Unit VI · Topic 5Sale of Goods Act, 1930 – Previous Year Questions

24 previous year questions on Sale of Goods Act, 1930 from UGC NET Law papers (2013–2026), including 2 assertion–reason, 5 match-the-list, 4 statement-based questions. The correct option is marked in green.

Questions

24 questions

2013Statements

"Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods is transferred from the seller to the buyer, the contract is called a sale, but where the transfer of the property in the goods is to take place at a future time or subject to some condition thereafter to be fulfilled, the contract is called an agreement to sell." Read above statement and find correct answer, using codes given below:

  1. (a)Contract of sale is conditional
  2. (b)Contract of agreement to sell is conditional✓
  3. (c)There is no difference between sale and agreement to sell, as both are contracts
  4. (d)Sale is a contract, agreement to sell is not a contract
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : According to subsection 3 of Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act, where the transfer of property in goods takes place at a future time or subject to some condition, such contract is called agreement to sell. Thus the contract of agreement to sell is conditional. A contract of sale becomes a sale when that time passes or the conditions are fulfilled under which the property in the goods is to transfer.

2013

Find correct answer, using codes given below:

Bulk shall correspond with sample, is an implied condition.

Buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing bulk with sample, is an implied condition.

Goods should be free from any defect rendering them unmerchantable, is an implied condition.

There is an implied condition that the buyer shall have and enjoy possession of the goods. Codes:

  1. (a)1 only is correct
  2. (b)1 and 2 only are correct
  3. (c)1, 2 and 3 only are correct✓
  4. (d)All of above are correct
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : Section 17 of the Sale of Goods Act 1930 relates to sale by sample. Section 17(2) provides that in a contract of sale by sample, the following implied conditions exist — (1) The bulk shall correspond with the sample in quality. (2) The buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the sample. (3) The goods shall be free from any defect rendering them unmerchantable which would not be apparent on reasonable examination of the sample.

2014

Which are essentials of a contract of sale of goods? Answer using codes given below:

Offer

Acceptance of offer

Exchange of goods for money

Transfer of property in goods from seller to buyer Codes:

  1. (a)only i and ii
  2. (b)only iii and iv
  3. (c)Only ii and iii
  4. (d)i, ii, iii and iv✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : i, ii, iii and iv Explanation: According to Section 4 of the Sale of Goods Act 1930, the following are essential elements of a contract of sale — (1) Offer, (2) Acceptance of offer, (3) Exchange of goods for money, (4) Transfer of property in goods from seller to buyer.

2014Assertion–Reason

Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes below: Assertion (A): Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully neglects to pay for the goods according to the terms of the contract, the buyer may sue the seller for the price of the goods. Reason (R): The seller is entitled to get the contractual price. Codes:

  1. (a)Both (A) and (R) are correct, and (R) is correct reason for (A)
  2. (b)Both (A) and (R) are wrong
  3. (c)(A) is wrong, but (R) is right✓
  4. (d)(R) is wrong, but (A) is right
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : (A) is wrong, but (R) is right Explanation: Under the Sale of Goods Act 1930, where under a contract of sale the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully refuses to pay for the goods according to the terms of the contract, the buyer refuses to pay the price of the goods and the seller cannot sue the buyer for the price of the goods — rather the seller is entitled to the contractual price.

2014Match the lists

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below: List-I A. Intention of parties to pass property in goods B. Ascertainment of intention to pass property in goods C. Property of goods D. Specific goods in deliverable state List-II

Ghasiram v. State

Badriprasad v. State of Madhya Pradesh

United Breweries Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Usha Beltron Ltd v. State of Punjab Code:

  1. (a)A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
  2. (b)A-3, B-1, C-2, D-4
  3. (c)A-1, B-3, C-4, D-2
  4. (d)A-3, B-1, C-4, D-2✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : Correct matching is —

2014Statements

Intention to pass property in goods — United Breweries Ltd. v. Andhra Pradesh

Ascertainment of intention to pass property — Ghasiram v. State

Property of goods — Usha Beltron Ltd v. State of Punjab

Specific goods in deliverable state — Badriprasad v. Madhya Pradesh State

Which one statement is correct from the following statements?

