Unit II · Topic 7Election Commission of India – Previous Year Questions

18 previous year questions on Election Commission of India from UGC NET Law papers (2012–2025), including 1 assertion–reason, 4 match-the-list questions. The correct option is marked in green.

Questions

18 questions

June 2012 · Paper 3

8. Holding of periodic, free, and fair elections by the Election Commission is part of the basic structure of the Constitution as per:

  1. (a)Election Commission of India v. AIADMK
  2. (b)S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India
  3. (c)In Gujarat Assembly Election matter✓
  4. (d)Sadiq Ali v. Election Commission of India
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

In the Gujarat Assembly Election case (2002–2003), the Supreme Court held that free and fair elections conducted by the Election Commission are a part of the basic structure of the Constitution.

December 2012 – Paper 3

18. Representation in the House of the People (Lok Sabha) is based on:

  1. (a)Literacy of the State
  2. (b)Area of the State
  3. (c)Population✓
  4. (d)Community
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

Representation in Lok Sabha is primarily based on population, as provided under Articles 81 and 82, subject to periodic delimitation based on census data.

June 2013

5. The maximum interval between two sessions of each House of Parliament is:

  1. (a)Three months
  2. (b)Four months
  3. (c)Five months
  4. (d)Six months✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation:

As per Article 85(1), not more than six months shall elapse between two sessions of Parliament. This ensures Parliament meets at least twice a year.

December 2013 · Paper 3

4. Which one of the following cases is not related to the doctrine of severability?

  1. (a)A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
  2. (b)R.M.D.C. v. Union of India
  3. (c)Minerva Mills v. Union of India✓
  4. (d)Kihota Holohan v. Zachilhu
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Minerva Mills v. Union of India

Explanation: While (a), (b), and (d) involved application of severability (invalid parts of laws can be removed without affecting valid portions), Minerva Mills focused primarily on the basic structure doctrine and Article 368, not on severability.

June 2014 · Paper 3

Q3. The Constitution of the Election Commission is provided under:

  1. (a)Article 323
  2. (b)Article 324✓
  3. (c)Article 327
  4. (d)Article 329
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b)

Explanation: Article 324 of the Indian Constitution provides for the constitution of the Election Commission, including the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners, and outlines their powers and responsibilities.

December 2015 Paper 3

5. Under Article 324, the Election Commission of India is responsible for conducting elections to:

Parliament and State Legislatures

President and Vice-President

Zilla Parishads and Panchayats

Municipal Corporations and Committees

Options:

  1. (a)1, 2, 3 and 4
  2. (b)1 and 3 only
  3. (c)1, 2 and 3✓
  4. (d)1, 3 and 4
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation:

The Election Commission under Article 324 conducts elections to Parliament, State Legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President. Local body elections (items 3 and 4) are conducted by State Election Commissions.

December 2015 Paper 3

8. In which case did the Supreme Court declare that no election can be challenged on the ground of defects in electoral rolls?

Options:

  1. (a)Inderjit Barua v. Election Commission of India✓
  2. (b)N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer
  3. (c)Kalyan Lal Omar v. R.K. Trivedi
  4. (d)Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

In Inderjit Barua v. Election Commission of India (1986), the Supreme Court held that elections cannot be questioned merely on the basis of defects in the electoral roll.

July 2016 Paper 3

8. Which of the following was not a recommendation of the Dinesh Goswami Committee on Electoral Reforms?

  1. (a)State assistance to national political parties for elections
  2. (b)Maintenance of proper accounts of elections
  3. (c)Strict enforcement of model code of conduct
  4. (d)Video coverage of polling booths to check booth capturing✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation:

While the Dinesh Goswami Committee recommended several reforms including financial transparency and enforcement of the model code, video surveillance of polling booths was not part of its recommendations.

September 2016 Paper 3Match the lists

8. Match the following cases with the principles involved:

A. A.C. Jose v. Sivam Pillai

B. S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India

C. Digvijay Mote v. Union of India

D. People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India

Powers of Election Commissioners

Provisions for NOTA

Use of electronic voting machines

Postponement of election due to disturbed conditions

Options:

  1. (a)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2✓
  2. (b)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1
  3. (c)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
  4. (d)A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

A.C. Jose v. Sivam Pillai: Upheld EVM use.

S.S. Dhanoa: Clarified powers of Election Commissioners.

Digvijay Mote: Dealt with postponing elections due to law and order.

PUCL v. Union of India: Introduced NOTA (None of the Above).

January 2017 Paper 3Assertion–Reason

8. Assertion (A): No one shall be eligible for inclusion in special electoral rolls on the basis of religion, race, caste, or sex.

