Seventh Schedule.
Reason (R): Because Sasanka Sekhar Maity v. Union of India decided so.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are incorrect✓
(b)Both A and R are correct, but R is not the correct reason for A
(c)A is correct and R is incorrect
(d)A is incorrect and R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 is plenary and not subject to limitations based on the entries in the Seventh Schedule, though it is subject to the basic structure doctrine. The cited case is not the authority for this point.
June 2015
The Preamble can only be amended if it violates the basic structure of the Constitution.
Since the Preamble is not an Article, it is not a part of the Constitution.
(a)Only 2
(b)3 and 4
(c)1, 2 and 3
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Statement 1 is partially correct, but the correct citation is that the Preamble is part of the Constitution, as held in Kesavananda Bharati (1973), but the "key to the minds of the makers" phrase was earlier used in Berubari Union case. Statement 2 is incorrect because "Socialist" and "Secular" were added by the 42nd Amendment, not the 44th. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Preamble, like other parts, can be amended under Article 368, provided the amendment does not violate the basic structure. Statement 4 is incorrect because the Preamble has been held to be a part of the Constitution by the Supreme Court.
June 2015
3. “It is the soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it.” — This famous observation refers to which Article and was made by whom?
(a)Justice P.N. Bhagwati
(b)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar✓
(c)Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer
(d)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar referred to Article 32 as the heart and soul of the Constitution, emphasizing its importance in ensuring the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
June 2015Statements
4. Which of the following statements is/are incorrect?
Chapter III of Fundamental Rights in the Constitution is based upon the Bill of Rights of the USA.
'Right to die' is a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Indian Constitution is a complete Federal Constitution.
Fundamental Rights can be waived under the Indian Constitution.
(a)Only 2
(b)Only 3 and 4
(c)Only 2 and 3
(d)2, 3, and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the Supreme Court in Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996) held that the right to die is not part of Article 21. Statement 3 is incorrect because India is quasi-federal or federal with a unitary bias. Statement 4 is incorrect as Fundamental Rights cannot be waived as per Behram Khurshed Pesikaka v. State of Bombay.
June 2015Match the lists
5. Match the following doctrines and leading cases:
A. Equal pay for equal work – 1. Randhir Singh v. Union of India
B. Agencies or Instrumentalities of the State under Article 12 – 2. R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
C. Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are complementary – 3. Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
D. Damages for violation of Article 21 – 4. Rudul Shah v. State of Bihar
(a)3 1 4 2✓
(b)1 2 3 4
(c)4 3 1 2
(d)2 4 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A. Randhir Singh v. Union of India (1982) recognized equal pay for equal work as a constitutional goal.
B. R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979) expanded the definition of "State" under Article 12.
C. Unnikrishnan (1993) linked Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights as complementary.
D. Rudul Shah (1983) established that monetary compensation can be awarded for violation of Article 21.
June 2015Match the lists
6. Match the following constitutional amendments and provisions:
A. Article 15(4) – 1. Constitution (1st Amendment), 1951
B. Article 13(4) – 2. Constitution (25th Amendment), 1971
C. Article 16(4A) – 3. Constitution (85th Amendment), 2001
D. Article 21A – 4. Constitution (86th Amendment), 2002
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)4 1 2 3✓
(c)3 4 1 2
(d)2 3 4 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Article 15(4) was inserted by the 1st Amendment (1951) to enable special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes.
B. Article 13(4) was added via the 25th Amendment (1971) stating that Constitutional amendments are not subject to Article 13.
C. Article 16(4A), regarding consequential seniority in promotions, came via the 85th Amendment (2001).
D. Article 21A, providing Right to Education, was introduced by the 86th Amendment (2002).
June 2015 Paper 3
1. Through the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution, which of the following expressions were added to the Preamble?
(a)Only 1, 2 and 3
(b)Only 2, 3 and 4✓
(c)Only 1, 3 and 4
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 inserted the words "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity" into the Preamble. "Sovereign" was already present since the original Constitution adopted in 1950. Therefore, only options 2, 3, and 4 were added by this amendment.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
2. Match the following cases with the subject matter and select the correct option:
A. Compensation to persons killed in fake encounters
B. Compensation to rape victims
C. Interim compensation to rape victims
D. Protection against illegal arrest, detention, and custodial deaths
(a)4 3 2 1
(b)3 1 2 4✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)1 2 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A → 3: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India addressed fake encounters.
B → 1: Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India involved compensation to rape victims.
C → 2: Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Subhra Chakraborty allowed interim compensation to rape victims.
D → 4: Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. related to guidelines on arrest and custodial rights.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
3. Match the following legal principles and related cases:
A. Right not to speak is part of right to speech
B. No monopoly of government on electronic media
C. Commercial ads are part of speech and expression
D. Government cannot impose prior restraint on publications
(a)4 3 2 1✓
(b)3 2 1 4
(c)1 4 3 2
(d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A → 4: Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala affirmed the right not to speak.
B → 3: Secretary, Ministry I&B v. Cricket Association of Bengal held that the government has no monopoly on broadcasting.
C → 2: Tata Press Ltd. v. MTNL recognized commercial speech as protected under Article 19(1)(a).
D → 1: R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu upheld freedom from prior restraint in media.
June 2015 Paper 3Statements
4. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Fundamental Rights are not absolute; they are subject to reasonable restrictions.
Freedom of the Press is implicit under Article 19.
Article 15(4) provides benefits to socially and economically backward classes.
Article 14’s “equal protection of laws” is based on English law.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct✓
(b)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(c)3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Article 19(1)(a) covers speech and expression, which has been interpreted to include press freedom. Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 15(4) covers socially and educationally backward classes (not economically), and statement 4 is incorrect because "equal protection" is inspired by the American Constitution, not English law.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
5. Match the features of the Indian Constitution with the countries from which they are borrowed:
A. Parliamentary system of government
B. Directive Principles of State Policy
C. Fundamental Rights
D. Emergency Provisions
(a)4 3 1 2
(b)3 4 1 2✓
(c)1 2 3 4
(d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A → 3: Parliamentary system is taken from the UK.
B → 4: Directive Principles are inspired by Ireland.
C → 1: Fundamental Rights are based on the US Bill of Rights.
D → 2: Emergency provisions are taken from the German Constitution.
June 2015 Paper 3
6. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that Article 31C was beyond Parliament’s amending power as it destroyed the balance between Parts III and IV of the Constitution?
(a)Minerva Mills v. Union of India✓
(b)In Re Kerala Education Bill
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(d)Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court declared that the expanded version of Article 31C was unconstitutional because it destroyed the harmony between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles (Part IV), violating the basic structure doctrine.
December 2015 · Paper 2Assertion–Reason
1. Read the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes given below:
Assertion (A): The preamble of the Constitution of India defines the ideal philosophy of Indian democracy and its key concepts are laid down as Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.
Reason (R): A democracy to be real must be characterized by two features.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true but (R) is false✓
(d)(A) is false but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Preamble lays down the ideals and key concepts of Indian democracy, including Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. However, the reason does not clearly explain the assertion, making it an incorrect justification.
December 2015 · Paper 2
4. Which of the following are included in the freedom of the press?
Right to print and publish news
Distribution of printed matter
Criticism of public affairs
Pre-censorship
(a)1, 2, 3, and 4
(b)1, 2, and 3✓
(c)1, 3, and 4
(d)2, 3, and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The freedom of the press includes the right to print and publish news, distribute printed content, and criticize public affairs. Pre-censorship is not considered part of this freedom and is unconstitutional.
December 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
1. Match the items of List-I with List-II and choose the correct code:
List-I:
A. To renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of woman
B. Mandamus cannot be sought against an individual who does not observe a fundamental duty
C. Respect to National Anthem
D. Respect and dignity to National Flag
List-II:
Surya Narain Choudhary v. Union of India
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal
Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal
Options:
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)2 1 3 4✓
(c)2 1 4 3
(d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The correct matching is:
A → 2 (Union of India v. Naveen Jindal),
B → 1 (Surya Narain Choudhary v. Union of India),
C → 3 (Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala),
D → 4 (Union of India v. Naveen Jindal).
These cases relate to interpretation and application of fundamental duties under Article 51A.
December 2015 Paper 3Statements
7. Which one of the following statements is correct regarding Article 368?
Options:
(a)Procedure for amendment of the Constitution only
(b)Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution only
(c)Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure therefore✓
(d)Limitation on the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 368 lays down both the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure to do so. It does not deal with limitations or just the procedure.
July 2016 Paper 2
1. In Golaknath v. State of Punjab, what did Justice K. Subba Rao observe?
(a)The Preamble contains in a nutshell the ideals and aspirations of the Constitution.✓
(b)The Preamble is the key to open the minds of the Constitution makers.
(c)The Preamble is enforceable by the judiciary.
(d)The Preamble of our Constitution is of great importance and it should be implemented.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the landmark case of Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), Justice K. Subba Rao remarked that the Preamble encapsulates the ideals and aspirations of the Indian Constitution. Though not enforceable by law, the Preamble plays a guiding role in the interpretation of the Constitution’s provisions.
July 2016 Paper 2
2. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that "Imparting education cannot be treated as a trade or business"?
(a)Unnikrishnan Case✓
(b)Mohini Jain Case
(c)Dinesh Kumar Case
(d)P.A. Inamdar Case
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993), a five-judge Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court held that education is not a business and cannot be commercialized like trade. The Court emphasized the role of education in social transformation and national development.
July 2016 Paper 2Statements
3. Which of the following statements are correct as per the Indian Constitution?
The State may make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work.
The State shall endeavor to provide early childhood care and education for all children until the age of six years.
The State shall not endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code in the territory of India.
The State shall endeavor to protect and improve forests and wildlife of the country.
Options:
(a)1, 2 and 3
(b)2, 3 and 4
(c)2 and 4✓
(d)3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement 2 is based on Article 45 (after the 86th Amendment), which directs the State to provide early childhood care and education up to age six. Statement 4 reflects Article 48A (added by the 42nd Amendment) that mandates protection and improvement of environment, forests, and wildlife. Statements 1 and 3 are either partially incorrect or misinterpreted.
July 2016 Paper 2
5. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court invalidate a constitutional amendment due to non-compliance with the procedure under Article 368(2)?
(a)Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu✓
(b)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)State of West Bengal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1992), the Supreme Court struck down the 52nd Amendment (related to the Tenth Schedule) as unconstitutional for failing to meet the procedural requirements laid out in the proviso to Article 368(2), which requires ratification by a majority of states for certain types of amendments.
July 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
3. Match the following Articles with their corresponding provisions:
A. Article 13 —
B. Article 15 —
C. Article 20 —
D. Article 23 —
Protection in respect of conviction for offences
Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth
Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of Fundamental Rights
(a)4 2 1 3
(b)2 1 4 3
(c)3 2 1 4
(d)4 3 1 2✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 13 prohibits laws that infringe Fundamental Rights. Article 15 prohibits discrimination. Article 20 gives protection in criminal convictions. Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labour.
July 2016 Paper 3
6. Which of the following are included in the Fundamental Duties in the Constitution of India?
To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India
To defend the country and render national service when called upon
To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
To develop the scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform
(a)1, 2 and 3
(b)1, 2 and 4
(c)2, 3 and 4✓
(d)1, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under Article 51A of the Constitution, these are listed as Fundamental Duties. Specifically, 51A(d), 51A(f), and 51A(h) cover defending the country, preserving culture, and promoting scientific temper respectively. Statement 1, although partially correct, incorrectly includes "and the states."
July 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
7. Match the following Articles with the provisions:
A. Article 40 —
B. Article 42 —
C. Article 44 —
D. Article 50 —
Separation of judiciary from the executive
Organisation of village panchayats
Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief
Uniform civil code
(a)1 2 4 3
(b)2 3 4 1✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 40 — Village panchayats
Article 42 — Just and humane work conditions
Article 44 — Uniform Civil Code
Article 50 — Separation of judiciary from the executive
September 2016
2. In which case did the Supreme Court of India decide that the right to education under Article 21 does not extend to professional education?
(a)Balbir Thomas v. Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology✓
(b)Haobijam Rita Devi v. Sikkim Manipal Health Sciences University
(c)P. Raveendran v. Union of India
(d)Tumnyak Etc. v. AIIMS
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Balbir Thomas v. Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology (1997), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 does not guarantee the right to professional education. Earlier cases like Mohini Jain (1992) and Unni Krishnan (1993) had expanded Article 21 to include the right to education, but in professional contexts, this was narrowed.
September 2016Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct combination:
List-I (Case)
A. Maharshi Avadhesh v. Union of India
B. Kachchh Jal Sankat Nivaran Samiti v. State of Gujarat
C. M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
D. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradhan Sangh Kshetra Samiti
List-II (Principle)
Organisation of Village Panchayats
Legal Aid
Common Good
Uniform Civil Code
Options:
(a)A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1
(b)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
(c)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1✓
(d)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
A. Maharshi Avadhesh case advocated for a Uniform Civil Code.
B. Kachchh Jal Sankat Nivaran Samiti dealt with common good and public interest.
C. M.H. Hoskot concerned the right to legal aid under Article 21.
D. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradhan Sangh related to the organization of Village Panchayats.
September 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
1. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer using the codes below:
Assertion (A): By amendment, the Parliament cannot destroy the basic features of the Constitution of India.
Reason (R): The power to amend does not include the power to abrogate the Constitution of India.
Options:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is false, but (R) is true
(d)(A) is true, but (R) is false
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) ruled that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy its basic structure. Therefore, an amendment that abrogates the Constitution is invalid. However, the statement that the amending power does not include abrogation is not the precise reasoning for the assertion that Parliament cannot destroy the Constitution’s basic features.
September 2016 Paper 3
2. The Supreme Court held that even petitions filed under Article 32 are subject to the general principle of res judicata in which case?
(a)M.S.M. Sharma v. Dr. Sree Krishna Sinha✓
(b)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(c)Charanlal Sahu v. K.R. Narayanan
(d)Ranji Thomas v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In M.S.M. Sharma v. Dr. Sree Krishna Sinha (1958), the Supreme Court observed that writ petitions under Article 32 could be barred by res judicata if the same issue had already been settled in previous proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of finality in litigation.
September 2016 Paper 3
6. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that constitutional amendments are not included within the definition of 'law' under Article 13(2) and (3)?
(a)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
(b)Sankari Prasad v. Union of India✓
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Sankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951), the Supreme Court held that a constitutional amendment made under Article 368 is not “law” under Article 13(2), and therefore cannot be challenged as violating Fundamental Rights. This view was later overruled in Golaknath, but reinstated with limitations in Kesavananda Bharati.
January 2017 Paper 2
1. The Preamble to the Constitution of India proclaims that "We, the People of India" have established which type of Republic?
(a)A Sovereign, Socialist, Democratic Republic only
Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution declares India to be a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic. These terms reflect the nature of the state and were introduced or reaffirmed through the 42nd Amendment of 1976.
January 2017 Paper 2Match the lists
2. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct code:
List-I (Articles)
A. Article 16(3)
B. Article 19(5)
C. Article 19(6)
D. Article 31A(2)(a)
List-II (Amendments)
1st Amendment
17th Amendment
7th Amendment
44th Amendment
Codes:
(a)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2✓
(b)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
(c)A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3
(d)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 16(3) was amended by the 7th Amendment.
Article 19(5) was affected by the 44th Amendment.
Article 19(6) was amended by the 1st Amendment.
Article 31A(2)(a) was amended by the 17th Amendment.
January 2017 Paper 2Statements
5. "The Fundamental Duties incorporated in Article 51A of the Constitution are mere reminders to the citizens with no enforceability," was a statement made by which judge?
(a)Justice J.S. Verma✓
(b)Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy
(c)Justice Y.V. Chandrachud
(d)Justice P.N. Bhagwati
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Justice J.S. Verma observed that Fundamental Duties under Article 51A are non-enforceable reminders to citizens. These duties were added by the 42nd Amendment to emphasize civic responsibilities, though not legally enforceable.
January 2017 Paper 2
7. The Supreme Court held that the right to be appointed as a guardian under personal law is not a fundamental right in which of the following cases?
(a)Mohd. Aslam v. Union of India
(b)Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammed Amirabbas Abbasi v. State of Madhya Bharat✓
(c)Khatri v. State of Bihar
(d)Mohd. Faruk v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammed Amirabbas Abbasi v. State of Madhya Bharat, the court ruled that appointment as guardian under personal law does not qualify as a fundamental right, as it is governed by personal law and not enforceable through writs.
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
1. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer using the codes given below:
List-I:
A. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
B. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
C. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
D. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
List-II:
i. Basic structure doctrine created
ii. Basic structure doctrine strengthened
iii. Basic structure doctrine crystallised
iv. Basic structure doctrine - new dimensions added
Codes:
(a)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1✓
(b)A-2, B-4, C-2, D-3
(c)A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3
(d)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Kesavananda Bharati laid down the basic structure doctrine.
Indira Nehru Gandhi strengthened it by reaffirming the limitations on amending power.
Minerva Mills added new dimensions by balancing Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights.
I.R. Coelho crystallised the doctrine by applying it to the Ninth Schedule.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
6. Assertion (A): An accused has the constitutional right to be informed of the nature and cause of accusation.
Reason (R): The accused must be presented before the nearest district judge within 24 hours.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is false, but R is true
(d)A is true, but R is false✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
A is derived from Article 22(1), which gives the accused the right to be informed. R is incorrect because the accused must be produced before a magistrate, not necessarily a district judge.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): Subject to the Constitution, Parliament may amend it by addition, variation or repeal following the procedure in this Article.
Reason (R): This statement is taken from Article 368(1) of the Constitution.
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are incorrect
(c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
(d)A is correct, but R is incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 368(1) of the Constitution permits the Parliament to amend any provision by following the prescribed procedure. Both the assertion and reason are correct, and R explains A.
November 2017Sequence / order
2. Arrange the following landmark cases in the order in which they were pronounced by the Supreme Court:
Selvi v. State of Karnataka
Official Liquidator v. Dayananda
I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
(a)4, 1, 3, 2
(b)4, 3, 2, 1✓
(c)3, 2, 4, 1
(d)2, 3, 4, 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
P.A. Inamdar – 2005
I.R. Coelho – 2007
Official Liquidator – 2008
Selvi – 2010
Hence, the correct chronological order is 4, 3, 2, 1.
November 2017Statements
3. Which of the following statements is correct?
(a)Fundamental Duties are mandatory for all citizens.
(b)Fundamental Duties have always been part of the Constitution.
(c)Fundamental Duties were added through an amendment to the Constitution of India.✓
(d)Fundamental Duties can be enforced by writs.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Fundamental Duties were introduced by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 and are listed under Article 51-A. They are not enforceable by writs but serve as moral obligations.
November 2017
5. Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched with regard to provisions of the Constitution of India?
(a)Article 352 – Effect of proclamation of Emergency
(b)Article 353 – Revenue distribution during Emergency
(c)Article 354 – Executive power during Emergency
(d)Article 355 – Duty of the Union to protect States against aggression✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 355 places a duty on the Union to protect States against external aggression and internal disturbance. Article 352 deals with proclamation, 353 with Union powers, and 354 with financial provisions.
November 2017
6. Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched with regard to constitutional amendments?
Explanation: The Forty-second Amendment to the Constitution of India was enacted in 1976, not 1956. It is known as the Mini-Constitution due to its sweeping changes. All the other pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, option (d) is not correctly matched.
November 2017Match the lists
7. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer using the codes given below:
List-I (Legal Principles / Case Themes):
A. The principle of constructive res judicata is also applicable to writ petitions
B. Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution can be restored
C. Direction given by the High Court under Article 226 cannot be altered by the State Government
D. The disposal of several writ petitions in a batch by a single order is permissible if facts are similar
List-II (Relevant Cases):
Women’s Education Trust v. State of Haryana
M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka
Ratan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
V. Porukutty Mannadissior v. State of Kerala
Codes:
(a)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
(b)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2✓
(c)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
(d)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. The principle of constructive res judicata in writs – Ratan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2013)
B. Restoration of writ dismissed for non-prosecution – V. Porukutty Mannadissior v. State of Kerala (1965)
C. High Court’s direction under Article 226 cannot be modified by the government – Women’s Education Trust v. State of Haryana
D. Disposal of similar writs in batch by single order – M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka (2011)
November 2017 Paper 3
1. 'Economic Justice' is one of the objectives of the Constitution of India. In which of the following parts is this objective specifically provided?
(a)Preamble and Fundamental Rights
(b)Preamble and Directive Principles of State Policy✓
(c)Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
(d)Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and Fundamental Duties
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Economic justice is enshrined in the Preamble and elaborated in Directive Principles of State Policy under Article 38, which aims at minimizing inequalities in income and ensuring the welfare of the people.
November 2017 Paper 3Sequence / order
2. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases in chronological order:
Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam and Others
Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Usha Mehta v. Government of A.P.
City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment
(a)3, 2, 4, 1✓
(b)2, 3, 4, 1
(c)4, 2, 3, 1
(d)2, 3, 1, 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The correct chronological order based on decision years is:
Usha Mehta v. Govt. of A.P. – 2012
Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer – 2013
City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment – 2014
Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam – 2015
November 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Read the following Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and choose the correct option:
Assertion (A): Article 40 of the Constitution directs the State to organize village Panchayats and endow them with the powers and authority necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
Reason (R): This directive ensures every village becomes an autonomous, self-sufficient republic capable of managing its own affairs.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 40 indeed aims at establishing self-governing village Panchayats. The reason correctly elaborates the intent of this article, reflecting Gandhian principles of decentralization.
November 2017 Paper 3
5. Which of the following pairs is correctly matched with respect to the provisions of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 118 – Duration of Parliament
(b)Article 119 – Restriction on discussion in Parliament
(c)Article 120 – Language to be used in Parliament✓
(d)Article 121 – Courts not to inquire into the proceedings of Parliament
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 120 deals with the language to be used in Parliament. Article 118 is about rules of procedure, not duration. Article 119 deals with financial business, and Article 121 prohibits judicial interference in Parliamentary proceedings.
July 2018
1. Which of the following is not included in the definition of law under Article 13 of Constitution of India?
(a)Legislation
(b)Customs
(c)Usage having no force of law✓
(d)Ordinance
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 13 of the Indian Constitution defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules, regulations, notifications, customs or usages having the force of law. Hence, usage having no force of law is not included.
July 2018
2. Which Article of the Constitution uses the term 'martial law'?
(a)Article 33
(b)Article 34✓
(c)Article 352
(d)Article 353
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 34 provides for restrictions on fundamental rights while martial law is in force in any area, and it is the only article that specifically mentions the term "martial law".
July 2018
6. Which of the following case is not related to the 'Theory of Basic Structure' under Article 368?
(a)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(b)Waman Rao v. Union of India
(c)L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
(d)T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: T.K. Rangarajan v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu (2003) is not related to the basic structure doctrine. The other cases are landmark decisions affirming the basic structure doctrine.
July 2018Statements
12. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
It is the duty of every citizen to respect the country and abide by the Constitution.
All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
The state shall in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle..
No law here after enacted by legislature of J&K shall be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with any right conferred on other citizens of India by any provision of Part III of the Constitution.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 3 and 4 are correct
(c)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: All statements are constitutionally valid: Fundamental Duties (Art. 51A), Minority Rights (Art. 30), Directive Principles (Art. 48), and special status (now abrogated but was applicable earlier).
July 2018
16. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that where the selection process consists solely of viva-voce, no upper limit is required for interview marks?
(a)A.K. Roy v. Union of India
(b)A.P. State Financial Corporation v. C.M. Ashok Raju✓
(c)Sambhu Nath Sarkar v. State of West Bengal
(d)P. Lakhanpal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In A.P. State Financial Corporation v. C.M. Ashok Raju (1994), the Supreme Court ruled that when there is only a viva-voce and no written test, there is no need to fix a limit on interview marks, as the selection process is inherently subjective.
December 2018
The solemn resolution in the Preamble of the Constitution of India is made in the name of the people of India.
The Preamble of the Constitution of India solemnly resolves to secure to its people Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties, and Directive Principles.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 1, 2 and 3 are correct
(c)Only 1 and 3 are correct✓
(d)Only 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Preamble reflects the founding fathers' intentions and is made "in the name of the people of India." However, it does not aim to secure Fundamental Duties (added later by amendment), and 'Socialist' focuses more on economic equality than political/religious.
December 2018Statements
2. Which of the following statements are correct?
Doctrine of Severability applies when certain provisions of an Act are declared invalid and affect the rest of the Act.
The prospective character of Article 13(1) gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse.
The American doctrine of waiver of Fundamental Rights is part of the Indian Constitution.
Doctrine of prospective overruling was not applied in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab.
(a)Only 1, 2 and 3 are correct
(b)Only 2, 3 and 4 are correct
(c)Only 2 is correct✓
(d)Only 4 is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Only Statement 2 is correct. Article 13(1) gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse. Severability and prospective overruling are valid doctrines in India, but waiver of Fundamental Rights is not part of the Indian Constitution.
December 2018Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer.
A. M. Nagaraj v. Union of India – 2. To provide reservations in promotions for SC/ST
B. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India – 3. Application of creamy layer to OBC quota
C. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka – 4. On capitation fees
D. A.K. Roy v. Union of India – 1. Case on national security
(a)3 1 4 2
(b)2 3 4 1✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)4 1 2 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
M. Nagaraj (2006) relates to reservation in promotions for SC/ST.
Indira Sawhney (1992) introduced the creamy layer in OBC reservations.
Mohini Jain (1992) dealt with capitation fees in private educational institutions.
A.K. Roy (1982) dealt with national security and preventive detention.
December 2018
4. Which constitutional amendment accorded primacy to the Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights?
(a)24th Amendment
(b)25th Amendment
(c)42nd Amendment✓
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The 42nd Amendment gave primacy to Directive Principles by inserting Article 31C, stating laws made to implement Directive Principles cannot be challenged for violating Fundamental Rights under Articles 14 and 19.
December 2018Statements
8. Which of the following statements are correct?
In Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh, personal law was upheld as not violating gender equality.
Selvi v. State of Karnataka dealt with rights of transgender persons.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India dealt with freedom of speech and expression.
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India addressed rights of converted Christian women.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 2 and 3 are correct
(c)Only 2 and 4 are correct
(d)Only 3 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Shreya Singhal struck down Section 66A of the IT Act for violating freedom of speech.
Sarla Mudgal dealt with issues around bigamy and conversion for marriage.
Selvi was about narco-analysis and not transgender rights.
Harvinder Kaur was about personal laws, but not related to gender equality under constitutional law.
December 2018Match the lists
11. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below.
A. K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu v. Union of India & Others – 2. Every author has a fundamental right to speak out ideas freely and express thoughts adequately
B. Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (Dead) by LRS and Others – 4. Seeking votes in the name of religion or caste is a corrupt practice
C. Pawan Kumar v. State of H.P. – 1. Women's right to love and reject
D. Bimolangshu Roy (Dead) Through LRS v. State of Assam and Others – 3. States are not empowered to create the office of Parliamentary Secretary
Code:
(a)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
(b)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3✓
(c)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
(d)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu, the Court emphasized the fundamental right to express opinions freely.
Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen held that electoral appeals in the name of religion/caste are a corrupt practice.
Pawan Kumar reaffirmed women’s autonomy in matters of love and rejection.
Bimolangshu Roy ruled that states cannot create the post of Parliamentary Secretary, as it violates constitutional separation of powers.
June 2019
1. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court state that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles aim at the same goal of bringing social revolution and the establishment of a Welfare State, and they can be interpreted and applied together and they are supplementary and complementary to each other?
(a)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
(b)Re Kerala Education Bill
(c)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(d)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court emphasized that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are meant to supplement each other in achieving the objective of a welfare state.
June 2019Assertion–Reason
11. Read both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer using the code below:
Assertion (A): Under the Indian Constitution, an Amendment Bill passed by both Houses of Parliament by the required majority shall be presented to the President, who shall give his assent, and thereupon the Constitution shall stand amended.
Reason (R): The President is bound to give his assent to the Bill.
Codes:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct but (R) is wrong
(d)(A) is wrong but (R) is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: According to Article 368(2) of the Indian Constitution, a Constitutional Amendment Bill passed by both Houses of Parliament by the requisite majority must be presented to the President, who is constitutionally bound to give his assent. Upon such assent, the Constitution stands amended. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.
June 2019
12. “A citizen has a fundamental right to use the best means of imparting and receiving information and as such to have an access to telecasting for the purpose.” This was the observation of the Supreme Court in which of the following cases?
(a)Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India v. Cricket Association of Bengal (1995)✓
(b)Prabhu Dutt v. Union of India (1982)
(c)Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India (1977)
(d)Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India (2014)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Ministry of Information and Broadcasting v. Cricket Association of Bengal (1995), the Supreme Court held that the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 includes the right to impart and receive information through the best available means, including electronic media such as telecasting. This landmark decision established that airwaves are public property and access to them cannot be denied arbitrarily.
December 2019
1. Constitution of India requires the State to adopt the Protectionist Policy and Improvinistic Policy. Which one of the following Articles declares the above?
(a)Article 51A(g)
(b)Article 38
(c)Article 48A✓
(d)Article 37
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 48A
Explanation: Article 48A of the Constitution of India directs the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife. It embodies the spirit of environmental protection as a part of the Directive Principles of State Policy.
December 2019Sequence / order
6. Arrange the following judgments of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the death penalty in chronological order:
Rajendra Prasad v. State of UP
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Jagmohan Singh v. State of UP
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
(a)1, 2, 3, 4
(b)3, 2, 1, 4
(c)4, 3, 2, 1
(d)3, 1, 4, 2✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 3, 1, 4, 2
Explanation: Chronologically:
Jagmohan Singh (1973)
Rajendra Prasad (1979)
Bachan Singh (1980)
Machhi Singh (1983)
December 2019
7. The expression "Minority" is a relative term and refers to linguistic or religious groups forming less than 50% of the population. This view was stated by the Supreme Court in:
(a)T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka✓
(b)P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Islamic Academy v. State of Karnataka
(d)Usha Mehta v. State of Maharashtra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Explanation: In this case, the Court clarified that "minority" is to be determined based on population — less than 50% — and can be linguistic or religious.
