Unit II · Topic 1Preamble, fundamental rights and duties, directive principles of state policy – Previous Year Questions
218 previous year questions on Preamble, fundamental rights and duties, directive principles of state policy from UGC NET Law papers (2009–2026), including 16 assertion–reason, 33 match-the-list, 14 statement-based questions. The correct option is marked in green.
Questions
218 questions
June 2009
2. Article 21 of the Constitution of India incorporates the right to "Doctor's assistance". In which of the following cases was this decided?
(a)Charles Sobhraj v. Superintendent Central Jail
(b)Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
(d)Parmanand Katara v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 includes the right to emergency medical aid and that doctors, whether in private or government hospitals, are obligated to provide immediate assistance to preserve life.
June 2009
3. In which of the following cases was the doctrine of "prospective overruling" applied?
(a)Shankari Prasad v. Union of India
(b)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
(c)I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab✓
(d)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The doctrine of prospective overruling was first introduced in Indian constitutional law in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court held that Parliament could not amend Fundamental Rights, and this ruling would apply only prospectively, not retrospectively.
June 2009
5. Part IV-A was added to the Constitution of India by the:
(a)Twenty-Fifth Amendment Act
(b)Forty-Second Amendment Act✓
(c)Forty-Fourth Amendment Act
(d)Fifty-Second Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Part IV-A, which contains Article 51A enumerating the Fundamental Duties of citizens, was inserted by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, during the Emergency period.
June 2009
6. Advertisement is a "Commercial Speech" was laid down in:
(a)Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India✓
(b)Express Newspapers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
(c)Bennett Coleman and Co. v. Union of India
(d)Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1960), the Supreme Court observed that advertisements which have an element of commercial interest do not fall under the ambit of freedom of speech and expression. However, this case laid the groundwork for the concept of commercial speech, although it restricted it. The later decision in Tata Press Ltd. v. MTNL expanded the scope and affirmed that commercial speech is protected, but the initial legal view was introduced in Hamdard Dawakhana.
June 2009Assertion–Reason
8. Assertion (A): Article 21 expressly incorporates the concept of due process of law.
Reason (R): Due process of law is an attribute of liberty.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 21 does not expressly mention "due process of law"; it uses the phrase "procedure established by law". However, the Maneka Gandhi case expanded its scope to include elements of due process. So while Article 21 does uphold liberty through fair procedure, it does not explicitly incorporate the term "due process".
December 2009
3. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that allowing medical examination of a woman to prove her virginity amounts to violation of her right to privacy, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution?
(a)Surjeet Singh Thind v. Kanwaljit Kaur✓
(b)Phillipa Anne v. State of Tamil Nadu
(c)Hameeda Sarfaraj v. M.S. Kashekar
(d)Kavita v. State of Maharashtra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Surjeet Singh Thind v. Kanwaljit Kaur
Explanation:
The court held that compelling a woman to undergo a virginity test violates her right to privacy, which is protected under Article 21.
December 2009
4. By which Constitutional Amendment was Article 21A (Right to Education) inserted in the Constitution of India?
(a)Eighty-Third Amendment Act
(b)Eighty-Sixth Amendment Act✓
(c)Ninetieth Amendment Act
(d)Ninety-Second Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Eighty-Sixth Amendment Act
Explanation:
The 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 inserted Article 21A, which provides for the Right to Education for children aged 6 to 14 years.
December 2009
6. Justice Verma Committee Report relates to:
(a)Effectuation of Fundamental Duties✓
(b)Duty to vote in Election
(c)Freedom of Religion
(d)National Judicial Commission
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Effectuation of Fundamental Duties
Explanation:
The Justice J.S. Verma Committee was set up in 1998 to recommend how Fundamental Duties (Part IV-A) could be made effective.
The committee emphasized:
Civic education
National integration
Incorporating duties into school curricula
It was not concerned with elections, religion, or judicial reforms.
December 2009
7. Article 51A(k) (Eleventh Fundamental Duty) was added by:
(a)Ninety-Third Amendment
(b)Ninety-First Amendment
(c)Eighty-Sixth Amendment✓
(d)Eighty-Fourth Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Eighty-Sixth Amendment
Explanation:
The Eighty-Sixth Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002:
Inserted Article 21A (Right to Education),
Amended Article 45 (Early childhood care),
Added Article 51A(k): Duty of parents/guardians to ensure education of children aged 6–14 years.
December 2009
8. Who submitted the report of the “National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution”?
(a)Justice B.P. Jeevan Reddy
(b)Justice A.S. Anand
(c)Justice R.S. Sarkaria
(d)Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah
Explanation:
The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) was established in 2000. It was chaired by Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah, former Chief Justice of India.
The commission submitted its report in 2002, suggesting several constitutional and governance reforms.
June 2010
1. Requirement of ‘reasonableness’ runs like a golden thread through the entire fabric of fundamental rights is held in:
(a)Keshavananda Bharthi v. State of Kerala
(b)Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
(c)Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Explanation:
In the Maneka Gandhi case (1978), the Supreme Court held that 'reasonableness' is an essential element of any law that seeks to restrict fundamental rights, particularly under Articles 14, 19, and 21. The Court emphasized that no procedure can be considered lawful if it is arbitrary or unjust.
June 2010
2. 'Right to life' does not include 'right to die'. It has been held in the case of:
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India
(c)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(d)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
Explanation:
In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that the right to life under Article 21 does not include the right to die. This reversed the earlier position in P. Rathinam, which had interpreted the right to life as including the right to die.
June 2010
3. Fundamental Rights are:
(a)Unrestricted Rights
(b)Absolute Rights
(c)Restricted Rights✓
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Restricted Rights
Explanation:
Fundamental Rights under Part III of the Constitution are not absolute. They are subject to reasonable restrictions under various clauses. For example, Article 19 outlines specific freedoms and then provides grounds for imposing restrictions under Article 19(2) to 19(6).
June 2010
4. Right against 'Double Jeopardy' is guaranteed under:
(a)Article 21
(b)Article 20(1)
(c)Article 20(2)✓
(d)Article 22(1)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 20(2)
Explanation:
Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution provides protection against double jeopardy, meaning a person cannot be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This is a crucial safeguard for individuals in criminal proceedings.
June 2010Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): An accused person cannot be compelled to give his thumb impression, except for comparison.
Reason (R): It amounts to self-incrimination.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) (A) is false, but (R) is true
Explanation:
Article 20(3) protects an accused from self-incrimination, but compelling thumb impressions or handwriting samples is not considered testimonial compulsion, and thus does not amount to self-incrimination. Hence, (R) is true, but (A) is incorrect.
December 2010
1. The term 'secularism' implies that:
(a)Parliament should support religion
(b)State and religion are inseparable
(c)State does not recognise any religion as a State religion✓
(d)People are free to worship State recognised religion
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The term secularism was added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment, 1976. It implies that the State has no official religion and treats all religions equally. The government shall not discriminate, patronize, or prefer any religion.
December 2010
2. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that, “if a body is an agency or instrumentality of the government, it may be an authority under Article 12”?
(a)Ujjambai v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(b)Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India✓
(c)Electricity Board Rajasthan v. Mohanlal
(d)P.O. Shamdasani v. Central Bank of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India (1979), the Supreme Court held that any body which is an agency or instrumentality of the government falls within the definition of “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution.
December 2010
3. The Supreme Court of India struck down the 'Carry Forward Rule' as unconstitutional in which case?
(a)Balaji v. State of Mysore
(b)Rangachari v. General Manager, Southern Railway
(c)Ashok Kumar Thakur v. State of Bihar
(d)Devadasan v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Devadasan v. Union of India (1964), the Supreme Court struck down the carry forward rule for reservations in government services as violative of Article 16(1) — right to equal opportunity in public employment.
December 2010
5. Which of the following cases is popularly known as the 'Fundamental Rights' case?
(a)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
(b)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(c)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(d)Champakam Dorairajan v. State of Madras
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court ruled that fundamental rights form part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be abrogated even by constitutional amendments.
December 2010Match the lists
6. Match the following (List I with List II):
Correct Code:
(a)4 2 1 3
(b)2 3 4 1
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)2 1 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
A. Right to go abroad → Maneka Gandhi case (1978) – expanded Article 21
B. Right to livelihood → Olga Tellis case – linked with right to life
C. Right against sexual harassment → Vishaka case – laid guidelines to protect women at workplace
D. Right to education → Mohini Jain case – education interpreted as part of right to life
June 2011
1. The Supreme Court of India has adopted a new approach for interpreting the concept of 'Equality' in which of the following cases?
(a)State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
(b)E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu✓
(c)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(d)State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu (1974), the Supreme Court gave a dynamic interpretation to Article 14 (Right to Equality), shifting from a traditional classification test to a broader concept of arbitrariness being opposed to equality. It marked a progressive departure from earlier formalistic interpretations.
June 2011
2. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the 'Right to Life' does not include the 'Right to Die'?
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
(c)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
(d)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that Right to Life under Article 21 does not include the Right to Die, overruling the earlier decision in P. Rathinam.
December 2011
1. The words 'Socialist' and 'Secular' were inserted in the Preamble by:
(a)1st Amendment✓
(b)24th Amendment
(c)44th Amendment
(d)42nd Amendment
Explanation: The words "Socialist" and "Secular" were added to the Preamble of the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 during the Emergency period.
2. The expression 'minority' in Article 30 means any community which is:
(a)Less than 50% of the population of a particular state as a whole✓
(b)Less than 40% of the population of a particular state
(c)Determined on basis of the population of the country
(d)Determined on basis of the Census
Explanation: Article 30 provides rights to religious and linguistic minorities. The Supreme Court in T.M.A. Pai Foundation (2002) held that minority status is determined state-wise, and if the population of a group is less than 50% in that state, it qualifies as a minority.
3. A writ of certiorari can be issued against:
(a)Parliament✓
(b)State Legislature
(c)Lower Courts to remit all documents to the writ court for verification
(d)Executive for duty performance
Explanation: Certiorari is issued by a higher court to a lower court or tribunal to quash an order passed without jurisdiction or in violation of principles of natural justice. It is not applicable to legislatures.
4. Who is competent to seek the advisory opinion of the Supreme Court?
(a)Parliament✓
(b)Governor
(c)Council of Ministers
(d)President of India
Explanation: As per Article 143, the President can refer matters of public importance or legal questions to the Supreme Court for its advisory opinion.
5. The Supreme Court observed that Parliamentary privileges are not subject to Fundamental Rights in:
(a)Ganapati Reddy v. Nafisul Hasan✓
(b)M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha
(c)Keshav Singh v. Speaker, U.P.
(d)S.P. Mittal v. Union of India
Explanation: In M.S.M. Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha (1959), the Supreme Court held that Parliamentary privileges are not subject to fundamental rights, particularly Article 19.
6. Article 360 of the Constitution relates to:
(a)Ordinance making power✓
(b)Amendment
(c)Election Commission
(d)Financial Emergency
Explanation: Article 360 empowers the President to declare a Financial Emergency if the financial stability or credit of India or any part thereof is threatened.
1. The Supreme Court held in which case that the Preamble is not part of the Constitution?
(a)Berubari case✓
(b)A.K. Gopalan case
(c)Balaji case
(d)Minerva Mills case
Explanation: In the Berubari case (1960), the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. This view was later overruled in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), which held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and reflects its basic structure.
2. Article 16(4A), which empowers states to make reservation in promotion for SC/STs, was added by:
(a)75th Amendment✓
(b)76th Amendment
(c)77th Amendment
(d)78th Amendment
Explanation: Article 16(4A) was inserted by the 77th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1995, allowing the State to provide for reservation in promotion to SCs and STs in government services.
3. Environmental protection, including forests and wildlife, is:
(a)Directive Principle of State Policy✓
(b)Fundamental National Policy
(c)Fundamental Duty of a Citizen
(d)Both (a) and (c)
Explanation:
Article 48A: Directive Principle about protecting the environment
Article 51A(g): Fundamental Duty of citizens to protect the environment, forests, and wildlife
4. Originally, the Supreme Court consisted of a Chief Justice and:
(a)Seven other judges✓
(b)Twelve other judges
(c)Thirteen other judges
(d)Fifteen other judges
Explanation: When the Supreme Court was established in 1950, it had one Chief Justice and seven other judges. This strength has been increased over the years.
5. A resolution passed under Article 249(1) remains in force for a maximum of:
(a)Three months✓
(b)Six months
(c)Nine months
(d)Twelve months
Explanation: A resolution under Article 249(1) passed by the Rajya Sabha remains valid for one year (12 months) and can be extended by similar resolutions.
6. The President's Rule under Article 356 remains valid in a State for a maximum of:
(a)One month✓
(b)Three months
(c)Six months
(d)One year
Explanation: Initially imposed for 6 months. Can be extended up to 3 years with parliamentary approval every 6 months and fulfillment of certain conditions.
7. The power of Parliament to amend the Constitution is given in Article 368 by:
(a)Twenty-fourth Amendment Act✓
(b)Twenty-sixth Amendment Act
(c)Forty-second Amendment Act
(d)Forty-fourth Amendment Act
Explanation: The 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971, made it clear that Parliament has the power to amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, and that the President must give assent.
1. "The new Constitution establishes, indeed a system of Government which is at the most quasi-federal... rather than the federal state with unitary features" — said by:
(a)Dr. K.C. Wheare✓
(b)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(c)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(d)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Dr. K.C. Wheare described the Indian Constitution as quasi-federal, meaning it has a unitary bias with some federal features. This highlights the dominance of the Centre over the States, unlike typical federal structures.
June 2012 · Paper 3
2. In which of the following cases was it held that 'Right to life' does not include 'Right to Die'?
(a)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
(b)Chenna Jagdeshwar v. State of A.P.
(c)State of U.P. v. Sanjay Kumar Bhatia
(d)Deena v. Union Bank of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 (Right to Life) does not include the Right to Die. The court overturned earlier precedents that had indicated otherwise.
June 2012 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Assertion (A): An accused person cannot be compelled to give his signature or thumb impression.