  1. (a)If the contract is inconsistent with the public documents, the person contracting will not be prejudiced by irregularities that may be set the outdoor working of the company
  2. (b)If the contract is consistent with the public documents, the person contracting will not be prejudiced by irregularities that may be set the indoor working of the company✓
  3. (c)The doctrine of indoor management seeks to protect the company against the outside
  4. (d)The doctrine of ultra vires seeks to protect the outsider against internal irregularities of the company
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : If the contract is consistent with the public documents, the person contracting will not be prejudiced by irregularities that may be set the indoor working of the company Explanation: If the agreement is consistent with the public documents, the person contracting will not be prejudiced by irregularities that may affect the internal working of the company. The doctrine of indoor management protects the outsider from acts or decisions done by the company. The doctrine of ultra vires protects the company's shareholders and creditors against the internal irregularities of the company.

2015

Which are essentials of sale of goods? Answer using codes given below:

Contractual capacity

Bilateral contract

Profit for seller

Mutual and free consent of parties to the contract of sale of goods Codes:

  1. (a)1, 2, 3
  2. (b)1, 2, 3✓
  3. (c)2, 3, 4
  4. (d)1, 3, 4
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : 1, 2, 3 Explanation: According to the Sale of Goods Act 1930, the following are essential elements of sale of goods — 1. Contractual capacity, 2. Bilateral contract, 3. Profit for seller.

2015Match the lists

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the code given below: List-I A. Installment Supply Ltd. v. STO B. Gardiner v. Gray C. Peter Darlington Partners Ltd. v. Gesho Co. Ltd. D. Farquharson Bros v. King and Co. List-II

Conditions applied by trade usage

Nemo dat quod non habet

Sale by description

Difference between sale and agreement to sale Code:

  1. (a)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1
  2. (b)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
  3. (c)A-4, B-3, C-1, D-2✓
  4. (d)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : Correct matching — Installment Supply Ltd. v. STO — Difference between sale and agreement to sale Gardiner v. Gray — Sale by description (Section 15) Peter Darlington Partners Ltd. v. Gesho Co. Ltd. — Conditions applied by trade usage Farquharson Bros v. King and Co. — Nemo dat quod non habet (Section 27)

2016Match the lists

Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using codes given below: List-I A. Goods in sale of goods B. Consideration for a sale of goods C. Sale and agreement to sale D. Difference between contract of sale and contract of agency List-II

Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. STO

Instalment Supply Ltd. v. STO

R.D. Goyal v. Reliance Industries Ltd.

Aldridge v. Johnson Code:

  1. (a)A-3, B-4, C-2, D-1✓
  2. (b)A-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
  3. (c)A-3, B-4, C-1, D-2
  4. (d)A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : Correct matching is — (a) Goods in sale of goods — R.D. Goyal v. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2002) (b) Consideration for sale of goods — Aldridge v. Johnson (1975) (c) Sale and agreement to sale — Instalment Supply Ltd. v. STO (1974) (d) Difference between contract of sale and contract of agency — Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd. v. STO (1977)

Which of the following partnerships are legal? Answer using the codes given below:

Twelve members forming a banking firm

2016Match the lists

Match list-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the codes given below: List-I A. Buyer purchasing on the basis of description B. Packing as description C. Reliance on description to be in contemplation of parties. D. Correspondence with description. List-II

Arcos v. Ronnason & Son

Varley v. Whipp

Moore and Co. v. Landauer & Co.

Leaf v. International Gallries Code:

  1. (a)A-3, B-2, C-4, D-1
  2. (b)A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1✓
  3. (c)A-2, B-3, C-1, D-4
  4. (d)A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : Correct matching — Arcos v. Ronnason & Son (1933) — Correspondence with description Varley v. Whipp (1900) — Buyer purchasing on the basis of description Moore & Company v. Landauer & Co. (1921) — Packing as description Leaf v. International Galleries (1950) — Reliance on description to be in contemplation of parties

2017Statements

Which of the following statement is correct according to section 2(9) of the Sale of Goods Act? "Mercantile Agent" means a mercantile agent

  1. (a)having in the usual course of business as such seller authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purpose of sale, or to buy goods, or to distribute money for security of goods
  2. (b)having in the customary business as such agent power either to sell goods, or to mortgage goods for purpose of sale
  3. (c)having in the customary course of business as such agent authority to sell goods✓
  4. (d)having in the normal course of business as such agent authority to confine goods or to raise goods for purpose of the security of money
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : having in the customary course of business as such agent authority to sell goods Explanation: Under Section 2(9) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, 'mercantile agent' means an agent having in the customary course of his business as such agent authority either to sell goods, or to consign goods for the purposes of sale, or to buy goods, or to raise money on the security of goods.