December 2019
8. “The provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas… but organic living institutions…” — This observation was made by:
(a)Schwartz
(b)Holmes, C.J.✓
(c)S.A. de Smith
(d)Lord Russel
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Holmes, C.J.
Explanation: Justice Holmes emphasized that constitutions are living documents and should be interpreted in light of evolving societal needs.
December 2019
10. Legal sovereignty in India resides in the Constitution itself and not in 'We the People of India'. This idea was expressed by the Supreme Court in:
(a)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(b)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(c)State of West Bengal v. Union of India
(d)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In this landmark case (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Constitution is supreme and even Parliament cannot alter its basic structure. Sovereignty, in legal terms, lies in the Constitution, not in the people.
December 2019
12. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that any executive, legislative, or judicial action which contravenes Article 14 is void?
(a)Amir Abbas v. State of M.B.
(b)Naresh Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Budhan v. State of Bihar✓
(d)Himmatlal v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Budhan v. State of Bihar
Explanation: The Supreme Court held that any action — whether legislative, executive, or judicial — that violates Article 14 (Right to Equality) is void.
December 2019Match the lists
14. Match the following Supreme Court cases with their subject matter:
Options:
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)1 3 4 2
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)2 4 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) 3 1 4 2
Explanation:
Hussainara Khatoon: Right to speedy trial
Murli S. Deora: Public smoking ban
Lakshmi Kant Pandey: Child welfare and adoption norms
Sunil Batra: Rights of prisoners and protection from inhuman treatment
Comprehension:
The Preamble of the Constitution is an integral part of the Constitution. Democratic form of government, federal structure, unity and integrity of the nation, secularism, socialism, social justice and judicial review are basic features of the Constitution. The Union of India shall protect the State Government and as corollary under Article 356 it is enjoined that the government of every state should be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. On receipt of a 574 report from the Governor or otherwise the President (Council of Ministers) on being satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the Government of a State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, is empowered to issue Proclamation under Article 356(1) and impose preisdent's rule in the state in a manner laid down in sub-clause (a) to (c) of Article 356(1) of the constitution. The exercise of the power under Article 356 is and extraordinary one and needs to be used sparingly when the situation contemplated by Article 356 warrants to maintain democratic form of Government and to prevent paralysing of the political process. Single or individual act or acts of violation of the constitution for good, bad or in different administration does not necessarily constitute failure of constitutional machinery or characterises that a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. The exercise of power under Article 356 should under no circumstances be for a political gain to the party in power in the Union government. It should be used sparingly and with circumspection that the government of the State functions with responsibility in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. Rule of law has been chosen as an instrument of social adjustment and resolution of conflicting social problems to integrate diverse sections of the society professing multi religious faiths, creed, caste or region fostering among them fraternity, transcending social, religious linguistic or regional barriers. Citizen is either by birth or by domicile and not as a member of religion, caste, sect, region or language Securalism has both positive and negative constants.
December 2019
15. On which of the following grounds can a restriction be imposed on the freedom of religion under Article 25(1) of the Constitution?
(a)Public order, decency and morality
(b)In the interest of general public
(c)Public order, morality and health✓
(d)In the interest of general public and for protection of Scheduled Tribe
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Public order, morality and health
Explanation: Article 25(1) guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. However, this right is subject to public order, morality, and health. These are constitutionally accepted grounds for imposing reasonable restrictions.
December 2019
16. Rule of law is recognized under which Article of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 14✓
(b)Article 19
(c)Article 21
(d)Article 22
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 14
Explanation: Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws. The principle of Rule of Law, as a fundamental concept in constitutional governance, is embedded in this article.
December 2019
18. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution?
(a)Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Venkiah
(b)Keshavananda Bharati Case
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)In re Berubari Case✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) In re Berubari Case
Explanation: In the Berubari case (1960), the Supreme Court initially held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. However, this view was later reversed in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Preamble was held to be part of the Constitution and reflective of its basic structure.
June 2020Match the lists
3. Match List I with List II regarding important cases and their subject matter:
Correct Pairing:
(a)A-(I), B-(II), C-(III), D-(IV)
(b)A-(II), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(III)
(c)A-(III), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(II)✓
(d)A-(IV), B-(III), C-(II), D-(I)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A-(III), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(II)
Explanation:
Murli S. Deora: Public smoking ban
Sunil Batra: Prisoner rights and humane treatment
Hussainara Khatoon: Right to speedy trial
Rural Litigation: Environmental protection
June 2020Sequence / order
4. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases chronologically:
A. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
B. Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi
C. Satwant Singh v. Passport Officer
D. Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
E. NALSA v. Union of India
(a)C, D, A, E, B
(b)A, B, C, D, E
(c)B, D, A, E, C
(d)D, C, B, A, E✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) D, C, B, A, E
Explanation:
Kharak Singh (1963)
Satwant Singh (1967)
Francis Coralie (1981)
Olga Tellis (1986)
June 2020Statements
5. Under Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, which of the following statements are correct?
(A) Rights are guaranteed only to religious minorities
(B) Rights are guaranteed to linguistic and religious minorities
(C) Right is given only to administer educational institutions
(D) Right is given to minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
(E) The State is prohibited from discriminating in grant of aid based on minority management
(a)A and E only
(b)B and C only
(c)B, D and E only✓
(d)C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, D and E only
Explanation: Article 30 protects the right of minorities—both linguistic and religious—to establish and administer educational institutions. It also prohibits the State from discriminating in granting aid to such institutions.
June 2020
10. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?
(a)Re Berubari Union Case
(b)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(d)S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In this landmark 1973 judgment, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and reflects its basic structure.
December 2020/June 2021
8. The referred paragraph is taken from the judgement of the Supreme Court in –
(a)A.D.M. Jabalpur v. S. Shukla
(b)Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
(c)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
(d)Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and another v. Union of India and others✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
The paragraph is from the 2017 judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, where the Supreme Court declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. The judgment overruled previous inconsistent rulings and expanded the scope of individual liberty.
December 2020/June 2021
9. In which of the following cases was it held that right to privacy is not protected as a fundamental right under the Constitution?
(a)M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi✓
(b)Govind v. State of M.P.
(c)R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
(d)K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
In M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954), the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is not a fundamental right under the Constitution. This judgment was later overruled by the 2017 Puttaswamy case, which recognized the right to privacy as part of Article 21.
December 2020/June 2021Statements
10. Which one of the following statements is correct?
(a)Right to privacy is expressly provided as a fundamental right under the Constitution
(b)Right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution✓
(c)Right to privacy is not protected as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution
(d)Article 21 of the Constitution protects the life and personal liberty only from executive action
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
The Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) case held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21. Though not expressly mentioned, it is implicitly derived from the guarantee of life and personal liberty.
December 2020/June 2021
11. The referred paragraph is a part of the judgement delivered by –
(a)Justice Chelameshwar
(b)Justice D.Y. Chandrachud✓
(c)Justice S.A. Bobde
(d)Justice F.M. Nariman
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud authored the main opinion in the landmark 2017 Puttaswamy judgment, which recognized privacy as a fundamental right and overruled earlier conflicting decisions such as M.P. Sharma and A.D.M. Jabalpur.
December 2020/June 2021
12. In which of the following cases was it held that the "procedure established by law" must be just, fair, and reasonable?
(a)Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
(b)A.K. Gopalan v. Union of India
(c)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
(d)Govind v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Supreme Court held that the procedure under Article 21 must not only be established by law but also be just, fair, and reasonable. This significantly expanded the interpretation of personal liberty under the Constitution and marked a departure from the narrow view adopted in A.K. Gopalan.
December 2021/June 2022Sequence / order
3. Arrange the following cases chronologically (from earliest to latest):
(A) National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
(B) Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi
(C) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
(D) Suresh Kaushal v. Naz Foundation
(E) The cases of Navtej Singh Johar and Suresh Kaushal were decided in the same year
Options:
(a)C, E, B, D
(b)D, B, A, C
(c)B, D, A, C✓
(d)E, D, A, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Chronologically, the cases were decided as follows:
Naz Foundation (2009) – decriminalized homosexuality
Suresh Kaushal (2013) – reversed Naz Foundation
National Legal Services Authority (2014) – transgender rights
Navtej Singh Johar (2018) – restored decriminalization under Section 377
Statement (E) is factually incorrect; hence, it is not part of the correct chronological order.
December 2021/June 2022
4. Under Article 338(5) of the Constitution of India, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes has –
(a)The power to issue caste certificates
(b)The power to revoke caste certificates
(c)The power to decide the validity of caste certificates
(d)No power to issue/revoke certificates and no power to decide upon the validity of caste certificates✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
As per Article 338(5), the National Commission for Scheduled Castes can investigate and monitor safeguards for SCs but does not have statutory powers to issue, revoke, or decide upon the validity of caste certificates. These functions lie with the competent authority designated by the state.
5. In the Constitution of India, the principle of Rule of Law is mainly embodied in:
(a) Article 14
(b) Article 32
(c) Article 226
(d) Article 227
Answer: (a)
The principle of Rule of Law is primarily embodied in Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws to all persons within the territory of India. This ensures that no one is above the law and forms the cornerstone of constitutional governance.
December 2021/June 2022
6. Every state and every local authority within the state is required to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups under:
(a)Article 350
(b)Article 350A✓
(c)Article 350B
(d)Article 351
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Article 350A of the Indian Constitution mandates that every State and every local authority shall provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups. It is a directive principle aimed at protecting the cultural and linguistic rights of minorities.
December 2021/June 2022Assertion–Reason
8.
Assertion (A): Ex post-facto laws are those which declare an act to be an offence and punishable, although it was lawful when committed.
Reason (R): Imposing or increasing a penalty retrospectively under a taxing statute does not violate Article 20(1).
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
The assertion is true because Article 20(1) prohibits retrospective criminal legislation that creates an offence or increases punishment after the act was committed. The reason is false, as such retrospective punishment—even under a taxing law—would still violate Article 20(1).
December 2021/June 2022
9.
Which of the following is not applicable under Article 13 of the Constitution of India?
(a)Any legislation made by Parliament under Article 245
(b)Any legislation made by Parliament under Article 253 for giving effect to international agreements
(c)Any constitutional amendment made under Article 368✓
(d)Custom and usage
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
As per Article 13(4), constitutional amendments under Article 368 are excluded from the purview of Article 13. This was clarified in the 24th Constitutional Amendment of 1971, which inserted Article 13(4) stating that Article 13 shall not apply to constitutional amendments.
December 2021/June 2022Match the lists
11. Match List I with List II and choose the correct answer:
A. Judicial Review → II. Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
B. Free and Fair Elections → I. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan
C. Balance between Part III and Part IV → IV. Minerva Mills Ltd v. Union of India
D. Secularism → III. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Each case is landmark in its domain:
Keshavananda Bharati case laid down the basic structure doctrine including judicial review.
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan emphasized free and fair elections.
Minerva Mills case highlighted the balance between fundamental rights (Part III) and directive principles (Part IV).
S.R. Bommai affirmed secularism as part of the basic structure.
December 2021/June 2022
14. In which one of the following cases was legal aid held as a fundamental right?
(a)Sunil Batra case
(b)M.H. Hoskot case✓
(c)Prem Shankar Shukla case
(d)Keshvananda Bharati case
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
In M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978), the Supreme Court held that legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21. The judgment emphasized that fair procedure includes access to legal assistance for those who cannot afford it.
December 2022Match the lists
8. Match the following constitutional provisions with their corresponding Articles:
List-I:
A. Promotion of International Peace and Security
B. Conduct of Business of the Government of India
C. Special Address by the Governor
D. Language to be used in the Legislature
List-II:
I. Article 210
II. Article 176
III. Article 77
IV. Article 51
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
A – IV: Article 51 encourages the promotion of international peace and security as part of the Directive Principles.
B – III: Article 77 deals with how the business of the Government of India is conducted.
C – II: Article 176 provides for the Governor’s special address to the State Legislature.
D – I: Article 210 relates to the language to be used in State Legislatures.
December 2022Sequence / order
9. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases in chronological order (from oldest to most recent):
A. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
B. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu
C. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
D. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
E. Azeez Basha v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
The correct chronological order is:
A. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1964)
E. Azeez Basha v. Union of India (1967)
D. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
B. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu (1992)
C. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997)
June 2023
6. Which of the following are included under Constitutional Remedies?
A. Extraordinary remedies under Articles 32 and 226
B. Appeals to Supreme Court under Articles 132 to 135
C. Appeals to High Court under Article 139 and 139A
D. Transfer of cases to Supreme Court under Article 139B
E. Advisory jurisdiction under Article 143
(a)A, C and D only
(b)A, B and E only✓
(c)B, C and D only
(d)C, D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Remedies include writs (Articles 32, 226), appeals to the Supreme Court (Articles 132–135), and advisory jurisdiction (Article 143). Article 139B and 139A relate more to administrative or procedural transfers, not core remedies.
June 2023
7. Under Article 15 of the Constitution of India, special provisions can be made for which of the following groups?
A. Women and children
B. Scheduled Tribes
C. Economically weaker sections
D. Socially backward classes
E. Linguistic minorities
(a)A, C, B and E only
(b)B, C, D and E only
(c)A, B, C and D only✓
(d)A, B, C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 15(3), 15(4), and 15(6) allow the State to make special provisions for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, SCs, STs, and economically weaker sections—not linguistic minorities.
June 2023Match the lists
9. Match the following Directive Principles with the corresponding Articles:
A. Equal justice and free legal aid – I. Article 39A
B. Promotion of co-operative societies – II. Article 43B
C. Living wages for workers – III. Article 43
D. Uniform civil code – IV. Article 44
(a)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
(b)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
(c)A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV✓
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Equal justice (39A), co-operatives (43B), living wages (43), and Uniform Civil Code (44) are correctly matched.
June 2023
10. In which case was the doctrine of 'Prospective Overruling' first applied in India?
(a)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(b)I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab✓
(c)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
(d)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The doctrine was first applied in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court ruled that certain constitutional amendments would not have retrospective effect.
June 2023
11. Which of the following are fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution?
A. Right not to remain employed
B. Right not to remain uneducated
C. Right not to remain unmarried
D. Right not to be killed without trial
E. Right not to change religion
(a)B, D and E only✓
(b)A, C and D only
(c)A, D and E only
(d)B, C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Right to education (Article 21A),
Right to life and liberty including protection from arbitrary killing (Article 21),
Right to freedom of religion (Article 25)
are all fundamental rights. Employment and marriage choices are personal liberties but not fundamental rights in this negative phrasing context.
June 2023Sequence / order
12. Which of the following select combinations from the Preamble are in the correct order?
(a)“Fraternity assuring the integrity”
(b)“Fraternity assuring the dignity”✓
(c)“Fraternity assuring the unity”
(d)“Fraternity assuring the unity and integrity”
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The Preamble of the Constitution of India reads: “Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.” The first part, "Fraternity assuring the dignity" is the correct initial combination.
June 2023
14. Under Article 51 of the Constitution of India, the State is directed to endeavour to:
(a)Promote international peace and security
(b)Maintain just and honorable relations between nations✓
(c)Foster respect for international law and treaty obligations
(d)Protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests
(e) Encourage settlement of international disputes through arbitration
Which of the above are included in Article 51?
(a)A, B, C and D only
(b)A, B, C and E only✓
(c)B, C, D and E only
(d)A, C, B and D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A, B, C and E only
Explanation: Article 51 of the Constitution, part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, obligates the State to promote international peace and security, maintain just and honourable relations between nations, foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, and encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration. The protection of environment and forests is not included under Article 51; it is addressed under Article 48A.
December 2023
1. Art. 28 of the Constitution of India mentions four types of educational institutions. In which of the following can religious instruction be imparted with consent of the individual or otherwise?
(A) Institution wholly maintained by the state
(B) Institution recognised by the state
(C) Institution receiving aid out of state fund
(D) Institution administered by the state but established under any trust or endowment
Options:
(a)(A), (B), (C) only
(b)(B), (C), (D) only✓
(c)(A), (C), (D) only
(d)(A), (B), (D) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 28(1) prohibits religious instruction in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State. However, institutions that are only recognized or aided, or those established under trust/endowments but administered by the State, can impart religious instruction with individual consent. Hence, options (B), (C), and (D) are correct.
December 2023
2. The Preamble of the Constitution of India:
Options:
(a)can be amended✓
(b)cannot be amended
(c)can be amended only by the Supreme Court
(d)cannot be amended because it is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case clarified that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368, provided the basic structure is not altered. So, amendment is permissible.
December 2023Sequence / order
3. Arrange the following cases in the sequence of their year of verdict:
(A) Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala
(B) Sankari Prasad v. Union of India
(C) Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
(D) Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Options:
(a)(B), (D), (C), (A)✓
(b)(A), (B), (C), (D)
(c)(C), (D), (B), (A)
(d)(A), (D), (B), (C)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Chronological order of verdicts: Sankari Prasad (1951), Sajjan Singh (1965), Golak Nath (1967), Kesavananda Bharti (1973). Hence, option (a) is correct.
December 2023
4. Which among the following provisions of the Constitution of India mandates criminalisation of prohibited conduct?
Options:
(a)Article 17 only
(b)Article 23 only
(c)Article 17 and 23 only✓
(d)Article 17, 23 and 24
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 17 (Abolition of untouchability) and Article 23 (Prohibition of human trafficking and forced labour) both specifically state that the practice is a punishable offence under law. Article 24 prohibits child labour but does not directly criminalise; it’s left to Parliament. Hence, (c) is correct.
December 2023Match the lists
5. Match List I with List II.
List I:
(A) Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar
(B) Kadra Pehadiya v. State of Bihar
(C) M. H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
(D) Khatri v. State of Bihar
List II:
(1) 1981
(2) 1980
(3) 1979
(4) 1978
Options:
(a)(A)-(3), (B)-(1), (C)-(2), (D)-(4)
(b)(A)-(4), (B)-(3), (C)-(2), (D)-(1)
(c)(A)-(1), (B)-(2), (C)-(3), (D)-(4)
(d)(A)-(3), (B)-(2), (C)-(4), (D)-(1)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The correct match is: A-1979, B-1980, C-1978, D-1981. These cases collectively strengthened the right to legal aid and speedy trial under Article 21.
December 2023Match the lists
6. Match List I with List II.
List I:
(A) Linkletter v. Walker
(B) Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
(C) Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin
(D) People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
List II:
(1) Prospective overruling in constitutional law
(2) Right to register "none of the above"
(3) Importation of ICCPR rights into Indian law
(4) Prospective overruling in criminal procedure
Options:
(a)(A)-(2), (B)-(1), (C)-(4), (D)-(3)
(b)(A)-(1), (B)-(4), (C)-(2), (D)-(3)
(c)(A)-(4), (B)-(2), (C)-(3), (D)-(1)
(d)(A)-(4), (B)-(1), (C)-(3), (D)-(2)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Linkletter introduced prospective overruling in criminal law; Golak Nath brought it into Indian constitutional law. Jolly George used ICCPR provisions in Indian context. PUCL led to the NOTA (None Of The Above) option in voting.
December 2023
7. Which Articles deal with protection of environment and/or cultural places?
(A) Article 51A(g)
(B) Article 40
(C) Article 48A
(D) Article 51A(j)
(E) Article 49
Options:
(a)(A), (C) and (E) only✓
(b)(A), (B) and (C) only
(c)(C), (D) and (E) only
(d)(A), (C) and (D) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A(g) directs citizens to protect the environment. Article 48A mandates the State to protect the environment and forests. Article 49 protects monuments and places of historic interest. Hence, (A), (C), and (E) are correct.
December 2023
10. Which Article in the Constitution of India established the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes?
(a)Article 335
(b)Article 338✓
(c)Article 341
(d)Article 342A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 338 of the Constitution of India provides for the establishment of the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes. This Article empowers the Commission to investigate and monitor matters relating to the safeguards provided for SCs under the Constitution and to inquire into specific complaints regarding the deprivation of their rights.
December 2023
11. The notion that every citizen must do his duty towards the nation as well as fellow citizens is incorporated in the Indian Constitution in:
(a)Part III
(b)Part IV
(c)Part IV A✓
(d)Preamble
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Part IV A of the Constitution, which was added by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, contains Article 51A that lays down the Fundamental Duties of citizens. These duties reflect the moral obligations of all citizens to help promote a spirit of patriotism and to uphold the unity of India.
December 2023
12. Which is distinguished as the ‘Conscience’ of the Constitution?
(a)Fundamental Duties
(b)Preamble
(c)Universal adult suffrage
(d)Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy together are often referred to as the "Conscience of the Constitution." While Fundamental Rights ensure individual liberties, Directive Principles guide the State in creating a just society. Their harmony and balance have been declared as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
December 2023
13. The protection and enforcement of Human Rights under Article 32 is confined in India to:
(a)Fundamental Rights✓
(b)Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(c)Fundamental Duties
(d)Right to Vote
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 32 of the Constitution of India provides the right to constitutional remedies, allowing individuals to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It does not cover Directive Principles or other socio-economic rights that are not legally enforceable.
December 2023
14. Which of the following is part of the basic feature of the Constitution?
(a)Fundamental Duties
(b)Directive policies
(c)Political process and decision making
(d)Harmony and balance between Part III and Part IV✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles (Part IV) form a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. This balance ensures both individual freedoms and the State’s role in social welfare.
December 2023
15. Which Part of the Constitution of India discusses the vision of the Constitution and its framers as to what kind of society they aspired to establish in the country?
(a)Article 51A
(b)Part III and Part IV
(c)Part IV only✓
(d)Part dealing with affirmative steps
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Part IV of the Constitution (Directive Principles of State Policy) outlines the socio-economic goals that the framers envisioned for Indian society. It reflects their intent to build an egalitarian society and lays down the path for the State to ensure social and economic justice.
June 2024Match the lists
2. Match List-I with List-II:
List-I (Judicial Decisions)
(A) Sri Srinivasa Theatre v. Govt. of T.N
(B) K. A. Abbas v. Union of India
(C) Selvi v. State of Karnataka
(D) Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P
List-II (Fundamental Rights)
(I) Article 20(3) of the Constitution
(II) Right to Environment
(III) Equality before Law
(IV) Censorship
Options:
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II✓
(c)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(d)A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Sri Srinivasa Theatre v. Govt. of T.N deals with Article 14 – equality before law.
K. A. Abbas v. Union of India dealt with film censorship under Article 19(1)(a).
Selvi v. State of Karnataka upheld the protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3).
Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P emphasized the right to environment under Article 21.
Thus, option (b) is correct.
June 2024Sequence / order
4. Arrange the following reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) in their chronological order:
(A) Contempt of court
(B) Incitement to an offence
(C) Public order
(D) Security of the State
(E) Friendly relations with Foreign States
Options:
(a)A, E, B, C, D
(b)D, E, C, A, B
(c)D, A, B, C, E✓
(d)D, C, B, E, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Chronologically, the order in which these grounds were introduced under Article 19(2) is as follows:
Security of the State (original)
Contempt of Court (original)
Incitement to an offence (added later)
Public order (added by First Amendment)
Friendly relations with foreign states (added by First Amendment)
So, the correct order is (D), (A), (B), (C), (E).
June 2024Sequence / order
5. Arrange the following cases in chronological order of their verdicts:
(A) Vineet Narain v. Union of India
(B) Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala
(C) Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
(D) D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Options:
(a)A, B, C, D
(b)B, C, A, D
(c)D, A, B, C
(d)B, C, D, A✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Kesavananda Bharti – 1973
Minerva Mills – 1980
D. K. Basu – 1997
Vineet Narain – 1998
Therefore, the correct chronological order is B, C, D, A.
June 2024
8. M. K. Ranjit Singh v. Union of India (2024) deals with which of the following issue?
(a)Preservation of biodiversity and climate change✓
(b)Immigrants and refugees
(c)Offence against children
(d)Cyber crimes
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 2024 verdict in M.K. Ranjit Singh v. Union of India revolved around the urgent need for environmental governance, climate responsibility, and preservation of biodiversity, aligning with India’s international commitments and Article 48A of the Constitution.
June 2024
9. In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that Section 309 of IPC is not unconstitutional and not violative of Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution?
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India
(c)M.S. Dubal v. State of Maharashtra
(d)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court overruled P. Rathinam and upheld the constitutional validity of Section 309 IPC (attempt to commit suicide), holding it not violative of Articles 14 or 21.
June 2024
12. In which of the following cases was it held that the Preamble of the Constitution emphasizes the need to secure to all citizens Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity?
(a)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(b)K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India✓
(c)National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
(d)E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the significance of the Preamble, emphasizing Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity as foundational values of the Indian Constitution, particularly in the context of privacy and dignity.
June 2024Sequence / order
13. Arrange in chronological order the following Fundamental Duties as they appear in the Constitution of India:
(A) To safeguard public property and abjure violence
(B) To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
(C) To develop scientific temper
(D) To defend the country and render national service
Options:
(a)D, A, B, C
(b)A, C, D, B
(c)D, C, B, A
(d)D, B, C, A✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The chronological order of Fundamental Duties as listed under Article 51A is:
(D) To defend the country,
(B) To value and preserve heritage,
(C) To develop scientific temper,
(A) To safeguard public property.
Hence, option (d) reflects the correct sequence.
December 2024Match the lists
1. Match List I with List II.
List I (Case Law)
(A) Birma v. State of Rajasthan
(B) NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh
(C) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
(D) People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India
List II (Theme)
(I) Safeguard interest of working women
(II) Enforcement of rights under international conventions
(III) Employment of children in construction work
(IV) Rights of refugees
Options:
(a)(A)-(II), (B)-(I), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
(b)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)✓
(c)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(III), (D)-(I)
(d)(A)-(II), (B)-(I), (C)-(IV), (D)-(III)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Birma case dealt with employment of children in construction work.
NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh was related to rights of refugees.
Vishaka case focused on protection of women at the workplace under international conventions.
PUDR case ensured labor protections for workers on government-funded projects.
December 2024
2. Which of the following groupings of Fundamental Rights is incorrectly placed according to Articles?
(a)Right to Equality (Art 14–18)
(b)Right to Constitutional Remedies (Art 32–35A)
(c)Right to Freedom of Religion (Art 25–28)
(d)Right Against Exploitation (Art 23–24)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The incorrect placement is option (b) — Right to Constitutional Remedies ends at Article 32. Articles 33 to 35 are miscellaneous provisions, and there is no Article 35A anymore (it was abrogated with Article 370). Hence, (b) is inaccurately placed.
December 2024Sequence / order
5. Arrange the following provisions in correct order as they appear in the Indian Constitution:
(A) Executive Power of State
(B) Term of Office of Governor
(C) Appointment of Governor
(D) Qualifications for Appointment as Governor
(E) Governor of State
Options:
(a)(E), (A), (C), (B), (D)✓
(b)(C), (D), (E), (B), (A)
(c)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E)
(d)(E), (C), (D), (A), (B)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Constitution first defines the post (E – Art 153), then covers executive power (A – Art 154), followed by appointment (C – Art 155), term (B – Art 156), and qualifications (D – Art 157).
December 2024
7. The word "Secular" was added to the Preamble by which Amendment?
(a)42nd Amendment Act, 1976✓
(b)44th Amendment Act, 1978
(c)24th Amendment Act, 1971
(d)72nd Amendment Act, 1992
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976 added the words "Socialist" and "Secular" to the Preamble, reinforcing India's commitment to religious neutrality.
December 2024Match the lists
8. Match List I with List II.
List I (Provisions)
(A) Early childhood care for under 6
(B) Promotion of educational and economic interest of SC/ST
(C) Free and compulsory education for 6–14 years
(D) Special provision for economically weaker sections
List II (Article)
(I) Article 46
(II) Article 21A
(III) Article 45
(IV) Article 15(6)
Options:
(a)(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)✓
(b)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
(c)(A)-(IV), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(I)
(d)(A)-(II), (B)-(III), (C)-(IV), (D)-(I)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 45: Early childhood education (under Directive Principles)
Article 46: Educational/economic uplift of SC/ST
Article 21A: Right to education (6–14 years)
Article 15(6): Special provisions for EWS
December 2024
9. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that passive euthanasia can be allowed under exceptional circumstances under strict court monitoring?
(a)Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India✓
(b)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
(c)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(d)Arayakkamdy v. State
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011), the Supreme Court permitted passive euthanasia under strict guidelines, allowing withdrawal of life support for terminally ill patients in exceptional situations with prior approval from the High Court.
December 2024Sequence / order
11. Arrange the following Fundamental Duties in the order as mentioned under Article 51A:
(A) To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
(B) To cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle
(C) To safeguard public property and abjure violence
(D) To develop scientific temper, humanism and inquiry
(E) To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India
Options:
(a)(C), (D), (B), (E), (A)
(b)(B), (E), (A), (D), (C)✓
(c)(A), (B), (C), (E), (D)
(d)(B), (E), (C), (A), (D)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The actual order in Article 51A is:
(B) cherish noble ideals,
(E) uphold sovereignty,
(A) preserve culture,
(D) develop scientific temper,
(C) safeguard public property.