Reason (R): An accused person cannot be compelled to be a witness against himself.
Code:
(a)A is true but R is false
(b)A is false but R is true
(c)Both A and R are true✓
(d)Both A and R are false
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution protects an accused from self-incrimination. However, the protection does not extend to giving thumb impressions or signatures, which are considered physical evidence, not testimony.
So technically, R is correct, but A is not fully correct, though courts have accepted both as true in some contexts. Hence, option (c) is most cited in standard MCQs.
June 2012 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
5. Assertion (A): Directive Principles are not enforceable by any Court.
Reason (R): Directive Principles are more or less fundamental in the governance of the country.
Code:
(a)A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Directive Principles of State Policy (Part IV) are non-justiciable, meaning they are not enforceable by courts (Article 37). However, they are fundamental to governance, guiding the State in lawmaking and policy. Hence, R correctly explains A.
June 2012 · Paper 3
9. Writ of Mandamus cannot be issued where a fundamental right is infringed by:
(a)A Statute
(b)A Statutory Order
(c)An Executive Order
(d)Private body✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Mandamus is issued to a public authority to perform a legal duty. It is not maintainable against a private body, unless that body is performing a public duty. Therefore, if the infringer is purely private and not discharging a public function, Mandamus cannot be invoked.
December 2012 – Paper 2
1. Clause (4) of Article 15 has been added to the Constitution by:
(a)The Constitution First Amendment Act✓
(b)The Constitution Second Amendment Act
(c)The Constitution Fourth Amendment Act
(d)The Constitution Sixth Amendment Act
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Clause (4) of Article 15 was inserted by the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951 to allow the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes or SCs and STs. It was a response to judicial decisions that had restricted such provisions.
December 2012 – Paper 2
2. The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India as per:
(a)Article 40
(b)Article 43
(c)Article 44✓
(d)Article 48
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 44 of the Indian Constitution directs the State to endeavor to secure a Uniform Civil Code for all citizens throughout the territory of India. It is a Directive Principle of State Policy (Part IV).
December 2012 – Paper 2
3. In India, sovereignty lies with:
(a)The Constitution
(b)The Supreme Court
(c)The Parliament
(d)The People✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
In India, sovereignty lies with the people, as declared in the Preamble of the Constitution: “We, the People of India…”. All authority — legislative, executive, and judicial — ultimately flows from the people.
December 2012 – Paper 2
4. The Supreme Court of India formulated the doctrine of eclipse in:
(a)Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of M.P.✓
(b)Bashesharnath v. Income Tax Commissioner
(c)State of W.B. v. Anwar Ali Sarkar
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Eclipse was laid down in Bhikaji Narain Dhakras v. State of M.P. (AIR 1955), which states that any law inconsistent with fundamental rights is not void but becomes dormant (eclipsed) and can become active again if the inconsistency is removed.
December 2012 – Paper 3
11. Democracy and Federalism are essential features of our Constitution and form part of its basic structure. This observation was made in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India by which judge?
(a)Justice P.B. Sawant✓
(b)Justice S.R. Pandyan
(c)Justice J.S. Verma
(d)Justice A.M. Ahmadi
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the S.R. Bommai v. Union of India case, Justice P.B. Sawant emphasized that Democracy and Federalism are basic features of the Constitution, forming part of its unamendable structure.
December 2012 – Paper 3
12. According to A.V. Dicey, the 'Rule of Law' is embodied in which Article of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 12
(b)Article 13
(c)Article 14✓
(d)Article 21
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 14 ensures equality before law and equal protection of laws, which reflects A.V. Dicey's concept of the Rule of Law—a foundational principle of constitutional governance.
December 2012 – Paper 3
13. When the court declares certain provisions of an Act invalid, but it does not affect the rest of the Act, the principle is called:
(a)Doctrine of Prospective Overruling
(b)Doctrine of Severability✓
(c)Doctrine of Pleasure
(d)Doctrine of Eclipse
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The Doctrine of Severability means if a part of a law is unconstitutional, it can be severed without affecting the validity of the rest of the law.
December 2012 – Paper 3Assertion–Reason
**14. Assertion (A): A bill which contains a taxation clause along with other matters may also be a Money Bill.
Reason (R): All bills dealing with taxes are Money Bills.**
(a)A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation✓
(b)A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
According to Article 110, a Money Bill may contain provisions on taxation and other matters mentioned therein. Hence, both statements are true, and R explains A.
December 2012 – Paper 3
16. Articles 20 and 21 were excluded from the scope of Article 359 by which Constitutional Amendment?
(a)42nd Amendment
(b)43rd Amendment
(c)44th Amendment✓
(d)59th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
The 44th Amendment Act (1978) excluded Articles 20 and 21 from suspension during an emergency under Article 359, thereby safeguarding life and personal liberty.
June 2013 · Paper 2
2. “The State shall make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief” is found:
(a)In the Preamble
(b)As a Fundamental Right under Article 21
(c)As a Directive Principle of State Policy✓
(d)As a Fundamental Duty of the State
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
This provision is found under Directive Principles of State Policy in Article 42 of Part IV of the Constitution, directing the State to ensure humane work conditions and maternity relief.
June 2013 · Paper 2
3. Fundamental Duties under Part IVA were added by which Amendment?
(a)17th Amendment
(b)25th Amendment
(c)42nd Amendment✓
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Part IVA and Article 51A, enumerating Fundamental Duties, were added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976.
June 2013 · Paper 2
4. The powers of the President of India are:
(a)Supra-Constitutional
(b)Beyond the Constitution
(c)In accordance with the Parliament of India
(d)In accordance with the Constitution of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
The President exercises powers as per the Constitution (Articles 52 to 78), including ordinance-making (Art. 123), emergency powers (Art. 352–360), and pardon powers (Art. 72).
June 2013 · Paper 2
6. In which case was it held that under Article 226, courts are flooded with PILs and frivolous petitions must be filtered and dismissed with costs?
(a)Deepak Sharma v. Vineeta Sharma
(b)Dharampal v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(c)Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. v. Premchandra Mishra✓
(d)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
In Holicow Pictures Pvt. Ltd. v. Premchandra Mishra (2007), the Supreme Court observed that courts must filter frivolous PILs to preserve judicial resources.
December 2013 · Paper 2
2. Article 15(1) prohibits discrimination against any citizen on the grounds of:
(a)Religion, race and caste only
(b)Religion, caste and sex only
(c)Religion, caste, sex and place of birth only
(d)Religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 15(1) of the Constitution of India prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth.
December 2013 · Paper 2Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:
Code: A–2, B–1, C–3, D–4
Answer & explanation
Correct Option: (a)
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A → 44th Amendment (Right to property removed as FR)
B → 42nd Amendment (Added “Integrity” in Preamble)
C → 86th Amendment (Right to education made FR under 21A)
D → 93rd Amendment (Inserted Clause (5) in Art. 15)
December 2013 · Paper 2
4. Which provision imposes a duty on the Union to ensure that State Governments function according to the Constitution?
(a)Article 352
(b)Article 355✓
(c)Article 356
(d)Article 360
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 355 imposes a duty on the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance, and to ensure that governance in every state is in accordance with the Constitution.
December 2013 · Paper 2
6. A Judge of the Supreme Court can be removed on the grounds of:
(a)Proved misbehaviour or incapacity✓
(b)Violation of the Constitution
(c)Both (A) and (B)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
According to Article 124(4), a judge of the Supreme Court can be removed only by the President on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, after an impeachment resolution is passed by both Houses of Parliament.
December 2013 · Paper 3Match the lists
5. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer:
A. Parliament can legislate on State subjects in national interest → Article 249
B. Parliament can legislate on State subjects during emergency → Article 250
C. Parliament can legislate for treaties and international agreements → Article 253
D. Parliament can legislate on State subjects with consent of States → Article 252
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 1 2 4 3
Explanation: These articles allow Parliament to override State List limitations under specific conditions, maintaining constitutional flexibility.
December 2013 · Paper 2
1. Social, economic and political justice is —
(a)an idea enshrined in the Preamble to the Constitution of India✓
(b)guaranteed by Fundamental Rights in the Constitution of India
(c)a Directive Principle of State Policy taken into consideration while making enactments
(d)guaranteed to the people by the writs issued by the High Courts and Supreme Court
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Justice—social, economic, and political—is one of the guiding principles mentioned in the Preamble of the Constitution. It reflects the ideals the Constitution aims to secure for all citizens and serves as a source of constitutional interpretation.
December 2013 · Paper 2
2. Without paying proper remuneration, labour taken from prisoners is 'forced labour' and a violation of —
(a)Article 20 of the Constitution of India
(b)Article 21 of the Constitution of India
(c)Article 22 of the Constitution of India
(d)Article 23 of the Constitution of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 23 prohibits trafficking, begar (bonded labour), and all forms of forced labour. Taking work from prisoners without fair payment, if not part of a lawful sentence, qualifies as forced labour and violates this fundamental right.
December 2013 · Paper 2
3. Article 51A of the Constitution of India provides for the Fundamental Duties of —
(a)Citizens of India✓
(b)Public Servants
(c)All those who run public and private sectors
(d)Prime Minister and his Council of Ministers
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A, added by the 42nd Amendment in 1976, outlines the Fundamental Duties of Indian citizens. These duties are moral obligations to help promote patriotism and maintain national integrity.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
2. In which of the following amendments were the words "Nothing in Article 13 shall apply to any amendment made under Article 368" inserted?
(a)22nd Amendment
(b)24th Amendment✓
(c)42nd Amendment
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The 24th Amendment Act of 1971 inserted Clause (4) to Article 13, clarifying that constitutional amendments under Article 368 are not subject to judicial review under Article 13. This was done to remove ambiguity following court decisions challenging Parliament’s amending power.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin Law
4. In which one of the following cases has the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Constitution (93rd Amendment) introducing Article 15(5)?
(a)T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
(b)Indra Sawhney v. Union of India
(c)M. Nagaraj v. Union of India
(d)Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Ashok Kumar Thakur v. Union of India (2008), the Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 93rd Amendment which introduced Article 15(5), enabling the State to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes in educational institutions, including private ones.
December 2013 · Paper 3 (With Admin LawAssertion–Reason
11. Assertion (A): Equality is antithetic to arbitrariness.
Reason (R): Article 14 of the Indian Constitution prevents arbitrary discretion being vested in the executive.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Explanation: Article 14 guarantees equality before law and forbids arbitrary state action. Arbitrary actions violate equality. Hence, equality and arbitrariness are fundamentally opposed. The reason rightly explains the assertion.
June 2014 · Paper 2
1. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?
Options:
(a)Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves
(b)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(d)None of these
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In the landmark 1973 case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is indeed a part of the Constitution. This overruled the earlier view expressed in the Berubari Union case (1960), where it was held otherwise. The Court affirmed that the Preamble reflects the basic structure and guiding philosophy of the Constitution.
June 2014 · Paper 2
2. Clause (5) of Article 15 was added to the Constitution by which amendment?
Explanation: Article 15(5) was inserted by the 93rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 2005. This clause empowers the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, including their admission to educational institutions, even in private institutions, except minority institutions.
June 2014 · Paper 2Match the lists
3. Match the following directives with the correct articles:
A. Equal justice and free legal aid
B. Uniform civil code for citizens
C. Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife
D. Promotion of international peace and security
Options (Codes):
(a)3, 2, 4, 1
(b)3, 1, 2, 4✓
(c)1, 2, 3, 4
(d)4, 1, 2, 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 3, 1, 2, 4
Explanation:
Equal justice and free legal aid: Article 39A
Uniform civil code for citizens: Article 44
Protection of environment and wildlife: Article 48A
Promotion of international peace and security: Article 51
These are Directive Principles of State Policy aimed at guiding the state in governance.
June 2014 · Paper 2
5. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the word "law" in Article 21 does not mean just any enacted piece of legislation, but must be just, fair, and reasonable?
Options:
(a)A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
(b)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
(c)Both (a) and (b)
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Explanation: In the 1978 case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court significantly widened the scope of Article 21. It held that “law” must be just, fair, and reasonable, not arbitrary or oppressive. This interpretation overruled the earlier narrow view in A.K. Gopalan, where mere existence of law was considered sufficient.
June 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
Q4. Match the following doctrines with relevant cases:
A. Doctrine of Eclipse
B. Doctrine of Severability
C. Doctrine of Waiver
D. Doctrine of Pith and Substance
RMDC v. Union of India
State of Bombay v. A.N. Balsara
Bhikaji v. State of M.P.
Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner
(a)3 2 4 1
(b)2 3 1 4
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)4 2 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Doctrine of Eclipse – Bhikaji v. State of M.P.
Doctrine of Severability – RMDC v. Union of India
Doctrine of Waiver – Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner
Doctrine of Pith and Substance – State of Bombay v. A.N. Balsara.
June 2014 · Paper 3Statements
Q6. Which of the following statements is true regarding self-incriminatory statements?
(c)Self-incriminatory statements made under compulsion violate Article 20(3)✓
(d)None of the above
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 20(3) of the Constitution protects an individual from being compelled to be a witness against themselves. However, only those statements made under compulsion violate this provision.
June 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
Q7. Assertion (A): Under Article 368, Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution.
Reason (R): Parliament is the supreme legislative body elected by the people.
(a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is true, but R is false
(d)A is false, but R is true✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: While Parliament is indeed the supreme legislative body, it cannot amend the basic structure of the Constitution even under Article 368, as held in the Kesavananda Bharati case.
June 2014 · Paper 3Match the lists
Q8. Match the following Directive Principles with their respective Articles:
A. Separation of Judiciary from Executive
B. Promotion of International Peace
C. Organisation of Village Panchayats
D. Protection of Forests and Wildlife
Article 40
Article 48A
Article 50
Article 51
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)3 1 4 2✓
(c)3 2 4 1
(d)2 1 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Separation of Judiciary – Article 50
International Peace – Article 51
Village Panchayats – Article 40
Forests and Wildlife – Article 48A.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q9. Which of the following is not correct about the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
(a)It is a part of the Constitution
(b)It can be amended under Article 368
(c)It confers power to the legislature✓
(d)It declares the objectives of the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Preamble does not confer any powers to the legislature. It is a statement of ideals and objectives guiding the Constitution. It was held to be part of the Constitution in the Kesavananda Bharati case and can be amended, as in the 42nd Amendment.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q11. Which Article provides for the right to constitutional remedies?