2017Statements

Which of the following statements are correct. Answer using the codes given below:

Ascertainment of goods for sale is done by buyer

Appropriation of goods for sale is done by seller

Distinction between ascertainment of goods and appropriation of goods that former involves "the element of common intention between buyer and seller", whereas latter can be a unilateral act by buyer

Property in goods does not pass to buyer till appropriation Codes:

  1. (a)only 1, 3 and 4 are correct
  2. (b)only 2 is correct
  3. (c)only 4 is correct✓
  4. (d)only 3 is correct
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : only 4 is correct Explanation: According to Section 18 of the Sale of Goods Act 1930, where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained. Property in goods does not pass to the buyer until appropriation. Ascertainment of goods for sale is done by the seller.

2017Assertion–Reason

Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and answer using the codes given below: Assertion (A): "Goods" means every kind of movable property including actionable claims and money and excludes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale. Reason (R): Above principle is laid down in Section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act. Code:

  1. (a)Both (A) and (R) are right
  2. (b)Both (A) and (R) are wrong✓
  3. (c)(A) is wrong but (R) is right
  4. (d)(A) is right but (R) is wrong
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : Both (A) and (R) are wrong Explanation: According to Section 2(7) of the Sale of Goods Act, goods means every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money, and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.

2019

Which of the following is incorrect regarding meaning of 'Merchantable quality of goods'?

  1. (a)the goods are free from patent defects✓
  2. (b)the goods are free from latent defects
  3. (c)the goods can be used for the purpose for which they are bought
  4. (d)that the goods are marketable at their full value
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : the goods are free from patent defects Explanation: Section 16(2) of the Sale of Goods Act describes the merchantable quality of goods. The proviso under the above provision states that if the buyer examines the goods before buying, then those defects which ought to have been revealed by such examination (patent defects) are not included as an implied condition.

2019

Which one of the following cannot be treated as delivery under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930?

  1. (a)Doing anything which has the effect of putting goods in possession of legal representatives of seller✓
  2. (b)Doing anything which has the effect of putting goods in possession of any person authorised by the buyer
  3. (c)Doing anything which has the effect of putting goods in possession of the buyer
  4. (d)Doing anything which the parties agree to be treated as delivery
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : Doing anything which has the effect of putting goods in possession of legal representatives of seller Explanation: Section 33 of Chapter 4 of the Sale of Goods Act 1930 defines delivery. According to it, delivery of goods sold may be made by doing anything which the parties agree shall be treated as delivery or which has the effect of putting the goods in the possession of the buyer or of any person authorised to hold them on his behalf. Therefore, doing anything which has the effect of putting goods in the possession of the legal representatives of the seller shall not be considered delivery.

2020-2021

Under Section 5 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, a contract for sale of goods can be made: A. By writing and must be registered B. By word of mouth C. By partly in writing and partly word of mouth D. By writing or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

  1. (a)A and C only
  2. (b)A and D only
  3. (c)A and B only
  4. (d)B and D only✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : According to Section 5(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, subject to the provisions of any law for the time being in force, a contract of sale may be made in writing or by word of mouth, or partly in writing and partly by word of mouth, or may be implied from the conduct of the parties.

2020-2021

In case of unascertained goods, the property in goods passes:

  1. (a)When goods are ascertained✓
  2. (b)When the parties intend the property in goods to pass
  3. (c)As soon as the contract of sale is signed
  4. (d)After the payment of goods is received by the seller
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : According to Section 18 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained goods, no property in the goods is transferred to the buyer unless and until the goods are ascertained.

2021-2022

A car was sold on 'as is' basis and without any warranty or guarantee whatever. After 5 days of the contract, the engine of the car blew up. Discuss the liability of the seller.

  1. (a)He is liable for the damages due to the doctrine of fundamental breach of standard form of contract✓
  2. (b)The seller is not liable because the car was sold on 'as is' basis and without any warranty or guarantee
  3. (c)The buyer should take care if he buys a second-hand car
  4. (d)Under standard form contract, in this case, contributory negligence is applicable
Answer & explanation

Ans. (a) : In the present problem, the car was sold on the basis of a standard form contract without any warranty or guarantee. The engine of the car blowing up 5 days after the contract constitutes a fundamental breach of the standard form contract, and the seller is liable for damages. Standard form contract — A standard form contract is a type of contract where there is no room for negotiation. It is often a contract between parties with unequal bargaining power.