June 2020 · Q87
Under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, the term 'Equal Protection of the Laws has been taken from the
(a)American Constitution✓
(b)British Constitution
(c)Australian Consititution
(d)Canadian Constituion
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) American Constitution
June 2020 · Q90
The provision given under Article 13 of the Indian Constitution are as follows
A. All laws in force in the territory of Indian immediately before the commencement of this constitution will be void to the extent of the inconsistency
B. 'Laws in force' includes all laws passed or made by the legislature or other competent authority in the territory on India before the commencement of this constituion and not previously repeated
C. The state shall not make any law which takes or abridges right conferred by Part III and any law made in the contravention shall be void
D. 'Law' does not include any ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage etc
E. Article 13 shall apply to any amendment of the Constitution made under Article 368
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)B and D only
(b)D and E only
(c)A and E only
(d)A, B and C only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A, B and C only
Passage for June 2020 Q91–Q95
Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow
The right to live with dignity has been recognized as a human right on the international front and by the number of precedents of this Court and therefore, the Constitutional courts must strive to protect the dignity of every individual, for, without the right to dignity, every other right would be rendered meaningless, Dignity is an inseparable facet of every individual that invites reciprocative respect from others to every aspect of an individual which he/she perceives as an essential attribute of his/her individuality, be it an orientation or an optional expression of choice. The Constitution has ladened the judiciary with the very important duty to protect and ensure the right of every individual including the right to express and choose without an impediments so as to enable an individual to fully realize his/her fundamental right to live with dignity. Sexual orientation is one of the many biological phenomena which is natural and inherent in an individual and is controlled by neurological and biological factors. The science of sexuality has theorized that an individual exerts little or no control over who he/she gets attracted to. Any discrimination on the basis of one's sexual orientation would entail a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of expression
June 2020 · Q91
Which one of the following judges were part of the judgement referred to in the paragarph
(a)J. Deepak Mishra✓
(b)J.R.F. Nariman
(c)Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
(d)J. Indu Malhotra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) J. Deepak Mishra
June 2020 · Q92
The above paragraph reflects the judgements in case of
(a)Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India✓
(b)Machi Singh v. State of Punjab
(c)Sate of U.P v. Ram Swaroop
(d)Chairman Railway Board v. Chandrima Das
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
June 2020 · Q93
The fundamental right of the freedom of expression is contained in the following articles of the Indian Constitution
(a)Article 19 (1) (a)✓
(b)Article 19 (1) (f)
(c)Article 18 (1)
(d)Article 21
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 19 (1) (a)
June 2020 · Q94
The consensual sexual act of an adult is criminalised under which of the following legislations
(a)Indian Penal Code✓
(b)POSCO
(c)Criminal Law (Amendment) 2013
(d)Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Indian Penal Code
June 2020 · Q95
Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is violative of which of the following fundamental rights
(a)Article 21 only
(b)Article 14, 15 only
(c)Article 14, 19
(d)Article 14,15,19,21✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Article 14,15,19,21
Dec 2020/June 2021 · Q3Statements
Which of the following statements are correct?
(1) The Preamble contains in nutshell ideals and aspirations of the Constitution
(2) The Preamble is the key to open the minds of the Constitution makers
(3) The Preamble to the Constitution of India is solemnly resolved to secure to its citizens justice and equity
(4) The Preamble is not the part of the Constituent
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)(1) and (2) only✓
(b)(3) and (4) only
(c)(1) and (3) only
(d)(1) and (2) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) (1) and (2) only
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q48
The Hicklin test under Article 19(2) is related to
(a)Defamation
(b)Decency and morality✓
(c)Integrity of India
(d)Negligence
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Decency and morality
December 2022 · Q42
The Supreme Court of India in State of Bihar V. Kameshwar Singh (1952) laid down certain test for discovering whether any particular act constitutes a colourable legislation
A. The court must look into whether a legislature used wide or vague words or not which may extend the operation of an Act to subject?
B. The court must look into the substance of the law and not to its form or the label which the legislature has given it
C. The court must look at the object as well as the effect of the law
D. If the legislature proceeds under a legislative plan the court must read all the statutes constituting that plan and determine the combined effect
E. The court must look into that repugnancy is in existance?
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)A and B only
(b)B, C and D only✓
(c)A, C, D and E only
(d)D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) B, C and D only
December 2022 · Q73Match the lists
Match List-I with List-II
List-I List-II
A. X. V/s Principal secretary, Health and Family Welfare Development, NCT Delhi (2022) I Collaborative Federal Structure
B. Union of India V/s M/s Mohit Minerals through Director (2022) II All women, whether married and unmarried are entitled to safe and legal abortion
C. Sahara India Real Estate Ltd. v/s SEBI (2012) III Postponement of publication
D. NCT of Delhi V/s Union of India (2018) IV Uncooperative federalism
I II
I -II
A. , , r (2022) I
B. (2022) II. b
C. (2012) III
D. (2018) IV
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(c)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
(d)A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I
December 2022 · Q82Sequence / order
Consider the following cases decided by the Supreme Court of India and arrange them in correct sequence of the year of the judgments
(Old to New)
A. Navtej Singh Jauhar v. Union of India
B. Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra
C. Sayra Bano v. Union of India
D. Selvi v. State of Karnataka
E. Shankri Prasad v. Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D, E
(b)E, D, C, B, A
(c)E, B, D, C, A✓
(d)D, E, C, A, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) E, B, D, C, A
December 2023 · Q52
According to Kaushal Kishore v. State of UP (2023) the fundamental right under article 19 is available against
(a)State actors only
(b)Non state actors only
(c)State as well as non state actors✓
(d)State under article 12 only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) State as well as non state actors
June 2025 · Q1
From which country is Part IV of the Indian Constitution borrowed?
(a)Russia
(b)Ireland✓
(c)USA
(d)Spain
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Ireland
Explanation: Part IV of the Indian Constitution, which contains the Directive Principles of State Policy, is inspired by the Irish Constitution. The concept was adopted from Ireland’s Directive Principles to guide the State in framing laws and policies toward social justice and welfare.
June 2025 · Q3
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as unconstitutional?
(a)Shreya Singhal v. Union of India✓
(b)Ajay Canu v. Union of India
(c)Tata Cellular v. Union of India
(d)Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Shreya Singhal v. Union of India
Explanation: In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court held that Section 66A of the IT Act violated the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and declared it unconstitutional.
June 2025 · Q46
Which Amendment inserted 'Secularism, Socialism, and Integrity' into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
(a)44th Amendment
(b)42nd Amendment✓
(c)73rd Amendment
(d)74th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 42nd Amendment
Explanation: The 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 inserted the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” into the Preamble during the Emergency.
June 2025 · Q63
In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that telephone tapping is a serious invasion of an individual's right to privacy?
(a)People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India✓
(b)R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
(c)Mr. 'X' v. Hospital 'Z'
(d)State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Explanation: The Court held in PUCL v. Union of India (1997) that phone tapping without procedural safeguards violates Article 21.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q60
National Commission for Minority Educational Institution Act was enacted by the Parliament in which year?
(a)1992
(b)1995
(c)2002
(d)2004✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 2004
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q66
Which of the following cases deal with the interpretation of the 'personal liberty' under Article 21 of the Constitution of India?
A. Kharak Singh V/s State of U.P
B. Mohini Jain V/s State of Karnataka
C. Maneka Gandhi V/s Union of India
D. A.K. Gopalan V/s Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C only
(b)A, B only
(c)A, C, D only✓
(d)B, C, D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A, C, D only
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q67Sequence / order
Arrange the following in the order in which they appear in the Preamble to the Indian Constitution
A. Equality
B. Justice
C. Liberty
D. Fraternity
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D
(b)B, C, D, A
(c)B, C, A, D✓
(d)C, B, D, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, C, A, D
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q75Sequence / order
Arrange the following cases in their chronological order
A. Sankari Prasad V/s Union of India
B. Sajjan Singh V/s State of Rajasthan
C. Golak Nath V/s State of Punjab
D. Kesavananda Bharati V/s State of Kerala
E. Waman Rao V/s Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D, E✓
(b)E, D, C, B, A
(c)A, B, D, C, E
(d)D, E, A, B, C
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A, B, C, D, E
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q88
In educational institutions, reservations of seats in favor of the Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes is governed by which Article of the Constitution of India?
(a)Article 21-A
(b)Article 19
(c)Article 15✓
(d)Article 16
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 15
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q118
Under Clause (3)(a) of Article 13 of the Constitution of India, "Law" includes
(a)Rule, Regulation, bye-law, order, notification, custom or usage
(b)Act, ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage
(c)Ordinance, order, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage
(d)Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage✓
Arrange the following cases chronologically (starting from earliest to the latest)
A. Minerva Mills Ltd. V/s Union of India
B. Samsher Singh V/s State of Punjab
C. S.P Anand V/s H. D. Deve Gowda
D. U.N.R. Rao V/s Smt. Indira Gandhi
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)D, B, A, C✓
(b)D, B, C, A
(c)C, B, A, D
(d)A, B, C, D
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) D, B, A, C
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q134Assertion–Reason
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R
Assertion A: Article 30 of Constitution of India confers a right on all minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
Reason R: The right to establish and administer educational institutions by the minorities is based solely on religion. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explantion of A
(c)A is correct but R is not correct✓
(d)A is not correct but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A is correct but R is not correct
June 2026 · Q59Sequence / order
Arrange the following cases of the Supreme Court on Right to Privacy in their ascending order
A. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
B. Kharak Singh v. State of UP
C. Govind v. State of M.P
D. Malak Singh v. State of Punjab
E. PUCL v. UOI
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)E, A, D, C, B
(b)B, C, A, D, E
(c)B, C, D, A, E✓
(d)C, B, D, E, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, C, D, A, E
Explanation: To arrange these landmark decisions of the Supreme Court concerning the Right to Privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India in ascending chronological order:
•
•
•
•
•
B. Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.: Decided in 1962 (AIR 1963 SC 1295). First major case addressing state surveillance and individual liberty.
C. Govind v. State of M.P.: Decided in 1975 (1975 2 SCC 148). Explicitly recognized a limited right to privacy under Article 21.
D. Malak Singh v. State of Punjab: Decided in 1980 (1981 1 SCC 420). Addressed surveillance registers maintained by police in relation to fundamental freedoms.
A. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (Auto Shankar Case): Decided in 1994 (1994 6 SCC 632). Explicitly linked the right to privacy to tortious law and publication of personal accounts.
E. PUCL v. Union of India (Telephone Tapping Case): Decided in 1996 (1997 1 SCC 301). Held that telephone tapping infringes Article 21 and Article 19(1)(a) unless conducted under strictly regulated procedures.
June 2026 · Q61Match the lists
Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II
A. Right against Public Hanging I. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administation
B. Right against Delayed Execution II. Charles Gurumukh Sobhraj v. Delhi Administration
C. Right against Bar Fetters III. Attorney General of India v. Lakhma Devi
D. Right against Solitary Confinement IV. T. V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I✓
(b)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
(c)A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV
(d)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
Explanation: Matching each fundamental right standard under Article 21 with its corresponding landmark Supreme Court judgment:
• A. Right against Public Hanging III. Attorney General of India v. Lachma Devi (1989):
The Supreme Court struck down execution by public hanging, declaring that a public execution is barbaric, inhumane, and violative of the right to human dignity under Article 21.
• B. Right against Delayed Execution IV. T.V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu (1983):
The Supreme Court held that prolonged delay in executing a death sentence causes immense mental trauma, violating Article 21, and can serve as a ground to commute the sentence to life imprisonment.
• C. Right against Bar Fetters II. Charles Gurumukh Sobhraj v. Delhi Administration (1978):
The Supreme Court ruled that putting iron bar fetters on prisoners continuously violates their right to dignity under Article 21, holding that prison regulations must comply with constitutional guarantees.
• D. Right against Solitary Confinement I. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978):
The Supreme Court held that solitary confinement imposes extreme mental torture and dehumanizes a prisoner, violating Article 21 and the provisions of the Prisons Act, 1894.
June 2026 · Q70Match the lists
Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II
A. State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) I. Viva Voice Test
B. Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana (1985) II. Transgender
C. National Legal Service Authority v. Union of India (2014) III. Special Court for Speedier Trial
D. Dinesh Trivedi v. UOI (1997) IV. Right to Know
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV✓
(b)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
(c)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(d)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
Explanation: Matching each landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India with its central legal subject/issue:
• A. State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) III. Special Court for Speedier Trial:
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950, which set up Special Courts for speedier trial of offences. The Court struck down Section 5(1) of the Act as violative of Article 14 due to arbitrary classification without proper guidelines.
• B. Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana (1985) I. Viva Voce Test:
This case related to public recruitment selection procedures and scrutinised the high percentage of marks allocated to the Viva Voce (interview) test. The Court laid down guidelines restricting the maximum percentage of marks that can be allocated for viva voce in public service examinations.
• C. National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India (2014) II. Transgender:
A historic ruling in which the Supreme Court legally recognized transgender individuals as the "third gender" and affirmed their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.
• D. Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India (1997) IV. Right to Know:
This case pertained to the disclosure of the Vohra Committee Report on the criminalization of politics. The Supreme Court held that the Right to Know is an implicit aspect of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). Thus, the exact match is A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV, corresponding to Option (a).
June 2026 · Q83
In which of the following case the Supreme Court went on to hold that the "width of power test" or direct impact and effect test" should be used to see, if a constitutional amendment violates the basic structure of the Constitution?
(a)Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala (1973)
(b)Ashok Thakur v. UOI (2005)
(c)In re Presidential reference Case (1999)
(d)Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association v. UOI (2016)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association v. UOI (2016)
Explanation: In Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India (2016) (famously known as the NJAC Case / Fourth Judges Case), the Supreme Court reiterated and applied the "width of power test" and "direct impact and effect test". The Court held that to determine whether a constitutional amendment violates the Basic Structure, the form or intent of the amendment is not determinative; rather, its consequence and direct effect on essential features (such as the independence of the judiciary) are what determine its constitutionality.
June 2026 · Q97Statements
Consider the following statement relating to Uniform Civil Code under the Constitution of India
A. Article 44 mandate State of secure for all person, a Uniform Civil Code
B. Article 44 mandate State to secure for the citizen of India, a Uniform Civil Code throughout India
C. In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, the Court ruled that Muslim husband is liable to pay maintenance to the divorced wife upto iddat period
D. In Danial Latifi v. UOI, the Court ruled that Muslim husband is liable to make provision for the future of wife even after Iddat period
E. In Sarla Mudgal v. UOI, the Court said that Article 44 is based on a concept that there is no necessary relation between religion and personal Law in civilized society
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, D and E only
(b)B, D and E only✓
(c)B, C, D and E only
(d)A, C, D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) B, D and E only
Explanation: Evaluating each statement in the context of Article 44 of the Constitution of India and landmark judicial precedents on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC):
• Statement A - INCORRECT: Article 44 mandates the State to secure a Uniform Civil
Code specifically for citizens, not for "all persons" (which would include noncitizens/foreigners).
• Statement B - CORRECT: The exact text of Article 44 (Directive Principles of State Policy) reads: "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India."
• Statement C - INCORRECT: In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985), the Supreme Court held that Section 125 of the CrPC applies to all citizens regardless of religion, and a Muslim husband's liability to pay maintenance to a divorced wife extends beyond the iddat period if she is unable to maintain herself.
• Statement D - CORRECT: In Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001), while upholding the constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, the Supreme Court ruled that a Muslim husband is liable to make a reasonable and fair provision for the future of his divorced wife, which must be made/paid within the iddat period, but extends to provide for her entire life unless she remarries.
• Statement E - CORRECT: In Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995), the Supreme Court observed that Article 44 is based on the concept that there is no necessary relation between religion and personal law in a civilized society, emphasizing the need for a Uniform Civil Code to promote national integration and secularism. Therefore, statements B, D, and E are correct, corresponding to Option (b).
3. Which one of the following privileges is guaranteed to the President of India under Article 361 of the Constitution?
(a)Not to participate in Parliamentary proceedings
(b)He is answerable to the Chief Justice of India
(c)He is not to be answerable to any Court during his term✓
(d)Can address both Houses of Parliament during a joint session
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 361(1) provides immunity to the President and Governors from legal proceedings during their term of office. They shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of powers and duties of their office.
June 2011
5. Who has the power to dissolve the House of the People (Lok Sabha)?
(a)The Council of Ministers
(b)The Prime Minister
(c)The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
(d)The President✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Under Article 85, the President has the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha, usually on the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister.
December 2012 – Paper 2
5. The satisfaction of the President means the satisfaction of the Council of Ministers and not his personal satisfaction, held in:
(a)Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab✓
(b)U.N. Roy v. Indira Gandhi
(c)Ram Jawaya Kapoor v. State of Punjab
(d)Sardar Lal v. Union Government
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Samsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974), the Supreme Court ruled that the President acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and the term “satisfaction of the President” means the collective decision of the Council, not personal discretion.
June 2013
4. The Supreme Court held that Election Commissioners cannot be treated on par with the Chief Election Commissioner in:
(a)S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India✓
(b)T.N. Seshan v. Union of India
(c)A.C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai
(d)Venkatachalam v. A. Swamichan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India (1991), the Court ruled that Election Commissioners do not have equal powers and status as the Chief Election Commissioner.
June 2013 · Paper 2
5. Which of the following is considered the authority of power in India?
(a)The Constitution of India✓
(b)The President of India
(c)The Parliament of India
(d)The Supreme Court of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
The Constitution of India is the supreme authority from which all institutions derive their powers and functions.
December 2013 · Paper 2
5. The power of the President of India to issue an ordinance is a —
(a)Legislative power✓
(b)Executive power
(c)Quasi-judicial power
(d)Judicial power
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Under Article 123, the President can issue ordinances when Parliament is not in session. This is a legislative power since the ordinance has the same effect as a law passed by Parliament.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawAssertion–Reason
6. Read the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and choose the correct answer:
Assertion (A): The Council of Ministers is the hub of the Parliamentary form of Government.
Reason (R): The Government is formed from the majority party.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Both statements are factually correct. The Council of Ministers does function as the core of a parliamentary system, and the government is indeed formed by the majority party. However, the formation by the majority party is not the reason why the Council of Ministers is central to the system—hence, (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q10. Under which Article of the Constitution is the President empowered to grant pardon?
(a)Article 72✓
(b)Article 74
(c)Article 76
(d)Article 78
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 72 gives the President the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment. This includes cases involving court martial and offenses against Union laws.
June 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
Q16. Assertion (A): The Indian Constitution provides for a parliamentary form of government.
Reason (R): The President of India is directly elected by the people.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation
(c)A is true, but R is false✓
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: India indeed follows a parliamentary system where the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers are collectively responsible to the legislature. However, the President is not directly elected by the people; instead, an electoral college elects the President.
December 2014 · Paper 2Match the lists
5. Match the following landmark cases with the related legal principles using the correct code:
A. Executive power must conform to the Constitution
B. Executive power is residual where there is no legislative or judicial power
C. Executive action can exist without legislative backing
D. The President is not bound to hear a petitioner before rejecting a mercy petition
Options:
(a)A – 4, B – 1, C – 2, D – 3✓
(b)A – 1, B – 4, C – 2, D – 3
(c)A – 4, B – 1, C – 3, D – 2
(d)A – 2, B – 3, C – 1, D – 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
(A) A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras held that executive power must follow the Constitution.
(B) H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao v. Union of India discussed residual executive powers.
(C) Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel v. Union of India allowed executive action even without legislative support.
(D) Kehar Singh v. Union of India confirmed that the President need not give a personal hearing in mercy petitions.
December 2014 · Paper 2
7. Which constitutional amendment introduced the provision that the total number of ministers, including the Prime Minister, shall not exceed 15% of the strength of the Lok Sabha?
(a)91st Amendment✓
(b)92nd Amendment
(c)93rd Amendment
(d)95th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 91st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2003 inserted this restriction to prevent the formation of oversized ministries and ensure accountability and efficiency in governance. It applies to both the Union and State Councils of Ministers.
December 2014 · Paper 3Sequence / order
6. If the Government is defeated on the floor of the Rajya Sabha, what is the consequence?
(a)Parliament is dissolved
(b)Prime Minister has to submit his resignation
(c)President’s rule is imposed
(d)Nothing happens✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The Government is accountable to the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha. A defeat in the Rajya Sabha does not impact the Government’s existence.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
11. Match the following cases (List I) with the corresponding legal doctrines (List II):
List I:
A. Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab
B. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
C. Vineet Narain v. Union of India
D. Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation
List II:
Doctrine of post-decisional hearing
Doctrine of public accountability
Doctrine of separation of powers
Doctrine of legitimate expectation
Codes:
(a)A–3, B–1, C–2, D–4✓
(b)A–4, B–2, C–1, D–3
(c)A–1, B–4, C–3, D–2
(d)A–1, B–2, C–3, D–4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A. Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab established the doctrine of separation of powers.
B. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India dealt with the doctrine of post-decisional hearing.
C. Vineet Narain v. Union of India is associated with the doctrine of public accountability.
D. Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation introduced the doctrine of legitimate expectation.
December 2015 · Paper 2Match the lists
3. Match the following:
A. S.R. Chaudhuri v. State of Punjab – 4. Non-member cannot be reappointed as minister if not elected within six months
B. Murali S. Devra v. Union of India – 1. Ban on smoking at public places
C. Food Corporation of India v. Bharatiya Khadya Nigam Karmachari Sangh – 2. Two extra increments to employees for higher qualification
D. Javed v. State of Haryana – 3. Disqualification on basis of number of children for panchayat election
(a)4 1 2 3✓
(b)4 2 1 3
(c)2 3 1 4
(d)3 2 4 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Each case listed corresponds to a distinct constitutional or service-related principle, correctly matched above.
December 2015 · Paper 2
6. In which of the following cases did Justice Pasayat hold that a pardon obtained on the basis of a manifest mistake or fraud can be rescinded?
(a)G. Krishna Goud v. State of Andhra Pradesh
(b)Maru Ram v. Union of India
(c)Epuru Sudhakar v. Government of Andhra Pradesh✓
(d)Kehar Singh v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In Epuru Sudhakar v. Govt. of A.P., the Supreme Court held that if a pardon is granted based on mala fide reasons or fraud, it can be revoked.
July 2016 Paper 3
According to the convention of Parliamentary Democracy, the Prime Minister must be from the House of the People.
Article 83 of the Constitution deals with the duration of the Houses of Parliament.
(a)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(b)1, 3 and 4 are correct
(c)2, 3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are all correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
All four statements are correct. In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court ruled that the basic structure of the Constitution cannot be amended. Parliamentary democracy is part of this basic structure. By convention, the Prime Minister must belong to the Lok Sabha. Article 83 specifies the term of the Houses of Parliament.
September 2016Statements
5. Which of the following statements are correct regarding the office of the Governor?
Executive action taken in the name of the Governor is the executive action of the State.
The Governor cannot be held personally answerable for any portion of the address to the joint session.
The Governor is bound to exercise all his powers and functions on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
The Governor of a State shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his hand and seal.
(a)1, 2 and 4✓
(b)1, 3 and 4
(c)2, 3 and 4
(d)1, 2 and 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct. Article 154 provides that executive action of the state is taken in the name of the Governor. Article 166 protects the Governor from personal liability. Article 155 mentions appointment by the President. However, Statement 3 is not always true, as there are certain discretionary powers vested in the Governor under Article 163.
January 2017 Paper 2
6. Justice Mukherjee, speaking for the court, stated that although the executive power is vested in the President, he is only a formal head, and real power lies with the Council of Ministers. This was held in which case?
(a)U.N.R. Rao v. Indira Gandhi
(b)Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab✓
(c)Jayantilal Amratlal Shodhan v. F.N. Rao
(d)Sardarilal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab (1955), the Supreme Court clarified that although the Constitution vests executive power in the President, it is exercised by the Council of Ministers, making the President a nominal head.
November 2017Assertion–Reason
4. Assertion (A): No person is eligible for appointment as Governor unless he is a citizen of India and has completed the age of thirty-five years.
Reason (R): The Governor is debarred from holding any other office of profit during his term of office.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A✓
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 157 lays down eligibility (citizen and 35 years), and Article 158 prohibits the Governor from holding any other office of profit. Both statements are true, but R is not an explanation of A.
July 2018Statements
4. Which of the following statements is/are incorrect?
The election of the President shall be held in accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of single non-transferable vote.
The President may resign by writing under his hand addressed to the Chief Justice of India.
No resolution to remove the Vice-President shall be moved unless at least thirty days notice has been given.
The Vice-President shall, notwithstanding the expiration of his term, continue to hold office until his successor enters upon his office.
(a)1, 2, 3 and 4 are incorrect
(b)1, 2 and 3 are incorrect✓
(c)Only 1 and 2 are incorrect
(d)Only 1 is incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect — the President is elected by single transferable vote, not non-transferable. Statement 2 is incorrect — resignation is addressed to the Vice President. Statement 3 is incorrect — it requires 14 days’ notice. Statement 4 is correct.
July 2018Match the lists
5. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct code:
A. K.M. Nanavati v. State of Bombay – 2. Power to pardon
B. Ram Prasad v. State of U.P. – 3. Fundamental Duties
C. Lily Thomas v. Union of India – 4. Disqualification of members
D. Dr. P. Nallar Thampy Terah v. Union of India – 1. Right to life
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
Explanation: The given cases correspond to the mentioned constitutional themes as per Supreme Court rulings.
December 2018
7. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that placing an ordinance before the legislature is mandatory, and repeated promulgation is a fraud on the Constitution?
(a)Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar✓
(b)R.K. Garg v. Union of India
(c)Maru Ram v. Union of India
(d)K.M. Nanavati v. State of Bombay
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (2017), the Court held that re-promulgation of ordinances without legislative approval is unconstitutional and amounts to a fraud on the Constitution.
December 2018Assertion–Reason
9. Assertion (A): The Council of Ministers holds office during the pleasure of the President of India.
Reason (R): The President of India can dismiss Ministers at his discretion.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false✓
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: While ministers hold office at the pleasure of the President (Art. 75), this is exercised on the advice of the Prime Minister. The President cannot act independently.
June 2019
2. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that a Governor cannot exercise the power of sentence suspension under Article 213 during the period when the Supreme Court is seized of the case. The order of the Governor could only operate until the matter became subjudice in the Supreme Court and it becomes so on the filing of the petition for special leave to appeal?
(a)Satpal Dang v. State of Punjab
(b)D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar✓
(c)K.M. Nanavati v. State of Bombay
(d)A.K. Roy v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar (1987), the Court clarified that once a matter becomes sub judice in the Supreme Court upon filing of a special leave petition, the Governor's suspension order loses effect.
June 2019
7. In which case did Chief Justice Sikri observe:
"Nobody can be above the institution which he is supposed to serve. He is merely the creature of the institution, he can exist only if the institution exists. To protect the individual as mighter than the Constitution would be grave injustice."
(a)S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
(b)T.N. Seshan v. Union of India
(c)Presidential Reference (2000)
(d)A.C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In A.C. Jose v. Sivan Pillai, CJI Sikri emphasized that no individual can be superior to the institution, affirming the supremacy of institutional integrity over personal authority.
December 2019Match the lists
11. Match List I with List II regarding Articles of the Constitution:
Choose the correct option:
(a)2 1 4 3
(b)2 4 1 3✓
(c)3 4 1 2
(d)4 3 2 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 2 4 1 3
Explanation:
Article 153: Governor for each state
Article 154: Executive power of the State
Article 155: Appointment of Governor
Article 156: Term of office of Governor
June 2020
1. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the pardoning powers of the President under Article 72 and the Governors under Article 161 are subject to judicial review?
(a)Satya Narain Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
(b)Vineet Narain v. Union of India
(c)Epuru Sudhakar v. State of Andhra Pradesh✓
(d)Chhotey Lal v. State of U.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Epuru Sudhakar v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Explanation: In this 2006 judgment, the Supreme Court held that the exercise of pardoning powers by the President and Governors is subject to judicial review if it is arbitrary, mala fide, or based on irrelevant considerations.
June 2020
7. Article 72 of the Indian Constitution makes a provision for:
(a)Discharge of the President's functions in other contingencies
(b)Power of President to grant pardons, suspend, remit or commute sentences✓
(c)Extent of executive power of the Union
(d)Council of Ministers to aid and advise the President
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Power of President to grant pardons, suspend, remit or commute sentences
Explanation: Article 72 confers the President with the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment.
December 2020/June 2021
1. What happens when the Vice President of India’s term expires?
(a)Vacates his office
(b)Gets a mandatory extension of 2 months
(c)Continues to hold office until successor enters upon office✓
(d)Elects his successor before relinquishing office
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
As per Article 67(c) of the Indian Constitution, the Vice President continues to hold office until his successor assumes charge. Hence, there is no automatic vacancy upon term completion unless a new Vice President takes over.
December 2020/June 2021Statements
4. Which of the following statements are true under the Constitution of India?
(1) Article 61 deals with impeachment of the President.
(2) Article 142 provides that law declared by Supreme Court shall be binding on all courts.
(3) Article 122 provides that courts shall not inquire into proceedings of Parliament.
(4) Article 163 deals with extent of executive power of State.
Options:
(a)1, 2 and 3
(b)2 and 3
(c)1 and 3✓
(d)1, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Article 61 provides for the impeachment procedure of the President. Article 122 restricts courts from inquiring into parliamentary proceedings. Article 142 is binding law by Supreme Court but wasn't included in correct answer due to some interpretation error in original key. Article 163 deals with the role of the Council of Ministers, not directly about "extent" of executive power.
December 2021/June 2022Assertion–Reason
1. Assertion (A): The President of India is a mere constitutional head.
Reason (R): In the parliamentary form of government, the Prime Minister is the head of government.
Choose the correct answer:
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Both the assertion and reason are correct. The President of India acts as a nominal or constitutional head, with real executive power exercised by the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. This is inherent in the parliamentary system adopted by the Constitution.
December 2021/June 2022Statements
7.
Statement I: It is the duty of the Prime Minister to communicate to the President all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation.
Statement II: It is also the duty of the Prime Minister to furnish such information relating to the administration and legislative proposals as the President may call for.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Both statements are correct. Article 78 of the Constitution lays down the duties of the Prime Minister, which include informing the President of all decisions of the Council of Ministers and furnishing any information that the President may request.
December 2021/June 2022Statements
15. Choose the correct statements:
(A) Courts cannot review the question of "aid and advice" given by Council of Ministers to the President.
(B) The question of "aid and advice" by the Council of Ministers is a justiciable issue.
(C) Article 14 cannot be invoked against discrimination made by constitutional provisions.
(D) The question of "aid and advice" by the Council of Ministers is a non-justiciable issue.
(E) Article 14 can be invoked against discrimination made by constitutional provisions.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Correct options are A, C, and D.
Article 74(2) bars courts from inquiring into advice tendered to the President. The question of advice is non-justiciable. Article 14 applies only to laws and executive actions, not to constitutional provisions.
December 2023
9. Under what circumstances can a Governor exercise discretion under Article 163?
(A) Appointment of Chief Minister
(B) Dismissal of ministry or dissolution of Assembly
(C) Submitting report to the President under Article 356
(D) Appointment of High Court Judges
Options:
(a)(A), (B), (C) only✓
(b)(B), (C), (D) only
(c)(D), (C), (A) only
(d)(D), (A), (B) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Governor acts in discretion in specific situations such as appointing a CM when there’s no clear majority, recommending President’s Rule (Art. 356), and dismissing a non-functioning ministry. High Court judge appointments are made by the President in consultation with the Governor and the Chief Justice, not under Governor’s discretion. So, (A), (B), and (C) are correct.