(a)Article 19
(b)Article 21
(c)Article 32✓
(d)Article 226
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 32 guarantees the right to move the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of fundamental rights. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called it the "heart and soul" of the Constitution.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q13. What does the doctrine of severability mean in constitutional law?
(a)If one part of a statute is unconstitutional, the entire law is void
(b)Only that part which is unconstitutional will be struck down✓
(c)The unconstitutional law will be modified by courts
(d)Law remains valid unless Parliament repeals it
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: According to the doctrine of severability, if any part of a statute is found unconstitutional, only that part is invalidated while the rest of the statute remains operative, provided it is separable.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q14. Who among the following was not a member of the Constituent Assembly of India?
(a)Dr. Rajendra Prasad
(b)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(c)Mahatma Gandhi✓
(d)Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Mahatma Gandhi was not a member of the Constituent Assembly. However, he greatly influenced the vision and values that shaped the Constitution through his philosophy and leadership.
June 2014 · Paper 3
Q15. The 44th Amendment to the Constitution of India removed which of the following rights from the list of fundamental rights?
(a)Right to property✓
(b)Right to education
(c)Right to life
(d)Right to religious freedom
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 44th Amendment Act, 1978, removed the right to property from the list of fundamental rights. It is now a constitutional right under Article 300A.
December 2014 · Paper 2
1. It was remarked in Golaknath v. State of Punjab that the Preamble to the Constitution contains in a nutshell its ideals and aspirations. Who made this observation?
(a)Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer
(b)Justice K. Subba Rao✓
(c)Justice A.N. Ray
(d)Justice H.R. Khanna
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In the Golaknath v. State of Punjab case (1967), Justice K. Subba Rao observed that the Preamble encapsulates the ideals and aspirations of the Indian Constitution. This interpretation was important in expanding the constitutional vision and laying the groundwork for the later doctrine of the basic structure.
December 2014 · Paper 2
2. The right of eligible employees to be considered for promotion is virtually a part of Fundamental Rights. This was decided by the Supreme Court in which case?
(a)Union of India v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan✓
(b)Supreme Court Employees Association v. Union of India
(c)John Vallamattam v. Union of India
(d)St. Stephens College v. University of Delhi
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Union of India v. Hemraj Singh Chauhan (2010), the Supreme Court held that consideration for promotion is part of service jurisprudence and can have implications under Article 14 (equality before law). Ignoring eligible candidates without due process may violate their fundamental rights.
December 2014 · Paper 2
4. In which of the following cases have Fundamental Duties been judicially invoked?
Prem Prakash v. Punjab University
Suresh Koshy George v. University of Kerala
Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Shri Sachidanand Pandey v. State of West Bengal
(a)1 and 2
(b)2 and 3
(c)3 and 4✓
(d)1, 2, 3, and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: In Rural Litigation and Sachidanand Pandey cases, the Supreme Court invoked Fundamental Duties while interpreting environmental laws. These cases expanded the role of Part IVA of the Constitution in guiding the interpretation of statutes and governance principles.
December 2014 · Paper 3
3. Article 51A of the Constitution of India is confined to:
(a)All citizens of India✓
(b)All persons of India
(c)All Non-Residents of India
(d)All students of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A, inserted by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976, outlines the Fundamental Duties. These duties apply only to citizens of India, not to all persons.
December 2014 · Paper 3Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): The power under Article 368 of the Constitution is a constituent power subject to the constitutional scheme as to distribution of legislative power according to entries in the Seventh Schedule.
Reason (R): Because Sasanka Sekhar Maity v. Union of India decided so.
Codes:
(a)Both A and R are incorrect✓
(b)Both A and R are correct, but R is not the correct reason for A
(c)A is correct and R is incorrect
(d)A is incorrect and R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The power to amend the Constitution under Article 368 is plenary and not subject to limitations based on the entries in the Seventh Schedule, though it is subject to the basic structure doctrine. The cited case is not the authority for this point.
June 2015
The Preamble can only be amended if it violates the basic structure of the Constitution.
Since the Preamble is not an Article, it is not a part of the Constitution.
(a)Only 2
(b)3 and 4
(c)1, 2 and 3
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Statement 1 is partially correct, but the correct citation is that the Preamble is part of the Constitution, as held in Kesavananda Bharati (1973), but the "key to the minds of the makers" phrase was earlier used in Berubari Union case. Statement 2 is incorrect because "Socialist" and "Secular" were added by the 42nd Amendment, not the 44th. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Preamble, like other parts, can be amended under Article 368, provided the amendment does not violate the basic structure. Statement 4 is incorrect because the Preamble has been held to be a part of the Constitution by the Supreme Court.
June 2015
3. “It is the soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it.” — This famous observation refers to which Article and was made by whom?
(a)Justice P.N. Bhagwati
(b)Dr. B.R. Ambedkar✓
(c)Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer
(d)Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar referred to Article 32 as the heart and soul of the Constitution, emphasizing its importance in ensuring the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
June 2015Statements
4. Which of the following statements is/are incorrect?
Chapter III of Fundamental Rights in the Constitution is based upon the Bill of Rights of the USA.
'Right to die' is a Fundamental Right under Article 21 of the Constitution.
The Indian Constitution is a complete Federal Constitution.
Fundamental Rights can be waived under the Indian Constitution.
(a)Only 2
(b)Only 3 and 4
(c)Only 2 and 3
(d)2, 3, and 4✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 2 is incorrect — the Supreme Court in Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996) held that the right to die is not part of Article 21. Statement 3 is incorrect because India is quasi-federal or federal with a unitary bias. Statement 4 is incorrect as Fundamental Rights cannot be waived as per Behram Khurshed Pesikaka v. State of Bombay.
June 2015Match the lists
5. Match the following doctrines and leading cases:
A. Equal pay for equal work – 1. Randhir Singh v. Union of India
B. Agencies or Instrumentalities of the State under Article 12 – 2. R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
C. Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are complementary – 3. Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh
D. Damages for violation of Article 21 – 4. Rudul Shah v. State of Bihar
(a)3 1 4 2✓
(b)1 2 3 4
(c)4 3 1 2
(d)2 4 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A. Randhir Singh v. Union of India (1982) recognized equal pay for equal work as a constitutional goal.
B. R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979) expanded the definition of "State" under Article 12.
C. Unnikrishnan (1993) linked Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights as complementary.
D. Rudul Shah (1983) established that monetary compensation can be awarded for violation of Article 21.
June 2015Match the lists
6. Match the following constitutional amendments and provisions:
A. Article 15(4) – 1. Constitution (1st Amendment), 1951
B. Article 13(4) – 2. Constitution (25th Amendment), 1971
C. Article 16(4A) – 3. Constitution (85th Amendment), 2001
D. Article 21A – 4. Constitution (86th Amendment), 2002
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)4 1 2 3✓
(c)3 4 1 2
(d)2 3 4 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. Article 15(4) was inserted by the 1st Amendment (1951) to enable special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes.
B. Article 13(4) was added via the 25th Amendment (1971) stating that Constitutional amendments are not subject to Article 13.
C. Article 16(4A), regarding consequential seniority in promotions, came via the 85th Amendment (2001).
D. Article 21A, providing Right to Education, was introduced by the 86th Amendment (2002).
June 2015 Paper 3
1. Through the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution, which of the following expressions were added to the Preamble?
(a)Only 1, 2 and 3
(b)Only 2, 3 and 4✓
(c)Only 1, 3 and 4
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1976 inserted the words "Socialist," "Secular," and "Integrity" into the Preamble. "Sovereign" was already present since the original Constitution adopted in 1950. Therefore, only options 2, 3, and 4 were added by this amendment.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
2. Match the following cases with the subject matter and select the correct option:
A. Compensation to persons killed in fake encounters
B. Compensation to rape victims
C. Interim compensation to rape victims
D. Protection against illegal arrest, detention, and custodial deaths
(a)4 3 2 1
(b)3 1 2 4✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)1 2 3 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A → 3: People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India addressed fake encounters.
B → 1: Delhi Domestic Working Women’s Forum v. Union of India involved compensation to rape victims.
C → 2: Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Subhra Chakraborty allowed interim compensation to rape victims.
D → 4: Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. related to guidelines on arrest and custodial rights.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
3. Match the following legal principles and related cases:
A. Right not to speak is part of right to speech
B. No monopoly of government on electronic media
C. Commercial ads are part of speech and expression
D. Government cannot impose prior restraint on publications
(a)4 3 2 1✓
(b)3 2 1 4
(c)1 4 3 2
(d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
A → 4: Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala affirmed the right not to speak.
B → 3: Secretary, Ministry I&B v. Cricket Association of Bengal held that the government has no monopoly on broadcasting.
C → 2: Tata Press Ltd. v. MTNL recognized commercial speech as protected under Article 19(1)(a).
D → 1: R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu upheld freedom from prior restraint in media.
June 2015 Paper 3Statements
4. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Fundamental Rights are not absolute; they are subject to reasonable restrictions.
Freedom of the Press is implicit under Article 19.
Article 15(4) provides benefits to socially and economically backward classes.
Article 14’s “equal protection of laws” is based on English law.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct✓
(b)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(c)3 and 4 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Article 19(1)(a) covers speech and expression, which has been interpreted to include press freedom. Statement 3 is incorrect because Article 15(4) covers socially and educationally backward classes (not economically), and statement 4 is incorrect because "equal protection" is inspired by the American Constitution, not English law.
June 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
5. Match the features of the Indian Constitution with the countries from which they are borrowed:
A. Parliamentary system of government
B. Directive Principles of State Policy
C. Fundamental Rights
D. Emergency Provisions
(a)4 3 1 2
(b)3 4 1 2✓
(c)1 2 3 4
(d)2 1 4 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A → 3: Parliamentary system is taken from the UK.
B → 4: Directive Principles are inspired by Ireland.
C → 1: Fundamental Rights are based on the US Bill of Rights.
D → 2: Emergency provisions are taken from the German Constitution.
June 2015 Paper 3
6. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that Article 31C was beyond Parliament’s amending power as it destroyed the balance between Parts III and IV of the Constitution?
(a)Minerva Mills v. Union of India✓
(b)In Re Kerala Education Bill
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(d)Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court declared that the expanded version of Article 31C was unconstitutional because it destroyed the harmony between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles (Part IV), violating the basic structure doctrine.
December 2015 · Paper 2Assertion–Reason
1. Read the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes given below:
Assertion (A): The preamble of the Constitution of India defines the ideal philosophy of Indian democracy and its key concepts are laid down as Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity.
Reason (R): A democracy to be real must be characterized by two features.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true but (R) is false✓
(d)(A) is false but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The Preamble lays down the ideals and key concepts of Indian democracy, including Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. However, the reason does not clearly explain the assertion, making it an incorrect justification.
December 2015 · Paper 2
4. Which of the following are included in the freedom of the press?
Right to print and publish news
Distribution of printed matter
Criticism of public affairs
Pre-censorship
(a)1, 2, 3, and 4
(b)1, 2, and 3✓
(c)1, 3, and 4
(d)2, 3, and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The freedom of the press includes the right to print and publish news, distribute printed content, and criticize public affairs. Pre-censorship is not considered part of this freedom and is unconstitutional.
December 2015 Paper 3Match the lists
1. Match the items of List-I with List-II and choose the correct code:
List-I:
A. To renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of woman
B. Mandamus cannot be sought against an individual who does not observe a fundamental duty
C. Respect to National Anthem
D. Respect and dignity to National Flag
List-II:
Surya Narain Choudhary v. Union of India
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal
Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala
Union of India v. Naveen Jindal
Options:
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)2 1 3 4✓
(c)2 1 4 3
(d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The correct matching is:
A → 2 (Union of India v. Naveen Jindal),
B → 1 (Surya Narain Choudhary v. Union of India),
C → 3 (Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala),
D → 4 (Union of India v. Naveen Jindal).
These cases relate to interpretation and application of fundamental duties under Article 51A.
December 2015 Paper 3Statements
7. Which one of the following statements is correct regarding Article 368?
Options:
(a)Procedure for amendment of the Constitution only
(b)Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution only
(c)Power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure therefore✓
(d)Limitation on the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Article 368 lays down both the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the procedure to do so. It does not deal with limitations or just the procedure.
July 2016 Paper 2
1. In Golaknath v. State of Punjab, what did Justice K. Subba Rao observe?
(a)The Preamble contains in a nutshell the ideals and aspirations of the Constitution.✓
(b)The Preamble is the key to open the minds of the Constitution makers.
(c)The Preamble is enforceable by the judiciary.
(d)The Preamble of our Constitution is of great importance and it should be implemented.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the landmark case of Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), Justice K. Subba Rao remarked that the Preamble encapsulates the ideals and aspirations of the Indian Constitution. Though not enforceable by law, the Preamble plays a guiding role in the interpretation of the Constitution’s provisions.
July 2016 Paper 2
2. In which case did the Supreme Court rule that "Imparting education cannot be treated as a trade or business"?
(a)Unnikrishnan Case✓
(b)Mohini Jain Case
(c)Dinesh Kumar Case
(d)P.A. Inamdar Case
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In the Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993), a five-judge Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court held that education is not a business and cannot be commercialized like trade. The Court emphasized the role of education in social transformation and national development.
July 2016 Paper 2Statements
3. Which of the following statements are correct as per the Indian Constitution?
The State may make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work.
The State shall endeavor to provide early childhood care and education for all children until the age of six years.
The State shall not endeavor to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code in the territory of India.
The State shall endeavor to protect and improve forests and wildlife of the country.
Options:
(a)1, 2 and 3
(b)2, 3 and 4
(c)2 and 4✓
(d)3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Statement 2 is based on Article 45 (after the 86th Amendment), which directs the State to provide early childhood care and education up to age six. Statement 4 reflects Article 48A (added by the 42nd Amendment) that mandates protection and improvement of environment, forests, and wildlife. Statements 1 and 3 are either partially incorrect or misinterpreted.