2021-2022

In which of the following cases, it was held that a 'contract to take and supply photographs' is a 'contract of sale of goods'?

  1. (a)Love V/s Norman Wright (Builders) Ltd. (1944)
  2. (b)Newman V/s Lipman (1951)✓
  3. (c)Lee V/s Griffin (1861)
  4. (d)Robinson V/s Graves (1935)
Answer & explanation

Ans. (b) : In Newman v. Lipman (1951), it was held that a contract to take and supply photographs is a contract of sale of goods.

2021-2022

In the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, "fault" means:

  1. (a)Wrongful gain or wrongful loss
  2. (b)Wrongful act
  3. (c)Wrongful act or default✓
  4. (d)Negligent and wrongful act
Answer & explanation

Ans. (c) : According to Section 2(S) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, "fault" means wrongful act or default.

2021-2022Match the lists

Match List-I with List-II: List-I A. Specific goods in a deliverable state B. Auction sale C. Remedy for breach of warranty D. Sale by one joint owners List-II I. Section 64, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 II. Section 28, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 III. Section 20, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 IV. Section 59, Sale of Goods Act, 1930

  1. (a)A-II, B-III, C-I, D-IV
  2. (b)A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I
  3. (c)A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV
  4. (d)A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II✓
Answer & explanation

Ans. (d) : Correct matching: A. Specific goods in a deliverable state — Section 20, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 B. Auction sale — Section 64, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 C. Remedy for breach of warranty — Section 59, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 D. Sale by one joint owners — Section 28, Sale of Goods Act, 1930

December 2024 · Q91

"Implied conditions as to quality or fitness of goods" is given under which section of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 ?

  1. (a)Section 14
  2. (b)Section 15
  3. (c)Section 16✓
  4. (d)Section 17
Answer & explanation

Answer: (c) Section 16

31 Dec 2025 (Shift 1) · Q79

Which of the following right is not available under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 to the Unpaid Seller notwithstanding that the property in the goods may have passed to the buyer?

  1. (a)A lien on the goods for the price while he is in possession of them
  2. (b)In case of the insolvency of the buyer, a right of stopping the goods in transit after he has parted with the possession of them
  3. (c)A right of re-sale as limited by the Act
  4. (d)A right of withholding delivery✓
Answer & explanation

Answer: (d) A right of withholding delivery

June 2026 · Q109

'A' purchase a horse from 'B'. 'A' needs the horse for riding but he does not mention this to 'B'. The horse is not suitable for riding but is suitable only for being driven in a carriage. 'A' can

A. 'A' can return the horse under implied conditions as to quality or purpose under Section 16 of the sale of Goods Act

B. 'A' can neither reject the horse nor can he claim any compensation from B

C. The situation is covered under the rule contained in the maxim caveat emptor

D. The situation is covered under exception mentioned under 16(1) dealing with implied conditions of the fitness of the goods for any particular purpose

Choose the correct answer from the options given below

  1. (a)A and B only
  2. (b)B and C only✓
  3. (c)A and C only
  4. (d)A and D only
Answer & explanation

Answer: (b) B and C only

Explanation: Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, this scenario illustrates the fundamental rule of Caveat Emptor ("Let the buyer beware") enshrined in Section 16:

• General Rule (Caveat Emptor): Section 16 provides that there is no implied warranty or condition as to the quality or fitness for any particular purpose of goods supplied under a contract of sale. The buyer must exercise their own judgment and care to ensure the goods suit their purpose.

• Exception under Section 16(1): For an implied condition as to fitness to apply, the buyer must expressly or impliedly make known to the seller the particular purpose for which the goods are required, relying on the seller's skill or judgment. Because 'A' did not inform 'B' that he needed the horse specifically for riding, the case falls strictly under the general rule of caveat emptor rather than the exception:

• Statement A is INCORRECT: 'A' cannot return the horse under implied conditions because he failed to communicate the specific purpose to the seller.

• Statement B is CORRECT: Since 'A' did not specify his requirement, 'A' can neither reject the horse nor claim any damages/compensation from 'B'.

• Statement C is CORRECT: The situation is directly governed by the legal maxim caveat emptor.

• Statement D is INCORRECT: The exception under Section 16(1) does not apply because 'A' did not disclose his intended purpose to 'B'.

← Back to all units All topics of Unit VI