June 2025 · Q43
Which of the following is not true in the context of powers of the President under the Indian Constitution?
(a)A. The President is the Supreme Commander of the Defence Forces of the country✓
B. All treaties and international agreements are negotiated and concluded in the name of the President though subject to ratification by the Parliament
C. President has power to summon and prorogue the Parliament and can dissolve the Lok Sabha
D. President is empowered to promulgate ordinances during recess of Parliament under Article 213 of the Indian Constitution
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)D Only✓
(b)B, C Only
(c)C Only
(d)A, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) D Only
Explanation: Article 213 applies to Governors, not the President. The President promulgates ordinances under Article 123.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q57
Which Article of the Constitution of India provides that "Government of India can be sued in the name of Union of India and State Government may be sued in the name of State"?
7. The question of disqualification of the Speaker of Lok Sabha on the ground of defection is determined by:
(a)The Deputy Speaker
(b)The Chairman of Rajya Sabha
(c)A member elected by Lok Sabha✓
(d)The President of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: As per Paragraph 6(2) of the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution (Anti-Defection Law), a member elected by the House is to decide disqualification of the Speaker on grounds of defection. This ensures neutrality in decision-making, since the Speaker cannot decide his/her own case.
December 2009Statements
2. Which one of the following is the correct statement?
"Full faith and credit" clause of the Constitution does not apply to:
(a)Public records
(b)Judicial proceedings
(c)Acts of Corporations✓
(d)Public acts
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Acts of Corporations
Explanation:
Article 261 of the Constitution deals with “full faith and credit” to public acts, records, and judicial proceedings. It does not extend to corporate acts.
December 2009
5. Joint session of Parliament was summoned to pass which of the following?
(a)Dowry Prohibition Act
(b)Banking Service Commission Act
(c)POTA
(d)All the above✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) All the above
Explanation:
Under Article 108 of the Constitution, the President can summon a joint sitting of both Houses of Parliament when there is a deadlock over a bill. This provision has been used only three times:
To pass the Dowry Prohibition Act (1961)
Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill (1977)
Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA, 2002)
Hence, the correct answer is (d).
June 2011
4. Money Bills can be introduced only:
(a)in Rajya Sabha
(b)in both Houses of Parliament
(c)in Lok Sabha only✓
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: As per Article 110, Money Bills can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha, with prior recommendation of the President. Rajya Sabha can only make recommendations on them but cannot amend or reject them.
June 2012 · Paper 3
4. After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People, within how many days is it transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations?
(a)Thirty days
(b)Twenty-four days
(c)Sixty days
(d)Fourteen days✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
As per Article 109(2) of the Constitution, a Money Bill must be transmitted to the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) within 14 days for recommendations. The Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject it, only suggest changes.
June 2012 · Paper 3
7. In the Constitution of India, the provision relating to the formation of new States can be amended by:
(a)A Parliamentary resolution ratified by majority of State Legislatures
(b)A simple majority in each House of Parliament✓
(c)3/4th majority in Parliament
(d)2/3rd majority in each House, and also the majority of total membership
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Under Article 3, Parliament can form new states by a simple majority through an ordinary law. No constitutional amendment or state ratification is required.
December 2012 – Paper 3
15. Article 40 of the Constitution of India deals with:
(a)Just and humane working conditions
(b)Living wages for workers
(c)State's duty to raise nutrition level
(d)Organization of Village Panchayats✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 40 directs the State to organize Village Panchayats and endow them with powers to function as units of self-government.
June 2013Statements
1. “It is likely that free India may be federal India... though there would be a great deal of Unitary Control.” — This statement was made by:
(a)Sir Alladi Krishna Swami Iyer
(b)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(c)Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru✓
(d)Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Jawaharlal Nehru expressed that India might adopt a federal structure, but would retain strong unitary features, which reflects the quasi-federal nature of the Indian Constitution.
June 2013
2. Judicial Review in the Constitution of India is based on:
(a)Precedents and conventions
(b)Rule of law
(c)Due process of law
(d)Procedure established by law✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Judicial Review in India is rooted in “procedure established by law”, as mentioned in Article 21, unlike the US Constitution which follows “due process of law.” Article 13 also empowers courts to strike down unconstitutional laws.
June 2013
6. The Supreme Court observed that "Parliamentary proceedings are not subject to Fundamental Rights" in the case:
(a)Keshav Singh v. Speaker, U.P. Assembly
(b)Gunapati v. Habibul Hasan
(c)M.S.M. Sharma v. Srikrishna Sinha✓
(d)State of Punjab v. Satpal Dang
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
In M.S.M. Sharma v. Srikrishna Sinha (1958), the Supreme Court held that Parliamentary privileges under Article 122 are not subject to Fundamental Rights, particularly Article 19(1)(a).
June 2013
7. For creating a new State in India, a constitutional amendment must be passed by:
(a)2/3rd majority of members present and voting in both Houses of Parliament
(b)2/3rd majority in Parliament and ratification by 2/3rd of States
(c)Simple majority in Parliament and ratification by half of the States
(d)Simple majority in Parliament✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 3 allows Parliament to create new states by a simple majority through ordinary legislation. It is not a constitutional amendment under Article 368
June 2013 · Paper 2
1. In E.P. Royappa case, which Supreme Court Judge propounded the concept that "Equality is a dynamic concept with many aspects and dimensions and it cannot be 'crippled, cabined and confined' within traditional and doctrinaire limits"?
(a)Justice Y.V. Chandrachud
(b)Justice P.N. Bhagwati✓
(c)Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer
(d)Justice O.P. Chinnappa Reddy
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (AIR 1974 SC), Justice P.N. Bhagwati advanced the modern interpretation of equality under Article 14, stating that it is dynamic and evolving, going beyond rigid classifications.
December 2013 · Paper 3
1. Which one of the following features does not support the federal character of Indian Constitution?
(a)Distribution of power between Centre and States
(b)Authority of Courts
(c)Supremacy of the Constitution
(d)Single citizenship✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Single citizenship
Explanation: Federalism implies a dual system of government, which includes separate citizenship, authority, and laws for both Centre and States. However, India provides single citizenship, unlike the USA, where dual citizenship (state and federal) is a core federal trait.
December 2013 · Paper 3Match the lists
2. Match List - I with List - II and select the correct answer using the codes given below:
A. Law declared by Supreme Court to be binding on all courts → Article 141
B. Advisory jurisdiction of Supreme Court → Article 143
C. Power of Supreme Court to review its own judgment → Article 137
D. Appeal by Special Leave → Article 136
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) 1 2 3 4
Explanation: These Articles define specific powers of the Supreme Court:
Article 141: Declared law is binding on all courts.
Article 143: President may seek SC's advisory opinion.
Article 137: SC may review its own judgment.
Article 136: SC may grant special leave to appeal.
December 2013 · Paper 3
6. Which of the following Articles providing for fundamental rights cannot be suspended during the Proclamation of Emergency?
(a)Articles 14 and 15
(b)Articles 19 and 20
(c)Article 20 and 21✓
(d)Articles 21 and 22
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 20 and 21
Explanation: As per the 44th Amendment, Articles 20 (Protection in respect of conviction for offences) and 21 (Protection of life and personal liberty) cannot be suspended even during an emergency under Article 359.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
1. Who among the following expressed the view that the Indian Constitution is federal as much as it establishes what may be called a dual polity?
(a)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar✓
(b)Sir Ivor Jennings
(c)Prof. K.C. Wheare
(d)Sir B.N. Rau
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar stated that the Indian Constitution is federal in structure as it creates a dual polity comprising the Union and the States. He emphasized that the Indian federation, while unique, retains essential characteristics of a federal system.
June 2014 · Paper 2Statements
7. The statement “What cannot be done directly, cannot be done indirectly” refers to which constitutional doctrine?
Options:
(a)Colourable legislation✓
(b)Pith and substance
(c)Harmonious construction
(d)Doctrine of eclipse
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Colourable legislation
Explanation: The doctrine of colourable legislation states that what a legislature cannot do directly, it cannot do indirectly. It is invoked when a law appears to be within the competence of the legislature in form, but in substance, it transgresses constitutional limits. This principle ensures legislative accountability and prevents circumvention of constitutional provisions.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q1. The Constitution establishes a system of government which is almost quasi-federal — a unitary state with subsidiary federal features rather than a federal state with subsidiary unitary features. This opinion was expressed by:
(a)K.C. Wheare✓
(b)Jennings
(c)A.V. Dicey
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: K.C. Wheare described the Indian Constitution as quasi-federal, characterizing it as essentially unitary with some federal features. This is due to the significant powers retained by the central government and the limited autonomy of the states.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q5. If there is any inconsistency between the laws made by Parliament and laws made by the State Legislature, which one prevails?
(a)Parliamentary law, if passed before state law
(b)Parliamentary law, if passed after state law
(c)Parliamentary law, whether passed before or after✓
(d)State law, if passed after parliamentary law
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: As per Article 254 of the Constitution, in case of any conflict between parliamentary and state laws on a subject in the Concurrent List, the parliamentary law prevails, regardless of whether it was enacted before or after the state law.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
4. Assertion (A): Code of conduct has statutory force.
Reason (R): Because Article 102 of the Constitution says so.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are incorrect✓
(c)A is correct, but R is incorrect
(d)R is correct, but A is incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: A code of conduct may be adopted by legislative bodies or professional institutions, but unless specifically enacted into law, it does not have statutory force. Article 102 deals with disqualifications of MPs and does not relate to the code of conduct.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): One of the two Acts enacted under List I Entry 66 and the other under List III Entry 25 can be repugnant to each other.
Reason (R): Because in Annamalai University v. Secretary of Inf. and Tourism Department decided so.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)A is correct, but R is incorrect
(c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
(d)Both A and R are incorrect✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The claim that laws under Entry 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List III can be repugnant is not upheld by precedent. In fact, the Supreme Court in later cases like Preeti Srivastava v. State of M.P. clarified their harmonious interpretation.
June 2015Match the lists
2. Match the following Articles and cases:
A. Article 329 – 1. Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
B. 10th Schedule – 2. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu
C. Article 31-C – 3. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
D. Article 13(2) – 4. I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(a)2 1 3 4
(b)3 4 2 1✓
(c)4 3 1 2
(d)1 2 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Article 329 relates to election disputes, addressed in Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975).
B. 10th Schedule (anti-defection) was interpreted in Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1993).
C. Article 31-C's validity was upheld in Kesavananda Bharati (1973).
D. Article 13(2) limiting laws violating fundamental rights was discussed in Golaknath (1967).
June 2015Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): Power and functions are distributed between the two tiers of governments under the written Constitution in India.
Reason (R): The Union and the States are completely independent of each other under the Indian Constitution.
(a)A is correct and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)A is correct but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct but R is wrong✓
(d)A is wrong but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Assertion is correct as Articles 245 and 246 provide for division of legislative powers under the Union, State, and Concurrent Lists. However, the Reason is incorrect — the Indian Constitution provides for a federal structure with unitary features; the Union has overriding authority in several areas.
June 2015 Paper 3Statements
8. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Union List has primacy under Article 246(1).
Residuary powers belong to States in India.
"Pith and substance" means true nature of legislation.
"Colourable legislation" means what can't be done directly can't be done indirectly.
(a)Only 1 and 3 are correct✓
(b)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(c)2, 3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Residuary powers (Statement 2) belong to the Union under Article 248. Statement 4 defines colourable legislation correctly but was marked incorrect here for its ambiguous phrasing in the source.
December 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
2. Match the following provisions with Articles of the Constitution:
A. Power of Parliament to legislate in State List in national interest
B. Legislation for giving effect to international agreements
C. Power of Parliament to establish additional courts
D. Power of Parliament to legislate for two or more states with consent
Options:
(a)4 1 2 3✓
(b)1 2 3 4
(c)4 3 1 2
(d)1 2 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A → Article 249
B → Article 253
C → Article 247
D → Article 252
This matches the constitutional articles with the correct legislative powers of Parliament.
December 2015 Paper 3
4. Who among the following shall be disqualified as a member of either House of Parliament?
A person who is not a citizen of India
A person who has acquired the citizenship of a foreign state
A person under any acknowledgement to a foreign state
A person under acknowledgement of adherence to a foreign state
Options:
(a)Only 1
(b)Only 1 and 2
(c)1, 2 and 3
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Under Article 102(1) of the Constitution, all four conditions lead to disqualification from Parliament. The Constitution bars anyone not maintaining Indian allegiance.
July 2016 Paper 2Match the lists
7. Match the following cases with their legal doctrines:
A. Hari Krishna Bhargav v. Union of India
B. Godfrey Philips India Ltd. v. State of U.P.
C. K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. State of Orissa
D. In re: Delhi Laws Act
Conditional Legislation
Principles of interpretation to avoid overlapping
Power of Parliament to levy taxes on non-agricultural income
Colourable Legislation
Options:
(a)3 2 4 1✓
(b)2 3 1 4
(c)3 4 2 1
(d)2 3 4 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Hari Krishna Bhargav case dealt with taxation powers under Entry 82.
Godfrey Philips case clarified interpretation principles to avoid overlapping in taxation.
K.C. Gajapati case addressed colourable legislation.
In re: Delhi Laws Act involved the doctrine of conditional legislation, assessing how much law-making can be delegated.
1. Which of the following statements are correct?
The Basic Structure of the Constitution of India cannot be amended.
Parliamentary Democracy is included in the Basic Structure of the Constitution of India.
July 2016 Paper 3
4. Which Parliamentary Committee in India acts as the "watchdog" on departmental expenditure and irregularities?
(a)Committee on Public Undertakings
(b)Committee on Public Assurances
(c)Estimates Committee
(d)Public Accounts Committee✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) scrutinizes the appropriation of funds by ministries and departments. It ensures accountability in public expenditure and audits irregularities based on CAG reports.
July 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): Both Houses of Parliament and State Legislatures enjoy similar privileges under the Constitution.
Reason (R): The position of the Speaker in India is generally similar to that of the Speaker in the UK House of Commons.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A✓
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Articles 105 and 194 provide similar privileges to both Parliament and State Legislatures. Although the Speaker’s role in India resembles that in the UK in terms of parliamentary procedure, it is not the basis for the privileges mentioned.
September 2016 Paper 3
3. Which Article of the Constitution empowers Parliament and State Legislatures to create the ‘Contingency Fund of India’ and the ‘Contingency Fund of the State’?
(a)Articles 265, 266, and 268
(b)Articles 265, 267, and 268
(c)Articles 266 and 267
(d)Article 267 only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 267 provides for the creation of the Contingency Fund of India and of the States. Article 265 relates to tax collection, Article 266 deals with Consolidated and Public Accounts, and Article 268 pertains to the distribution of revenue, not contingency funds.
September 2016 Paper 3
4. In the case of a bill other than a money bill, what can the State Legislative Council do?
(a)It can veto the bill
(b)It cannot veto the bill
(c)It can request a joint session of the legislature
(d)It can send the bill back for reconsideration✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Under Article 197, the Legislative Council in a State cannot permanently block a non-money bill. It can delay it by sending it back with suggestions. If the Legislative Assembly passes the bill again, it is deemed passed. Thus, the Council only has a recommendatory role.
September 2016 Paper 3
5. In case of inconsistency between the laws made by Parliament and State Legislature, which one prevails?
(a)State Law
(b)Parliament Law made before the State Law
(c)Parliament Law made after the State Law
(d)Parliament Law made either before or after the State Law✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 254 of the Constitution states that in case of conflict between a central and state law on a subject in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails whether made before or after. A state law can prevail only if it receives Presidential assent under Article 254(2).
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
2. Assertion (A): A state law on a Concurrent List subject prevails despite repugnancy with a prior parliamentary law.
Reason (R): Parliament can always enact a law on Concurrent List which will prevail over any repugnant state law.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is false, but R is true✓
(d)A is true, but R is false
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
According to Article 254 of the Constitution, if there is inconsistency between state and central law on Concurrent List, central law prevails, unless the state law has received Presidential assent. Therefore, A is incorrect and R is true.
November 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
6. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code below:
List-I (Articles)
A. Article 249
B. Article 250
C. Article 252
D. Article 253
List-II (Description)
Power of Parliament to legislate for two or more States by consent
Power of Parliament to legislate on State List during emergency
Legislation to give effect to international agreements
Power of Parliament to legislate in State List in national interest
Code:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(b)A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3✓
(c)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1
(d)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 249 – Parliament can legislate in State List for national interest (A-4)
Article 250 – Parliament can legislate during emergency (B-2)
Article 252 – Legislation for two or more states by consent (C-1)
Article 253 – Legislation for international agreements (D-3)
November 2017 Paper 3Statements
7. Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding a Constitutional Amendment Bill?
Prior permission of the President is required before introducing a Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament.
A Constitutional Amendment Bill can be introduced in either House of Parliament.
The President is bound to give assent to the Bill if it is passed by both Houses and ratified by at least half of the States (if required).
The President may return the Bill to the Houses for reconsideration.
(a)Only 1, 2 and 3 are correct
(b)Only 2 and 3 are correct✓
(c)Only 2, 3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 all are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: According to Article 368:
No prior permission of the President is required before introducing the bill.
The bill can be introduced in either House.
The President is bound to give assent if the bill is duly passed and ratified (if required).
The President cannot return a Constitutional Amendment Bill for reconsideration.
July 2018Assertion–Reason
3. Assertion (A): A person shall be disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament if he holds any office of profit under the Government.
Reason (R): If 'pecuniary gain' is receivable in connection with the office, then it shall not become an office of profit, irrespective of whether such gains are actually promised or not.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct and (R) is incorrect✓
(d)(A) is incorrect but (R) is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 102 disqualifies a person from being a member of Parliament if they hold an office of profit under the government. The assertion is correct, but the reason is not because pecuniary gain does matter and determines the office's nature.
July 2018Statements
8. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
A. An ordinary Bill can only originate in the Council of States
B. A Bill pending in the House of the People shall not lapse by prorogation of the House
C. A Bill pending in the Council of States which has been passed by the House of the People shall not lapse on dissolution of the House
D. A Bill pending in the House of the People shall not lapse by reason of the dissolution of the House
(a)A and B are correct
(b)B and C are correct✓
(c)A and D are correct
(d)B and D are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 107 clarifies that prorogation does not cause lapse, and bills passed by Lok Sabha and pending in Rajya Sabha also do not lapse.
July 2018
9. In which of the following cases does the Parliament have no power to legislate on the State List?
(a)Consent of two states
(b)Implementing international agreements
(c)Emergency is in operation
(d)In the public interest if so declared by Council of States✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In case of a public interest declaration, Parliament can legislate on State List as per Article 249. So the question is incorrectly framed; actually, it always has power under some condition.
July 2018
11. Which of the following cases is not related to parliamentary privileges?
(a)M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha
(b)State of Karnataka v. Union of India
(c)Jatish Chandra Ghose v. Harisadhan Mukherjee
(d)State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Shyam Sundar✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The 2011 case involving Tamil Nadu was about state legislation, not parliamentary privilege.
December 2018
5. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that any MP or MLA convicted with a minimum of two years imprisonment loses membership with immediate effect?
(a)M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha
(b)Ramakrishna Hegde v. State of Karnataka
(c)Hardwari Lal v. Ch. Bhajan Lal
(d)Lily Thomas v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013), the Court ruled that MPs and MLAs convicted with two or more years of imprisonment lose their membership immediately, overruling Section 8(4) of the Representation of People Act.
June 2019Statements
3. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
If the other House does not pass an Ordinary Bill and more than six months have passed,, the President may summon a joint session.
At a Joint Session, new amendment can be proposed in the Bill with the permission of the Presiding Officer (Speaker of the Lok Sabha).
The Lower House has exclusive power over Money Bills.
Money and Financial Bills can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha with prior Presidential recommendation.
(a)Only 1
(b)1, 2 and 3
(c)1, 3 and 4
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: All four statements are true. Article 108 provides for a joint session. Amendments during joint sessions require the Speaker’s approval. Article 110 assigns exclusive power over Money Bills to Lok Sabha, and Articles 110 & 117 mandate their introduction with prior Presidential recommendation.
June 2020
2. The provision relating to 'solid waste management' is found under which Schedule of the Constitution of India?
(a)Schedule VII
(b)Schedule IX
(c)Schedule XI
(d)Schedule XII✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Schedule XII
Explanation: Schedule XII of the Constitution, inserted by the 74th Amendment Act (1992), lists the functions of municipalities, including solid waste management.
June 2020Assertion–Reason
8. Assertion (A): The Parliament has the power to make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India and such laws can have extra-territorial operation.
Reason (R): Article 245(1) empowers Parliament to make laws for the whole or any part of India and 245(2) states that such laws cannot be held invalid for having extra-territorial operation.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation: Article 245(1) and 245(2) together allow Parliament to make laws with extra-territorial effect, and these laws cannot be invalidated on that ground.
June 2020
9. The provision relating to 'drinking water' is contained in which Schedule of the Constitution?
(a)Schedule VII
(b)Schedule IX
(c)Schedule XI✓
(d)Schedule XII
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Schedule XI
Explanation: Entry 11 of Schedule XI (inserted by the 73rd Amendment Act) relates to the responsibility of Panchayats in providing drinking water.
December 2020/June 2021
6. Under the special powers of Rajya Sabha, which resolutions can originate only in Rajya Sabha?
(1) Resolution seeking removal of Vice President
(2) Resolution for creation of All India Services
(3) Resolution for legislation on State subject
(4) Introduction of Money Bills
Options:
(a)1 and 2
(b)1 and 3
(c)4 and 2
(d)1, 2 and 3✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Resolutions for removal of Vice President (Article 67(b)), creation of All India Services (Article 312), and legislation on State List subjects (Article 249) can originate in the Rajya Sabha. Money Bills (Article 110/109) can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, not Rajya Sabha. Hence, option (4) is incorrect.
December 2021/June 2022
12. Which of the following Articles relate to trade, commerce and intercourse?
(A) Freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse is covered under Article 301
(B) Restrictions on legislative powers of Union and States with regard to trade and commerce are in Article 302
(C) Parliament’s power to impose restrictions on trade is under Article 302
(D) Restrictions among states are under Article 304
(E) Appointment of authority for Articles 301–304 is in Article 306
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Articles 301 to 304 deal with trade and commerce:
Article 301 ensures freedom of trade across India.
Article 302 empowers Parliament to impose restrictions.
Article 304 applies to state-imposed restrictions.
However, Article 306 was repealed; appointment of authority is under Article 307, not 306. Hence, (E) is incorrect.
December 2022Match the lists
7. Match the following Parts of the Constitution with their respective subjects:
List-I:
A. Part IX B
B. Part XIV A
C. Part VIII
D. Part XVII
List-II:
I. Tribunals
II. Co-operative Societies
III. Official Languages
IV. Union Territories
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
A – II: Part IX B relates to Co-operative Societies, inserted by the 97th Constitutional Amendment.
B – I: Part XIV A deals with Tribunals (Administrative and other).
C – IV: Part VIII deals with Union Territories.
D – III: Part XVII deals with Official Languages.
June 2023
2. Which of the following Articles of the Indian Constitution relate to the State Legislature?
A. Article 176 – Special address by the Governor
B. Article 189 – Oath or affirmation by members
C. Article 198 – Special procedure in respect of Money Bills
D. Article 196 – Introduction and passing of Bills
E. Article 190 – Disqualification of members
(a)A, B and C only
(b)B, C and D only
(c)A, D and E only
(d)A, C and D only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Articles 176, 196, and 198 directly relate to Governor’s address, legislative procedure, and Money Bills. Article 189 relates to voting and quorum, and Article 190 to resignation and disqualification—not oath taking.
June 2023Match the lists
3. Match the following landmark cases with the doctrines they represent:
A. State of Rajasthan v. G. Chawla – I. Pith and substance
B. K.T. Moopil Nair v. State of Kerala – II. Colourable legislation
C. O.N. Mahindroo v. Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa – III. Harmonious construction
D. M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India – IV. Repugnancy
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(c)A-IV, B-III, C-I, D-II
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: These cases are known for their respective doctrines as follows—Pith and substance (A), Colourable legislation (B), Harmonious construction (C), and Repugnancy (D).
June 2023
8. Under which Article was the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 enacted?
(a)Article 249
(b)Article 250
(c)Article 252
(d)Article 253✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 253 enables Parliament to legislate for implementing international agreements. The Environment Protection Act was enacted under this power after the Stockholm Conference of 1972.
June 2023
13. According to Article 80 of the Constitution of India, the representatives of each state in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) are elected by:
(a)Elected members of the State Legislative Assembly by majority vote through secret ballot
(b)All the members of the State Legislative Assembly by majority vote through secret ballot
(c)Elected members of the State Legislative Assembly in accordance with system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote✓
(d)All the members of the State Legislative Assembly in accordance with system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
As per Article 80(4) of the Constitution, representatives of the States to the Rajya Sabha are elected by the elected members of the State Legislative Assemblies through proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote system.
June 2023Match the lists
15. Which of the following subjects are covered under List I (Union List) of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India?
(a)Foreign Loans
(b)Public Health✓
(c)Atomic Energy
(d)Public Order
(e) Insurance
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A, C and E only
Explanation: Foreign loans, atomic energy, and insurance are all subjects under the Union List (List I). Public health and public order are matters listed under the State List (List II), hence not part of the Union List.
Read the passage carefully and answer the following question:
"Where is legal wrong or legal injury is caused to a person or to a determinate class of person by reason of violation of any Constitutional or Legal right and such person or determinate class of persons is by reason of poverty, helplessness or disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position unable to approach the court for relief, any member of the public can maintain an application for an appropriate direction or order or writ in the High Court under Article 226 or in case of breach of any Fundamental Right to this court under Article 32. Where the weaker section of the community are concerned such as undertrial prisoners languishing in jails without a trial, inmates of the protective Home in Agra, or Harijan workers engaged in road construction in the District of Ajmer, who are living in poverty and desolation, who are barely eking out a miserable existence with their sweat and toil, who are helpless victims of an exploitative society and who do not have easy access to justice, the Supreme Court will not insist on a regular writ petition to be filed by the public spirited individual espousing their cause and seeking relief for them. The Supreme court will readily respond to the letter addressed by such individual acting pro bono piblico. It is true that there are rules made by the Supreme Court prescribing the procedure for moving it for relief under Article 32 and they require various formalities to be gone through by a person seeking to approach it. But it must not be forgotten that procedure is but a handmaid of justice and the cause of justice may never be allowed to be wasted by any procedural technicalities. The Court will therefore unhesitatingly cast aside the technical rules of procedure in the exercise of its dispensing power and treat the letter of the public minded individual as a writ-petition and act upon it."
16. Under which Article of the Constitution of India can one file an application directly to the Supreme Court for an appropriate remedy in PIL cases?
(a) Article 226
(b) Article 21
(c) Article 19
(d) Article 32
Answer: (d) Article 32
Explanation: Article 32 of the Indian Constitution provides the right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of fundamental rights. It serves as a constitutional remedy and is frequently used in PIL (Public Interest Litigation) matters.
December 2023Match the lists
8. Match List I with List II (Schedules and Descriptions).
List I:
(A) Fifth Schedule
(B) Eighth Schedule
(C) Tenth Schedule
(D) Fourth Schedule
List II:
(1) Languages
(2) Disqualification on ground of defection
(3) Scheduled areas and Scheduled Tribes administration
(4) Allocation of seats in Council of States
Options:
(a)(A)-(1), (B)-(2), (C)-(4), (D)-(3)
(b)(A)-(3), (B)-(1), (C)-(2), (D)-(4)✓
(c)(A)-(2), (B)-(4), (C)-(3), (D)-(1)
(d)(A)-(4), (B)-(3), (C)-(1), (D)-(2)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The Fifth Schedule deals with tribal areas administration, Eighth with official languages, Tenth with anti-defection, and Fourth with allocation of seats in Rajya Sabha. Thus, (b) is correct.
June 2024Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II:
List-I (List in Constitution)
(A) Concurrent List
(B) State List
(C) Union List
(D) Appellate Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
List-II (Subject)
(I) In civil matters
(II) Marriage and Divorce
(III) Public health and sanitation
(IV) Elections to the legislatures of State
Options:
(a)A-I, B-IV, C-II, D-III
(b)A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I
(c)A-II, B-III, C-IV, D-I✓
(d)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Concurrent List includes Marriage and Divorce
State List includes Public Health and Sanitation
Union List includes Elections to the State Legislatures
Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court applies in civil matters
Hence, option (c) is correct.
June 2024
7. In which of the important circumstances can Parliament legislate with respect to matters in the State List?
(A) To make laws with respect to Goods and Services Tax imposed by such state
(B) In matters of National Interest
(C) If a proclamation of Emergency is in operation
(D) By consent of states
(E) For giving effect to International Agreements
Options:
(a)A, B, C only
(b)B, C, D only
(c)A, C, D, E only
(d)B, C, D, E only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Under Articles 249, 250, 252, and 253 of the Constitution, Parliament may legislate on subjects in the State List: (B) in national interest (Rajya Sabha resolution under Art. 249), (C) during emergency (Art. 250), (D) by state consent (Art. 252), and (E) for international agreements (Art. 253). GST is governed separately under Article 246A and does not fall under these exceptions.
December 2019 · Q85
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India has specifically said that 'federal structure' is the basic feature of the Constitution?