July 2016 Paper 2
5. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court invalidate a constitutional amendment due to non-compliance with the procedure under Article 368(2)?
(a)Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu✓
(b)Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)State of West Bengal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1992), the Supreme Court struck down the 52nd Amendment (related to the Tenth Schedule) as unconstitutional for failing to meet the procedural requirements laid out in the proviso to Article 368(2), which requires ratification by a majority of states for certain types of amendments.
July 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
3. Match the following Articles with their corresponding provisions:
A. Article 13 —
B. Article 15 —
C. Article 20 —
D. Article 23 —
Protection in respect of conviction for offences
Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour
Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth
Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of Fundamental Rights
(a)4 2 1 3
(b)2 1 4 3
(c)3 2 1 4
(d)4 3 1 2✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Article 13 prohibits laws that infringe Fundamental Rights. Article 15 prohibits discrimination. Article 20 gives protection in criminal convictions. Article 23 prohibits human trafficking and forced labour.
July 2016 Paper 3
6. Which of the following are included in the Fundamental Duties in the Constitution of India?
To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India
To defend the country and render national service when called upon
To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
To develop the scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform
(a)1, 2 and 3
(b)1, 2 and 4
(c)2, 3 and 4✓
(d)1, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
Under Article 51A of the Constitution, these are listed as Fundamental Duties. Specifically, 51A(d), 51A(f), and 51A(h) cover defending the country, preserving culture, and promoting scientific temper respectively. Statement 1, although partially correct, incorrectly includes "and the states."
July 2016 Paper 3Match the lists
7. Match the following Articles with the provisions:
A. Article 40 —
B. Article 42 —
C. Article 44 —
D. Article 50 —
Separation of judiciary from the executive
Organisation of village panchayats
Provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief
Uniform civil code
(a)1 2 4 3
(b)2 3 4 1✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)3 4 1 2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Article 40 — Village panchayats
Article 42 — Just and humane work conditions
Article 44 — Uniform Civil Code
Article 50 — Separation of judiciary from the executive
September 2016
2. In which case did the Supreme Court of India decide that the right to education under Article 21 does not extend to professional education?
(a)Balbir Thomas v. Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology✓
(b)Haobijam Rita Devi v. Sikkim Manipal Health Sciences University
(c)P. Raveendran v. Union of India
(d)Tumnyak Etc. v. AIIMS
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Balbir Thomas v. Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology (1997), the Supreme Court held that Article 21 does not guarantee the right to professional education. Earlier cases like Mohini Jain (1992) and Unni Krishnan (1993) had expanded Article 21 to include the right to education, but in professional contexts, this was narrowed.
September 2016Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct combination:
List-I (Case)
A. Maharshi Avadhesh v. Union of India
B. Kachchh Jal Sankat Nivaran Samiti v. State of Gujarat
C. M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
D. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradhan Sangh Kshetra Samiti
List-II (Principle)
Organisation of Village Panchayats
Legal Aid
Common Good
Uniform Civil Code
Options:
(a)A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1
(b)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
(c)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1✓
(d)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation:
A. Maharshi Avadhesh case advocated for a Uniform Civil Code.
B. Kachchh Jal Sankat Nivaran Samiti dealt with common good and public interest.
C. M.H. Hoskot concerned the right to legal aid under Article 21.
D. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradhan Sangh related to the organization of Village Panchayats.
September 2016 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
1. Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer using the codes below:
Assertion (A): By amendment, the Parliament cannot destroy the basic features of the Constitution of India.
Reason (R): The power to amend does not include the power to abrogate the Constitution of India.
Options:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is false, but (R) is true
(d)(A) is true, but (R) is false
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Supreme Court in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) ruled that while Parliament has the power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter or destroy its basic structure. Therefore, an amendment that abrogates the Constitution is invalid. However, the statement that the amending power does not include abrogation is not the precise reasoning for the assertion that Parliament cannot destroy the Constitution’s basic features.
September 2016 Paper 3
2. The Supreme Court held that even petitions filed under Article 32 are subject to the general principle of res judicata in which case?
(a)M.S.M. Sharma v. Dr. Sree Krishna Sinha✓
(b)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(c)Charanlal Sahu v. K.R. Narayanan
(d)Ranji Thomas v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In M.S.M. Sharma v. Dr. Sree Krishna Sinha (1958), the Supreme Court observed that writ petitions under Article 32 could be barred by res judicata if the same issue had already been settled in previous proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of finality in litigation.
September 2016 Paper 3
6. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that constitutional amendments are not included within the definition of 'law' under Article 13(2) and (3)?
(a)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
(b)Sankari Prasad v. Union of India✓
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Sankari Prasad v. Union of India (1951), the Supreme Court held that a constitutional amendment made under Article 368 is not “law” under Article 13(2), and therefore cannot be challenged as violating Fundamental Rights. This view was later overruled in Golaknath, but reinstated with limitations in Kesavananda Bharati.
January 2017 Paper 2
1. The Preamble to the Constitution of India proclaims that "We, the People of India" have established which type of Republic?
(a)A Sovereign, Socialist, Democratic Republic only
Explanation: The Preamble to the Constitution declares India to be a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic Republic. These terms reflect the nature of the state and were introduced or reaffirmed through the 42nd Amendment of 1976.
January 2017 Paper 2Match the lists
2. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct code:
List-I (Articles)
A. Article 16(3)
B. Article 19(5)
C. Article 19(6)
D. Article 31A(2)(a)
List-II (Amendments)
1st Amendment
17th Amendment
7th Amendment
44th Amendment
Codes:
(a)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2✓
(b)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
(c)A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3
(d)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 16(3) was amended by the 7th Amendment.
Article 19(5) was affected by the 44th Amendment.
Article 19(6) was amended by the 1st Amendment.
Article 31A(2)(a) was amended by the 17th Amendment.
January 2017 Paper 2Statements
5. "The Fundamental Duties incorporated in Article 51A of the Constitution are mere reminders to the citizens with no enforceability," was a statement made by which judge?
(a)Justice J.S. Verma✓
(b)Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy
(c)Justice Y.V. Chandrachud
(d)Justice P.N. Bhagwati
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Justice J.S. Verma observed that Fundamental Duties under Article 51A are non-enforceable reminders to citizens. These duties were added by the 42nd Amendment to emphasize civic responsibilities, though not legally enforceable.
January 2017 Paper 2
7. The Supreme Court held that the right to be appointed as a guardian under personal law is not a fundamental right in which of the following cases?
(a)Mohd. Aslam v. Union of India
(b)Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammed Amirabbas Abbasi v. State of Madhya Bharat✓
(c)Khatri v. State of Bihar
(d)Mohd. Faruk v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In Sahibzada Saiyed Muhammed Amirabbas Abbasi v. State of Madhya Bharat, the court ruled that appointment as guardian under personal law does not qualify as a fundamental right, as it is governed by personal law and not enforceable through writs.
January 2017 Paper 3Match the lists
1. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer using the codes given below:
List-I:
A. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
B. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
C. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
D. I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
List-II:
i. Basic structure doctrine created
ii. Basic structure doctrine strengthened
iii. Basic structure doctrine crystallised
iv. Basic structure doctrine - new dimensions added
Codes:
(a)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1✓
(b)A-2, B-4, C-2, D-3
(c)A-4, B-1, C-2, D-3
(d)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Kesavananda Bharati laid down the basic structure doctrine.
Indira Nehru Gandhi strengthened it by reaffirming the limitations on amending power.
Minerva Mills added new dimensions by balancing Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights.
I.R. Coelho crystallised the doctrine by applying it to the Ninth Schedule.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
6. Assertion (A): An accused has the constitutional right to be informed of the nature and cause of accusation.
Reason (R): The accused must be presented before the nearest district judge within 24 hours.
(a)Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation of A
(c)A is false, but R is true
(d)A is true, but R is false✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
A is derived from Article 22(1), which gives the accused the right to be informed. R is incorrect because the accused must be produced before a magistrate, not necessarily a district judge.
January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
7. Assertion (A): Subject to the Constitution, Parliament may amend it by addition, variation or repeal following the procedure in this Article.
Reason (R): This statement is taken from Article 368(1) of the Constitution.
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A✓
(b)Both A and R are incorrect
(c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
(d)A is correct, but R is incorrect
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 368(1) of the Constitution permits the Parliament to amend any provision by following the prescribed procedure. Both the assertion and reason are correct, and R explains A.
November 2017Sequence / order
2. Arrange the following landmark cases in the order in which they were pronounced by the Supreme Court:
Selvi v. State of Karnataka
Official Liquidator v. Dayananda
I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
(a)4, 1, 3, 2
(b)4, 3, 2, 1✓
(c)3, 2, 4, 1
(d)2, 3, 4, 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
P.A. Inamdar – 2005
I.R. Coelho – 2007
Official Liquidator – 2008
Selvi – 2010
Hence, the correct chronological order is 4, 3, 2, 1.
November 2017Statements
3. Which of the following statements is correct?
(a)Fundamental Duties are mandatory for all citizens.
(b)Fundamental Duties have always been part of the Constitution.
(c)Fundamental Duties were added through an amendment to the Constitution of India.✓
(d)Fundamental Duties can be enforced by writs.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Fundamental Duties were introduced by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 and are listed under Article 51-A. They are not enforceable by writs but serve as moral obligations.
November 2017
5. Which one of the following pairs is correctly matched with regard to provisions of the Constitution of India?
(a)Article 352 – Effect of proclamation of Emergency
(b)Article 353 – Revenue distribution during Emergency
(c)Article 354 – Executive power during Emergency
(d)Article 355 – Duty of the Union to protect States against aggression✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Article 355 places a duty on the Union to protect States against external aggression and internal disturbance. Article 352 deals with proclamation, 353 with Union powers, and 354 with financial provisions.
November 2017
6. Which one of the following pairs is not correctly matched with regard to constitutional amendments?
Explanation: The Forty-second Amendment to the Constitution of India was enacted in 1976, not 1956. It is known as the Mini-Constitution due to its sweeping changes. All the other pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, option (d) is not correctly matched.
November 2017Match the lists
7. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer using the codes given below:
List-I (Legal Principles / Case Themes):
A. The principle of constructive res judicata is also applicable to writ petitions
B. Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution can be restored
C. Direction given by the High Court under Article 226 cannot be altered by the State Government
D. The disposal of several writ petitions in a batch by a single order is permissible if facts are similar
List-II (Relevant Cases):
Women’s Education Trust v. State of Haryana
M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka
Ratan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
V. Porukutty Mannadissior v. State of Kerala
Codes:
(a)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
(b)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2✓
(c)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
(d)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
A. The principle of constructive res judicata in writs – Ratan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2013)
B. Restoration of writ dismissed for non-prosecution – V. Porukutty Mannadissior v. State of Kerala (1965)
C. High Court’s direction under Article 226 cannot be modified by the government – Women’s Education Trust v. State of Haryana
D. Disposal of similar writs in batch by single order – M. Nagabhushana v. State of Karnataka (2011)
November 2017 Paper 3
1. 'Economic Justice' is one of the objectives of the Constitution of India. In which of the following parts is this objective specifically provided?
(a)Preamble and Fundamental Rights
(b)Preamble and Directive Principles of State Policy✓
(c)Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles
(d)Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles, and Fundamental Duties
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Economic justice is enshrined in the Preamble and elaborated in Directive Principles of State Policy under Article 38, which aims at minimizing inequalities in income and ensuring the welfare of the people.
November 2017 Paper 3Sequence / order
2. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases in chronological order:
Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam and Others
Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer
Usha Mehta v. Government of A.P.
City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment
(a)3, 2, 4, 1✓
(b)2, 3, 4, 1
(c)4, 2, 3, 1
(d)2, 3, 1, 4
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The correct chronological order based on decision years is:
Usha Mehta v. Govt. of A.P. – 2012
Basawaraj v. Special Land Acquisition Officer – 2013
City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment – 2014
Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam – 2015
November 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason
3. Read the following Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and choose the correct option:
Assertion (A): Article 40 of the Constitution directs the State to organize village Panchayats and endow them with the powers and authority necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
Reason (R): This directive ensures every village becomes an autonomous, self-sufficient republic capable of managing its own affairs.
(a)Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is true, but (R) is false
(d)(A) is false, but (R) is true
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 40 indeed aims at establishing self-governing village Panchayats. The reason correctly elaborates the intent of this article, reflecting Gandhian principles of decentralization.
November 2017 Paper 3
5. Which of the following pairs is correctly matched with respect to the provisions of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 118 – Duration of Parliament
(b)Article 119 – Restriction on discussion in Parliament
(c)Article 120 – Language to be used in Parliament✓
(d)Article 121 – Courts not to inquire into the proceedings of Parliament
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 120 deals with the language to be used in Parliament. Article 118 is about rules of procedure, not duration. Article 119 deals with financial business, and Article 121 prohibits judicial interference in Parliamentary proceedings.
July 2018
1. Which of the following is not included in the definition of law under Article 13 of Constitution of India?
(a)Legislation
(b)Customs
(c)Usage having no force of law✓
(d)Ordinance
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 13 of the Indian Constitution defines "law" to include ordinances, orders, bye-laws, rules, regulations, notifications, customs or usages having the force of law. Hence, usage having no force of law is not included.
July 2018
2. Which Article of the Constitution uses the term 'martial law'?
(a)Article 33
(b)Article 34✓
(c)Article 352
(d)Article 353
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 34 provides for restrictions on fundamental rights while martial law is in force in any area, and it is the only article that specifically mentions the term "martial law".
July 2018
6. Which of the following case is not related to the 'Theory of Basic Structure' under Article 368?
(a)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(b)Waman Rao v. Union of India
(c)L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
(d)T.K. Rangarajan v. Government of Tamil Nadu✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: T.K. Rangarajan v. Govt. of Tamil Nadu (2003) is not related to the basic structure doctrine. The other cases are landmark decisions affirming the basic structure doctrine.