Reason (R): This statement is the title of Article 325 of the Constitution.

  1. (a)Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A✓
  2. (b)Both A and R are incorrect
  3. (c)A is incorrect, but R is correct
  4. (d)A is correct, but R is incorrect
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

Article 325 prohibits discrimination in electoral rolls based on religion, race, caste, or sex. It ensures one general electoral roll without exclusion on discriminatory grounds.

November 2017 Paper 3Match the lists

8. Match List-I with List-II and choose the correct answer:

List-I (Articles)

A. Article 324(1) –

B. Article 324(2) –

C. Article 324(4) –

D. Article 324(5) –

List-II (Subjects)

Composition of Election Commission

Appointment of Regional Commissioners

Powers of Election Commission

Conditions of service and tenure of Election Commissioners

Code:

  1. (a)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4✓
  2. (b)A-1, B-2, C-3, D-4
  3. (c)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
  4. (d)A-4, B-2, C-3, D-1
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a)

Explanation:

A. Article 324(1) – Powers of the Election Commission

B. Article 324(2) – Composition of Election Commission

C. Article 324(4) – Appointment of Regional Commissioners

D. Article 324(5) – Conditions of service and tenure

December 2019Sequence / order

13. Arrange the following cases related to the Election Commission in chronological order:

Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India

T.N. Seshan v. Union of India

People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India

S.S. Dhanoa v. Union of India

  1. (a)2, 3, 4, 1
  2. (b)3, 4, 2, 1
  3. (c)1, 4, 2, 3
  4. (d)4, 2, 1, 3✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) 4, 2, 1, 3

Explanation: Chronological order:

S.S. Dhanoa (1991)

T.N. Seshan (1995)

Kuldip Nayar (2000)

December 2020/June 2021Match the lists

5. Match the Articles with their relevant provisions regarding elections:

A. Article 326 → (III) Elections based on adult suffrage

B. Article 324(3) → (I) Chief Election Commissioner shall act as Chairman of Election Commission

C. Article 328 → (IV) Power of State Legislature to make laws regarding elections

D. Article 329 → (II) Bar on court interference in electoral matters

Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

The correct matching is:

(A)-(III), (B)-(I), (C)-(IV), (D)-(II).

Each article relates to important provisions of the electoral process under the Constitution.

June 2024

6. As per Article 324 of the Constitution of India, any other Election Commissioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office except on the recommendation of the:

  1. (a)President
  2. (b)Chief Justice of India
  3. (c)Prime Minister
  4. (d)Chief Election Commissioner✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d)

Explanation: Article 324(5) provides that the Chief Election Commissioner cannot be removed from office except in the manner and on the grounds applicable to a Supreme Court judge. However, other Election Commissioners can be removed only on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner, ensuring their functional independence.

December 2024

6. Who has the power to make laws regarding electoral rolls and delimitation of constituencies for State Legislature elections?

  1. (a)Election Commission of India
  2. (b)President of India
  3. (c)Parliament by Law✓
  4. (d)Governor in consultation with Chief Minister
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c)

Explanation: Article 327 empowers Parliament to make laws with respect to elections, including delimitation and electoral rolls, for both Union and State legislatures.

June 2025 · Q75

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India issue fourteen directions to the Union and State Governments for the eradication of manual scavenging?

  1. (a)Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India
  2. (b)Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Union of India
  3. (c)Adivasis for Social and Human Rights Action v. Union of India
  4. (d)Dr. Balram Singh v. Union of India✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) Dr. Balram Singh v. Union of India

Explanation: This PIL led to a comprehensive ruling where the Supreme Court issued binding directions for the elimination of manual scavenging.

31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q103Match the lists

Match the LIST-I with LIST-II LIST-I (Article from the Indian LIST-II (Corresponding Provisions) Constitution)

A. Article 325 I. One general electoral roll

B. Article 326 II. Adult Suffrage

C. Article 327 III. Bar to interference by courts in electoral matters

D. Article 329 IV. Power of Parliament to make provisions w.r.t. elections to legislatures

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
  2. (b)A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III✓
  3. (c)A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
  4. (d)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III

31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q106

In which of the following case, the Supreme Court declared that till a law is made by the Parliament, the appointment to the posts of Chief Election Commissioner of India and Election Commission shall be done by the President of India on the basis of the advice tendered by a Committee?

  1. (a)S. S. Dhannoa V/s Union of India
  2. (b)T. N. Seshan V/s Union of India
  3. (c)Anoop Baranwal V/s Union of India✓
  4. (d)In Re Presidential Reference, 2002
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Anoop Baranwal V/s Union of India

← Back to all units All topics of Unit II