(a)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(b)S.R. Bommai v. Union of India✓
(c)Govind v.State of Madhya Pradesh
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
June 2020 · Q85
The provision regarding 'legislation for giving effect to international agreements' is given in the Indian Constitution under
(a)Article 253✓
(b)Article 255
(c)Article 251
(d)Article 254
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 253
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q25
Every decision of the Goods and Services Tax Council shall require it to be taken at a meeting
(a)By a majority of not less than two thirds of the weighted votes of the members present
(b)By a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present✓
(c)By a majority of not less than two-thirds of the weighted votes of all the members of the council
(d)By a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of all the members of the Council
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) By a majority of not less than three-fourths of the weighted votes of the members present
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q82Match the lists
Match List-I with List-II
I -II
List-I/I List-II
A. Doctrine of Pith and Substance/I. What cannot be done directly, cannot be done indirectly
B. Doctrine of Incidental Encroachment II. The part of statute which is bad can be severed from the rest
C. Doctrine of Severability : III. A law is not invalid even through trenched incidentally to another list
D. Doctrine of Colourable legislation IV. True nature and character of the legislation
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A - I, B – II, C - III, D - IV
(b)A - IV, B - III, C- I, D - II
(c)A - III, B - II, C- IV, D - I
(d)A - IV, B - III, C - II, D - I✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A - IV, B - III, C - II, D - I
December 2022 · Q65
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that while applying and interpreting the anti defection law, the Speaker of Lok-Sabha functions as a tribunal
A. S.P. Sampath Kumar V/s Union of India (1987)
(1987)
B. I.R. Coelho V/s State of Tamilnadu (2007)
C. Kihota Hollohon V/s Zachilhu (1992)
D. L. Chandra Kumar V/s Union of India (1997)
E. M.S.M. Sharma V/s Shri Krishna Sharma (1959)
(1959)
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)B, C and E only
(b)A, B and C only
(c)C only✓
(d)D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) C only
June 2025 · Q56
The foundation of federation in India was laid down by which of the following legislations?
(a)Government of India Act, 1919
(b)Government of India Act, 1935✓
(c)Constitution of India, 1950
(d)Queen’s Proclamation of 1875
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Government of India Act, 1935
Explanation: The 1935 Act introduced federal features in India’s governance, creating provincial autonomy and division of powers.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q102
Which of the Article of the Constitution of India mentions Union List, Concurrent List and State List?
(a)Article 245
(b)Article 246✓
(c)Article 246A
(d)Article 249
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Article 246
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q137Match the lists
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II LIST-I (Doctrine) LIST-II (Case Law)
A. Doctrine of Pith and Substance I. K C G Narayan Dev. V/s State of Orissa
B. Doctrine of Territorial Nexus II. M. Karunanidhi V/s Union of India
C. Doctrine of Repugnancy III. P. K. Mukherjee V/s Bank of Khulna
D. Doctrine of Colourable Legislation IV. Wallace V/s Income Tax Commissioner
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-III, B-II, C-IV, D-I
(c)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I✓
(d)A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
June 2026 · Q75Statements
Which of the following statement is correct regarding the impact of dissolution of House of People on Business pending in house?
A. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses as per Article 107(5)
B. A contempt proceedings pending in House lapses
C. A Bill passed in the Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha does not lapse as per Article 107(5)
D. A Bill pending in Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse
E. A Bill passed by both houses but pending assent by the president does not lapse
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B and D only
(b)B, C and D only
(c)A, D and E only✓
(d)A, B and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A, D and E only
Explanation: Under Article 107 of the Constitution of India and established parliamentary procedures, the position regarding the impact of the dissolution of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) on pending business is as follows:
• A. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses as per Article 107(5) - CORRECT: Under Article 107(5), any Bill pending in the Lok Sabha (whether originating in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha) lapses upon the dissolution of the House.
• B. A contempt proceeding pending in the House lapses - INCORRECT: As per established parliamentary privilege rules and precedents, motions, notices, or proceedings relating to contempt of the House or breach of privilege do NOT lapse automatically upon dissolution; they are carried forward to be considered or revived in the subsequent Lok Sabha.
• C. A Bill passed in the Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha does not lapse as per Article 107(5) INCORRECT: Article 107(5) expressly provides that a Bill which has been passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
• D. A Bill pending in Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse - CORRECT:
Under Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha that has not been passed by the Lok Sabha does not lapse on dissolution. (Since the Rajya Sabha is a permanent body not subject to dissolution).
• E. A Bill passed by both houses but pending assent by the President does not lapse - CORRECT: A Bill passed by both Houses and submitted to the President for assent under Article 111 does not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Therefore, the correct combination of statements is A, D and E only, corresponding to Option (c).
June 2026 · Q123
In times of Emergency, Parliament may vote a lump sum without allocating it to any particular object, when demand cannot be stated with usual details under Article 116(1)(b) of the Constitution is called which of the following?
(a)Exceptional Grant
(b)Votes of Credit✓
(c)Vote on Account
(d)Supplementary Grants
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Votes of Credit
Explanation: Under Article 116(1)(b) of the Constitution of India, a Vote of Credit is granted to meet an unexpected demand upon the resources of India when, on account of the magnitude or the indefinite character of the service, the demand cannot be stated with the details ordinarily given in an Annual Financial Statement. Key features include:
• Blank Cheque to Executive: It functions as an open financial authorization given by the Parliament to the Executive to handle sudden national emergencies, full-scale wars, or major unexpected crises where detailed expenditure cannot be itemized in advance.
• No Specific Object Allocation: Unlike regular budget grants, Parliament votes a lump sum amount without specifying the exact itemized allocations due to the urgent and uncertain nature of the situation.
Passage for June 2026 Q141–Q145
Comprehension (for Q141–145)
An academic question raised time and again is whether the Indian Constitution can be characterized as Federal. According to Wheare, the Constitution of India is 'quasi-federal' and not strictly federal. Jennings has characterized it as a "federation with strong centralizing tendency." Austin described it as "Co-operative federation." In West Bengal v. UOI, the Supreme Court projected the traditional view of federalism and characterized the Indian Constitution as not being true to any traditional pattern of federalism. On the other hand, Subba Rao, J. in his bid to bolster the position of the States against the centre, took to the extreme view of competitive and dual federalism which has been long discarded in older federation. In State of Rajasthan v. UOI, Beg, CJ, said, the extent of federalism in it is largely watered down by the needs of progress and development of a country which has to nationally integrated, politically and economically coordinated and socially, intellectually and spiritually uplifted. In S.R. Bommai v. UOI, Ahmadi J. described the Indian Constitution following K.C. Wheare as "quasi federal" because it is mixture of the federal and unitary elements, learning more towards the latter. Sawant J. observed "Democracy and federalism are essential features of our Constitution and are part of basic structure". Justice Reddy, has observed, the fact that under the scheme of our Constitution greater power is conferred upon the centre vis-à-vis the States do not mean that States are mere appendages of the Centre. Within the sphere allotted to them, the State are supreme and the center cannot tamper with their power. More particularly the Court should not adopt an approach, an interpretation, which has the effect of or tends to have effect of whittling down the power reserved to the States. Federalism in India is not a matter of administrative convince but are of the principle. Accordingly, in Bommai case, the Supreme Court has developed a more balance approach to Article 356 of the Constitution
June 2026 · Q141
Which of the following jurist has characterized the Indian Constitution as Federation with strong centralizing tendency?
(a)K.C. Wheare
(b)Nicholas
(c)Jennings✓
(d)Austin
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Jennings
Explanation: Sir Ivor Jennings described the Indian Constitution as a "federation with a strong centralizing tendency."
• As explicitly mentioned in the passage, different jurists have given different characterizations:
o K.C. Wheare (a): "Quasi-federal" o Sir Ivor Jennings (c): "Federation with strong centralizing tendency" o Granville Austin (d): "Co-operative federalism"
June 2026 · Q142
The provisions of failure of Constitutional machinery of the States is provided the which of the following provision of the Constitution?
(a)Article 355
(b)Article 352
(c)Article 356✓
(d)Article 360
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 356
Explanation: Article 356 of the Constitution of India contains provisions for imposition of President's Rule in case of the failure of constitutional machinery in States.
• Article 352 (b): Proclamation of National Emergency (War, External Aggression, Armed Rebellion).
• Article 355 (a): Duty of the Union to protect States against external aggression and internal disturbance.
• Article 360 (d): Financial Emergency.
June 2026 · Q143
Which one of the following is not feature of Federal Constitution?
(a)Separation of Power✓
(b)Division of Power
(c)Written and Rigid Constitution
(d)Supremacy of the Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Separation of Power
Explanation: • Division of Powers (b), Written & Rigid Constitution (c), and Supremacy of the Judiciary/Courts (d) are core structural features of Federalism (distribution of sovereign powers between Center and States).
• Separation of Powers (a), on the other hand, refers to the division of governmental functions among the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. It is a feature of constitutionalism and democratic governance, but is not an exclusive defining feature of federalism (e.g., unitary systems like the UK also maintain judicial independence and separation of powers).
June 2026 · Q144
The subject matter with respect to which the Union Parliament and State Legislative shall have power to make law is provided the which of the following schedule of the Constitution?
(a)Fifth Schedule
(b)Sixth Schedule
(c)Seventh Schedule✓
(d)Twelve Schedule
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Seventh Schedule
Explanation: The Seventh Schedule (read with Article 246) of the Constitution of India allocates legislative powers between the Union Parliament and State Legislatures through three lists:
1. List I: Union List
2. List II: State List
3. List III: Concurrent List
• Fifth & Sixth Schedules (a, b): Administration of Scheduled Areas and Tribal Areas.
• Twelfth Schedule (d): Powers, authority, and responsibilities of Municipalities.
June 2026 · Q145
The proper course for testing the strength of the ministry was holding the test on the floor of the house, except in cases where the holding of the floor test was considered not possible for reasons given in writing, was laid down by the Supreme Court in which of the following case?
(a)State of Rajasthan v. UOI
(b)S.R. Bommai v. UOI✓
(c)Rameshwar Prasad v. UOI
(d)State of West Bengal v. UOI
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) S.R. Bommai v. UOI
Explanation: In the landmark case S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court held that the floor of the Assembly is the only legal forum to test the majority of a Council of Ministers/Government, and calling for a floor test is mandatory except in extraordinary circumstances recorded in writing.
1. In the appointment of the Supreme Court Judge, primary importance is given to the opinion of:
(a)The Chief Justice of India
(b)Union Law Minister✓
(c)Chief Justice of India and other three Senior Judges of the Supreme Court
(d)The Prime Minister
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Control mechanisms like writs, judicial review, and tribunal supervision exist to ensure administrative authorities act within the bounds of law and do not overstep or abuse their power.
December 2009Sequence / order
1. Consider the following Judgements of the Supreme Court which dealt with the appointment and transfer of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts:
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
Sakal Chand v. Union of India
President's Special Reference No.1
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India
Which one of the following is the correct chronological order in which the above judgements were delivered?
(a)1, 2, 3, 4
(b)2, 1, 3, 4
(c)2, 1, 4, 3✓
(d)1, 2, 4, 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) 2, 1, 4, 3
Explanation:
Sakal Chand – 1962
S.P. Gupta – 1981
Advocates-on-Record Association – 1993
President's Reference – 1998
December 2010
4. A Judge of the Supreme Court or High Court may be removed from service by:
(a)The President of India
(b)The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court
(c)Parliament through impeachment motion✓
(d)National Judicial Academy
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: As per Articles 124(4) and 218 of the Constitution, a judge can be removed only through an impeachment process in Parliament, on grounds of proved misbehavior or incapacity.
June 2011
6. Judicial Review in the Indian Constitution is based on:
(a)Procedure established by law✓
(b)Due process of law
(c)Rule of law
(d)Precedents and Conventions
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The concept of Judicial Review in India is rooted in "procedure established by law", as per Article 21. The Indian judiciary ensures that laws passed by the legislature do not violate the Constitution. Unlike the U.S., India did not originally adopt the "due process" doctrine, although post-Maneka Gandhi, the interpretation became broader.
June 2012 · Paper 3
6. The Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction regarding a dispute between:
(a)A citizen and a State✓
(b)The Government of India and one State
(c)Two States
(d)The Government of India and one State on one side and another State on the other side
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 131 gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in disputes between States or the Centre and States. However, it does not apply to disputes between a citizen and a State, which fall under regular writ or civil jurisdictions.
June 2013
3. The Constitution of India embodies the parliamentary form of government because:
(a)The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha✓
(b)The Council of Ministers is responsible to both Houses of Parliament
(c)The President is answerable to Parliament
(d)The Prime Minister is accountable to Parliament
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 75(3) provides that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, a hallmark of the parliamentary system.
June 2013 · Paper 2
7. A resolution for revoking the proclamation of National Emergency may be initiated by:
(a)Ten members of Lok Sabha
(b)One-fifth of the total membership of Lok Sabha
(c)One-tenth of the total membership of Lok Sabha✓
(d)One-fifteenth of the total membership of Lok Sabha
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under Article 352, a resolution to revoke National Emergency can be introduced if at least one-tenth of Lok Sabha members submit a notice.
December 2013 · Paper 2
7. Parliament can legislate on matters in the State List if it is in the:
(a)Public interest
(b)National interest✓
(c)Both (a) and (b)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Under Article 249, Parliament can make laws on State List subjects if the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution supported by two-thirds majority stating it is necessary in the national interest.
December 2013 · Paper 3
3. Which of the following cases held that free and fair election is recognized as a basic structure of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan✓
(b)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(c)Both (a) and (b)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan
Explanation: In this landmark judgment, free and fair elections were recognized as part of the basic structure doctrine, which cannot be amended even by constitutional amendment.
December 2013 · Paper 2
6. The jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India may be enlarged by —
(a)The President of India
(b)The Parliament by resolution
(c)The Parliament by Law✓
(d)The President in consultation with the Chief Justice of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 138 empowers Parliament to expand the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by enacting a law. It ensures that the Court's authority evolves with changing societal needs.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
3. The Supreme Court of India held in which of the following cases that the views expressed by it in exercise of its advisory jurisdiction are binding on all courts within the territory of India?
(a)In Re-Berubari Case
(b)In Re-Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal Case
(c)In Re-Kerala Education Bill
(d)In Re-Special Courts Bill✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In the case of In Re: Special Courts Bill (1978), the Supreme Court clarified that opinions expressed under its advisory jurisdiction (Article 143) are binding on all courts within India. This elevated the importance of the Court's advisory function.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
7. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India may be enlarged by —
(a)The President of India
(b)The President of India in consultation with the Prime Minister and Chief Justice of India
(c)The Parliament by resolution
(d)The Parliament by law✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 138 of the Constitution authorizes Parliament to expand the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court by law. This allows flexibility in granting the Court additional powers as and when necessary.
June 2014 · Paper 2
6. A distinguished jurist can be appointed as a judge of which court under the Constitution?
Options:
(a)High Court only
(b)Supreme Court only✓
(c)Both High Court and Supreme Court
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Supreme Court only
Explanation: Under Article 124(3)(c) of the Indian Constitution, a person who is a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President may be appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court. This provision does not apply to High Courts.
June 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
Q2. Match the following:
A. Appointment of Judges
B. Court of Record
C. Appeal in Civil Cases
D. Certificate for Appeal to Supreme Court
Article 124
Article 129
Article 133
Article 134A
(a)1 2 3 4✓
(b)1 3 2 4
(c)1 2 4 3
(d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The correct matches are:
Appointment of Judges – Article 124
Court of Record – Article 129
Appeal in Civil Cases – Article 133
Certificate for Appeal to Supreme Court – Article 134A.
December 2014 · Paper 2
3. In Vishram Singh Raghubanshi v. State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 2011 SC 2275), what did the Supreme Court hold?
(a)Superior Courts have a duty to protect the reputation of subordinate judicial officers✓
(b)Procedure in appointments to subordinate judiciary was clarified
(c)Guidelines regarding salary and service conditions of judges were laid
(d)It was about transfer of High Court judges
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In this case, the Court emphasized the importance of protecting the reputation of subordinate judicial officers, stating that it is the responsibility of higher judiciary to ensure their integrity is not maligned without proof.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
7. Match the jurisdictional powers of the Supreme Court with the related Articles:
A. Original jurisdiction – 1. Article 143
B. Advisory jurisdiction – 2. Article 136
C. Appeal by special leave – 3. Article 132
D. Appellate jurisdiction – 4. Article 131
(a)2 3 4 1
(b)1 2 3 4
(c)4 1 2 3✓
(d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
A → 4: Original jurisdiction under Article 131 (Centre-State disputes).
B → 1: Advisory jurisdiction under Article 143.
C → 2: Special leave to appeal under Article 136.
D → 3: Appellate jurisdiction in constitutional matters under Article 132.
December 2015 · Paper 2Assertion–Reason
7. Read the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes below:
Assertion (A): The administrative control over the subordinate judiciary in the State lies with the Governor.
Reason (R): The High Court has power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within its jurisdiction except military tribunals.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false but (R) is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 227 of the Constitution gives the High Court supervisory powers over subordinate courts, not the Governor. Thus, the assertion is false, but the reason is true.
December 2015 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Assertion (A): The rule-making power of the Supreme Court of India is not subject to any law made by the Parliament.
Reason (R): Only an impartial and independent judiciary can protect the rights of individuals without fear or favour.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
While it is true that an independent judiciary protects rights, the rule-making power of the Supreme Court (Article 145) is subject to parliamentary law. Hence, A is false but R is true.
December 2015 Paper 3
6. Who can establish additional courts for better administration of existing laws on a Union List matter?
Options:
(a)Chief Justice of India
(b)Parliament✓
(c)Concerned State Legislature
(d)High Court of the concerned State
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
As per Article 247, Parliament has the power to establish additional courts for the better administration of laws related to matters in the Union List.
July 2016 Paper 2Assertion–Reason
4. Assertion (A): No minimum age is prescribed for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court of India nor any fixed term of office.
Reason (R): The original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is dealt with in Article 132 of the Constitution.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are correct, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct, but R is incorrect✓
(d)Both A and R are incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 124(2) lays down qualifications for Supreme Court judges, but does not mention a minimum age. However, Article 132 relates to appellate jurisdiction, not original jurisdiction. Original jurisdiction is covered under Article 131. Hence, only the assertion is correct.
July 2016 Paper 3Statements
2. Which of the following statements about the Indian Judiciary are correct?
The Supreme Court of India stands at the head of the entire judicial system.
The High Courts of various states function under the Supreme Court.
District and Sessions Courts function under the concerned High Court.
(a)1 and 2 only
(b)2 and 3 only
(c)1 and 3 only
(d)1, 2 and 3✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
All the statements are correct. Article 124 establishes the Supreme Court at the apex. High Courts, under Article 214, are established in each state. Subordinate courts such as District and Sessions Courts function under the administrative supervision of the respective High Courts.
September 2016
7. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the court cannot expand the scope or intent of legislation when the language of the provision is clear?
(a)Union of India v. Deoki Nandan Aggarwal✓
(b)A.P. Krishna Swamy v. State of Madras
(c)Dharam Dutt v. Union of India
(d)Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Union of India v. Deoki Nandan Aggarwal (1991), the Supreme Court emphasized that when the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous, the court should not read into it anything beyond its text, nor can it expand the intention of the legislation.
September 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
7. Match the following decisions with their legal principles:
A. Rajesh Gupta v. State of U.P.
B. Attorney General v. Lachma Devi
C. Avinash Mehrotra v. Union of India
D. Vishal Jeet v. Union of India
Execution of death sentence by public hanging
Reservation to women
Traffic in human beings includes devadasis
Right to safe education
Options:
(a)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3✓
(b)A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3
(c)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
(d)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Rajesh Gupta: Right to safe education upheld.
Attorney General v. Lachma Devi: Public hanging case—held unconstitutional.
Avinash Mehrotra: Enforced the right to safe schooling.
Vishal Jeet: Addressed trafficking and devadasis, calling for strict regulation.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Assertion (A): The President of India has the right to seek the advisory opinion of the Supreme Court on any matter of law or fact of public importance.
Reason (R): The President is bound to accept the advice rendered by the Supreme Court.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false✓
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under Article 143, the President may seek the Supreme Court’s advisory opinion, but the advice is not binding. Hence, A is true, R is false.
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
4. Match List-I with List-II regarding constitutional articles:
List-I:
A. Article 136
B. Article 134
C. Article 131
D. Article 130
List-II:
i. Appellate jurisdiction in criminal matters
ii. Seat of the Supreme Court
iii. Special leave to appeal jurisdiction
iv. Original jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Codes:
(a)A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
(b)A-1, B-3, C-4, D-2
(c)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
(d)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 136: Special leave to appeal jurisdiction
Article 134: Appellate jurisdiction in criminal matters
Article 131: Original jurisdiction between states and union
Article 130: Seat of the Supreme Court
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
5. Match List-I with List-II regarding High Court provisions:
List-I:
A. Article 221
B. Article 222
C. Article 223
D. Article 224
List-II:
i. Transfer of a judge
ii. Appointment of acting Chief Justice
iii. Appointment of additional and acting judges
iv. Salaries of High Court judges
Codes:
(a)A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3✓
(b)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
(c)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
(d)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 221: Salaries of High Court judges
Article 222: Transfer of judges
Article 223: Appointment of acting Chief Justice
Article 224: Appointment of additional and acting judges
November 2017 Paper 3Statements
4. Which of the following statements are correct?
Government judicial service candidates need not resign to participate in the District Judge selection process as per Vijay Kumar Misra v. Patna High Court.
In S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society, the Supreme Court held that all tribunals are not necessary parties to a case where legality of their orders is challenged.
In Cardamom Marketing Corporation v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court observed that social security for lawyers is part of the legal system.
In Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court, the Supreme Court exempted High Court judges from airport frisking.
(a)Only 2 is correct
(b)1, 2 and 3 are correct✓
(c)2, 3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The first three statements are based on correct Supreme Court rulings. However, the fourth statement is incorrect; the Supreme Court did not exempt High Court judges from airport frisking.
July 2018Match the lists
10. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer:
A. Union of India v. Sankalchand Seth – 4. Appointment/Transfer of Judges
B. Leila David v. State of Maharashtra – 3. Power to punish for contempt
C. R.S.E.S. Ltd. v. Fennen India Ltd. – 2. Foreign precedent
D. Darshan Gupta v. Radhika Gupta – 1. Power to do
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Explanation: Each case corresponds to the listed constitutional issue based on judgments and legal precedents.
December 2018
6. A 'distinguished jurist' can be appointed as a judge of:
(a)A District Court
(b)A High Court
(c)The Supreme Court✓
(d)The International Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 124(3) allows a distinguished jurist to be appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court by the President of India.
December 2018Sequence / order
10. Arrange the following advisory opinions of the Supreme Court under Article 143 in correct chronological order:
In re Keshava Singh
In re Berubari case
In re Delhi Laws Act case
In re Sea Customs Act
(a)3, 1, 2, 4
(b)3, 4, 1, 2
(c)3, 2, 4, 1✓
(d)4, 2, 1, 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Delhi Laws Act (1951)
Berubari Union (1960)
Sea Customs Act (1964)
Keshava Singh (1965)
June 2019Match the lists
4. Match List-I with List-II:
A. Appointment of Supreme Court Judges
B. Jurisdiction of Supreme Court as Court of Record
C. Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
D. Power of Supreme Court to withdraw and transfer cases
In Re: Vinay Chander Mishra
SC Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India
A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
State of Karnataka v. Union of India
(a)2 1 4 3✓
(b)4 3 2 1
(c)1 4 3 2
(d)1 2 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A – 2: Appointment of judges – SC Advocates-on-Record Assn.
B – 1: Jurisdiction as Court of Record – In Re: Vinay Chander Mishra
C – 4: Original jurisdiction – State of Karnataka v. Union of India
D – 3: Withdrawal and transfer of cases – A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak
December 2019
4. The Supreme Court or the High Court in exercise of judicial review can declare a law passed by Parliament or State Legislature invalid on which of the following grounds?
It is not within the competence of the legislature which passed it.
It contravenes fundamental rights or other constitutional provisions.
The legislature did not apply its mind or acted arbitrarily or with improper motive.
(a)1 and 3 only
(b)1 and 2 only✓
(c)2 and 3 only
(d)1, 2 and 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 1 and 2 only
Explanation: A law can be invalidated for being ultra vires or violative of fundamental rights. Motives of the legislature are generally not justiciable unless procedural requirements are not followed.
December 2019
5. According to Article 233 of the Constitution of India, appointment of a District Judge shall be made by:
(a)Collegium of the State High Court concerned
(b)Governor in consultation with Chief Justice of India
(c)Governor of the State in consultation with the High Court having jurisdiction✓
(d)President in consultation with the Chief Justice of High Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Governor of the State in consultation with the High Court having jurisdiction
Explanation: Article 233 specifies that the appointment of District Judges shall be made by the Governor in consultation with the concerned High Court.
December 2019Statements
9. Which of the following statements are correct?
The Supreme Court of India has Original Jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and one or more states.
The Supreme Court of India has Original Jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any state on one side and one or more states on the other side.
The Supreme Court of India has Original Jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and an individual on one side and one or more states on the other side.
The Supreme Court of India has Original Jurisdiction in any dispute in India.
(a)1 and 2✓
(b)2 and 3
(c)1 and 3
(d)1 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) 1 and 2
Explanation: Article 131 of the Constitution provides original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court in disputes between the Government of India and one or more states, or between two or more states. It does not cover disputes involving individuals.
December 2020/June 2021Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): The rule-making power of the Supreme Court for regulating its practice and procedure is not subject to any law made by the Parliament of India.
Reason (R): Only an impartial and independent judiciary can protect the rights of individuals without fear or favour.
Choose the correct answer:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
The assertion is false because Article 145(1) of the Constitution of India explicitly states that the Supreme Court may, from time to time, make rules for regulating its own practice and procedure, subject to any law made by Parliament. This means the rule-making power is not completely independent of parliamentary law.
The reason is true: an impartial and independent judiciary is essential for upholding individual rights and ensuring justice without bias or influence.
Comprehension:
Privacy of the individual is an essential aspect of dignity. Dignity has both an intrinsic and instrumental value. As an intrinsic value, dignity is an entitlement or a constitutionally protected interest in itself. In its instrumental facet, dignity and freedom are inseperably inter-twined. Each being a facilitative tool to achieve the other. The ability of the individual to protect a zone of privacy enables the realization of the full value of life and liberty. Liberty has a broader meaning of which privacy is a subset. All liberties may not be exercised in privacy. Yet others can be fulfilled only within a private space. Privacy enables the individual to retain the autonomy of the body and mind. The autonomy of the individual is the ability to make decisions on vital matters of concern to life, Privacy has not been couched as an independent fundamental right. But that does not detract from the constitutional protection afforded to it. Once the true nature of privacy and its relationship with those fundamental rights which are expressly protected is understood. Privacy lies across the spectrum of protected freedoms.
December 2021/June 2022Statements
2. Statement I: An appeal shall lie in the Supreme Court from any judgment, final order, or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court if the High Court has reversed an acquittal and sentenced the accused to death.
Statement II: An appeal shall lie in the Supreme Court if a High Court has withdrawn a case from a subordinate court and after trial, convicted and sentenced the accused to death.
Choose the most appropriate answer:
(a)Both Statement I and II are correct✓
(b)Both Statement I and II are incorrect
(c)Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
(d)Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Under Article 134(1) of the Constitution, both circumstances allow a direct appeal to the Supreme Court: (i) where an acquittal is reversed and a death sentence is passed; (ii) where the High Court tries the case itself after withdrawing it and awards a death sentence.
June 2023Sequence / order
4. What is the correct chronological order of the following cases related to appointment and transfer of judges?
A. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
B. Sakal Chand Seth v. Union of India
C. Special Reference No. 1 of 1998
D. Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India
(a)A, C, B, D
(b)B, A, D, C✓
(c)D, B, C, A
(d)A, B, C, D
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Chronological order by year: B (1976), A (1982), D (1993), and C (1998).
June 2023
5. In which case was the strict application of the ‘Rule of Locus Standi’ first diluted?
(a)D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar
(b)Parmanand Katara v. Union of India
(c)Ratlam Municipal Council v. Vardichand✓
(d)Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Ratlam case (1980) allowed a resident to bring an issue to court concerning sanitation and public health, relaxing the strict rule of locus standi.
June 2023
17. Which was the first case in which the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was invoked?
(a)Sheela Barse v. Union of India
(b)Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
(c)People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India
(d)Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdul Bhai✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdul Bhai
Explanation: The case of Mumbai Kamgar Sabha v. Abdul Bhai (1976) is widely considered the starting point of PIL jurisprudence in India, where the Supreme Court began loosening traditional rules of standing.
June 2023Statements
18. Which of the following statements are correct with respect to Article 32 and procedural formalities in PIL cases?
A. It is necessary to follow all technical formalities even in PIL cases.
B. It is not necessary to follow technical formalities in such cases.
C. The Supreme Court may treat even a letter addressed to it as a writ petition in PIL.
D. Rule of locus standi is not relaxed in such cases.
(a)Only B is correct
(b)Only B and C are correct✓
(c)Only C is correct
(d)Only A and B are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Only B and C are correct
Explanation: In PIL matters under Article 32, the Supreme Court has relaxed procedural formalities and locus standi rules. A letter or postcard can be treated as a writ petition if it concerns public interest, making B and C correct.
June 2023
19. PIL cases are considered to be:
(a)Private interest cases
(b)Personal interest cases
(c)Public interest cases✓
(d)Permanent interest cases
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Public interest cases
Explanation: PIL stands for Public Interest Litigation. It is a mechanism to seek justice for the public or a disadvantaged group, where the petitioner is not directly affected but acts in the interest of the public.
June 2023
20. In PIL cases, what is the general position of the Supreme Court regarding the filing of petitions?
(a)The Supreme Court will always insist on technical compliance
(b)The Supreme Court may waive procedural requirements✓
(c)The Supreme Court cannot insist on any condition
(d)The petitioner must be directly related to the aggrieved party
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) The Supreme Court may waive this
Explanation: While the Court generally encourages petitions to be filed by public-spirited individuals, it has waived procedural requirements in many PIL cases and allowed even letters to be treated as writ petitions. The emphasis is on justice rather than rigid rules.
June 2024
10. The Constitution of India confers original and exclusive jurisdiction on the Supreme Court in cases where there is a dispute:
(A) Between two or more States
(B) Arising out of any treaty entered into before commencement of the Constitution
(C) Between Union Govt and one or more States
(D) Between Union Govt and any States on one side and one or more States on the other
(E) Arising out of substantial question of law of general importance
Options:
(a)A, B, C only
(b)C, D, E only
(c)B, C, D, E only
(d)A, C, D only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 131 of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original and exclusive jurisdiction in disputes between the Union and one or more States, or between States inter se (A, C, D). Disputes arising out of treaties or general legal questions do not fall under this jurisdiction.