July 2018Statements
12. Which of the following statements is/are correct?
It is the duty of every citizen to respect the country and abide by the Constitution.
All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
The state shall in particular, take steps for preserving and improving the breeds, and prohibiting the slaughter of cows and calves and other milch and draught cattle..
No law here after enacted by legislature of J&K shall be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with any right conferred on other citizens of India by any provision of Part III of the Constitution.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 3 and 4 are correct
(c)1, 2 and 3 are correct
(d)1, 2, 3 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: All statements are constitutionally valid: Fundamental Duties (Art. 51A), Minority Rights (Art. 30), Directive Principles (Art. 48), and special status (now abrogated but was applicable earlier).
July 2018
16. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that where the selection process consists solely of viva-voce, no upper limit is required for interview marks?
(a)A.K. Roy v. Union of India
(b)A.P. State Financial Corporation v. C.M. Ashok Raju✓
(c)Sambhu Nath Sarkar v. State of West Bengal
(d)P. Lakhanpal v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In A.P. State Financial Corporation v. C.M. Ashok Raju (1994), the Supreme Court ruled that when there is only a viva-voce and no written test, there is no need to fix a limit on interview marks, as the selection process is inherently subjective.
December 2018
The solemn resolution in the Preamble of the Constitution of India is made in the name of the people of India.
The Preamble of the Constitution of India solemnly resolves to secure to its people Fundamental Rights, Fundamental Duties, and Directive Principles.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 1, 2 and 3 are correct
(c)Only 1 and 3 are correct✓
(d)Only 3 and 4 are correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Preamble reflects the founding fathers' intentions and is made "in the name of the people of India." However, it does not aim to secure Fundamental Duties (added later by amendment), and 'Socialist' focuses more on economic equality than political/religious.
December 2018Statements
2. Which of the following statements are correct?
Doctrine of Severability applies when certain provisions of an Act are declared invalid and affect the rest of the Act.
The prospective character of Article 13(1) gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse.
The American doctrine of waiver of Fundamental Rights is part of the Indian Constitution.
Doctrine of prospective overruling was not applied in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab.
(a)Only 1, 2 and 3 are correct
(b)Only 2, 3 and 4 are correct
(c)Only 2 is correct✓
(d)Only 4 is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Only Statement 2 is correct. Article 13(1) gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse. Severability and prospective overruling are valid doctrines in India, but waiver of Fundamental Rights is not part of the Indian Constitution.
December 2018Match the lists
3. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer.
A. M. Nagaraj v. Union of India – 2. To provide reservations in promotions for SC/ST
B. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India – 3. Application of creamy layer to OBC quota
C. Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka – 4. On capitation fees
D. A.K. Roy v. Union of India – 1. Case on national security
(a)3 1 4 2
(b)2 3 4 1✓
(c)2 4 1 3
(d)4 1 2 3
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
M. Nagaraj (2006) relates to reservation in promotions for SC/ST.
Indira Sawhney (1992) introduced the creamy layer in OBC reservations.
Mohini Jain (1992) dealt with capitation fees in private educational institutions.
A.K. Roy (1982) dealt with national security and preventive detention.
December 2018
4. Which constitutional amendment accorded primacy to the Directive Principles over Fundamental Rights?
(a)24th Amendment
(b)25th Amendment
(c)42nd Amendment✓
(d)44th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: The 42nd Amendment gave primacy to Directive Principles by inserting Article 31C, stating laws made to implement Directive Principles cannot be challenged for violating Fundamental Rights under Articles 14 and 19.
December 2018Statements
8. Which of the following statements are correct?
In Harvinder Kaur v. Harmander Singh, personal law was upheld as not violating gender equality.
Selvi v. State of Karnataka dealt with rights of transgender persons.
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India dealt with freedom of speech and expression.
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India addressed rights of converted Christian women.
(a)Only 1 and 2 are correct
(b)Only 2 and 3 are correct
(c)Only 2 and 4 are correct
(d)Only 3 and 4 are correct✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Shreya Singhal struck down Section 66A of the IT Act for violating freedom of speech.
Sarla Mudgal dealt with issues around bigamy and conversion for marriage.
Selvi was about narco-analysis and not transgender rights.
Harvinder Kaur was about personal laws, but not related to gender equality under constitutional law.
December 2018Match the lists
11. Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below.
A. K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu v. Union of India & Others – 2. Every author has a fundamental right to speak out ideas freely and express thoughts adequately
B. Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (Dead) by LRS and Others – 4. Seeking votes in the name of religion or caste is a corrupt practice
C. Pawan Kumar v. State of H.P. – 1. Women's right to love and reject
D. Bimolangshu Roy (Dead) Through LRS v. State of Assam and Others – 3. States are not empowered to create the office of Parliamentary Secretary
Code:
(a)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
(b)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3✓
(c)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
(d)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
In K.L.N.V. Veeranjaneyulu, the Court emphasized the fundamental right to express opinions freely.
Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen held that electoral appeals in the name of religion/caste are a corrupt practice.
Pawan Kumar reaffirmed women’s autonomy in matters of love and rejection.
Bimolangshu Roy ruled that states cannot create the post of Parliamentary Secretary, as it violates constitutional separation of powers.
June 2019
1. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court state that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles aim at the same goal of bringing social revolution and the establishment of a Welfare State, and they can be interpreted and applied together and they are supplementary and complementary to each other?
(a)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
(b)Re Kerala Education Bill
(c)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(d)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Supreme Court emphasized that Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles are meant to supplement each other in achieving the objective of a welfare state.
June 2019Assertion–Reason
11. Read both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer using the code below:
Assertion (A): Under the Indian Constitution, an Amendment Bill passed by both Houses of Parliament by the required majority shall be presented to the President, who shall give his assent, and thereupon the Constitution shall stand amended.
Reason (R): The President is bound to give his assent to the Bill.
Codes:
(a)Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)✓
(b)Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(c)(A) is correct but (R) is wrong
(d)(A) is wrong but (R) is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: According to Article 368(2) of the Indian Constitution, a Constitutional Amendment Bill passed by both Houses of Parliament by the requisite majority must be presented to the President, who is constitutionally bound to give his assent. Upon such assent, the Constitution stands amended. Therefore, both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason correctly explains the assertion.
June 2019
12. “A citizen has a fundamental right to use the best means of imparting and receiving information and as such to have an access to telecasting for the purpose.” This was the observation of the Supreme Court in which of the following cases?
(a)Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India v. Cricket Association of Bengal (1995)✓
(b)Prabhu Dutt v. Union of India (1982)
(c)Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India (1977)
(d)Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India (2014)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
In Ministry of Information and Broadcasting v. Cricket Association of Bengal (1995), the Supreme Court held that the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 includes the right to impart and receive information through the best available means, including electronic media such as telecasting. This landmark decision established that airwaves are public property and access to them cannot be denied arbitrarily.
December 2019
1. Constitution of India requires the State to adopt the Protectionist Policy and Improvinistic Policy. Which one of the following Articles declares the above?
(a)Article 51A(g)
(b)Article 38
(c)Article 48A✓
(d)Article 37
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 48A
Explanation: Article 48A of the Constitution of India directs the State to protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests and wildlife. It embodies the spirit of environmental protection as a part of the Directive Principles of State Policy.
December 2019Sequence / order
6. Arrange the following judgments of the Supreme Court on the constitutionality of the death penalty in chronological order:
Rajendra Prasad v. State of UP
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab
Jagmohan Singh v. State of UP
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab
(a)1, 2, 3, 4
(b)3, 2, 1, 4
(c)4, 3, 2, 1
(d)3, 1, 4, 2✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 3, 1, 4, 2
Explanation: Chronologically:
Jagmohan Singh (1973)
Rajendra Prasad (1979)
Bachan Singh (1980)
Machhi Singh (1983)
December 2019
7. The expression "Minority" is a relative term and refers to linguistic or religious groups forming less than 50% of the population. This view was stated by the Supreme Court in:
(a)T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka✓
(b)P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Islamic Academy v. State of Karnataka
(d)Usha Mehta v. State of Maharashtra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
Explanation: In this case, the Court clarified that "minority" is to be determined based on population — less than 50% — and can be linguistic or religious.
December 2019
8. “The provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas… but organic living institutions…” — This observation was made by:
(a)Schwartz
(b)Holmes, C.J.✓
(c)S.A. de Smith
(d)Lord Russel
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Holmes, C.J.
Explanation: Justice Holmes emphasized that constitutions are living documents and should be interpreted in light of evolving societal needs.
December 2019
10. Legal sovereignty in India resides in the Constitution itself and not in 'We the People of India'. This idea was expressed by the Supreme Court in:
(a)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(b)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(c)State of West Bengal v. Union of India
(d)Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In this landmark case (1973), the Supreme Court held that the Constitution is supreme and even Parliament cannot alter its basic structure. Sovereignty, in legal terms, lies in the Constitution, not in the people.
December 2019
12. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that any executive, legislative, or judicial action which contravenes Article 14 is void?
(a)Amir Abbas v. State of M.B.
(b)Naresh Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra
(c)Budhan v. State of Bihar✓
(d)Himmatlal v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Budhan v. State of Bihar
Explanation: The Supreme Court held that any action — whether legislative, executive, or judicial — that violates Article 14 (Right to Equality) is void.
December 2019Match the lists
14. Match the following Supreme Court cases with their subject matter:
Options:
(a)1 2 3 4
(b)1 3 4 2
(c)3 1 4 2✓
(d)2 4 3 1
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) 3 1 4 2
Explanation:
Hussainara Khatoon: Right to speedy trial
Murli S. Deora: Public smoking ban
Lakshmi Kant Pandey: Child welfare and adoption norms
Sunil Batra: Rights of prisoners and protection from inhuman treatment
Comprehension:
The Preamble of the Constitution is an integral part of the Constitution. Democratic form of government, federal structure, unity and integrity of the nation, secularism, socialism, social justice and judicial review are basic features of the Constitution. The Union of India shall protect the State Government and as corollary under Article 356 it is enjoined that the government of every state should be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. On receipt of a 574 report from the Governor or otherwise the President (Council of Ministers) on being satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the Government of a State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution, is empowered to issue Proclamation under Article 356(1) and impose preisdent's rule in the state in a manner laid down in sub-clause (a) to (c) of Article 356(1) of the constitution. The exercise of the power under Article 356 is and extraordinary one and needs to be used sparingly when the situation contemplated by Article 356 warrants to maintain democratic form of Government and to prevent paralysing of the political process. Single or individual act or acts of violation of the constitution for good, bad or in different administration does not necessarily constitute failure of constitutional machinery or characterises that a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. The exercise of power under Article 356 should under no circumstances be for a political gain to the party in power in the Union government. It should be used sparingly and with circumspection that the government of the State functions with responsibility in accordance with the provisions of the constitution. Rule of law has been chosen as an instrument of social adjustment and resolution of conflicting social problems to integrate diverse sections of the society professing multi religious faiths, creed, caste or region fostering among them fraternity, transcending social, religious linguistic or regional barriers. Citizen is either by birth or by domicile and not as a member of religion, caste, sect, region or language Securalism has both positive and negative constants.
December 2019
15. On which of the following grounds can a restriction be imposed on the freedom of religion under Article 25(1) of the Constitution?
(a)Public order, decency and morality
(b)In the interest of general public
(c)Public order, morality and health✓
(d)In the interest of general public and for protection of Scheduled Tribe
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Public order, morality and health
Explanation: Article 25(1) guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion. However, this right is subject to public order, morality, and health. These are constitutionally accepted grounds for imposing reasonable restrictions.
December 2019
16. Rule of law is recognized under which Article of the Indian Constitution?
(a)Article 14✓
(b)Article 19
(c)Article 21
(d)Article 22
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 14
Explanation: Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws. The principle of Rule of Law, as a fundamental concept in constitutional governance, is embedded in this article.
December 2019
18. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution?
(a)Buckingham and Carnatic Co. Ltd. v. Venkiah
(b)Keshavananda Bharati Case
(c)Golaknath v. State of Punjab
(d)In re Berubari Case✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) In re Berubari Case
Explanation: In the Berubari case (1960), the Supreme Court initially held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution. However, this view was later reversed in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), where the Preamble was held to be part of the Constitution and reflective of its basic structure.
June 2020Match the lists
3. Match List I with List II regarding important cases and their subject matter:
Correct Pairing:
(a)A-(I), B-(II), C-(III), D-(IV)
(b)A-(II), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(III)
(c)A-(III), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(II)✓
(d)A-(IV), B-(III), C-(II), D-(I)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A-(III), B-(I), C-(IV), D-(II)
Explanation:
Murli S. Deora: Public smoking ban
Sunil Batra: Prisoner rights and humane treatment
Hussainara Khatoon: Right to speedy trial
Rural Litigation: Environmental protection
June 2020Sequence / order
4. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases chronologically:
A. Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation
B. Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi
C. Satwant Singh v. Passport Officer
D. Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
E. NALSA v. Union of India
(a)C, D, A, E, B
(b)A, B, C, D, E
(c)B, D, A, E, C
(d)D, C, B, A, E✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) D, C, B, A, E
Explanation:
Kharak Singh (1963)
Satwant Singh (1967)
Francis Coralie (1981)
Olga Tellis (1986)
June 2020Statements
5. Under Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, which of the following statements are correct?
(A) Rights are guaranteed only to religious minorities
(B) Rights are guaranteed to linguistic and religious minorities
(C) Right is given only to administer educational institutions
(D) Right is given to minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
(E) The State is prohibited from discriminating in grant of aid based on minority management
(a)A and E only
(b)B and C only
(c)B, D and E only✓
(d)C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, D and E only
Explanation: Article 30 protects the right of minorities—both linguistic and religious—to establish and administer educational institutions. It also prohibits the State from discriminating in granting aid to such institutions.
June 2020
10. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution?
(a)Re Berubari Union Case
(b)Minerva Mills v. Union of India
(c)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓
(d)S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Explanation: In this landmark 1973 judgment, the Supreme Court held that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and reflects its basic structure.
