Unit VI · Topic 8Company law – Incorporation of a company, prospectus, shares and debentures – Previous Year Questions

27 previous year questions on Company law – Incorporation of a company, prospectus, shares and debentures from UGC NET Law papers (2012–2026), including 1 assertion–reason, 4 match-the-list, 1 statement-based questions. The correct option is marked in green.

Questions

27 questions

2012Assertion–Reason

Assertion (A): Doctrine of Indoor Management protects an outsider dealing with a company from irregularities inside a company. Reason (R): Doctrine of ultra vires protects an outsider dealing with a company for corporate capacity not mentioned in the objects clause. Code:

  1. (a)(A) is true, but (R) is false
  2. (b)(A) is false and (R) is true
  3. (c)(A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not an explanation of (A)✓
  4. (d)(A) and (R) are true, but (R) is an explanation of (A)
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : The doctrine of indoor management tells us about the internal management of the company. It provides protection to outside persons. The doctrine of ultra vires means that the company will not act beyond its memorandum of association, and if it does any such act, the outside person gets protection. Hence both assertion A and reason R are correct but reason R is not the correct explanation of assertion A.

2013

Role of doctrine of ultra vires is

  1. (a)to fight virus of ultras
  2. (b)to protect indoor managers
  3. (c)to confine corporate action within fixed limits✓
  4. (d)to protect directors for exercising their implied authority
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : A company is required to function within the limits of the objects defined in its memorandum of association. But when it acts beyond those limits, it is called ultra vires.

2014

Haward v. Patent Ivory manufacturing Co. (1888) 38 Ch. D. 156 is a case about

  1. (a)Doctrine of ultra vires
  2. (b)Doctrine of indoor management✓
  3. (c)Doctrine of public notice
  4. (d)Doctrine of social responsibility
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : Doctrine of indoor management Explanation: Haward v. Patent Ivory Manufacturing Co. (1838) 38 C.H.D. 156 is related to the Doctrine of Indoor Management.

2015

If incidental objects are not stated in the memorandum, they would not be allowed by the principle of reasonable construction

The doctrine of indoor management operates to protect insiders against the company Codes:

  1. (a)Only 1 and 2
  2. (b)Only 2 and 3
  3. (c)Only 1, 2 and 3
  4. (d)1, 2, 3 and 4✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : 1, 2, 3 and 4 Explanation: According to Companies Act 2013, all the options given in the question are wrong. (1) In Attorney General v. Great Eastern Railway Company, it was not said that the doctrine of ultra vires as explained in the Ashbury case should not be maintained, but rather that in every circumstance, incidental acts cannot be declared ultra vires. Statement (1) is wrong. (2) Section 13 of the Companies Act permits alteration of the memorandum. Therefore, a change in incidental objects can be made in the memorandum, but it must be clearly stated. Statement (2) is wrong. (3) Even if incidental objects are not mentioned in the memorandum, they may be allowed by the principle of reasonable construction. Statement (3) is wrong. (4) The doctrine of indoor management was laid down in Royal British Bank v. Turquand. Any person dealing with a company or its directors can assume that the company is acting in accordance with its memorandum and articles. Therefore, statement (4) saying 'the doctrine of indoor management protects company employees against the company' is wrong.

2015

Which of the following cases is about doctrine of indoor management?

  1. (a)Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Co.Ltd v. Riche
  2. (b)Rama Corpn. V. Proved tin and General Investment Co.✓
  3. (c)London Country Council v. Attorney-General
  4. (d)A. Lakshmana swamy Mudaliar v. L.I.C
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : Rama Corpn. V. Proved tin and General Investment Co. Explanation: The doctrine of indoor management of Royal British Bank v. Turquand is said to have been laid down for the first time in this case.

2017Statements

Which of the following statement is correct? Answer using codes given below:

Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of knowledge of irregularity in company

Doctrine of indoor management does not apply in case of suspicion of irregularity

Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of forgery

Doctrine of indoor management does not apply if the act of an officer of a company is one which would ordinarily be beyond the powers of such an officer Codes:

  1. (a)only 1 is correct
  2. (b)only 2 is correct
  3. (c)only 3 is correct
  4. (d)only 4 is correct✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : only 4 is correct Explanation: The doctrine of indoor management does not apply in the following circumstances — (1) Knowledge of irregularity, (2) Forgery, (3) In cases of suspicion of irregularity, (4) Acts which are beyond the apparent authority.