December 2024Match the lists
3. Match List I with List II.
List I (Title of the Article)
(A) National Judicial Appointments Commission
(B) Appointment of Acting Chief Justice
(C) Supreme Court to be a Court of Record
(D) Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
List II (Article Number)
(I) Article 126
(II) Article 131
(III) Article 124A
(IV) Article 129
Options:
(a)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
(b)(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(IV), (D)-(II)✓
(c)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)
(d)(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 124A: National Judicial Appointments Commission (now struck down)
Article 126: Acting Chief Justice
Article 129: Supreme Court as a court of record
Article 131: Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court
December 2024
14. Which authority is vested with the power of superintendence over tribunals?
(a)Administrative agencies
(b)Government agencies
(c)High Court✓
(d)Supreme Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 227 of the Constitution grants High Courts supervisory jurisdiction over all courts and tribunals within their territory, ensuring legality, proper procedure, and fairness.
Passage
Read the passage carefully and answer the following questions
This is the greatest paradox involved in the doctrine of 'basic features', namely, that though it does not constitute a limitation on the legislature while enacting ordinary legislation, it would operate as a limitation on the 'Constituent' body, though in the same breath it is conceded that the latter is a 'Sovereign' authority while the Legislature is not. This means that while determining the validity of an ordinary law, the court can only look into the express provisions of the Constitution or the necessary implications thereof, but when the validity of a Constitution Amendment Act is challenged, the court may travel behind or beyond the express provisions of the Constitution to invoke some principles superior to express provisions to find whether the impunged amendment is in tune with those principles, which arere supposed to Constitute the 'norm' behind the specific provisions of the Constitution. In short, it involve an illogical attempt to usher in the doctrines of 'Spirit of the Constitution' or of 'natural law, through the backdoor, to circumscribe the Constitution itself, while it had been openly rejected as a limitation upon ordinary legislation
December 2023 · Q146
While determining the validity of an ordinary law, what can the court look into?
(a)The court cannot look into the express provisions of the Constitution
(b)The court can only look into the necessary implications but not the express provisions of the Constitution
(c)The court can only look into express provisions of the Constitution or the necessary implications thereof✓
(d)The court can only look into the express provisions of the Constitution and not the implications thereof
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) The court can only look into express provisions of the Constitution or the necessary implications thereof
December 2023 · Q147
As per the apprehension of the author, when may a court travel beyond the express provisions of the Constitution to invoke some principles superior to the express provisions ?
(a)While exercising the judicial power to interpret the constitution
(b)When the court wants to assert the power of judicial review
(c)When the validity of a Constitution Amendment Act is challenged✓
(d)When the validity of an ordinary legislation is challenged
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) When the validity of a Constitution Amendment Act is challenged
December 2023 · Q148
What does the author identify as the greatest paradox involved in the doctrine of basic features?
(a)The doctrine does not constitute a limitation on the power of the Parliament, but limits the state legislatures
(b)The doctrine ushers in the concept of natural law through the backdoors, while the judiciary get a free run
(c)The doctrine operates as a limitation on the constituent body as well as legislature when enacting ordinary legislation
(d)The doctrine does not constitute a limitation on the legislature while enacting ordinary legislation but operates as a limitation on the Constituent body though the Constituent body is a sovereign authority while the legislature is not✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
December 2023 · Q149
What does the author consider to be the doctrine used to circumscribe the Constitution?
(a)Doctrine of 'Spirit of the constitution' and 'natural law✓
(b)Doctrine of basic structure' and of 'grund norm'
(c)Doctrine of 'basic features' and of 'ultra vires
(d)Doctrine of 'Constituent body' and of 'Sovereign authority'
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Doctrine of 'Spirit of the constitution' and 'natural law
December 2023 · Q150
Which of the following options reflect the opinion of the author as can be discerned from the cited paragraph?
(a)A critical and negative view of the way the court uses the doctrines of 'Spirit of the Constitution and of 'natural law' to circumscribe the Constitution itself✓
(b)Admiration of the court's view that legislative power need not be circumscribed
(c)Neutral view on the use of basic features by the court to limit the constituent power and the legislative power
(d)Positive view on the use of natural law as a limitation on the legislative power and constituent power
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
June 2025 · Q45
Which Article is referred to as the "heart and soul" of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 32✓
(b)Article 21
(c)Article 14
(d)Article 226
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 32
Explanation: Dr. Ambedkar called Article 32 the heart and soul of the Constitution because it provides the right to constitutional remedies.
June 2025 · Q61Sequence / order
Arrange the following provisions in the correct Article-wise order as per the Indian Constitution
A. Establishment and Constitution of Supreme Court
B. Original jurisdiction of Supreme Court
C. Legislative power of Governor
D. Transfer of a judge from one High Court to another
E. Jurisdiction of existing High Courts
(a)A, B, C, D, E✓
(b)E, D, C, B, A
(c)D, C, B, A, E
(d)E, C, D, B, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A, B, C, D, E
Explanation: The correct order of articles is:
• E: Article 225 (Jurisdiction of existing High Courts)
• C: Article 213 (Legislative power of Governor)
• D: Article 222 (Transfer of judges)
• B: Article 131 (Original jurisdiction of Supreme Court)
• A: Article 124 (Establishment of Supreme Court)
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q73Match the lists
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II LIST-I (Basic Feature) LIST-II (Judge and the case)
A. Independence of the judiciary I. Fazal Ali - SP Gupta V/s Union of India
B. Federal system II. Bachawat - Golak Nath V/s State of Punjab
C. Secularism III. Reddy - Kesavananda Bharati V/s State of Kerala
D. Parliamentary system of government IV. Khanna - Indira Gandhi V/s Raj Narain
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III✓
(b)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
(c)A-I, B-III, C-IV, D-II
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III
Passage for 31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) Q141–Q145
Read the following passage and answer the questions below
"While interpreting the Articles of the Indian Constitution, the Court should remember that it is not construing a petrified legal parchment but reading the luscent lines of a human text with a national mission. The Court must never forget that the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by the social setting, that jurisdical abstractions and theoretical conceptions may be fascinating forensics but jejune jurisprudence if the raw Indian realities are slurred over. The Constitution of a nation is being expounded whose people hunger for a full life for each, and therefore, a perception of the signature of social justice writ on it is imperative. 'Nothing is more certain in modern 'society', declared the American Supreme Court at midcentury 'than the principle that there are no absolutes. Legal Einstienism guides the Court, not doctrinal absolutes."
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q141
What should the Court remember while interpreting the Articles of the Indian Constitution?
(a)That it is constructing a petrified legal parchment
(b)That they are reading the luscent lines of a human text with a national mission✓
(c)That they are interpreting it for the future generations
(d)That it is their national mission to petrify the legal parchment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) That they are reading the luscent lines of a human text with a national mission
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q142
As per the American Supreme Court, what guides the Court?
(a)Legal Einstienism guides the Court✓
(b)Lucent Lines guides the Court
(c)Doctrinal absolutes guides the Court
(d)Jejune jurisprudence guides the Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Legal Einstienism guides the Court
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q143
What must the Court never forget, according to the author?
(a)That the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by juridical abstractions
(b)That the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by theoretical conceptions
(c)That the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by fascinating forensics
(d)That the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by the social setting✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) That the life of the Supreme Lex is nourished by the social setting
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q144
Why is a perception of the signature of social justice writ on the Constitution, an imperative for its exposition?
(a)It is because it is a human text to be read with a national mission
(b)It is because it is a juridical abstraction making for fascinating forensics
(c)It is because it is jejune jurisprudence slurring over raw Indian realities
(d)It is because it is expounded for a nation whose people hunger for a full life for each✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) It is because it is expounded for a nation whose people hunger for a full life for each
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q145
Which is the most certain principle in Modern society?
(a)The principle that there are no certainties
(b)The principle that there are no principles
(c)The principle that there are no absolutes✓
(d)The principle that social justice is not an absolute
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) The principle that there are no absolutes
June 2026 · Q81Sequence / order
Arrange the following advisory opinion of the Supreme Court under Article 143(1) in their ascending order
A. In re the Sea Custom Act
B. In re Special Court Bill
C. In re Keshav Singh
D. In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)D, A, C, B✓
(b)A, D, C, B
(c)D, B, A, C
(d)A, C, D, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) D, A, C, B
Explanation: Arranging the Presidential References / Advisory Opinions under Article 143(1) in ascending chronological order of their decision date:
• D. In re Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves (1960):
Dealt with the implementation of the 1958 Indo-Pakistan agreement regarding the transfer/exchange of enclave territories.
• A. In re the Sea Customs Act (1963):
Dealt with whether Section 20(2) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, imposing duties on goods owned by state governments, violated Article 289 of the Constitution.
• C. In re Keshav Singh / In re Special Reference No. 1 of 1964 (1965):
Dealt with the conflict between legislative privileges (Article 194) and the fundamental rights of individuals / powers of the judiciary (Articles 21 and 226).
• B. In re Special Courts Bill, 1978 (1979):
Dealt with the constitutionality of establishing Special Courts for the speedy trial of offenses committed by high public functionaries during the Emergency.
June 2026 · Q96Match the lists
Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II
A. In re Kerala Education Bill I. Legislative Privilege
B. In re Keshav Singh II. Governor Power of Reserve Bill
C. In re Presidential Reference (1999) III. Election Matter
D. In re Special Reference No. 1 of 2002 IV. Appointment of Judges
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-II, B-III, C-IV, D-I
(b)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III✓
(c)A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Explanation: Matching each landmark Presidential Reference / Advisory Opinion under Article 143 from List I to its core legal subject matter in List II:
• A. In re Kerala Education Bill (1958) II. Governor Power of Reserve Bill:
The President referred the Kerala Education Bill to the Supreme Court after it was reserved by the Governor of Kerala for Presidential consideration under Article 200. The case dealt with the extent of State legislative powers and fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19, and 30.
• B. In re Keshav Singh / Special Reference No. 1 of 1964 (1965) I. Legislative Privilege:
Famously known as the Parliamentary Privileges Case, it dealt with a direct conflict between the legislative privileges of the State Legislative Assembly (Article 194) and the fundamental rights of individuals / jurisdiction of the judiciary (Articles 21 and 226).
• C. In re Presidential Reference (1999) IV. Appointment of Judges:
Famously known as the Third Judges Case (Special Reference No. 1 of 1998), the President sought the Supreme Court's opinion on the consultation process for the appointment and transfer of Supreme Court and High Court judges (Articles 124, 217, and 222), leading to the expansion of the Judicial Collegium system.
• D. In re Special Reference No. 1 of 2002 III. Election Matter:
Famously known as the Gujarat Assembly Election Matter, the President sought the opinion of the Supreme Court regarding the power of the Election Commission under Article 324 to schedule and conduct elections following the premature dissolution of the State Assembly.
4. Match List-I and List-II and select the correct answer:
List I (Cases) | List II (Articles)
A. S.R. Bommai case | Article 356
B. P.V. Narsimha Rao case | Article 105
C. A.D.M. Jabalpur case | Article 21
D. Lily Thomas case | Article 44
Code:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(b)A-1, B-3, C-2, D-4
(c)A-1, B-4, C-3, D-2
(d)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
S.R. Bommai case dealt with misuse of Article 356 (President’s Rule).
P.V. Narsimha Rao case dealt with parliamentary privileges under Article 105.
A.D.M. Jabalpur concerned Article 21 and its suspension during Emergency.
Lily Thomas case dealt with disqualification of MPs/MLAs, linked with reforms in personal law, hinting at Article 44 (Uniform Civil Code).
December 2012 – Paper 3
17. The Chairperson of the 2002 Delimitation Commission was:
(a)Justice Kuldeep Singh✓
(b)Justice R.S. Sarkaria
(c)Justice R.S. Pathak
(d)Justice S.N. Phukan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Justice Kuldeep Singh was appointed as the Chairperson of the Delimitation Commission established in 2002.
December 2013 · Paper 2
1. The word 'Secular' was added in the Preamble to the Constitution of India by:
(a)First Amendment Act
(b)Seventh Amendment Act
(c)Forty-Second Amendment Act✓
(d)Forty-Fourth Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 added the words “Secular” and “Socialist” to the Preamble of the Constitution during the Emergency period, reaffirming the secular character of the state.
December 2013 · Paper 2
5. The Supreme Court ruled that Right to Life under Article 21 does not include Right to Die in which case?
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
(c)Both (A) and (B)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court overruled P. Rathinam, holding that Right to Life under Article 21 does not include the Right to Die.
December 2013 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): Under Article 368, the Parliament can amend any provision of the Constitution except the basic structure.
Reason (R): The Supreme Court has restricted the absolute power of Parliament to amend the Constitution.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: This is based on the Kesavananda Bharati case, where SC ruled that Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution but not the basic structure. Thus, both statements are true, and R explains A correctly.
December 2013 · Paper 2
7. At the first instance, the President can issue a proclamation of financial emergency for a period of —
(a)Fifteen days
(b)Two months✓
(c)One month
(d)Six months
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: As per Article 360, the President may declare a financial emergency which remains valid for two months unless approved by Parliament. Once approved, it can continue indefinitely, although no such emergency has ever been declared in India.
June 2014 · Paper 2
4. The rights of a citizen under Article 19 are automatically suspended during a national emergency declared under Article 352 on which grounds?
Options:
(a)War, external aggression or armed rebellion
(b)War or armed rebellion
(c)External aggression or armed rebellion
(d)War or external aggression✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) War or external aggression
Explanation: Under Article 358, the rights under Article 19 are automatically suspended only when a national emergency is declared on the grounds of war or external aggression, not armed rebellion. This suspension is automatic and applies to all citizens during the period of emergency.
December 2014 · Paper 2
6. The Supreme Court laid down specific guidelines for imposing President’s Rule under Article 356 in which case?
(a)A.K. Roy v. Union of India
(b)S.R. Bommai v. Union of India✓
(c)State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
(d)Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), the Supreme Court laid down detailed safeguards and procedures for the imposition of President’s Rule under Article 356, thereby preventing its arbitrary misuse.
December 2015 · Paper 2
5. During a Financial Emergency, which of the following powers can the Union exercise over state finances?
It can issue directions to states to observe financial propriety norms
It can ask states to reserve money bills for the President's consideration
It can direct states to reduce salaries and allowances of officials and judges
(a)1 and 2✓
(b)1 and 3
(c)2 and 3
(d)1, 2, and 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 360(4) empowers the Union to direct states on maintaining financial discipline, including reserving bills for presidential consideration. However, salary reductions under this article do not extend to judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts.
July 2016 Paper 2
6. Under Article 352, when the President of India declares a national emergency, what does his "satisfaction" legally imply?
(a)The personal satisfaction of the President.
(b)The personal satisfaction of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers, informing the President.
(c)The decision of the Union Cabinet communicated to him in writing.✓
(d)The decision of the Union Cabinet along with signatures of 2/3rd of Parliament members.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 352(3) was inserted by the 44th Amendment to ensure that the President can issue a proclamation of emergency only after receiving a written recommendation from the Union Cabinet. It eliminated the possibility of unilateral Presidential action.
September 2016
6. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the proclamation of emergency under Article 356 is subject to judicial review?
(a)S.R. Bommai v. Union of India✓
(b)Makan Singh v. State of Punjab
(c)State of Maharashtra v. Lok Shikshan Sansthan
(d)M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994), the Supreme Court held that President’s Rule under Article 356 is subject to judicial review. It marked a major development in federalism by ensuring checks on arbitrary dismissal of state governments.
July 2018
7. Which of the following is incorrect in relation to the declaration of financial emergency under Article 360?
(a)It shall cease to operate at the expiration of one month unless approved by both Houses of Parliament✓
(b)Salary and allowances of persons serving the State may be reduced
(c)It may be revoked or varied by a subsequent proclamation by the President
(d)Salary and allowances of the Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts may be reduced
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Financial Emergency continues for two months unless approved by Parliament. One month is incorrect.
December 2018Assertion–Reason
12. Assertion (A): Proclamation of emergency can be issued by the President of India if there is an imminent danger of war, external aggression, or internal disturbance and armed rebellion.
Reason (R): The President of India can suspend the enforcement of some fundamental rights during the period of emergency.
Code:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 352 allows proclamation of emergency only in cases of war, external aggression, or armed rebellion, but not internal disturbance anymore (post 44th Amendment).
Article 359 permits suspension of enforcement (not the rights themselves) of certain Fundamental Rights during emergency. Thus, (R) is true but (A) is inaccurate in its conditions.
June 2019Statements
5. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
The declaration of National Emergency of the ground of 'Armed Rebellion' was inserted by the Constitutional (42 Amendment) Act, 1976.
The President shall not issue a Proclamation under Clause (1) Article 352 unless the decision of the Union Cabinet (the Prime Minister and his Council of Ministers).
A resolution approving the proclamation of National Emergency must be passed by a special majority.
A proclamation of Emergency once approved by the Parliament shall remain in force until the emergency ceases.
(a)Only 1
(b)1 and 4
(c)2, 3 and 4✓
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement 1 is incorrect. “Armed Rebellion” replaced “Internal Disturbance” in the 44th Amendment (1978), not the 42nd. The remaining statements are correct and reflect provisions under Articles 352 and 359.
December 2019Statements
2. Which of the following statements are correct?
Article 353 deals with effect of Proclamation of Emergency.
Article 354 deals with income-generating power of the Governor during Emergency.
Article 355 deals with Union’s duty to protect States against external aggression and armed rebellion.
Article 356 deals with imposition of Emergency during local disturbance by militants or terrorists.
(a)1 and 2
(b)1 and 3✓
(c)2 and 3
(d)3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 1 and 3
Explanation: Article 353 gives powers to the Union in case of national emergency. Article 355 puts a duty on the Union to protect States from external aggression and internal disturbance. Articles 354 and 356 do not have the interpretations stated in options 2 and 4 respectively.
December 2019
17. Article 356(1) provides that:
(a)Any proclamation under Article 356(1) may be revoked by a subsequent proclamation
(b)Every proclamation under Article 356(1) shall be laid before each House of Parliament
(c)A proclamation under Article 356(1) shall cease to operate on the expiration of six months
(d)The President may by proclamation under Article 356(1) declare that the powers of the legislature of the state shall be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) The President may by proclamation under Article 356(1) declare that the powers of the legislature of the state shall be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament
Explanation: Under Article 356(1), if the President is satisfied that a state's governance cannot be carried out according to the Constitution, he may assume legislative powers and vest them in Parliament.
December 2019
19. Which one of the following provisions of the Constitution imposes an obligation on the Union to ensure that the Government of the State is carried on in accordance with the Constitution?
(a)Article 352
(b)Article 355✓
(c)Article 356
(d)Article 360
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Article 355
Explanation: Article 355 places a duty on the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance and ensure that the government of every state is carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
December 2020/June 2021
3. Maximum period for which State Emergency (President’s Rule) can be imposed under Article 356:
(a)3 years✓
(b)2 years extendable by 1 year
(c)6 months
(d)1 year
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Article 356 allows President’s Rule to be initially imposed for six months and extended with parliamentary approval every six months up to a maximum of three years, under special conditions as per Article 356(4).
December 2021/June 2022
10. Under which Article of the Constitution is it the duty of the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance, and to ensure that the government of every state is carried on in accordance with the Constitution?
(a)Article 353
(b)Article 354
(c)Article 355✓
(d)Article 356
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Article 355 imposes a duty on the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance, and to ensure that the governance of every state is in accordance with the Constitution.
June 2024
1. After declaration of financial emergency, what is the maximum period of its operation without approval of Parliament?
(a)One month
(b)Two months✓
(c)Six months
(d)One year
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: As per Article 360 of the Constitution, a proclamation of financial emergency ceases to operate at the expiration of two months unless it is approved by both Houses of Parliament before the expiry of that period. Therefore, the correct maximum period without parliamentary approval is two months.
December 2022 · Q43
A resolution approving the proclamation of emergency under Article 352 of the Constitution of India for the first time or on subsequent occasion may be passed by either house of Parliament only by
A. A majority of the total membership of that house
B. A majority of not less than two thirds of the members of that house present and voting
C. A majority of not less than two thirds of the members of that house
D. and the resolution must be ratified by the legislature of not less than one half of the states
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A only
(b)B, C and D only
(c)A and B only✓
(d)C and D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A and B only
June 2025 · Q7Sequence / order
Arrange the following provisions as per their order in the Indian Constitution (Article-wise)
A. Failure of Constitutional Machinery in State
B. Proclamation of Emergency
C. Financial Emergency
D. Suspension of Article 19 during emergency Options
(a)B, A, D, C✓
(b)A, B, C, D
(c)B, C, D, A
(d)D, A, B, C
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) B, A, D, C
Explanation: The order as per the Articles is:
•
•
•
• B: Article 352 (Proclamation of Emergency) A: Article 356 (Failure of Constitutional Machinery) D: Article 358 (Suspension of Article 19) C: Article 360 (Financial Emergency)
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q94
Which of the following are correct in the context of guidelines laid down in S. R. Bommai V/s Union of India?
A. Presidential proclamation under Art. 356 is not subject to judicial review
B. If a state government works against secularism, President Rule can be imposed
C. State assembly can be dissolved only after the Approval of Parliament
D. Power under Art. 356 is not an absolute Power
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C only
(b)B, C, D only✓
(c)C and A only
(d)B and D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) B, C, D only
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q109Sequence / order
Arrange the following provisions in the order in which they appear in the Constitution of India
A. Provision as to Financial emergency
B. Suspension of provisions of Article 19 during emergencies
C. Provision in case of failure of constitutional machinery in States
D. Effect of Proclamation of Emergency
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
6. Which provisions of the Indian Constitution were extended to Jammu & Kashmir via Presidential Orders?
Freedom of trade, commerce, intercourse, services, and citizenship
Provisions relating to Elections
Financial Emergency (Article 360)
High Court's power to issue writs for "any other purpose"
(a)Only 1
(b)3 and 4
(c)1 and 2✓
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Only provisions relating to trade, commerce, services, citizenship and elections were constitutionally extended to J&K by Presidential Orders. Others were not.
December 2019
3. Article 371-F, containing special provisions for the State of Sikkim, was inserted by:
Explanation: The 36th Amendment Act, 1975, added Article 371-F to incorporate special provisions for Sikkim when it became a part of India.
June 2020Match the lists
6. Match List I with List II regarding special constitutional provisions for specific states:
Options:
(a)A–II, B–I, C–IV, D–III
(b)A–I, B–II, C–III, D–IV
(c)A–IV, B–III, C–II, D–I
(d)A–III, B–IV, C–I, D–II✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A–III, B–IV, C–I, D–II
Explanation:
Manipur → Article 371-C
Karnataka → Article 371-J
Sikkim → Article 371-F
Mizoram → Article 371-G
December 2020/June 2021Sequence / order
2. Chronological order of special provisions in the Constitution (Article-wise):
(1) Sikkim
(2) Karnataka
(3) Manipur
(4) Nagaland
(a)3, 4, 1, 2
(b)4, 3, 2, 1
(c)4, 3, 1, 2✓
(d)3, 4, 2, 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
The correct chronological order by Article number is:
Article 371A: Nagaland
Article 371C: Manipur
Article 371F: Sikkim
Article 371J: Karnataka
Therefore, the correct sequence is (4), (3), (1), (2).
December 2024
12. Which of the following States is not included in Part XXI: Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions of the Constitution?
(a)Nagaland
(b)Assam
(c)Telangana
(d)Haryana✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Part XXI includes special provisions for States like Nagaland (Art. 371A), Assam (Art. 371B), and Telangana (Art. 371D). Haryana does not have such a provision under this Part.
Read the following passage and answer the questions below:
Besides providing for a functional government and consequential growth in the administrative process, the Constitution has also provided for an elaborate control mechanism so that the water may not overrun its banks. Under Articles 32 and 226, the Supreme Court and the various High Courts have been invested with powers to issue writs of certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto, prohibition and habeas corpus to check the excesses of the government and the administrative agencies. Article 300 gives a right to individuals to file a suit against the government for torts committed by its servants. Article 311 protects government servants from arbitrary actions of the government in the matters of dismissal, termination and reduction in rank. In the same manner, Article 136 confers power on the Supreme Court to grant special leave to appeal from any judgement, decree, determination, sentence or order passed or made by any court or tribunal in India. Article 227 further invests the High Courts with the power of superintendence over all courts and tribunals within their jurisdiction. All legislative actions of the administration have been expressly brought by the Constitution within the purview of Article 13 by defining "law" as including "order", "bye-law", "rule" and "notification", etc. having the force of law.
June 2025 · Q76
Which Schedule of the Indian Constitution contains special provisions for the administration and control of Scheduled Areas in several states?
(a)Fifth✓
(b)Third
(c)Seventh
(d)Ninth
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Fifth
Explanation: The Fifth Schedule addresses the administration and governance of Scheduled Areas and Tribes in states other than those in the Sixth Schedule.
8. Holding of periodic, free, and fair elections by the Election Commission is part of the basic structure of the Constitution as per:
(a)Election Commission of India v. AIADMK
(b)S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
(c)In Gujarat Assembly Election matter✓
(d)Sadiq Ali v. Election Commission of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
In the Gujarat Assembly Election case (2002–2003), the Supreme Court held that free and fair elections conducted by the Election Commission are a part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
December 2012 – Paper 3
18. Representation in the House of the People (Lok Sabha) is based on:
(a)Literacy of the State
(b)Area of the State
(c)Population✓
(d)Community
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Representation in Lok Sabha is primarily based on population, as provided under Articles 81 and 82, subject to periodic delimitation based on census data.
June 2013
5. The maximum interval between two sessions of each House of Parliament is:
(a)Three months
(b)Four months
(c)Five months
(d)Six months✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
As per Article 85(1), not more than six months shall elapse between two sessions of Parliament. This ensures Parliament meets at least twice a year.
December 2013 · Paper 3
4. Which one of the following cases is not related to the doctrine of severability?
(a)A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(b)R.M.D.C. v. Union of India
(c)Minerva Mills v. Union of India✓
(d)Kihota Holohan v. Zachilhu
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Minerva Mills v. Union of India
Explanation: While (a), (b), and (d) involved application of severability (invalid parts of laws can be removed without affecting valid portions), Minerva Mills focused primarily on the basic structure doctrine and Article 368, not on severability.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q3. The Constitution of the Election Commission is provided under:
(a)Article 323
(b)Article 324✓
(c)Article 327
(d)Article 329
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 324 of the Indian Constitution provides for the constitution of the Election Commission, including the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners, and outlines their powers and responsibilities.
December 2015 Paper 3
5. Under Article 324, the Election Commission of India is responsible for conducting elections to:
Parliament and State Legislatures
President and Vice-President
Zilla Parishads and Panchayats
Municipal Corporations and Committees
Options:
(a)1, 2, 3 and 4
(b)1 and 3 only
(c)1, 2 and 3✓
(d)1, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The Election Commission under Article 324 conducts elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President. Local body elections (items 3 and 4) are conducted by State Election Commissions.
December 2015 Paper 3
8. In which case did the Supreme Court declare that no election can be challenged on the ground of defects in electoral rolls?
Options:
(a)Inderjit Barua v. Election Commission of India✓
(b)N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer
(c)Kalyan Lal Omar v. R.K. Trivedi
(d)Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Inderjit Barua v. Election Commission of India (1986), the Supreme Court held that elections cannot be questioned merely on the basis of defects in the electoral roll.
July 2016 Paper 3
8. Which of the following was not a recommendation of the Dinesh Goswami Committee on Electoral Reforms?
(a)State assistance to national political parties for elections
(b)Maintenance of proper accounts of elections
(c)Strict enforcement of model code of conduct
(d)Video coverage of polling booths to check booth capturing✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
While the Dinesh Goswami Committee recommended several reforms including financial transparency and enforcement of the model code, video surveillance of polling booths was not part of its recommendations.
September 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
8. Match the following cases with the principles involved:
A. A.C. Jose v. Sivam Pillai
B. S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
C. Digvijay Mote v. Union of India
D. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Powers of Election Commissioners
Provisions for NOTA
Use of electronic voting machines
Postponement of election due to disturbed conditions
Options:
(a)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2✓
(b)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1
(c)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
(d)A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A.C. Jose v. Sivam Pillai: Upheld EVM use.
S.S. Dhanoa: Clarified powers of Election Commissioners.
Digvijay Mote: Dealt with postponing elections due to law and order.
PUCL v. Union of India: Introduced NOTA (None of the Above).
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
8. Assertion (A): No one shall be eligible for inclusion in special electoral rolls on the basis of religion, race, caste, or sex.
Reason (R): This statement is the title of Article 325 of the Constitution.
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are incorrect
(c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
(d)A is correct, but R is incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 325 prohibits discrimination in electoral rolls based on religion, race, caste, or sex. It ensures one general electoral roll without exclusion on discriminatory grounds.
November 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
8. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer:
List-I (Articles)
A. Article 324(1) –
B. Article 324(2) –
C. Article 324(4) –
D. Article 324(5) –
List-II (Subjects)
Composition of Election Commission
Appointment of Regional Commissioners
Powers of Election Commission
Conditions of service and tenure of Election Commissioners
Code:
(a)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4✓
(b)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(c)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
(d)A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A. Article 324(1) – Powers of the Election Commission
B. Article 324(2) – Composition of Election Commission
C. Article 324(4) – Appointment of Regional Commissioners
D. Article 324(5) – Conditions of service and tenure
December 2019Sequence / order
13. Arrange the following cases related to the Election Commission in chronological order:
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
T.N. Seshan v. Union of India
People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
(a)2, 3, 4, 1
(b)3, 4, 2, 1
(c)1, 4, 2, 3
(d)4, 2, 1, 3✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 4, 2, 1, 3
Explanation: Chronological order:
S.S. Dhanoa (1991)
T.N. Seshan (1995)
Kuldip Nayar (2000)
December 2020/June 2021Match the lists
5. Match the Articles with their relevant provisions regarding elections:
A. Article 326 → (III) Elections based on adult suffrage
B. Article 324(3) → (I) Chief Election Commissioner shall act as Chairman of Election Commission
C. Article 328 → (IV) Power of State Legislature to make laws regarding elections
D. Article 329 → (II) Bar on court interference in electoral matters
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
The correct matching is:
(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(IV), (D)-(II).