December 2020/June 2021
8. The referred paragraph is taken from the judgement of the Supreme Court in –
(a)A.D.M. Jabalpur v. S. Shukla
(b)Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
(c)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
(d)Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and another v. Union of India and others✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
The paragraph is from the 2017 judgment in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, where the Supreme Court declared that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. The judgment overruled previous inconsistent rulings and expanded the scope of individual liberty.
December 2020/June 2021
9. In which of the following cases was it held that right to privacy is not protected as a fundamental right under the Constitution?
(a)M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi✓
(b)Govind v. State of M.P.
(c)R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
(d)K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
In M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (1954), the Supreme Court held that the right to privacy is not a fundamental right under the Constitution. This judgment was later overruled by the 2017 Puttaswamy case, which recognized the right to privacy as part of Article 21.
December 2020/June 2021Statements
10. Which one of the following statements is correct?
(a)Right to privacy is expressly provided as a fundamental right under the Constitution
(b)Right to privacy is protected as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution✓
(c)Right to privacy is not protected as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution
(d)Article 21 of the Constitution protects the life and personal liberty only from executive action
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
The Supreme Court in the K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) case held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right protected under Article 21. Though not expressly mentioned, it is implicitly derived from the guarantee of life and personal liberty.
December 2020/June 2021
11. The referred paragraph is a part of the judgement delivered by –
(a)Justice Chelameshwar
(b)Justice D.Y. Chandrachud✓
(c)Justice S.A. Bobde
(d)Justice F.M. Nariman
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud authored the main opinion in the landmark 2017 Puttaswamy judgment, which recognized privacy as a fundamental right and overruled earlier conflicting decisions such as M.P. Sharma and A.D.M. Jabalpur.
December 2020/June 2021
12. In which of the following cases was it held that the "procedure established by law" must be just, fair, and reasonable?
(a)Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
(b)A.K. Gopalan v. Union of India
(c)Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India✓
(d)Govind v. State of M.P.
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Supreme Court held that the procedure under Article 21 must not only be established by law but also be just, fair, and reasonable. This significantly expanded the interpretation of personal liberty under the Constitution and marked a departure from the narrow view adopted in A.K. Gopalan.
December 2021/June 2022Sequence / order
3. Arrange the following cases chronologically (from earliest to latest):
(A) National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
(B) Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT of Delhi
(C) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
(D) Suresh Kaushal v. Naz Foundation
(E) The cases of Navtej Singh Johar and Suresh Kaushal were decided in the same year
Options:
(a)C, E, B, D
(b)D, B, A, C
(c)B, D, A, C✓
(d)E, D, A, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Chronologically, the cases were decided as follows:
Naz Foundation (2009) – decriminalized homosexuality
Suresh Kaushal (2013) – reversed Naz Foundation
National Legal Services Authority (2014) – transgender rights
Navtej Singh Johar (2018) – restored decriminalization under Section 377
Statement (E) is factually incorrect; hence, it is not part of the correct chronological order.
December 2021/June 2022
4. Under Article 338(5) of the Constitution of India, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes has –
(a)The power to issue caste certificates
(b)The power to revoke caste certificates
(c)The power to decide the validity of caste certificates
(d)No power to issue/revoke certificates and no power to decide upon the validity of caste certificates✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
As per Article 338(5), the National Commission for Scheduled Castes can investigate and monitor safeguards for SCs but does not have statutory powers to issue, revoke, or decide upon the validity of caste certificates. These functions lie with the competent authority designated by the state.
5. In the Constitution of India, the principle of Rule of Law is mainly embodied in:
(a) Article 14
(b) Article 32
(c) Article 226
(d) Article 227
Answer: (a)
The principle of Rule of Law is primarily embodied in Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of laws to all persons within the territory of India. This ensures that no one is above the law and forms the cornerstone of constitutional governance.
December 2021/June 2022
6. Every state and every local authority within the state is required to provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups under:
(a)Article 350
(b)Article 350A✓
(c)Article 350B
(d)Article 351
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Article 350A of the Indian Constitution mandates that every State and every local authority shall provide adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic minority groups. It is a directive principle aimed at protecting the cultural and linguistic rights of minorities.
December 2021/June 2022Assertion–Reason
8.
Assertion (A): Ex post-facto laws are those which declare an act to be an offence and punishable, although it was lawful when committed.
Reason (R): Imposing or increasing a penalty retrospectively under a taxing statute does not violate Article 20(1).
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
The assertion is true because Article 20(1) prohibits retrospective criminal legislation that creates an offence or increases punishment after the act was committed. The reason is false, as such retrospective punishment—even under a taxing law—would still violate Article 20(1).
December 2021/June 2022
9.
Which of the following is not applicable under Article 13 of the Constitution of India?
(a)Any legislation made by Parliament under Article 245
(b)Any legislation made by Parliament under Article 253 for giving effect to international agreements
(c)Any constitutional amendment made under Article 368✓
(d)Custom and usage
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
As per Article 13(4), constitutional amendments under Article 368 are excluded from the purview of Article 13. This was clarified in the 24th Constitutional Amendment of 1971, which inserted Article 13(4) stating that Article 13 shall not apply to constitutional amendments.
December 2021/June 2022Match the lists
11. Match List I with List II and choose the correct answer:
A. Judicial Review → II. Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
B. Free and Fair Elections → I. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan
C. Balance between Part III and Part IV → IV. Minerva Mills Ltd v. Union of India
D. Secularism → III. S.R. Bommai v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Each case is landmark in its domain:
Keshavananda Bharati case laid down the basic structure doctrine including judicial review.
Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narayan emphasized free and fair elections.
Minerva Mills case highlighted the balance between fundamental rights (Part III) and directive principles (Part IV).
S.R. Bommai affirmed secularism as part of the basic structure.
December 2021/June 2022
14. In which one of the following cases was legal aid held as a fundamental right?
(a)Sunil Batra case
(b)M.H. Hoskot case✓
(c)Prem Shankar Shukla case
(d)Keshvananda Bharati case
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
In M.H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra (1978), the Supreme Court held that legal aid is a fundamental right under Article 21. The judgment emphasized that fair procedure includes access to legal assistance for those who cannot afford it.
December 2022Match the lists
8. Match the following constitutional provisions with their corresponding Articles:
List-I:
A. Promotion of International Peace and Security
B. Conduct of Business of the Government of India
C. Special Address by the Governor
D. Language to be used in the Legislature
List-II:
I. Article 210
II. Article 176
III. Article 77
IV. Article 51
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
A – IV: Article 51 encourages the promotion of international peace and security as part of the Directive Principles.
B – III: Article 77 deals with how the business of the Government of India is conducted.
C – II: Article 176 provides for the Governor’s special address to the State Legislature.
D – I: Article 210 relates to the language to be used in State Legislatures.
December 2022Sequence / order
9. Arrange the following Supreme Court cases in chronological order (from oldest to most recent):
A. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
B. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu
C. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
D. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
E. Azeez Basha v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
The correct chronological order is:
A. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1964)
E. Azeez Basha v. Union of India (1967)
D. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
B. Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachilhu (1992)
C. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997)
June 2023
6. Which of the following are included under Constitutional Remedies?
A. Extraordinary remedies under Articles 32 and 226
B. Appeals to Supreme Court under Articles 132 to 135
C. Appeals to High Court under Article 139 and 139A
D. Transfer of cases to Supreme Court under Article 139B
E. Advisory jurisdiction under Article 143
(a)A, C and D only
(b)A, B and E only✓
(c)B, C and D only
(d)C, D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Remedies include writs (Articles 32, 226), appeals to the Supreme Court (Articles 132–135), and advisory jurisdiction (Article 143). Article 139B and 139A relate more to administrative or procedural transfers, not core remedies.
June 2023
7. Under Article 15 of the Constitution of India, special provisions can be made for which of the following groups?
A. Women and children
B. Scheduled Tribes
C. Economically weaker sections
D. Socially backward classes
E. Linguistic minorities
(a)A, C, B and E only
(b)B, C, D and E only
(c)A, B, C and D only✓
(d)A, B, C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 15(3), 15(4), and 15(6) allow the State to make special provisions for women, children, socially and educationally backward classes, SCs, STs, and economically weaker sections—not linguistic minorities.
June 2023Match the lists
9. Match the following Directive Principles with the corresponding Articles:
A. Equal justice and free legal aid – I. Article 39A
B. Promotion of co-operative societies – II. Article 43B
C. Living wages for workers – III. Article 43
D. Uniform civil code – IV. Article 44
(a)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
(b)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
(c)A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV✓
(d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Equal justice (39A), co-operatives (43B), living wages (43), and Uniform Civil Code (44) are correctly matched.
June 2023
10. In which case was the doctrine of 'Prospective Overruling' first applied in India?
(a)S.P. Gupta v. Union of India
(b)I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab✓
(c)Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
(d)M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The doctrine was first applied in I.C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court ruled that certain constitutional amendments would not have retrospective effect.
June 2023
11. Which of the following are fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution?
A. Right not to remain employed
B. Right not to remain uneducated
C. Right not to remain unmarried
D. Right not to be killed without trial
E. Right not to change religion
(a)B, D and E only✓
(b)A, C and D only
(c)A, D and E only
(d)B, C and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Right to education (Article 21A),
Right to life and liberty including protection from arbitrary killing (Article 21),
Right to freedom of religion (Article 25)
are all fundamental rights. Employment and marriage choices are personal liberties but not fundamental rights in this negative phrasing context.
June 2023Sequence / order
12. Which of the following select combinations from the Preamble are in the correct order?
(a)“Fraternity assuring the integrity”
(b)“Fraternity assuring the dignity”✓
(c)“Fraternity assuring the unity”
(d)“Fraternity assuring the unity and integrity”
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
The Preamble of the Constitution of India reads: “Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation.” The first part, "Fraternity assuring the dignity" is the correct initial combination.
June 2023
14. Under Article 51 of the Constitution of India, the State is directed to endeavour to:
(a)Promote international peace and security
(b)Maintain just and honorable relations between nations✓
(c)Foster respect for international law and treaty obligations
(d)Protect and improve the environment and safeguard forests
(e) Encourage settlement of international disputes through arbitration
Which of the above are included in Article 51?
(a)A, B, C and D only
(b)A, B, C and E only✓
(c)B, C, D and E only
(d)A, C, B and D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) A, B, C and E only
Explanation: Article 51 of the Constitution, part of the Directive Principles of State Policy, obligates the State to promote international peace and security, maintain just and honourable relations between nations, foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, and encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration. The protection of environment and forests is not included under Article 51; it is addressed under Article 48A.
December 2023
1. Art. 28 of the Constitution of India mentions four types of educational institutions. In which of the following can religious instruction be imparted with consent of the individual or otherwise?
(A) Institution wholly maintained by the state
(B) Institution recognised by the state
(C) Institution receiving aid out of state fund
(D) Institution administered by the state but established under any trust or endowment
Options:
(a)(A), (B), (C) only
(b)(B), (C), (D) only✓
(c)(A), (C), (D) only
(d)(A), (B), (D) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 28(1) prohibits religious instruction in educational institutions wholly maintained by the State. However, institutions that are only recognized or aided, or those established under trust/endowments but administered by the State, can impart religious instruction with individual consent. Hence, options (B), (C), and (D) are correct.
December 2023
2. The Preamble of the Constitution of India:
Options:
(a)can be amended✓
(b)cannot be amended
(c)can be amended only by the Supreme Court
(d)cannot be amended because it is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharati case clarified that the Preamble is a part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368, provided the basic structure is not altered. So, amendment is permissible.
December 2023Sequence / order
3. Arrange the following cases in the sequence of their year of verdict:
(A) Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala
(B) Sankari Prasad v. Union of India
(C) Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
(D) Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Options:
(a)(B), (D), (C), (A)✓
(b)(A), (B), (C), (D)
(c)(C), (D), (B), (A)
(d)(A), (D), (B), (C)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Chronological order of verdicts: Sankari Prasad (1951), Sajjan Singh (1965), Golak Nath (1967), Kesavananda Bharti (1973). Hence, option (a) is correct.
December 2023
4. Which among the following provisions of the Constitution of India mandates criminalisation of prohibited conduct?
Options:
(a)Article 17 only
(b)Article 23 only
(c)Article 17 and 23 only✓
(d)Article 17, 23 and 24
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Article 17 (Abolition of untouchability) and Article 23 (Prohibition of human trafficking and forced labour) both specifically state that the practice is a punishable offence under law. Article 24 prohibits child labour but does not directly criminalise; it’s left to Parliament. Hence, (c) is correct.
December 2023Match the lists
5. Match List I with List II.
List I:
(A) Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar
(B) Kadra Pehadiya v. State of Bihar
(C) M. H. Hoskot v. State of Maharashtra
(D) Khatri v. State of Bihar
List II:
(1) 1981
(2) 1980
(3) 1979
(4) 1978
Options:
(a)(A)-(3), (B)-(1), (C)-(2), (D)-(4)
(b)(A)-(4), (B)-(3), (C)-(2), (D)-(1)
(c)(A)-(1), (B)-(2), (C)-(3), (D)-(4)
(d)(A)-(3), (B)-(2), (C)-(4), (D)-(1)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The correct match is: A-1979, B-1980, C-1978, D-1981. These cases collectively strengthened the right to legal aid and speedy trial under Article 21.
December 2023Match the lists
6. Match List I with List II.
List I:
(A) Linkletter v. Walker
(B) Golak Nath v. State of Punjab
(C) Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin
(D) People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
List II:
(1) Prospective overruling in constitutional law
(2) Right to register "none of the above"
(3) Importation of ICCPR rights into Indian law
(4) Prospective overruling in criminal procedure
Options:
(a)(A)-(2), (B)-(1), (C)-(4), (D)-(3)
(b)(A)-(1), (B)-(4), (C)-(2), (D)-(3)
(c)(A)-(4), (B)-(2), (C)-(3), (D)-(1)
(d)(A)-(4), (B)-(1), (C)-(3), (D)-(2)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: Linkletter introduced prospective overruling in criminal law; Golak Nath brought it into Indian constitutional law. Jolly George used ICCPR provisions in Indian context. PUCL led to the NOTA (None Of The Above) option in voting.