2019

Which of the following actions can be taken when an issue is made under the provisions of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013?

  1. (a)An advertisement can be issued in a local newspaper having city coverage
  2. (b)The money payable toward subscription can be received in cash
  3. (c)The share can be allotted within sixty days of the date of offer
  4. (d)The offer can be made to a maximum of fifty people✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : The offer can be made to a maximum of fifty people Explanation: Section 42 of the Companies Act 2013 provides for private placement of securities. Under this section, an offer or invitation for subscription of securities on private placement can be made to a maximum of fifty persons.

2019

Choose the correct section of the Competition Act, 2002. Which provides that 'No enterprise shall abuse its dominant position:

  1. (a)Section 4✓
  2. (b)Section 9
  3. (c)Section 8
  4. (d)Section 6
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : Section 4 Explanation: According to Section 4 of the Competition Act 2002, no enterprise shall abuse its dominant position. Section 6 — regulation of combinations; Section 8 — composition of Commission; Section 9 — selection committee for Chairperson and members of Commission.

2019

Who among the following said that there is in essence, no difference between the legal personability of a company and that of an individual?

  1. (a)Maitland
  2. (b)Dicey
  3. (c)Gierke
  4. (d)Kelsen✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : Kelsen Explanation: Kelsen said that in essence, there is no difference between the legal personality of a company and that of an individual.

2020-2021Match the lists

Match List I with List II (Sections of the Companies Act, 2013): List-I A. Abridged Prospectus B. Deemed Prospectus C. Shelf Prospectus D. Red Herring Prospectus List-II (i) Section 31 (II) Section 32 (III) Section 2(1) (IV) Section 25 Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)(A)-(III), (B)-(IV), (C)-(I), (D)-(II)✓
  2. (b)(A)-(II), (B)-(III), (C)-(IV), (D)-(I)
  3. (c)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
  4. (d)(A)-(IV), (B)-(I), (C)-(II), (D)-(III)
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : The correct matching of sections under the Companies Act, 2013: A. Abridged Prospectus — Section 2(1) B. Deemed Prospectus — Section 25 C. Shelf Prospectus — Section 31 D. Red Herring Prospectus — Section 32

2020-2021

Who among the following can remove the name of company from Register of Companies on suo moto basis in terms of Section 248(1) of Companies Act, 2013?

  1. (a)Registrar of companies✓
  2. (b)Securities and Exchange Board of India
  3. (c)National Company Law Tribunal
  4. (d)Ministry of Corporate Affairs
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : The Registrar has been empowered under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act to remove the name of a company from the Register of Companies in the following circumstances:

The company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation, or

The company has not been carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under Section 455, or

The subscribers to the memorandum have not paid the subscription money which they had undertaken to pay at the time of incorporation of the company and a declaration to this effect has not been filed within 180 days of its incorporation, or

2020-2021

The company is not carrying on any business or operations as revealed after physical verification carried out under Section 12(9).

Endorsement of Negotiable instrument followed by delivery: (1) Transfers the property in instrument to endorsee (2) Transfers the right of further negotiation to the endorsee (3) May exclude or restrict the right of further negotiation by endorsee (4) May merely constitute the endorsee as an agent Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)(1) and (2) only
  2. (b)(3) and (4) only
  3. (c)(1), (2), (3) only
  4. (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4)✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : According to Section 50 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, endorsement of a negotiable instrument followed by delivery transfers the property therein to the endorsee along with the right of further negotiation, but the endorsement may by express words restrict or exclude such right, or may merely constitute the endorsee as an agent to endorse the instrument or to receive its contents for the endorser or for some other specified person.

2021-2022Match the lists

Match List I with List II: List-I A. Solomon v. Solomon B. Royal British Bank v. Turquand C. Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron v. Riche (Ashbury) D. Vodafone International Holdings v. UOI List-II I. Voting rights II. Corporate Personality III. Doctrine of Ultra Virus IV. Doctrine of Indoor Management Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I
  2. (b)A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
  3. (c)A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV
  4. (d)A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : Correct matching: A. Solomon v. Solomon — Corporate Personality B. Royal British Bank v. Turquand — Doctrine of Indoor Management C. Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron v. Riche (Ashbury) — Doctrine of Ultra Vires D. Vodafone International Holdings v. UOI — Voting rights

2021-2022

_____ has to provide by making regulations for any class or class of companies which may file a shelf prospectus with the Registrar at the stage of first offer of securities.