Each article relates to important provisions of the electoral process under the Constitution.
June 2024
6. As per Article 324 of the Constitution of India, any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the:
(a)President
(b)Chief Justice of India
(c)Prime Minister
(d)Chief Election Commissioner✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 324(5) provides that the Chief Election Commissioner cannot be removed from office except in the manner and on the grounds applicable to a Supreme Court judge. However, other Election Commissioners can be removed only on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner, ensuring their functional independence.
December 2024
6. Who has the power to make laws regarding electoral rolls and delimitation of constituencies for State Legislature elections?
(a)Election Commission of India
(b)President of India
(c)Parliament by Law✓
(d)Governor in consultation with Chief Minister
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 327 empowers Parliament to make laws with respect to elections, including delimitation and electoral rolls, for both Union and State legislatures.
June 2025 · Q75
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India issue fourteen directions to the Union and State Governments for the eradication of manual scavenging?
(a)Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India
(b)Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
(c)Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action v. Union of India
(d)Dr. Balram Singh v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Dr. Balram Singh v. Union of India
Explanation: This PIL led to a comprehensive ruling where the Supreme Court issued binding directions for the elimination of manual scavenging.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q103Match the lists
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II LIST-I (Article from the Indian LIST-II (Corresponding Provisions) Constitution)
A. Article 325 I. One general electoral roll
B. Article 326 II. Adult Suffrage
C. Article 327 III. Bar to interference by courts in electoral matters
D. Article 329 IV. Power of Parliament to make provisions w.r.t. elections to legislatures
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(b)A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III✓
(c)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q106
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court declared that till a law is made by the Parliament, the appointment to the posts of Chief Election Commissioner of India and Election Commission shall be done by the President of India on the basis of the advice tendered by a Committee?
12. A mandatory procedural requirement for an administrative tribunal must be:
(a)Legal representation
(b)Cross-examination
(c)Reasoned decision
(d)All of the above✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: To ensure fairness, administrative tribunals must provide:
Legal representation,
Right to cross-examine witnesses, and
Reasoned decisions explaining the rationale behind their orders.
These are essential elements of natural justice and fair procedure.
June 2012 · Paper 3Match the lists
14. Match an item in List-I with the correct answer in List-II.
List-I (Institution):
Lokpal and Lokayukta
Correct match from List-II:
(c)Evaporate maladministration and corruption to bring good governance✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Lokpal (at the central level) and Lokayuktas (at the state level) are anti-corruption bodies set up to investigate complaints against public functionaries, including ministers and bureaucrats. Their goal is to combat maladministration and corruption, thereby ensuring good governance.
June 2012 · Paper 3
15. Find the correct answer:
(a)Administrative law is a branch of public law and is only a part of Constitutional law. It cannot control the Constitutional law✓
(b)Administrative law is a branch of private Constitutional law
(c)Administrative law is independent of Constitutional law
(d)Administrative law is neither the branch of public law nor of private law, but a part of Constitutional law
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Administrative law is a subset of public law, focusing on the functioning of administrative authorities. It derives its authority from the Constitution but does not override constitutional law. It provides rules and procedures that govern executive action, ensuring accountability and legality.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawMatch the lists
5. Match the following correctly:
List I
A. Independence of the Judiciary
B. Executive Legislation
C. Quasi-Judicial Function
D. Collective Responsibility
List II
Appointment of Judges
Ordinance
Administrative adjudication
Parliamentary form of Government
Codes:
(a)2 1 4 3
(b)3 4 1 2✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)3 1 4 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A → 3 (Independence of Judiciary relates to appointment of Judges)
B → 4 (Executive Legislation corresponds to Ordinance power)
C → 1 (Quasi-Judicial function includes administrative adjudication)
D → 2 (Collective Responsibility is a feature of Parliamentary government)
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawAssertion–Reason
13. Assertion (A): Lokpal is the demand of time.
Reason (R): Lokpal is a time-saving institution.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
Explanation: Lokpal is indeed a timely and necessary institution to fight corruption, but calling it merely a “time-saving” body underplays its role. It is primarily an anti-corruption watchdog. So, while both statements are true individually, R doesn’t explain A correctly.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
14. “Administrative Law is the law concerning the powers and procedures of administrative agencies, including especially the law governing judicial review of administrative action.” This definition is given by —
Options:
(a)Ivor Jennings
(b)Garner
(c)K.C. Davis✓
(d)Wade
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) K.C. Davis
Explanation: K.C. Davis is a prominent scholar of administrative law. His definition emphasizes not just the structure and functioning of administrative bodies but also the legal standards under which their decisions are reviewed by courts.
December 2014 · Paper 3
8. Administrative law deals with:
(a)Only powers of constitutional authorities
(b)Only judicial powers
(c)Only administrative powers✓
(d)All of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Administrative law focuses on the powers, functions, and procedures of administrative authorities, not constitutional, legislative, or judicial bodies.
June 2015 Paper 3
9. Administrative law does not primarily concern itself with which function?
(a)Rule-making
(b)Rule-application
(c)Quasi-judicial action
(d)Private law✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Administrative law governs the activities of administrative agencies involving rule-making, rule-application, and quasi-judicial functions. Private law deals with disputes between individuals and is not part of administrative law.
June 2015 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
12. Consider the following assertion and reason:
Assertion (A): In any intensive form of government, the government cannot function without the exercise of some discretion by its officials.
Reason (R): Giving discretion to government officials is necessary for the welfare of people.
Options:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct but (R) is incorrect
(d)Both (A) and (R) are incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In an intensive administrative system, some level of discretion is essential for effective governance. The reason supports this necessity by stating that discretion is also vital for public welfare, thereby making both the assertion and reason correct and directly linked.
June 2015 Paper 3
13. Which of the following is correct regarding the functioning of Lokayukta institutions in Indian States?
(a)They are provided with an independent investigating agency
(b)They have not been given constitutional status✓
(c)Prosecution and punishment powers are vested with them
(d)Their decisions are final and not recommendatory
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Lokayuktas are statutory, not constitutional bodies. They are created by state legislation and do not derive their authority from the Constitution of India. Their recommendations are not binding, and they do not possess final prosecutorial powers.
December 2015 Paper 3
9. Who defined administrative law as "Law relating to the administration…"?
Options:
(a)Sir Ivor Jennings✓
(b)A.V. Dicey
(c)Kenneth Culp Davis
(d)Griffith and Street
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Sir Ivor Jennings defined administrative law as the law relating to administration, which determines the organization, powers, and duties of administrative authorities.
December 2015 Paper 3
10. What was declared in the Delhi Laws Act case?
Legislature should not delegate its essential legislative functions
Excessive delegation of powers can be struck down by courts
Extension of laws with modification and change in policy is allowed
Legislature should lay down standards while delegating powers
Options:
(a)3, 1, 4
(b)2, 4, 1
(c)4, 3, 2
(d)1, 2, 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
In the Delhi Laws Act case (1951), the Supreme Court held that essential legislative powers cannot be delegated, courts can strike down excessive delegation, and that while delegation is allowed, the legislature must lay down the standards to guide the delegate.
July 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
9. Assertion (A): The system of Droit Administratif is not based on the doctrine of separation of powers.
Reason (R): The French Administrative Law's most distinctive feature is the independence of administration from judicial control.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
The French system of administrative law is indeed based on a separation of administrative and judicial authorities, not a complete denial of the doctrine. So, the assertion is false but the reason is true.
July 2016 Paper 3
14. What is the objective of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013?
(a)To investigate charges of corruption against public and private companies
(b)To substitute the Central Vigilance Commission with Lokpal
(c)To repeal Lokayukta and establish Lokpal
(d)To inquire into allegations of corruption against public functionaries✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
The primary objective of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 is to establish institutions for the inquiry into allegations of corruption against public functionaries. It does not replace the CVC or Lokayukta but complements existing mechanisms.
July 2016 Paper 3
15. Which of the following declarations relating to assets and liabilities by a public servant are to be made under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013?
Assets jointly or severally owned by the public servant, spouse, and dependent children
Assets owned by the public servant, parents, and children
Liabilities of the public servant, spouse, and dependent children
Liabilities of the public servant, spouse, parents, and children
(a)Only 1 and 2
(b)Only 3 and 4
(c)Only 1 and 3✓
(d)Only 2 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, a public servant must declare:
July 2016 Paper 3Statements
Assets held by self, spouse, and dependent children (not parents)
Liabilities of self, spouse, and dependent children
Hence, only statements 1 and 3 are correct.
1. The objectives of the Preamble of the Constitution of India were first articulated in which of the following?
(a)Adopted by the Indian National Congress at its Calcutta Session
(b)Spelt out in the Indian Independence Act, 1947
(c)Spelt out in the Objective Resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru and adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 22nd January, 1947✓
(d)Spelt out by the Chairman of the Drafting Committee Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and adopted on 29th January, 1947
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The ideals reflected in the Preamble of the Constitution of India were first proposed in the Objective Resolution moved by Jawaharlal Nehru in the Constituent Assembly on 13 December 1946 and adopted on 22 January 1947. These objectives later shaped the Preamble.
September 2016Assertion–Reason
4. Assertion (A): High Court has no jurisdiction over the State Administrative Tribunal.
Reason (R): Because L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India has decided so.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are false✓
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Supreme Court held that High Courts do have the power of judicial review over decisions of State Administrative Tribunals under Article 226/227. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are incorrect.
September 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
9. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and choose the correct answer:
Assertion (A): Administrative law is law, but not law in the traditional lawyer’s sense like property or contract law.
Reason (R): In India, administrative law is a combination of judicial precedents and statutes.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Administrative law is distinct because it emerges from judicial review of executive actions and principles of fair procedure, not codified like traditional laws. In India, it is shaped by case law and enabling statutes, making R a correct explanation for A.
September 2016 Paper 3Statements
12. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the establishment of Lokayukta under the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013?
(a)Every State must establish a Lokayukta under this Act within four years from its commencement.
(b)Every State must establish a Lokayukta by its own law, if not already done, within one year of the Act’s commencement.✓
(c)States having Lokayukta must amend their laws within one year, and others must establish within two years.
(d)States are not obligated to establish a Lokayukta.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Section 63 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, mandates that each State shall establish a Lokayukta by law, if not already established, within one year of the commencement of the Act. This provision leaves it to the State legislature to define the structure and powers of the Lokayukta.
September 2016 Paper 3
13. In which of the following cases does the Lokpal have jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry under the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013?
Member of Parliament
Group 'C' and 'D' public servants
Employees of a board or corporation financed by the Central Government
Officers of a society or trust wholly or partly financed by the Central Government
Options:
(a)1 and 3 only
(b)2 and 3 only
(c)1, 2 and 3 only
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, empowers the Lokpal to inquire into allegations of corruption against: (i) Members of Parliament, (ii) Group A–D public servants, (iii) employees of Central Government-financed corporations/boards/companies, and (iv) officers of societies/trusts funded wholly or partly by the Central Government.
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
14. Match List-I with List-II regarding the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013:
List-I (Provisions):
A. Composition of Lokpal
B. Establishment of Lokayukta
C. Term of office of Chairperson and Members
D. Removal of Chairperson and Members
List-II (Relevant Sections):
Section 3(2)
Section 6
Section 37
Section 63
Codes:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(b)A-1, B-4, C-2, D-3✓
(c)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
(d)A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Composition of Lokpal – Section 3(2)
B. Establishment of Lokayukta – Section 63
C. Term of Office – Section 6
D. Removal – Section 37
These sections are integral to understanding the structure and functioning of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
January 2017 Paper 3
15. The appointment of the Chairperson of Lokpal shall be made by the President after obtaining the recommendation of a Selection Committee consisting of:
(a)The Prime Minister; the Speaker of the Lok Sabha; and the Chief Justice of India
(b)The Prime Minister; the Speaker of the Lok Sabha; and the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
(c)The Prime Minister; the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha; and one eminent jurist nominated by the President
(d)The Prime Minister; the Speaker of the Lok Sabha; the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha; the Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court Judge nominated by him; and one eminent jurist nominated by the President✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
As per Section 4 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, the Chairperson of Lokpal is appointed by the President based on recommendations of a Selection Committee comprising:
The Prime Minister
The Speaker of the Lok Sabha
The Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
The Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court Judge nominated by him
One eminent jurist nominated by the President
1. Assertion (A): The preamble to the Constitution of India clearly indicates the ideals set before the Nation.
Reason (R): The ideals set before the Nation are Justice, Equity, Fraternity of the individual, and unity and integrity of the Nation.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false✓
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Preamble of the Constitution does indicate the ideals before the Nation. However, the correct ideals are Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, not "Equity". Thus, the assertion is true but the reason misstates one ideal and is incorrect.
November 2017 Paper 3
9. Administrative law as a separate discipline, especially in India, gained recognition in which century?
(a)17th century
(b)18th century
(c)19th century
(d)20th century✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Administrative law began to be recognized as an independent branch of law in India during the 20th century, particularly post-independence as the role of the state expanded.
November 2017 Paper 3
15. What is the qualification required for a judicial member of the Lokpal?
(a)A Member of Parliament
(b)A Member of State Legislature
(c)A retired High Court judge
(d)A retired Chief Justice of a High Court✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: A judicial member of the Lokpal must be either a retired Chief Justice of a High Court or a retired Supreme Court judge, as per Section 3 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
July 2018Assertion–Reason
13. Assertion (A): Administrative law is a branch of public law as opposed to private law.
Reason (R): Administrative law primarily deals with the relationship of individuals inter se.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct, but (R) is incorrect✓
(d)(A) is incorrect, but (R) is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Administrative law is a part of public law because it governs the relationship between the State and individuals. However, Reason (R) is incorrect, as it describes private law, which deals with individual-to-individual relationships.
July 2018
18. Which of the following Acts are amended by Section 58 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013?
Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952
Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003
Code of Civil Procedure
Central Bureau of Investigation Act
(a)1 and 2 are correct✓
(b)3 and 4 are correct
(c)1 and 4 are correct
(d)2 and 3 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Section 58 of the Lokpal Act amends several laws to enable the effective functioning of the Lokpal, including the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952, and the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003. The Civil Procedure Code and CBI Act are not amended by this section.
1. Which of the following statements are correct?
The Preamble embodies the intentions of the founding fathers and the objective of the Constitution.
The word 'Socialist' in the Preamble aims to eliminate inequality in political and religious matters.
December 2018Statements
13. Which of the following statements are correct in relation to the growth of Administrative Law in India?
In the pre-constitutional period, a system of administrative legislation and adjudication existed.
The philosophy of the welfare state was made the creed of the Indian Constitution.
In the new economic order, the State is withdrawing from business, but its role as facilitator and regulator is increasing.
All administrative matters are dealt with by Administrative Courts and their decisions are final and not subject to judicial review.
(a)1 and 2 are correct
(b)2 and 4 are correct
(c)1, 2 and 3 are correct✓
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct. Administrative law has evolved with the rise of welfare governance and liberalization. However, statement 4 is incorrect—administrative decisions are subject to judicial review under Articles 32, 226, and 136.
December 2018
17. Who among the following are within the jurisdiction of inquiry under Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013?
Group 'A' or Group 'B' officers
Group 'C' or Group 'D' officials
Group 'E' or Group 'F' employees
Group 'G' or Group 'H' workers
(a)Only 1 is correct
(b)1 and 2 are correct✓
(c)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act covers public servants in Groups A to D. Groups E to H are not defined classifications in the Act, making 3 and 4 invalid.
December 2018
18. Which of the following powers is not vested with Lokpal under Chapter VII of the Act, 2013?
(a)Power of search and seizure
(b)Power of criminal court in certain cases✓
(c)Power of attachment of assets
(d)Power to utilize services of Central or State Government officers
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Chapter VII of the Lokpal Act provides Lokpal with powers of investigation, search, seizure, attachment of property, and using services of other officers. However, it does not grant criminal court powers, which are vested in judicial courts.
June 2019
8. Which of the following is correct regarding Administrative Law?
(a)It is a branch of Public Law and part of Constitutional Law. It cannot control the Constitutional Law.✓
(b)It is a branch of Private Law.
(c)It is independent to the Constitutional Law.
(d)It is neither the branch of Public nor Private Law but a part of Constitutional Law.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Administrative Law is a branch of Public Law and a subset of Constitutional Law. It governs public administration and is subordinate to the Constitution.
June 2023Assertion–Reason
1. Assertion (A): From a functional point of view, an administrative tribunal is neither exclusively a judicial body nor exclusively an administrative body, but is somewhere between the two.
Reason (R): An administrative tribunal is not bound by strict rules of evidence and procedure.
What is the correct explanation?
(a)Both A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are correct, but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct, but R is not correct
(d)A is not correct, but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Administrative tribunals serve quasi-judicial functions and are not bound by procedural technicalities. They lie between judicial and administrative bodies and are exempt from strict rules of evidence, making R the correct explanation of A.
June 2024
11. Which Articles were added to the Constitution of India to facilitate the establishment of specific tribunals to meet the needs of administrative justice?
(a)Article 124A
(b)Article 233A
(c)Articles 323A and 323B✓
(d)Articles 338A and 338B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976 inserted Articles 323A and 323B to provide for administrative tribunals and other tribunals for resolving disputes in public service and other specified matters, thereby supporting speedy and specialized justice.
December 2024
4. Which of the following does not truly describe the nature of administrative law?
(a)The main thrust is on procedure for official action
(b)Deals with relationship of individuals with organized power
(c)Does not include control against arbitrariness✓
(d)Seldom addresses reconciliation of power with liberty
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Administrative law does include mechanisms to control arbitrary actions, such as judicial review and natural justice principles. Hence, both (c) and (d) fail to capture the nature of administrative law accurately.
December 2024
13. How were all legislative actions of the administration brought under the purview of Article 13?
(a)By conferring power of appeal on the Supreme Court
(b)By defining law narrowly under Article 13
(c)By vesting writ powers with courts
(d)By giving a wide definition of ‘law’ under Article 13✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 13 provides a broad definition of "law", including rules, notifications, orders, and bye-laws. This expansive definition ensures that any administrative legislative action violating Fundamental Rights can be declared void.
December 2024
15. Which of the following Articles provide mechanisms to check excesses of government and administrative agencies?
(a)Article 32 and 226✓
(b)Article 300, 311 and 227
(c)Article 13 and 136
(d)Article 13 and 32
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 32 (Supreme Court) and Article 226 (High Courts) empower citizens to approach courts for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and issue writs, providing direct checks on government excess.
December 2024
16. What was the reason for the growth of administrative processes in India?
(a)Constitution codified the administrative process
(b)Constitution gave Supreme Court exclusive power of appeal
(c)Constitution provided for a functional government✓
(d)Constitution lacked control mechanism for administrative actions
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Constitution facilitated the formation of a functional government, leading to expansion of administration. This, in turn, led to increased delegated legislation and the need for administrative law.
December 2024
17. What is the relevance of control mechanisms under the Constitution?
(a)To enable administrative agencies to exercise unfettered authority
(b)To check the excess of administrative actions✓
(c)To make the Supreme Court and High Courts more powerful
(d)To allow people and government servants to control agencies
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Control mechanisms like writs, judicial review, and tribunal supervision exist to ensure administrative authorities act within the bounds of law and do not overstep or abuse their power.
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q6
Ordinarily, a delegated legislation can be given
(a)Prospective effect only✓
(b)retrospective effect only
(c)both, prospective and retrospective effect
(d)effect, as the Court may decide
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Prospective effect only
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q52
Which of the following is/are NOT administrative actions?
(a)Internment, Externment and Deportation ,
(b)Functions of a selection committee
(c)Fact-finding action
(d)Forming opinion on objective satisfaction✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Forming opinion on objective satisfaction
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q57Statements
Given below are two statements
Statements I : The power of legislation carries with it the power to delegate and unless the legislature has completely abdicated or effaced itself, there is no restriction on delegation of legislative powers
Statement II : Parliament can abdicate or effaced itself by creating a parallel legislative body
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)Bothe statements I and Statement II are correct
(b)Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect
(c)Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect✓
(d)Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
June 2023 · Q68Assertion–Reason
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as
Reason R
(Assertion A) (Reason R)
Assertion A : The Supreme Court in Dev Dutta v Union of India (2008) emphasised that now transparency and good governance have been added as a new dimension to natural justice which includes the duty to give reason
Reason R : Reason reassure that discretion has been exercised by the decision maker on relevant grounds and by disregarding extraneous considerations
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct but R is not correct A R
(d)A is not correct but R is correct A R
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
June 2023 · Q86
About Administrative Tribunals, Supreme Court recommended in 2010 Madras Bar Association Case
A. The Tribunal should not become postretirement heaven for civil servents
B. Members of the Tribunals should be independent person and nor serving Civil servants
C. Members of Tribunal should retain lien in any government department
D. The Tribunal should resemble more the Courts and not bureaucratic boards
E. The Tribunals must depend on government for infrastructure facilities
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B and C only
(b)A, C and D only
(c)C, D and E only
(d)A, B and D only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A, B and D only
June 2025 · Q14Match the lists
Match the following jurists with their definitions of Administrative Law
List-I (Jurists)
A. Wade
B. Garner
C. Griffith & Street
D. Ivor Jennings
List-II (Definitions)
1. Administrative Law is the law relating to the administration. It determines the organization, powers and duties of administrative authorities
2. Main object of administrative law is the operation and control of administrative authorities
3. Rules recognized by the courts as law, and which relate to and regulate the administration of government
4. Law relating to the control of government power
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(c)A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II
(d)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
Explanation: • Wade emphasized control of government power (IV)
• Garner recognized rules relating to regulation of administration (III)
• Griffith & Street saw administrative law as control of authorities (II)
Which of the following are correct about the ‘Rule of Law’?
A. It is derived from the French phrase “La principe de legalite”
B. It is called supremacy of law
C. It promotes arbitrary governance
D. Decisions could be made by discretion only
(a)B, C only
(b)C, D only
(c)A, D only
(d)A, B only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A, B only
Explanation: Rule of Law stands for supremacy of law and is derived from the French phrase meaning principle of legality. It prohibits arbitrary governance.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q55Assertion–Reason
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R
Assertion A: Once Rule of Law is acknowledged as a constitutional law superior to the express provision in Article 21, it is only one step further to assert that Rule of Law is a 'basic feature' of Indian Constitution, which is beyond the pale of the express provision in Article 368, which was provided for by the initial constituent body
Reason R: It is not unimaginable to conceive that the enacted provisions of a written Constitution would be nullified by invoking some unwritten principle of law of higher ethical value as evident under the West German Constitution of 1949. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explantion of A✓
(b)Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct but R is not correct
(d)A is not correct but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explantion of A
June 2026 · Q54
The System of 'Droit Administrative' evolved in which of the following jurisdiction?
(a)England
(b)France✓
(c)USA
(d)Germany
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) France
Explanation: • The system of Droit Administratif (Administrative Law) originated and evolved in France.
• It is a distinct body of administrative law that governs public authorities, public servants, and state institutions in their dealings with private citizens. Disputes under this system are adjudicated by specialized administrative courts, headed by the Conseil d'État (Council of State), completely separate from the ordinary civil court hierarchy. Information Booster
• Key Features of Droit Administratif:
o o o Dual Court System: A clear separation exists between ordinary judicial courts (Tribunaux Judiciaires) and administrative courts (Tribunaux Administratifs). Role of Conseil d'État: Serves as the highest appellate court for administrative matters and acts as a legal advisor to the French government. A.V. Dicey’s Criticism: In England, A.V. Dicey criticized Droit Administratif, claiming it violated the Rule of Law by granting state officials special privileges and immunity from ordinary judicial courts.
June 2026 · Q91
Which of the following formulation do not incorporate Prof. A.V. Dicey's concept of Rule of Law?
(a)Absence or Excess of discretionary power✓
(b)Absence of discretionary power
(c)Equality before law
(d)Predominance of Legal sprit
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Absence or Excess of discretionary power
Explanation: Prof. A. V. Dicey formulated three core pillars of the Rule of Law in his classic work, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (1885):
1. Absence of Arbitrary / Discretionary Power: Absolute supremacy of regular law as opposed to arbitrary power or wide discretionary authority.
2. Equality Before Law: Equal subjection of all classes/citizens to the ordinary law of the land administered by ordinary courts.
3. Predominance of Legal Spirit: The general principles of the constitution are the result of judicial decisions determining the rights of private persons. "Absence or Excess of discretionary power" is a modern administrative law formulation (often associated with judicial review of administrative action) rather than one of Dicey's original three classic formulations. Dicey strictly emphasized the total absence of wide discretionary power (arguing that any discretion leads to arbitrariness).
10. Assertion (A): The principles of natural justice ensure fair hearing.
Reason (R): It requires an unbiased judge to decide after hearing all parties.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The principles of natural justice include fair hearing (audi alteram partem) and impartial adjudication (nemo judex in causa sua). These principles ensure procedural fairness in judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings, and the Reason (R) correctly supports the Assertion (A).
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
8. What are exceptions to the rule of natural justice?
Options:
Exclusion by statutory provisions
Exclusion by Constitutional provisions
Exclusion in case of legislative act
Exclusion in public interest
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) All of the above are correct
Explanation: The rule of natural justice can be excluded in several scenarios, such as: when there is a specific statutory provision excluding it, when constitutional provisions override it, when the action is legislative in nature, or when public interest demands such exclusion. Courts have upheld these exceptions in various judgments.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawAssertion–Reason
9. Assertion (A): In India, the order passed in violation of the principles of natural justice is void.
Reason (R): In India, there is a void in the area of principles of justice by nature.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A is true, but R is false
Explanation: In India, an administrative or judicial order passed in violation of natural justice principles is considered void and unenforceable. However, the reason (R) incorrectly claims that there is a void (absence) in this area, which is not true. India recognizes and strongly enforces natural justice in law.
December 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
9. Match the following:
A. No rigid formula for natural justice – R.S. Dass v. Union of India
B. Choice of application of natural justice – R. v. Sussex Justices
C. Justice must be seen to be done – Union of India v. P.K. Roy
D. Meaning of bias – Secy, to Govt. Transport Dept. v. Munuswamy Mudaliar
Correct code:
(a)B D A C
(b)C A D B
(c)A C B D
(d)C A B D✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Each principle corresponds to the case as follows:
C – Union of India v. P.K. Roy (justice seen to be done)
A – R.S. Dass (no fixed formula for natural justice)
B – Sussex Justices (application of principles)
D – Munuswamy (bias)
December 2014 · Paper 3
14. What was the principle laid down in A.K. Kripak v. Union of India?
(a)Rule of law is embedded in Article 14
(b)Judicial review is part of the basic structure
(c)Principles of natural justice apply to administrative proceedings✓
(d)Post-decisional hearing is sufficient
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In A.K. Kripak v. Union of India (1970), the Supreme Court held that even administrative decisions must conform to natural justice principles.
June 2015 Paper 3
10. Which of the following is not an exception to the principles of natural justice?
(a)Impracticability
(b)Legislative action
(c)Rule against dictation✓
(d)Statutory necessity
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: "Rule against dictation" is a part of natural justice and administrative fairness, not an exception. The other options — impracticability, legislative action, and statutory necessity — are recognized exceptions where natural justice can be bypassed.
July 2016 Paper 3
10. Which of the following is not an essential element of the doctrine of audi alteram partem?
(a)Person affected adversely must be heard
(b)Fair and transparent procedure must be provided by authority
(c)Reasoned decision must not be based on satisfaction of the concerned authority✓
(d)Authority must dispose of the matter by a speaking order
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The doctrine of audi alteram partem (hear the other side) emphasizes natural justice, including the right to be heard and a reasoned decision. Statement (c) is incorrect as a reasoned decision should be independent and not merely based on the authority's satisfaction.
July 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
11. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below.
List-I (Decision):
A. Hira Nath Mishra v. Rajendra Medical College
B. Bhagat Ram v. State of H.P.
C. A.K. Roy v. Union of India
D. H.L. Trehan v. Union of India
List-II (Principle):
The inquiry was vitiated as a Class IV employee had to defend himself against officers, hence denial of principles of natural justice.
Principles of natural justice can be exempted for the security of girl students and they may testify in the absence of miscreants.
No deprivation of existing rights enjoyed by a government servant without giving him an opportunity of being heard.
Principles of natural justice are not rigid norms; they must be tailored to the nature of the proceeding.
Codes:
(a)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3✓
(b)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(c)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
(d)A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A. In Hira Nath Mishra, for the safety of girl students, the Court allowed testimony in absence of accused males, accepting deviation from natural justice.
B. Bhagat Ram emphasized fair inquiry and held that denial of cross-examination vitiated justice.
C. In A.K. Roy, preventive detention procedures were held not subject to rigid natural justice but flexible to context.
D. H.L. Trehan held that existing benefits of employees cannot be withdrawn without hearing them.
September 2016 Paper 3
10. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court apply the doctrine of necessity?
Election Commission of India v. Dr. Subramaniam Swamy
Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana
Institute of Chartered Accountants v. L.K. Ratna
Amarnath Chowdhary v. Braithwaite
Options:
(a)1 and 2 only✓
(b)3 and 4 only
(c)1, 2, and 3 only
(d)All of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Necessity was applied in Election Commission v. Subramaniam Swamy and Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana, where the Court allowed certain exceptions due to administrative exigencies. The other cases did not invoke this doctrine.
September 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
15. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct code:
List-I (Cases)
A. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
B. Gullapalli Nageswar Rao v. A.P.S.R.T.C.
C. State of Orissa v. Binapani Devi
D. Mahapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa
List-II (Legal Principle)
Rule of Pecuniary Bias
Rule of Official Bias
Rule of Personal Bias
Rule of Hearing
Options:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(b)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1✓
(c)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
(d)A-4, B-2, C-1, D-3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India involved personal bias, where a member of the selection board was also a candidate.
Gullapalli Nageswar Rao v. APSRTC involved official bias, as the person who decided the case had also conducted the hearing.
State of Orissa v. Binapani Devi affirmed the right to be heard (audi alteram partem).
Mahapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa involved pecuniary bias, where an authority had a financial interest in the decision.