December 2023
7. Which Articles deal with protection of environment and/or cultural places?
(A) Article 51A(g)
(B) Article 40
(C) Article 48A
(D) Article 51A(j)
(E) Article 49
Options:
(a)(A), (C) and (E) only✓
(b)(A), (B) and (C) only
(c)(C), (D) and (E) only
(d)(A), (C) and (D) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 51A(g) directs citizens to protect the environment. Article 48A mandates the State to protect the environment and forests. Article 49 protects monuments and places of historic interest. Hence, (A), (C), and (E) are correct.
December 2023
10. Which Article in the Constitution of India established the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes?
(a)Article 335
(b)Article 338✓
(c)Article 341
(d)Article 342A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: Article 338 of the Constitution of India provides for the establishment of the National Commission for the Scheduled Castes. This Article empowers the Commission to investigate and monitor matters relating to the safeguards provided for SCs under the Constitution and to inquire into specific complaints regarding the deprivation of their rights.
December 2023
11. The notion that every citizen must do his duty towards the nation as well as fellow citizens is incorporated in the Indian Constitution in:
(a)Part III
(b)Part IV
(c)Part IV A✓
(d)Preamble
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Part IV A of the Constitution, which was added by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, contains Article 51A that lays down the Fundamental Duties of citizens. These duties reflect the moral obligations of all citizens to help promote a spirit of patriotism and to uphold the unity of India.
December 2023
12. Which is distinguished as the ‘Conscience’ of the Constitution?
(a)Fundamental Duties
(b)Preamble
(c)Universal adult suffrage
(d)Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy together are often referred to as the "Conscience of the Constitution." While Fundamental Rights ensure individual liberties, Directive Principles guide the State in creating a just society. Their harmony and balance have been declared as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
December 2023
13. The protection and enforcement of Human Rights under Article 32 is confined in India to:
(a)Fundamental Rights✓
(b)Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(c)Fundamental Duties
(d)Right to Vote
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: Article 32 of the Constitution of India provides the right to constitutional remedies, allowing individuals to move the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. It does not cover Directive Principles or other socio-economic rights that are not legally enforceable.
December 2023
14. Which of the following is part of the basic feature of the Constitution?
(a)Fundamental Duties
(b)Directive policies
(c)Political process and decision making
(d)Harmony and balance between Part III and Part IV✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that the harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights (Part III) and Directive Principles (Part IV) form a part of the basic structure of the Constitution. This balance ensures both individual freedoms and the State’s role in social welfare.
December 2023
15. Which Part of the Constitution of India discusses the vision of the Constitution and its framers as to what kind of society they aspired to establish in the country?
(a)Article 51A
(b)Part III and Part IV
(c)Part IV only✓
(d)Part dealing with affirmative steps
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Part IV of the Constitution (Directive Principles of State Policy) outlines the socio-economic goals that the framers envisioned for Indian society. It reflects their intent to build an egalitarian society and lays down the path for the State to ensure social and economic justice.
June 2024Match the lists
2. Match List-I with List-II:
List-I (Judicial Decisions)
(A) Sri Srinivasa Theatre v. Govt. of T.N
(B) K. A. Abbas v. Union of India
(C) Selvi v. State of Karnataka
(D) Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P
List-II (Fundamental Rights)
(I) Article 20(3) of the Constitution
(II) Right to Environment
(III) Equality before Law
(IV) Censorship
Options:
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II✓
(c)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
(d)A-IV, B-II, C-I, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Sri Srinivasa Theatre v. Govt. of T.N deals with Article 14 – equality before law.
K. A. Abbas v. Union of India dealt with film censorship under Article 19(1)(a).
Selvi v. State of Karnataka upheld the protection against self-incrimination under Article 20(3).
Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P emphasized the right to environment under Article 21.
Thus, option (b) is correct.
June 2024Sequence / order
4. Arrange the following reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) in their chronological order:
(A) Contempt of court
(B) Incitement to an offence
(C) Public order
(D) Security of the State
(E) Friendly relations with Foreign States
Options:
(a)A, E, B, C, D
(b)D, E, C, A, B
(c)D, A, B, C, E✓
(d)D, C, B, E, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c)
Explanation: Chronologically, the order in which these grounds were introduced under Article 19(2) is as follows:
Security of the State (original)
Contempt of Court (original)
Incitement to an offence (added later)
Public order (added by First Amendment)
Friendly relations with foreign states (added by First Amendment)
So, the correct order is (D), (A), (B), (C), (E).
June 2024Sequence / order
5. Arrange the following cases in chronological order of their verdicts:
(A) Vineet Narain v. Union of India
(B) Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala
(C) Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
(D) D. K. Basu v. State of West Bengal
Options:
(a)A, B, C, D
(b)B, C, A, D
(c)D, A, B, C
(d)B, C, D, A✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation:
Kesavananda Bharti – 1973
Minerva Mills – 1980
D. K. Basu – 1997
Vineet Narain – 1998
Therefore, the correct chronological order is B, C, D, A.
June 2024
8. M. K. Ranjit Singh v. Union of India (2024) deals with which of the following issue?
(a)Preservation of biodiversity and climate change✓
(b)Immigrants and refugees
(c)Offence against children
(d)Cyber crimes
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 2024 verdict in M.K. Ranjit Singh v. Union of India revolved around the urgent need for environmental governance, climate responsibility, and preservation of biodiversity, aligning with India’s international commitments and Article 48A of the Constitution.
June 2024
9. In which of the following case, the Supreme Court held that Section 309 of IPC is not unconstitutional and not violative of Articles 21 and 14 of the Constitution?
(a)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(b)Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India
(c)M.S. Dubal v. State of Maharashtra
(d)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: In Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab (1996), the Supreme Court overruled P. Rathinam and upheld the constitutional validity of Section 309 IPC (attempt to commit suicide), holding it not violative of Articles 14 or 21.
June 2024
12. In which of the following cases was it held that the Preamble of the Constitution emphasizes the need to secure to all citizens Justice, Liberty, Equality and Fraternity?
(a)Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
(b)K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India✓
(c)National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
(d)E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: In K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017), the Supreme Court reaffirmed the significance of the Preamble, emphasizing Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity as foundational values of the Indian Constitution, particularly in the context of privacy and dignity.
June 2024Sequence / order
13. Arrange in chronological order the following Fundamental Duties as they appear in the Constitution of India:
(A) To safeguard public property and abjure violence
(B) To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
(C) To develop scientific temper
(D) To defend the country and render national service
Options:
(a)D, A, B, C
(b)A, C, D, B
(c)D, C, B, A
(d)D, B, C, A✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The chronological order of Fundamental Duties as listed under Article 51A is:
(D) To defend the country,
(B) To value and preserve heritage,
(C) To develop scientific temper,
(A) To safeguard public property.
Hence, option (d) reflects the correct sequence.
December 2024Match the lists
1. Match List I with List II.
List I (Case Law)
(A) Birma v. State of Rajasthan
(B) NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh
(C) Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan
(D) People's Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India
List II (Theme)
(I) Safeguard interest of working women
(II) Enforcement of rights under international conventions
(III) Employment of children in construction work
(IV) Rights of refugees
Options:
(a)(A)-(II), (B)-(I), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
(b)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)✓
(c)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(III), (D)-(I)
(d)(A)-(II), (B)-(I), (C)-(IV), (D)-(III)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation:
Birma case dealt with employment of children in construction work.
NHRC v. State of Arunachal Pradesh was related to rights of refugees.
Vishaka case focused on protection of women at the workplace under international conventions.
PUDR case ensured labor protections for workers on government-funded projects.
December 2024
2. Which of the following groupings of Fundamental Rights is incorrectly placed according to Articles?
(a)Right to Equality (Art 14–18)
(b)Right to Constitutional Remedies (Art 32–35A)
(c)Right to Freedom of Religion (Art 25–28)
(d)Right Against Exploitation (Art 23–24)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d)
Explanation: The incorrect placement is option (b) — Right to Constitutional Remedies ends at Article 32. Articles 33 to 35 are miscellaneous provisions, and there is no Article 35A anymore (it was abrogated with Article 370). Hence, (b) is inaccurately placed.
December 2024Sequence / order
5. Arrange the following provisions in correct order as they appear in the Indian Constitution:
(A) Executive Power of State
(B) Term of Office of Governor
(C) Appointment of Governor
(D) Qualifications for Appointment as Governor
(E) Governor of State
Options:
(a)(E), (A), (C), (B), (D)✓
(b)(C), (D), (E), (B), (A)
(c)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E)
(d)(E), (C), (D), (A), (B)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The Constitution first defines the post (E – Art 153), then covers executive power (A – Art 154), followed by appointment (C – Art 155), term (B – Art 156), and qualifications (D – Art 157).
December 2024
7. The word "Secular" was added to the Preamble by which Amendment?
(a)42nd Amendment Act, 1976✓
(b)44th Amendment Act, 1978
(c)24th Amendment Act, 1971
(d)72nd Amendment Act, 1992
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: The 42nd Constitutional Amendment in 1976 added the words "Socialist" and "Secular" to the Preamble, reinforcing India's commitment to religious neutrality.
December 2024Match the lists
8. Match List I with List II.
List I (Provisions)
(A) Early childhood care for under 6
(B) Promotion of educational and economic interest of SC/ST
(C) Free and compulsory education for 6–14 years
(D) Special provision for economically weaker sections
List II (Article)
(I) Article 46
(II) Article 21A
(III) Article 45
(IV) Article 15(6)
Options:
(a)(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)✓
(b)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
(c)(A)-(IV), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(I)
(d)(A)-(II), (B)-(III), (C)-(IV), (D)-(I)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation:
Article 45: Early childhood education (under Directive Principles)
Article 46: Educational/economic uplift of SC/ST
Article 21A: Right to education (6–14 years)
Article 15(6): Special provisions for EWS
December 2024
9. In which case did the Supreme Court hold that passive euthanasia can be allowed under exceptional circumstances under strict court monitoring?
(a)Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India✓
(b)Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab
(c)P. Rathinam v. Union of India
(d)Arayakkamdy v. State
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a)
Explanation: In Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011), the Supreme Court permitted passive euthanasia under strict guidelines, allowing withdrawal of life support for terminally ill patients in exceptional situations with prior approval from the High Court.
December 2024Sequence / order
11. Arrange the following Fundamental Duties in the order as mentioned under Article 51A:
(A) To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture
(B) To cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle
(C) To safeguard public property and abjure violence
(D) To develop scientific temper, humanism and inquiry
(E) To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India
Options:
(a)(C), (D), (B), (E), (A)
(b)(B), (E), (A), (D), (C)✓
(c)(A), (B), (C), (E), (D)
(d)(B), (E), (C), (A), (D)
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b)
Explanation: The actual order in Article 51A is:
(B) cherish noble ideals,
(E) uphold sovereignty,
(A) preserve culture,
(D) develop scientific temper,
(C) safeguard public property.
June 2020 · Q87
Under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, the term 'Equal Protection of the Laws has been taken from the
(a)American Constitution✓
(b)British Constitution
(c)Australian Consititution
(d)Canadian Constituion
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) American Constitution
June 2020 · Q90
The provision given under Article 13 of the Indian Constitution are as follows
A. All laws in force in the territory of Indian immediately before the commencement of this constitution will be void to the extent of the inconsistency
B. 'Laws in force' includes all laws passed or made by the legislature or other competent authority in the territory on India before the commencement of this constituion and not previously repeated
C. The state shall not make any law which takes or abridges right conferred by Part III and any law made in the contravention shall be void
D. 'Law' does not include any ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage etc
E. Article 13 shall apply to any amendment of the Constitution made under Article 368
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)B and D only
(b)D and E only
(c)A and E only
(d)A, B and C only✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A, B and C only
Passage for June 2020 Q91–Q95
Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow
The right to live with dignity has been recognized as a human right on the international front and by the number of precedents of this Court and therefore, the Constitutional courts must strive to protect the dignity of every individual, for, without the right to dignity, every other right would be rendered meaningless, Dignity is an inseparable facet of every individual that invites reciprocative respect from others to every aspect of an individual which he/she perceives as an essential attribute of his/her individuality, be it an orientation or an optional expression of choice. The Constitution has ladened the judiciary with the very important duty to protect and ensure the right of every individual including the right to express and choose without an impediments so as to enable an individual to fully realize his/her fundamental right to live with dignity. Sexual orientation is one of the many biological phenomena which is natural and inherent in an individual and is controlled by neurological and biological factors. The science of sexuality has theorized that an individual exerts little or no control over who he/she gets attracted to. Any discrimination on the basis of one's sexual orientation would entail a violation of the fundamental right of freedom of expression
June 2020 · Q91
Which one of the following judges were part of the judgement referred to in the paragarph
(a)J. Deepak Mishra✓
(b)J.R.F. Nariman
(c)Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
(d)J. Indu Malhotra
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) J. Deepak Mishra
June 2020 · Q92
The above paragraph reflects the judgements in case of
(a)Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India✓
(b)Machi Singh v. State of Punjab
(c)Sate of U.P v. Ram Swaroop
(d)Chairman Railway Board v. Chandrima Das
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India
June 2020 · Q93
The fundamental right of the freedom of expression is contained in the following articles of the Indian Constitution
(a)Article 19 (1) (a)✓
(b)Article 19 (1) (f)
(c)Article 18 (1)
(d)Article 21
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Article 19 (1) (a)
June 2020 · Q94
The consensual sexual act of an adult is criminalised under which of the following legislations
(a)Indian Penal Code✓
(b)POSCO
(c)Criminal Law (Amendment) 2013
(d)Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Indian Penal Code
June 2020 · Q95
Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is violative of which of the following fundamental rights
(a)Article 21 only
(b)Article 14, 15 only
(c)Article 14, 19
(d)Article 14,15,19,21✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Article 14,15,19,21
Dec 2020/June 2021 · Q3Statements
Which of the following statements are correct?