  1. (a)NCLT
  2. (b)SEBI✓
  3. (c)IBBI
  4. (d)Director of a company
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : SEBI has to provide by making regulations for any class or class of companies which may file a shelf prospectus with the Registrar at the stage of first offer of securities.

2021-2022

Every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a public company shall state the following information: A. Name and addresses of the registered office of the company B. Details about underwriting of the Issue C. Details of directors D. Details about Trustees and their interest E. Collateral objects of the business. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)A, B, C and D only
  2. (b)C, D and E only
  3. (c)A, B and C only✓
  4. (d)A, B and D only
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : According to Section 26 of the Companies Act, 2013, every prospectus issued by or on behalf of a public company shall state the following information: A. The registered name and address of the company B. Details about underwriting of the Issue C. Details of directors.

2021-2022

Which of the following are correct? A. A company may issue debentures with option to convert them to shares, either wholly or partly at the time of redemption. B. Such issue has to be approved by a special resolution passed at a general meeting. C. Debentures with voting rights can be issued. D. Debentures cannot be issued. E. The debenture trustee has to take steps to protect the interest of debenture holders. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)B, C and E only
  2. (b)A, B and E only✓
  3. (c)A, C and D only
  4. (d)C, D and E only
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : According to Section 71(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, a company may issue debentures with an option to convert them into shares, wholly or partly, and such issue must be approved by a special resolution passed at a general meeting. Section 71(6) provides that the debenture trustee shall take steps to protect the interests of the debenture holders.

2021-2022Sequence / order

Arrange the following as per sections of the Companies Act, 2013 in descending order: A. Execution of Bills of Exchange, etc. B. Punishment in case of repeated default C. Annual reports on government companies D. Petition for winding up E. Functions of company Secretary Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)C, D, E, A, B
  2. (b)B, C, D, E, A✓
  3. (c)C, A, E, D, B
  4. (d)B, A, D, C, E
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : The descending order of sections under the Companies Act, 2013 is: A. Punishment in case of repeated default B. Annual reports on government companies C. Petition for winding up D. Functions of company Secretary E. Execution of Bills of Exchange, etc.

December 2023 · Q61

Red herring prospectus is a prospectus issued

  1. (a)Prior to the issue of prospectus✓
  2. (b)After the issue of main prospectus
  3. (c)With the consent of shareholder
  4. (d)On the behest of ROC (Register of Companies)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) Prior to the issue of prospectus

December 2023 · Q73Match the lists

Match List - I with List - II

List-I

(A) Producer companies

(B) Statutory companies

(C) Section 8 company

(D) Small company

List-II (I) Do not necessarily require Memorandum of Association (II) Association not for profit (III) Formed to convert cooperative into a company (IV) Paid up share capital is between 50 lakh-5 crore and turnover is between 2 crore - 20 crore

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)(A)-(I), (B)-(II), (C)-(IV), (D)-(III)
  2. (b)(A)-(III), (B)-(1), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)✓
  3. (c)(A)-(IV), (B)-(III), (C)-(1), (D)-(II)
  4. (d)(A)-(II), (B)-(IV), (C)-(III), (D)-(1)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) (A)-(III), (B)-(1), (C)-(II), (D)-(IV)

December 2023 · Q117Sequence / order

Arrange following cases in sequence of year they were decided

(A) Ashbyry Rly Carriage Co. Ltd. v. Riche

(B) Royal British Bank v. Turquand

(C) Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose

(D) State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. CTO, Vishakhaptnam

(E) Salomon v. Salomon Co. Ltd

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)(B), (A), (E), (C), (D)✓
  2. (b)(A), (B), (C), (E), (D)
  3. (c)(C), (D), (A), (B), (E)
  4. (d)(B), (C), (E), (A), (D)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) (B), (A), (E), (C), (D)

December 2024 · Q60

The limitation of the doctrine of constructive notice is known as which of the following?