January 2017 Paper 2Match the lists
4. Match the following cases (List-I) with the principles (List-II):
List-I (Cases)
A. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
B. Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC
C. Fagu Shaw v. State of West Bengal
D. Upendra Baxi v. State of U.P.
List-II (Principles)
Departmental Bias
Preventive Detention
Rights of Inmates of Protective Homes
Rights of Prisoners
Codes:
(a)A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3✓
(b)A-1, B-4, C-2, D-3
(c)A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
(d)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain – Deals with rights of prisoners during election petitions.
Fagu Shaw v. State of West Bengal – Concerned with preventive detention.
Upendra Baxi v. State of U.P. – Dealt with conditions of inmates in protective homes.
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
12. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer from the codes given below:
List-I (Type of Bias):
A. Personal Bias
B. Pecuniary Bias
C. Subject Matter Bias
D. Departmental Bias
List-II (Cases):
Ijeejeebhoy v. Collector
Krishna Bus Service (P) Ltd. v. State of Haryana
Manak Lal v. Dr. Prem Chand
G. Nageswara Rao v. A.P.S.R.T.C.
Codes:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(b)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2✓
(c)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1
(d)A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Personal Bias – Manak Lal v. Dr. Prem Chand
B. Pecuniary Bias – Ijeejeebhoy v. Collector
C. Subject Matter Bias – G. Nageswara Rao v. A.P.S.R.T.C.
D. Departmental Bias – Krishna Bus Service v. State of Haryana
This matching is based on recognized classifications of bias in judicial and administrative law.
November 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
10. Assertion (A): Natural justice is justice of the nature where the lion devours the lamb and the tiger feeds upon the antelope.
Reason (R): The above statement is taken from Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel.
(a)Both A and R are correct✓
(b)A is correct but R is incorrect
(c)R is correct but A is incorrect
(d)Both A and R are incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985), this metaphor was used to show that principles of natural justice may be excluded in some administrative matters, such as public emergency or interest of state.
November 2017 Paper 3
11. The quotation “Principles of natural justice must be read into the provision of law” is taken from which case?
(a)State of U.P. v. Vijay Kumar Tripathi✓
(b)P. Satyanarayan v. Land Reforms Tribunal
(c)I.T.C. v. State of Madras
(d)Manjula Manjari Devi v. Director of Public Instruction
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The quote is taken from State of U.P. v. Vijay Kumar Tripathi, where the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of applying natural justice even when not explicitly mentioned in the statute.
July 2018Match the lists
14. Match List-I (Name of Case) with List-II (Principle of Natural Justice) and choose the correct answer.
List-I
A. Hira Nath Mishra v. Rajendra Medical College
B. Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan
C. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
D. Union of India v. Narendra Singh
List-II
Right to notice
No evidence should be taken behind the back of the other party
Enquiry report must be shown to the other party
Speaking orders or reasoned decision
Code:
(a)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
(b)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
(c)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
(d)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-3✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Hira Nath Mishra: Violated the principle that no evidence should be taken behind the back.
Union of India v. Ramzan Khan: Enquiry report must be furnished.
Maneka Gandhi: Right to a reasoned decision (speaking orders).
Union of India v. Narendra Singh: Right to notice was affirmed.
December 2018Statements
14. Which of the following statements are correct in relation to the principles of natural justice?
Principles of natural justice have enriched law and constitutions globally.
A fixed formula can always be applied to determine bias.
Giving reasons for a decision promotes objectivity over subjectivity.
Prior hearing can always be replaced by post-decisional hearing.
(a)1 and 2 are correct
(b)3 and 4 are correct
(c)1 and 3 are correct✓
(d)2 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct. Principles of natural justice are universal and giving reasons fosters transparency. Statements 2 and 4 are incorrect as no universal formula exists for bias, and post-decisional hearing is not always a substitute for prior hearing.
June 2019
9. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that 'the audi alteram partem rule, in essence enforces the equality clause in Article 14 and it is applicable not only to quasijudicial bodies but also to administrative order adversely affecting the party in question?’
(a)U.P. Warehousing Corp. v. Vijay Narain
(b)Delhi Transport Corp. v. DTC Mazdoor Union✓
(c)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(d)Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. APSRTC
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Delhi Transport Corp. v. DTC Mazdoor Union, the Court held that the rule of natural justice applies to both quasi-judicial and administrative decisions if they adversely affect individual rights.
June 2020 · Q46
In which case, in respect of natural justice, Lord Denning said that "With a good man in the saddle, the unruly horse can be kept under control, it can jump over abstacles. It can leap fences put up by fictions and come down on the other side of justice."
(a)Enderby Town Football Club Ltd. v. Football Association Ltd✓
(b)Canara Bank v. Debasis Das
(c)R.V. Hendon Rural District Council
(d)American Cyanamide Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Enderby Town Football Club Ltd. v. Football Association Ltd
December 2022 · Q62Statements
Which of the statement's is/are correct?
A. A quasi-judicial body may never review its own decisions if there is grave error of law in it
B. A quasi judicial body may review its own decisions if there is grave error of law in it
C. A quasi judicial body has inherent power to review its own decisions
D. A quasi judicial body has power to issue writs
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A and C only
(b)B only
(c)A only✓
(d)B and D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A only
June 2025 · Q25Match the lists
Match the following principles of natural justice with case laws
List-I (Principle)
A. Pecuniary Bias
B. Personal Bias
C. Official Bias
D. Judicial Obstinacy
List-II (Case Law)
1. Dimes v. Grand Junction Canal
2. Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. A.P. SRTC
3. Mineral Development Ltd. v. State of Bihar
4. State of West Bengal v. Shivananda Pathak
(a)A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV
(b)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV✓
(c)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(d)A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
Explanation: These matches are based on the type of bias or judicial conduct interpreted and applied in the corresponding judgments.
11. Prerogative writs to review an administrative action are:
(a)Two: Habeas Corpus and Mandamus
(b)Three: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, and Prohibition
(c)Four: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, and Certiorari
(d)Five: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition, and Quo Warranto✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution empower the Supreme Court and High Courts to issue five types of writs:
Habeas Corpus
Mandamus
Certiorari
Prohibition
Quo Warranto
These writs are key instruments for judicial review of administrative actions.
June 2012 · Paper 3
13. Judicial review of an administrative action means:
(a)Review by the Parliament
(b)Review by the Government
(c)Review by the Legislative Assembly
(d)Review by the Judiciary✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Judicial review is the power of the judiciary to examine the legality, reasonableness, and constitutionality of administrative or executive actions. It ensures that authorities do not exceed or abuse their power and remain accountable under the rule of law.
December 2013 · Paper 2
4. The appropriate writ issued by Supreme Court to quash the appointment of a person to a public office is —
(a)Certiorari
(b)Mandamus
(c)Prohibition
(d)Quo-Warranto✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The writ of Quo-Warranto is used to challenge the legitimacy of a person’s claim to a public office. It is issued when someone holds a public post without being qualified under law.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
10. In which of the following conditions is abuse of discretionary power inferred?
Options:
Use for improper purpose
Mala fide (bad faith)
Relevant consideration
Leaving out irrelevant consideration
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Only 1 and 2 are correct
Explanation: Abuse of discretionary power is inferred when a decision-maker acts with improper purpose or mala fide intentions. Using relevant considerations or ignoring irrelevant ones does not indicate abuse—it reflects lawful use of discretion.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
12. The writ of habeas corpus will be issued if —
Options:
(a)Detention is legal
(b)Detention is prima facie legal
(c)Detention is prima facie illegal✓
(d)Detention is primarily illegal
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Detention is prima facie illegal
Explanation: The writ of habeas corpus, meaning "to produce the body," is issued when a person is detained without legal justification. If the detention appears prima facie (on its face) illegal, courts can issue this writ to secure immediate release.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
15. On which of the following grounds may a writ of certiorari be issued?
Options:
(a)Error of jurisdiction
(b)Error apparent on the face of record
(c)Violation of natural justice
(d)All of the above✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) All of the above
Explanation: A writ of certiorari is issued by a higher court to quash a lower court or tribunal’s decision when there is an error of jurisdiction, a manifest error on record, or a violation of natural justice. It ensures judicial accountability and procedural fairness.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q12. Which of the following writs can be issued against administrative authorities?
(a)Mandamus
(b)Certiorari
(c)Prohibition
(d)All of the above✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: All the mentioned writs—mandamus (to command), certiorari (to quash decisions), and prohibition (to prevent overstepping of jurisdiction)—can be issued against administrative authorities to ensure legality and fairness.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
1. Assertion (A): The writ of habeas corpus can be granted to enable the detainee to argue his case in person.
Reason (R): Because R. v. Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte (1992) decided so.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are correct, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)A is correct, but R is incorrect
(c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
(d)Both A and R are incorrect✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The writ of habeas corpus is a constitutional remedy to ensure the release of a person unlawfully detained. However, the specific case mentioned (R. v. Secretary of State for Home Department ex parte, 1992) does not establish that a detainee must be allowed to argue the case personally in all scenarios. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are incorrect.
December 2014 · Paper 3
2. Which of the following are matched incorrectly?
Habeas Corpus – To produce the body
Quo Warranto – Issued to a lower court to stop
Prohibition – Issued to a lower court to question decision or order
Mandamus – Commands a person to perform a public duty**
(a)1, 2, and 3
(b)2 and 3✓
(c)2, 3, and 4
(d)2 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: "Quo Warranto" is issued to challenge the legality of a person’s claim to a public office, not to stop a lower court. "Prohibition" is issued to a lower court or tribunal to prevent it from exceeding its jurisdiction. Therefore, both 2 and 3 are incorrectly matched.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
10. Assertion (A): Legitimate expectation does not grant an absolute right to a claimant.
Reason (R): It protects the right of fair hearing before a decision negating a promise or undertaking is taken.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation
(c)A is true and R is false
(d)A is false and R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The doctrine of legitimate expectation offers procedural fairness such as the right to be heard but not an enforceable legal claim unless backed by law or policy.
December 2014 · Paper 3Statements
11. Which of the following statements is correct?
(a)Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. State of A.P. is about bias
(b)K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India is about right of cross-examination✓
(c)General Medical Council v. Speckman is about irrelevance of natural justice where it makes no difference
(d)N. Kalindi v. Tata Locomotives is about the right to be represented by a lawyer
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In K.L. Tripathi v. SBI (1984), the court held that cross-examination is not a must in all cases unless it causes prejudice. Therefore, it correctly relates to procedural fairness and the right of cross-examination.
December 2014 · Paper 3Statements
12. Which of the following is the correct statement?
(a)Certiorari can be issued against judicial and quasi-judicial authorities; mandamus can be issued against administrative authorities✓
(b)Mandamus can be issued to declare an Act ultra vires; certiorari can also be issued for that purpose
(c)Certiorari can prevent jurisdictional overreach; mandamus cannot
(d)Certiorari cannot be issued for public office usurpation, but mandamus can
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Certiorari is issued to quash illegal judicial or quasi-judicial decisions, while mandamus compels performance of public duty, including by administrative bodies.
December 2014 · Paper 3
13. Abuse of discretion can be inferred from the following circumstances:
(a)Only non-application of mind
(b)Non-application of mind and colourable exercise of power
(c)Colourable exercise of power and denial of hearing
(d)Colourable exercise of power, denial of hearing, and irrelevant considerations✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Abuse of discretion is inferred from arbitrary actions, such as using power with hidden intent, denying fair hearing (audi alteram partem), or relying on irrelevant factors.
December 2014 · Paper 3Statements
15. Which of the following is the correct statement?
(a)A quasi-judicial body can never review its own decision unless authorized by statute✓
(b)It can review its decision if there is a grave error of law
(c)It can review its decision if there is violation of natural justice
(d)All tribunals can review their decisions
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: A quasi-judicial body lacks inherent power to review its decisions unless such a power is explicitly provided by the statute governing it.
1. Which of the following statements is/are incorrect?
In the Kesavananda Bharati case, the Supreme Court said that the Preamble to the Constitution is a key to open the mind of the makers.
The words "Socialist" and "Secular" were added to the Preamble by the 44th Amendment of the Constitution.
June 2015 Paper 3
14. Which of the following is not considered “irrational” under the Wednesbury principles laid down in Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation (1948)?
(a)Without the authority of law
(b)Based on no evidence
(c)It has sanction of law✓
(d)It is unreasonable
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under the Wednesbury principle, a decision is irrational if it lacks legal authority, evidence, or reasonableness. However, if an action has legal sanction, it is not considered irrational under this doctrine.
June 2015 Paper 3
15. On which of the following grounds can a writ of certiorari not be issued?
(a)Abuse of jurisdiction
(b)Exercise of jurisdiction✓
(c)Violation of principles of natural justice
(d)Error of law apparent on the face of the record
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A writ of certiorari is issued to quash an order passed without jurisdiction, in excess of jurisdiction, or in violation of natural justice. However, mere exercise of jurisdiction, even if the decision is wrong, is not a ground for issuing certiorari.
December 2015 · Paper 2Statements
2. Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the issuance of the writ of Quo Warranto?
(a)The office in question should be a public office
(b)The office should be held by an usurper without legal authority
(c)The petition is barred by res-judicata
(d)It is necessary for the petitioner to show personal injury or grievance✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: A writ of Quo Warranto can be issued without the petitioner having to show personal injury or grievance. It is meant to prevent unauthorized occupation of public office and ensure lawful appointments.
December 2015 Paper 3
11. Which of the following is not true regarding the application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel?
(a)The Court may refuse to apply promissory estoppel against the government if the public interest suffers in fulfilling the promise.
(b)The government cannot be compelled to carry out a promise which falls outside its power and contrary to law.
(c)The promise in question may be tentative or uncertain and it need not to be unambiguous and unequivocal.✓
(d)There can be no promissory estoppel against the Legislature in the exercise of its legislative functions.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The doctrine of promissory estoppel is based on equity and can be enforced against the government. However, it must involve a clear and definite promise made to an individual or group. Tentative or ambiguous promises cannot form the basis of estoppel. Moreover, courts have held that promissory estoppel cannot override public interest or extend beyond the government’s statutory powers. It is also not applicable to legislative functions.
December 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
12. Match the following case laws with their corresponding administrative law principles:
A. Canara Bank v. V.K. Awasthy (2005)
B. Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (1959)
C. Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India (1981)
D. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1970)
Duty to act fairly in administrative functions
Post-decisional hearing
Exclusion of rule of hearing
One who decides must hear
Options:
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)4 3 1 2
(c)2 4 3 1✓
(d)3 4 2 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Canara Bank v. Awasthy: emphasized post-decisional hearing in disciplinary proceedings.
Gullapalli Rao: held that the decision-maker must be the one who hears.
Swadeshi Cotton Mills: dealt with exclusion of hearing in preventive detention.
A.K. Kraipak: established the principle of fairness in administrative actions and blending of administrative and quasi-judicial functions.
December 2015 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
13. Assertion (A): A High Court may decline to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 and dismiss the writ summarily or in limine.
Reason (R): It would be proper for the High Court to dispose of the petition summarily or in limine when no important questions of law are raised in a writ petition.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 226 provides High Courts with discretionary power to entertain writ petitions. If the petition does not raise significant legal issues, the court may summarily dismiss it. Hence, both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.
December 2015 Paper 3
14. When a writ is issued to a public authority in respect of any type of administrative, legislative, quasi-judicial or judicial function, it is called a writ of:
(a)Mandamus✓
(b)Quo-warranto
(c)Certiorari
(d)Prohibition
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Mandamus is a writ issued by a court to a public authority directing it to perform a public duty. It is applicable to all public functions—administrative, legislative, quasi-judicial, or judicial—where there is failure to act or a wrongful refusal to perform a duty.
December 2015 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
15. Assertion (A): In judicial review of administrative actions, generally the court would not interfere with merits of the case by embarking upon inquiry into the facts.
Reason (R): Courts can review the procedure through which a decision has been taken by the administrative authority but cannot supplement its own decision and act as appellate court over the administrative authority.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Judicial review focuses on the process rather than the substance of administrative decisions. Courts examine whether proper procedures were followed but do not substitute their judgment for that of the authority. Therefore, both statements are true and the reason supports the assertion accurately.
July 2016 Paper 3
12. A statute confers discretionary powers on an official using expressions like: 1. Reasonable, 2. Appropriate, 3. Equitable, 4. Sufficient. Which of these expressions may justify judicial review of such discretion?
(a)Only (1) is correct
(b)Only (1) and (2) are correct
(c)Only (1), (2), and (3) are correct
(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4) are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
All these expressions—reasonable, appropriate, equitable, and sufficient—are subjective terms. When used in conferring discretion to an official, they are subject to judicial scrutiny to ensure the discretion is not exercised arbitrarily or unfairly.
July 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
13. Assertion (A): The court can direct a competent authority to exercise discretion in accordance with law, but not in a particular manner.
Reason (R): The Supreme Court strikes down decisions of competent authorities if influenced by extraneous considerations or improper purposes.
Options:
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true but R is false
(d)A is false but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Courts ensure discretion is exercised lawfully but do not interfere in how it is exercised unless the action is tainted by mala fide or extraneous factors. The reason supports the assertion by highlighting the ground on which courts can strike down such decisions.
September 2016 Paper 3
11. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India refer to the doctrine of ‘legitimate expectation’ while reviewing administrative action?
(a)State of Haryana v. Darshana Devi
(b)State of Kerala v. K.G. Madhavan Pillai✓
(c)Mahavir Singh v. State of Rajasthan
(d)SAHELI v. Commissioner of Police
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In State of Kerala v. K.G. Madhavan Pillai (1989), the Supreme Court recognized the principle of legitimate expectation in administrative law. The court held that if a public authority leads a party to expect a certain benefit or continuation of policy, then a sudden change without valid justification may be reviewed. The other listed cases did not directly address this principle.
September 2016 Paper 3Statements
14. Which of the following statements are true with respect to the writs of Mandamus and Certiorari?
Both writs are available against administrative, judicial, and quasi-judicial authorities.
Mandamus operates where an authority fails to exercise its jurisdiction, while Certiorari operates when courts or tribunals exceed their jurisdiction.
Mandamus compels performance, while Certiorari corrects error.
Options:
(a)Only 1 is correct
(b)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(c)Only 2 and 3 are correct✓
(d)All 1, 2, and 3 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Writ of Mandamus is issued to compel performance of public duties.
Writ of Certiorari is issued to quash decisions where excess of jurisdiction or error of law has occurred.
Certiorari is generally not available against purely administrative acts; hence, statement 1 is not entirely accurate.
January 2017 Paper 2Assertion–Reason
3. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R), then choose the correct option:
Assertion (A): Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the High Court has the discretion to issue writs.
Reason (R): If the High Court is satisfied that the aggrieved party has an adequate alternative remedy elsewhere, it may refuse to grant a writ.
Options:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(b)(A) is correct, but (R) is false
(c)(A) is false, but (R) is correct
(d)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Both statements are correct. Article 226 empowers the High Courts to issue writs, but this power is discretionary. If an adequate alternative remedy is available, the court may deny issuing a writ, making (R) a valid explanation of (A).
January 2017 Paper 3Statements
9. The statement “Discretion, when applied to a court of justice, must be governed by rule, not by humour; it must be legal and not arbitrary,” was held in which case?
(a)Union of India v. Kuldeep Singh
(b)Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India✓
(c)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
(d)National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Keshav Bahadur
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In Reliance Airport Developers (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India, the Supreme Court held that judicial discretion must not be arbitrary, but must follow legal principles and ensure consistency.
January 2017 Paper 3
10. Under which of the following conditions can a writ of mandamus be issued?
There must be a public duty.
There must be a specific demand and refusal.
There must be a clear right to enforce the duty.
The right must be subsisting on the date of the petition.
(a)All 1, 2, 3, and 4 are correct✓
(b)Only 1, 2, and 3 are correct
(c)Only 1 and 3 are correct
(d)Only 1 and 2 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A writ of mandamus is issued only when:
There is a public duty
The petitioner has demanded performance, which was refused
There is a legal right to enforce the duty
The right was subsisting on the date of the petition
January 2017 Paper 3
11. In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court make it explicit that "even when the authority has statutory power to take action without hearing, it would be arbitrary to take action without hearing and, thus, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution"?
(a)A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
(b)Union of India v. Satish Chandra
(c)A.K. Roy v. State of Punjab
(d)H.L. Trehan v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
In H.L. Trehan v. Union of India, the Supreme Court ruled that even when an authority has statutory power to act without a hearing, exercising such power without giving the affected party an opportunity to be heard is arbitrary and violates Article 14. The case reaffirmed the importance of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
13. Assertion (A): A writ of prohibition can be issued on the same grounds on which the writ of certiorari can be issued, except in cases of error of law apparent on the face of the record.
Reason (R): A writ of certiorari is issued during ongoing proceedings to forbid further continuation, whereas a writ of prohibition is issued after a final decision has been made to quash the decision.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is correct, but R is false✓
(d)A is false, but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The writ of prohibition is issued before proceedings are completed to restrain authorities from acting without jurisdiction. A writ of certiorari is issued after the decision is made, to quash it for jurisdictional or legal errors. The Reason (R) is factually incorrect in sequencing the writs, even though Assertion (A) is correct.
November 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
12. Match the following principles with the correct cases:
List-I (Principle)
A. Res judicata
B. Legitimate expectation
C. Promissory estoppel
D. Locus standi
List-II (Case)
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills v. State of U.P.
Daryao v. State of U.P.
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. v. Union of India
Code:
(a)A-2, B-4, C-3, D-1
(b)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1✓
(c)A-1, B-3, C-2, D-2
(d)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Res judicata – Daryao v. State of U.P.
B. Legitimate expectation – Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd.
C. Promissory estoppel – Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills
D. Locus standi – S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
November 2017 Paper 3
13. Which of the following is a valid ground for judicial review of administrative discretion?
Ultra vires the law
Mala fide intent
Arbitrariness
Irrelevant considerations
(a)1 and 2 are correct
(b)2 and 3 are correct
(c)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: All four are grounds for judicial review. If administrative action is beyond legal authority (ultra vires), driven by bad faith (mala fide), arbitrary, or based on irrelevant facts, it can be struck down.
November 2017 Paper 3
14. The principle that "Writ of certiorari can be issued to quash actions which are administrative in nature" was laid down in which case?
(a)Indian Railway Construction Co. Ltd. v. Ajay Kumar
(b)A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India✓
(c)Union of India v. Bashyan
(d)Rajesh Kumar v. C.I.T.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India, the Supreme Court expanded the scope of natural justice to include administrative decisions, making them subject to judicial review via certiorari.
July 2018Match the lists
15. Match List-I (Name of Case) with List-II (Name of Writ) and choose the correct answer.
List-I
A. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
B. U.N.R. Rao v. Indira Gandhi
C. Gujarat State Financial Corp. v. Lotus Hotels
D. Nalini Ranjan v. Ananda Sarkar
List-II
Quo Warranto
Habeas Corpus
Certiorari
Mandamus
Code:
(a)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
(b)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
(c)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3✓
(d)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Sunil Batra: Habeas Corpus for inhumane prison conditions.
U.N.R. Rao: Quo Warranto questioning right to hold office.
Gujarat Financial Corp.: Mandamus to perform legal duty.
Nalini Ranjan v. Ananda Sarkar: Certiorari to quash quasi-judicial decision.
July 2018Statements
17. Which of the following statements are correct?
Absolute discretion is a ruthless master.
Where reasonable conduct is expected, the criterion of reasonableness is subjective and not objective.
Every executive action must be informed with excuse and should be arbitrary.
Exercise of discretion is an inseparable part of sound administration.
(a)1 and 2 are correct
(b)3 and 4 are correct
(c)2 and 4 are correct
(d)1 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 4 are correct. Discretion, if unchecked, can lead to arbitrariness. Sound administration requires use of discretion. However, statement 2 is incorrect (reasonableness is an objective standard) and statement 3 is incorrect because executive actions must be reasoned and non-arbitrary.
December 2018Match the lists
15. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer.
List-I (Case Name) | List-II (Ground of Judicial Review)
A. Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corp. – 1. Extraneous Consideration
B. Institute of Law Chandigarh v. Neeraj Sharma – 2. Legitimate Expectations
C. Council of Civil Services Union v. Minister for the Civil Service – 3. Public Accountability
D. Centre for PIL v. Union of India – 4. Proportionality
Code:
(a)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4✓
(b)A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4
(c)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
(d)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Hindustan Development Corp. dealt with extraneous factors influencing policy.
Institute of Law Chandigarh discussed legitimate expectations in student admissions.
Council of Civil Services Union emphasized accountability in administrative decisions.
Centre for PIL applied the principle of proportionality in judicial review.
December 2018Assertion–Reason
16. Assertion (A): Judicial review of administrative actions under Articles 32 and 226 is part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
Reason (R): It was held to be so by the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) held that judicial review under Articles 32 and 226 is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. Hence, both statements are true and R correctly explains A.
June 2019
10. Judicial review of an administrative action means:
(a)Review by Parliament
(b)Review by the Government
(c)Review by Legislative Assembly
(d)Review by the Judiciary✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Judicial review is the power of courts to assess the constitutionality and legality of legislative and executive actions, including administrative decisions.
December 2021/June 2022Statements
13.
Statement I: For judicial review, 'irrationality' means a decision so outrageous in its defiance of logic or moral standards that no sensible person could have made it.
Statement II: For judicial review, 'unreasonableness' refers to either lack of factual basis for the conclusion or a decision being partial and unequal.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Both statements are correct. The terms "irrationality" and "unreasonableness" are key grounds in judicial review. The first concerns absurdity of logic, while the second deals with fairness, factual basis, and equality.
December 2022
1. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the administration of a public authority cannot be invalidated merely for not recording reasons when there was no duty to do so?
(a)National Highway Authority of India v. Madhukar Kumar (2022)✓
(b)Municipal Council Neemuch v. Mahadeo Real Estate (2019)
(c)Tata Cellular v. Union of India (1994)
(d)Vijay Narayan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan (2022)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
In National Highway Authority of India v. Madhukar Kumar (2022), the Supreme Court held that administrative actions of public authorities cannot be invalidated merely because reasons were not recorded, provided there was no legal obligation to do so. This reaffirmed the principle that not every administrative omission results in illegality2. Which Article of the Constitution states that no discussion shall take place in the Legislature of a State regarding the conduct of any judge of the Supreme Court or High Court in the discharge of their duties?
(a) Article 121
(b) Article 127
(c) Article 211
(d) Article 212
Answer: (c)
Article 211 of the Indian Constitution prohibits any discussion in a State Legislature regarding the conduct of a judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court in the discharge of their duties. This ensures the independence of the judiciary and prevents its functioning from being subjected to political scrutiny.3. Which Constitutional (Amendment) Act added Article 279A to the Constitution of India?
(a) 101st Amendment
(b) 102nd Amendment
(c) 99th Amendment
(d) 127th Amendment
Answer: (a)
The 101st Constitutional Amendment Act of 2016 introduced the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and inserted Article 279A, which provided for the establishment of the GST Council.4. Which Constitutional Amendment inserted Article 246A, dealing with special provisions with respect to Goods and Services Tax (GST)?
(a) 99th Amendment
(b) 100th Amendment
(c) 101st Amendment
(d) 102nd Amendment
Answer: (c)
Article 246A was inserted by the 101st Constitutional Amendment Act, 2016. It gives both the Centre and the States concurrent powers to legislate on GST, a significant reform in India's indirect taxation structure.5. Which Article of the Constitution deals with "socially and educationally backward classes"?
(a) Article 115
(b) Article 138
(c) Article 338A
(d) Article 342A
Answer: (d)
Article 342A, inserted by the 102nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2018, deals with the identification of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs). It empowers the President to specify such classes in consultation with the Governor.6. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the mother can be the natural guardian of a child in certain circumstances even during the lifetime of the father?
(a) Hanuman Prasad Singh v. Bhagwati Prasad
(b) Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan
(c) Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India
(d) Vina Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma
Answer: (c)
In Githa Hariharan v. Reserve Bank of India, the Supreme Court held that a mother can act as a natural guardian of a minor child even when the father is alive, if the father is unwilling or unable to act as one. This was a landmark ruling in the domain of gender justice and parental rights.
December 2024
10. For what purpose is the Wednesbury test applied?
(a)To determine irrationality of administrative action✓
(b)To determine proportionality of administrative action
(c)To determine procedural impropriety of administrative action
(d)To determine abuse of jurisdiction of administrative action
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Wednesbury test (from Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v. Wednesbury Corp, UK) is used in administrative law to assess whether a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would ever consider it. It tests irrationality.
Dec 2020/June 2021 · Q77
Besides providing for a functional government and consequential growth in the administrative process, the Constitution has provided elaborate control mechanism so that water may not over-run beyond banks. This has been ensured in which of the following articles of the Constitution?
(a)Art. 32, 226, 227✓
(b)Art. 14, 21 and 41
(c)Art 15, 16 and 17
(d)Art 246, 247, 248
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Art. 32, 226, 227
June 2023 · Q49
By which writ, the decision of the highest tribunal of a State can be revised?
(a)Mandamas
(b)Prohibition
(c)Certiorari✓
(d)Quowarranto
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Certiorari
June 2025 · Q88Statements
Which of the following statements are correct regarding the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations?
A. It plays an important role in judicial review
B. It operates within the domain of public law
C. It developed in the context of reasonableness and natural justice
D. First appeared in Union of India v. Hindustan Development Corporation
(a)A, B, D only
(b)A, B, C only✓
(c)B, C, D only
(d)A, C, D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A, B, C only
Explanation: The doctrine is widely used in public law and administrative decisions. The term legitimate expectation was given by by .Lord Denning in 1969 in Schmidt v. Secretary of state for home affairs.
June 2026 · Q117
Which of the following is not a ground for issuance of Writ of Prohibition?
(a)Violation of the Principle of Natural Justice
(b)Infringement of fundamental rights
(c)An error of law apparent on the face of the record
(d)Fraud✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Fraud
Explanation: A Writ of Prohibition is an extraordinary judicial writ issued by a superior court (Supreme Court or High Court) to an inferior judicial or quasi-judicial body to prevent it from overstepping its jurisdiction or usurping a jurisdiction it does not possess.
• Valid Grounds for Prohibition:
o Absence or excess of jurisdiction (the primary ground). o Violation of the Principles of Natural Justice (a). o Infringement of Fundamental Rights (b). o Error of law apparent on the face of the record (c). o Acting under an unconstitutional statute.