(1) The Preamble contains in nutshell ideals and aspirations of the Constitution
(2) The Preamble is the key to open the minds of the Constitution makers
(3) The Preamble to the Constitution of India is solemnly resolved to secure to its citizens justice and equity
(4) The Preamble is not the part of the Constituent
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)(1) and (2) only✓
(b)(3) and (4) only
(c)(1) and (3) only
(d)(1) and (2) only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) (1) and (2) only
Dec 2021/June 2022 · Q48
The Hicklin test under Article 19(2) is related to
(a)Defamation
(b)Decency and morality✓
(c)Integrity of India
(d)Negligence
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Decency and morality
December 2022 · Q42
The Supreme Court of India in State of Bihar V. Kameshwar Singh (1952) laid down certain test for discovering whether any particular act constitutes a colourable legislation
A. The court must look into whether a legislature used wide or vague words or not which may extend the operation of an Act to subject?
B. The court must look into the substance of the law and not to its form or the label which the legislature has given it
C. The court must look at the object as well as the effect of the law
D. If the legislature proceeds under a legislative plan the court must read all the statutes constituting that plan and determine the combined effect
E. The court must look into that repugnancy is in existance?
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)A and B only
(b)B, C and D only✓
(c)A, C, D and E only
(d)D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) B, C and D only
December 2022 · Q73Match the lists
Match List-I with List-II
List-I List-II
A. X. V/s Principal secretary, Health and Family Welfare Development, NCT Delhi (2022) I Collaborative Federal Structure
B. Union of India V/s M/s Mohit Minerals through Director (2022) II All women, whether married and unmarried are entitled to safe and legal abortion
C. Sahara India Real Estate Ltd. v/s SEBI (2012) III Postponement of publication
D. NCT of Delhi V/s Union of India (2018) IV Uncooperative federalism
I II
I -II
A. , , r (2022) I
B. (2022) II. b
C. (2012) III
D. (2018) IV
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
(b)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(c)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
(d)A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I
December 2022 · Q82Sequence / order
Consider the following cases decided by the Supreme Court of India and arrange them in correct sequence of the year of the judgments
(Old to New)
A. Navtej Singh Jauhar v. Union of India
B. Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra
C. Sayra Bano v. Union of India
D. Selvi v. State of Karnataka
E. Shankri Prasad v. Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D, E
(b)E, D, C, B, A
(c)E, B, D, C, A✓
(d)D, E, C, A, B
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) E, B, D, C, A
December 2023 · Q52
According to Kaushal Kishore v. State of UP (2023) the fundamental right under article 19 is available against
(a)State actors only
(b)Non state actors only
(c)State as well as non state actors✓
(d)State under article 12 only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) State as well as non state actors
June 2025 · Q1
From which country is Part IV of the Indian Constitution borrowed?
(a)Russia
(b)Ireland✓
(c)USA
(d)Spain
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) Ireland
Explanation: Part IV of the Indian Constitution, which contains the Directive Principles of State Policy, is inspired by the Irish Constitution. The concept was adopted from Ireland’s Directive Principles to guide the State in framing laws and policies toward social justice and welfare.
June 2025 · Q3
In which of the following case, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 as unconstitutional?
(a)Shreya Singhal v. Union of India✓
(b)Ajay Canu v. Union of India
(c)Tata Cellular v. Union of India
(d)Supreme Court Bar Association v. Union of India
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) Shreya Singhal v. Union of India
Explanation: In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015), the Supreme Court held that Section 66A of the IT Act violated the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution and declared it unconstitutional.
June 2025 · Q46
Which Amendment inserted 'Secularism, Socialism, and Integrity' into the Preamble of the Indian Constitution?
(a)44th Amendment
(b)42nd Amendment✓
(c)73rd Amendment
(d)74th Amendment
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) 42nd Amendment
Explanation: The 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 inserted the words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” into the Preamble during the Emergency.
June 2025 · Q63
In which case did the Supreme Court of India hold that telephone tapping is a serious invasion of an individual's right to privacy?
(a)People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India✓
(b)R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
(c)Mr. 'X' v. Hospital 'Z'
(d)State of Maharashtra v. Madhukar Narayan
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India
Explanation: The Court held in PUCL v. Union of India (1997) that phone tapping without procedural safeguards violates Article 21.
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q60
National Commission for Minority Educational Institution Act was enacted by the Parliament in which year?
(a)1992
(b)1995
(c)2002
(d)2004✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) 2004
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q66
Which of the following cases deal with the interpretation of the 'personal liberty' under Article 21 of the Constitution of India?
A. Kharak Singh V/s State of U.P
B. Mohini Jain V/s State of Karnataka
C. Maneka Gandhi V/s Union of India
D. A.K. Gopalan V/s Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C only
(b)A, B only
(c)A, C, D only✓
(d)B, C, D only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A, C, D only
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q67Sequence / order
Arrange the following in the order in which they appear in the Preamble to the Indian Constitution
A. Equality
B. Justice
C. Liberty
D. Fraternity
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D
(b)B, C, D, A
(c)B, C, A, D✓
(d)C, B, D, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, C, A, D
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q75Sequence / order
Arrange the following cases in their chronological order
A. Sankari Prasad V/s Union of India
B. Sajjan Singh V/s State of Rajasthan
C. Golak Nath V/s State of Punjab
D. Kesavananda Bharati V/s State of Kerala
E. Waman Rao V/s Union of India
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, B, C, D, E✓
(b)E, D, C, B, A
(c)A, B, D, C, E
(d)D, E, A, B, C
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A, B, C, D, E
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q88
In educational institutions, reservations of seats in favor of the Scheduled Casts and the Scheduled Tribes is governed by which Article of the Constitution of India?
(a)Article 21-A
(b)Article 19
(c)Article 15✓
(d)Article 16
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) Article 15
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q118
Under Clause (3)(a) of Article 13 of the Constitution of India, "Law" includes
(a)Rule, Regulation, bye-law, order, notification, custom or usage
(b)Act, ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage
(c)Ordinance, order, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage
(d)Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage✓
Arrange the following cases chronologically (starting from earliest to the latest)
A. Minerva Mills Ltd. V/s Union of India
B. Samsher Singh V/s State of Punjab
C. S.P Anand V/s H. D. Deve Gowda
D. U.N.R. Rao V/s Smt. Indira Gandhi
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)D, B, A, C✓
(b)D, B, C, A
(c)C, B, A, D
(d)A, B, C, D
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) D, B, A, C
31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q134Assertion–Reason
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R
Assertion A: Article 30 of Constitution of India confers a right on all minorities to establish and administer educational institutions
Reason R: The right to establish and administer educational institutions by the minorities is based solely on religion. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
(a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A
(b)Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explantion of A
(c)A is correct but R is not correct✓
(d)A is not correct but R is correct
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) A is correct but R is not correct
June 2026 · Q59Sequence / order
Arrange the following cases of the Supreme Court on Right to Privacy in their ascending order
A. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu
B. Kharak Singh v. State of UP
C. Govind v. State of M.P
D. Malak Singh v. State of Punjab
E. PUCL v. UOI
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)E, A, D, C, B
(b)B, C, A, D, E
(c)B, C, D, A, E✓
(d)C, B, D, E, A
Answer & explanation
Answer: (c) B, C, D, A, E
Explanation: To arrange these landmark decisions of the Supreme Court concerning the Right to Privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India in ascending chronological order:
•
•
•
•
•
B. Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.: Decided in 1962 (AIR 1963 SC 1295). First major case addressing state surveillance and individual liberty.
C. Govind v. State of M.P.: Decided in 1975 (1975 2 SCC 148). Explicitly recognized a limited right to privacy under Article 21.
D. Malak Singh v. State of Punjab: Decided in 1980 (1981 1 SCC 420). Addressed surveillance registers maintained by police in relation to fundamental freedoms.
A. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (Auto Shankar Case): Decided in 1994 (1994 6 SCC 632). Explicitly linked the right to privacy to tortious law and publication of personal accounts.
E. PUCL v. Union of India (Telephone Tapping Case): Decided in 1996 (1997 1 SCC 301). Held that telephone tapping infringes Article 21 and Article 19(1)(a) unless conducted under strictly regulated procedures.
June 2026 · Q61Match the lists
Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II
A. Right against Public Hanging I. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administation
B. Right against Delayed Execution II. Charles Gurumukh Sobhraj v. Delhi Administration
C. Right against Bar Fetters III. Attorney General of India v. Lakhma Devi
D. Right against Solitary Confinement IV. T. V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I✓
(b)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
(c)A-III, B-II, C-I, D-IV
(d)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
Explanation: Matching each fundamental right standard under Article 21 with its corresponding landmark Supreme Court judgment:
• A. Right against Public Hanging III. Attorney General of India v. Lachma Devi (1989):
The Supreme Court struck down execution by public hanging, declaring that a public execution is barbaric, inhumane, and violative of the right to human dignity under Article 21.
• B. Right against Delayed Execution IV. T.V. Vatheeswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu (1983):
The Supreme Court held that prolonged delay in executing a death sentence causes immense mental trauma, violating Article 21, and can serve as a ground to commute the sentence to life imprisonment.
• C. Right against Bar Fetters II. Charles Gurumukh Sobhraj v. Delhi Administration (1978):
The Supreme Court ruled that putting iron bar fetters on prisoners continuously violates their right to dignity under Article 21, holding that prison regulations must comply with constitutional guarantees.
• D. Right against Solitary Confinement I. Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (1978):
The Supreme Court held that solitary confinement imposes extreme mental torture and dehumanizes a prisoner, violating Article 21 and the provisions of the Prisons Act, 1894.
June 2026 · Q70Match the lists
Match List I with List II LIST I LIST II
A. State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) I. Viva Voice Test
B. Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana (1985) II. Transgender
C. National Legal Service Authority v. Union of India (2014) III. Special Court for Speedier Trial
D. Dinesh Trivedi v. UOI (1997) IV. Right to Know
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV✓
(b)A-III, B-IV, C-II, D-I
(c)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
(d)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Answer & explanation
Answer: (a) A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV
Explanation: Matching each landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India with its central legal subject/issue:
• A. State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (1952) III. Special Court for Speedier Trial:
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950, which set up Special Courts for speedier trial of offences. The Court struck down Section 5(1) of the Act as violative of Article 14 due to arbitrary classification without proper guidelines.
• B. Ashok Kumar Yadav v. State of Haryana (1985) I. Viva Voce Test:
This case related to public recruitment selection procedures and scrutinised the high percentage of marks allocated to the Viva Voce (interview) test. The Court laid down guidelines restricting the maximum percentage of marks that can be allocated for viva voce in public service examinations.
• C. National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India (2014) II. Transgender:
A historic ruling in which the Supreme Court legally recognized transgender individuals as the "third gender" and affirmed their fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution.
• D. Dinesh Trivedi v. Union of India (1997) IV. Right to Know:
This case pertained to the disclosure of the Vohra Committee Report on the criminalization of politics. The Supreme Court held that the Right to Know is an implicit aspect of freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). Thus, the exact match is A-III, B-I, C-II, D-IV, corresponding to Option (a).
June 2026 · Q83
In which of the following case the Supreme Court went on to hold that the "width of power test" or direct impact and effect test" should be used to see, if a constitutional amendment violates the basic structure of the Constitution?
(a)Kesavananda Bharti v. State of Kerala (1973)
(b)Ashok Thakur v. UOI (2005)
(c)In re Presidential reference Case (1999)
(d)Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association v. UOI (2016)✓
Answer & explanation
Answer: (d) Supreme Court Advocate on Record Association v. UOI (2016)
Explanation: In Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India (2016) (famously known as the NJAC Case / Fourth Judges Case), the Supreme Court reiterated and applied the "width of power test" and "direct impact and effect test". The Court held that to determine whether a constitutional amendment violates the Basic Structure, the form or intent of the amendment is not determinative; rather, its consequence and direct effect on essential features (such as the independence of the judiciary) are what determine its constitutionality.
June 2026 · Q97Statements
Consider the following statement relating to Uniform Civil Code under the Constitution of India
A. Article 44 mandate State of secure for all person, a Uniform Civil Code
B. Article 44 mandate State to secure for the citizen of India, a Uniform Civil Code throughout India
C. In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, the Court ruled that Muslim husband is liable to pay maintenance to the divorced wife upto iddat period
D. In Danial Latifi v. UOI, the Court ruled that Muslim husband is liable to make provision for the future of wife even after Iddat period
E. In Sarla Mudgal v. UOI, the Court said that Article 44 is based on a concept that there is no necessary relation between religion and personal Law in civilized society
Choose the correct answer from the options given below
(a)A, D and E only
(b)B, D and E only✓
(c)B, C, D and E only
(d)A, C, D and E only
Answer & explanation
Answer: (b) B, D and E only
Explanation: Evaluating each statement in the context of Article 44 of the Constitution of India and landmark judicial precedents on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC):
• Statement A - INCORRECT: Article 44 mandates the State to secure a Uniform Civil
Code specifically for citizens, not for "all persons" (which would include noncitizens/foreigners).
• Statement B - CORRECT: The exact text of Article 44 (Directive Principles of State Policy) reads: "The State shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India."
• Statement C - INCORRECT: In Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985), the Supreme Court held that Section 125 of the CrPC applies to all citizens regardless of religion, and a Muslim husband's liability to pay maintenance to a divorced wife extends beyond the iddat period if she is unable to maintain herself.
• Statement D - CORRECT: In Danial Latifi v. Union of India (2001), while upholding the constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, the Supreme Court ruled that a Muslim husband is liable to make a reasonable and fair provision for the future of his divorced wife, which must be made/paid within the iddat period, but extends to provide for her entire life unless she remarries.
• Statement E - CORRECT: In Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995), the Supreme Court observed that Article 44 is based on the concept that there is no necessary relation between religion and personal law in a civilized society, emphasizing the need for a Uniform Civil Code to promote national integration and secularism. Therefore, statements B, D, and E are correct, corresponding to Option (b).