  1. (a)Doctrine of indoor management✓
  2. (b)Lifting the corporate veil
  3. (c)Oppression and mismanagement
  4. (d)Doctrine of ultra vires
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) Doctrine of indoor management

December 2024 · Q88Match the lists

Match List - I with List - II

List -I (Concepts/Doctrines)

(A) Lifting the corporate veil

(B) Invitation to public in the context of prospectus

(C) Doctrine of ultra vires

(D) Doctrine of indoor management

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

List - II (Cases)

(1) Nash v/s Lynde (II) Ashbury Rly Carriage and Iron Co. Ltd. v/s Riche (III) Royal British Bank v/s Turquand (IV) Salomon v/s Salomon

  1. (a)(A)-(IV), (B)-(I), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)✓
  2. (b)(A)-(1), (B)-(II), (C)-(III), (D)-(IV)
  3. (c)(A)-(IV), (B)-(III), (C)-(II), (D)-(I)
  4. (d)(A)-(III), (B)-(II), (C)-(IV), (D)-(1)
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) (A)-(IV), (B)-(I), (C)-(I), (D)-(III)

June 2025 · Q71

In which case was the golden rule for framing a prospectus formulated by V.C. Kindersley?

  1. (a)Methodist Church v. Union of India
  2. (b)R. v. Registrar of Companies
  3. (c)New Brunswick Railway Co. v. Muggeridge✓
  4. (d)Jubilee Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Lewis
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) New Brunswick Railway Co. v. Muggeridge

Explanation: This case laid down the rule that the prospectus must disclose all material facts truthfully to avoid misleading investors.

June 2025 · Q86

Which provision of the Companies Act, 2013 identifies shares and debentures as movable property?

  1. (a)Section 44✓
  2. (b)Section 45
  3. (c)Section 46
  4. (d)Section 47
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) Section 44

Explanation: Section 44 of the Companies Act, 2013 clearly states that shares or debentures shall be movable property, transferable in the manner provided in the company’s articles.

31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q76

Which of the following is not a type of prospectus under the Companies Act, 2013?

  1. (a)Shelf Prospectus
  2. (b)Deemed Prospectus
  3. (c)Yellow (Herring) Prospectus✓
  4. (d)Abridged Prospectus
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Yellow (Herring) Prospectus

June 2026 · Q127Sequence / order

Arrange the following chapter of the Companies Act, 2013 in their ascending order

A. Share Capital and Debentures

B. Prospectus and Allotment of Securities

C. Audit and Auditors

D. Appointment and Qualification of Directors

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)B, A, D, C
  2. (b)A, B, D, C
  3. (c)D, B, A, C
  4. (d)B, A, C, D✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) B, A, C, D

Explanation: Arranging the given chapters of the Companies Act, 2013 in ascending numerical order:

1. B. Prospectus and Allotment of Securities: Covered under Chapter III (Sections 23 to 42).

2. A. Share Capital and Debentures: Covered under Chapter IV (Sections 43 to 72).

3. C. Audit and Auditors: Covered under Chapter X (Sections 139 to 148).

4. D. Appointment and Qualification of Directors: Covered under Chapter XI (Sections 149 to 172).

June 2026 · Q132Sequence / order

Arrange the following landmark decision on the Concept of Lifting the Corporate Veil in ascending order

A. LIC, India v. Escorts Ltd

B. Singer India v. Chandra Mohan Chaddha

C. In re R.G. Films Limited

D. Connors Brothers v. Conners

E. Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre and Rubber Company

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)E, D, C, A, B✓
  2. (b)D, E, C, A, B
  3. (c)E, C, D, B, A
  4. (d)D, E, B, C, A
Answer & explanation

Answer: (a) E, D, C, A, B

Explanation: Chronological Order of Decisions:

1. E. Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre and Rubber Co. Ltd. - 1916: (House of Lords ruling on lifting the veil to determine the enemy character of a company during war.)

2. D. Connors Brothers v. Connors - 1940: (Privy Council ruling applying the enemy character test and lifting the corporate veil against de facto enemy control.)

3. C. In re R.G. Films Limited - 1953: (English court decision lifting the veil where a corporate form was used as a mere sham/agent to circumvent quota regulations for film production.)

4. A. LIC, India v. Escorts Ltd. - 1986: (Supreme Court of India landmark decision clarifying the circumstances under which courts can lift the corporate veil.)

5. B. Singer India v. Chandra Mohan Chaddha - 2004: (Supreme Court of India ruling on lifting the corporate veil in lease/eviction matters involving company amalgamation.)

← Back to all units All topics of Unit VI